OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Journal of the Optical Society of America A


  • Vol. 9, Iss. 11 — Nov. 1, 1992
  • pp: 1937–1954

Atmospheric turbulence and the resolution limits of large ground-based telescopes

T. Stewart McKechnie  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA A, Vol. 9, Issue 11, pp. 1937-1954 (1992)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (2675 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Conventional theory of imaging through the atmosphere is based on two main assumptions: (1) atmospheric turbulence is assumed to follow a Kolmogorov spectrum and (2) the outer scale, Lo, is assumed to be much larger than any telescope. There are numerous reports in the literature, however, of image properties that are not consistent with this theory—for example, cores in star images and lack of expected image motion. In almost every case these reports are consistent with a smaller value of Lo. There is also evidence of smaller Lo from other, more direct sources such as balloonborne temperature probes and long-baseline interferometry. If Lo is smaller than previously thought, as is suggested here, many long-held ideas about imaging with ground-based telescopes will have to be modified. A much more favorable picture emerges, especially at near-infrared wavelengths. At these wavelengths, resolution in the range 0.03–0.1 arcsec should be routinely attainable with 4–10-m telescopes, even though seeing at visible wavelengths is only 1 arcsec. To attain such high levels of resolution, telescopes must be built to diffraction-limited standards rather than to the currently accepted standards, which fall well short of this limit. Recent images obtained at 2.2 μm with the 4-m Kitt Peak telescope show that very high resolution (0.1 arcsec) is attainable. The images also show that telescope aberrations prevent even higher resolution (0.05 arcsec). A further benefit of a smaller Lo is that the isoplanatic angle of the atmosphere at near-infrared wavelengths is likely to be much larger than previously thought. Thus much wider angular regions are available from which to select suitably bright stars for guiding and tracking. A small Lo also means that ground-based infrared laser beams may be focused to diffraction-limited accuracy on targets in space without necessarily having to use wave-front compensation.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

Original Manuscript: May 21, 1990
Revised Manuscript: April 3, 1992
Manuscript Accepted: July 8, 1992
Published: November 1, 1992

T. Stewart McKechnie, "Atmospheric turbulence and the resolution limits of large ground-based telescopes," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 1937-1954 (1992)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. R. E. Hufnagel, N. R. Stanley, “Modulation transfer function associated with image transmission through the atmosphere,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 52–61 (1964), Eqs. (7.2) and (7.6). [CrossRef]
  2. D. L. Fried, “Optical resolution through a randomly inhomogeneous medium for very long and very short exposures,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1372–1379 (1966). [CrossRef]
  3. R. F. Griffin, “On image structure, and the value and challenge of very large telescopes,” Observatory 93, 3–8 (1973).
  4. R. F. Griffin, “Giant telescopes, tiny images,” Sky Telescope 79, 469–470 (1990).
  5. A. B. Meinel, “Astronomical seeing and observatory site selection,” in Telescopes, G. P. Kuiper, B. M. Middlehurst, eds. (U. Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1960).
  6. J. M. Beckers, J. T. Williams, “Performance of the MMT III: seeing experiments with the MMT,” in Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes, L. D. Barr, G. Burbridge, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.332, 16–23 (1982). [CrossRef]
  7. N. J. Woolf, D. W. McCarthy, J. R. P. Angel, “Performance of the MMT VII: image shrinkage in sub-arc second seeing at the MMT and 2.3 meter telescopes,” in Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes, L. D. Barr, G. Burbridge, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.332, 50–56 (1982). [CrossRef]
  8. T. S. McKechnie, “Light propagation through the atmosphere and the properties of images formed by large ground-based telescopes,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 346–365 (1991). [CrossRef]
  9. C. E. Coulman, J. Vernin, Y. Coqueugniot, J. L. Caccia, “Outer scale of turbulence appropriate to modeling refractive-index structure profiles,” Appl. Opt. 27, 155–160 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. C. E. Coulman, J. Vernin, “Significance of anistropy and the outer scale of turbulence for optical and radio seeing,” Appl. Opt. 30, 118–126 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. J. L. Bufton, “Comparison of vertical profile turbulence structure with stellar observations,” Appl. Opt. 12, 1785–1793 (1973). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. J. M. Mariotti, G. P. Di Benedetto, “Pathlength stability of synthetic aperture telescopes. The case of the 25 cm Cerga interferometer,” in Proceedings of International Astronomical Union Colloquium 79, M. H. Ulrich, K. Jaer, eds. (European Southern Observatory, Garching bei MiInchen, Germany, 1984), pp. 257–265.
  13. T. S. McKechnie, “Focusing infrared laser beams on targets in space without using adaptive optics,” in Propagation of High-Energy Laser Beams through the Earth’s Atmosphere II, P. B. Ulrich, L. E. Wilson, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.1408, 119–135 (1991). [CrossRef]
  14. T. S. McKechnie, “Diffraction limited imaging using large ground-based telescopes,” in Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes IV, L. D. Barr, ed., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.1236, 164–178 (1990). [CrossRef]
  15. R. L. Ulich, “Performance of the multi-mirror telescope (MMT) V: pointing and tracking of the MMT,” in Advanced Technology Optical Telescopes, L. D. Barr, G. Burbridge, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.332, 33–41 (1982). [CrossRef]
  16. R. L. Ulich, “Overview of acquisition, tracking, and pointing system technologies,” in Acquisition, Tracking, and Pointing II, J. E. Kimbrell, ed., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.887, 40–63 (1988). [CrossRef]
  17. R. R. Ninneman, P. F. Sydney, P. C. Reamy, T. V. Lanier, S. E. Carter, M. L. Olives, Ambient Vibration Test Results of Proposed RME LSS Site at the Air Force Maui Optical Station (AMOS), engineering rep. (Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, N.M., December1987).
  18. T. S. McKechnie, seminar presented at Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Albuquerque, N.M., September 1989. Attendees: D. W. McCarthy, Jr., K. Hege (Steward Observatory); G. Loos, B. Venet (U.S. Air Force); and R. Haddock (Lentec Corp.).
  19. D. W. McCarthy, B. Mcleod, D. J. Barlow, “Infrared array camera for interferometry with the cophased multiple-mirror telescope,” in Amplitude and Intensity Spatial Interferometry, J. B. Breckenridge, ed., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.1237, 496–507 (1990). [CrossRef]
  20. D. W. McCarthy, T. J. Henry, B. McLeod, J. C. Christou, “The low-mass companion of Gliese 22A: first results of the Steward Observatory infrared speckle camera,” Astron. J. 101, 214–219 (1991). [CrossRef]
  21. J. C. Christou, “Infrared speckle imaging with application to binary stars,” Exp. Astron. 2, 22–56 (1991). [CrossRef]
  22. J. C. Christou, “Image quality, tip-tilt correction and shift-and-add infrared imaging,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 103, 1040–1048 (1991). [CrossRef]
  23. M. Haas, J. C. Christou, H. Zinnecker, S. T. Ridgway, Ch. Leinert, “Z. C. Ma, a binary star,” submitted to Astron. Astrophys.
  24. M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1970).
  25. D. Anderson, R. Crawford, “The MMT7 mirror: analysis of the rms difference specifications and their impact on fabrication and testing,” in Advances in Fabrication and Metrology for Optics and Large Optics, J. B. Arnold, R. E. Parks, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.966, 332–340 (1988). [CrossRef]
  26. R. F. Griffin, The Observatories, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA, England, UK (personal communication, 1989).
  27. R. H. T. Bates, F. M. Cady, “Towards true imaging by wideband speckle interferometry,” Opt. Commun. 32, 365–369 (1980). [CrossRef]
  28. E. Wolf, Progress in Optics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980), Vol. 19, Sec. 5.3, pp. 281–376.
  29. J. C. Dainty, Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, Vol. 9 of Topics in Applied Physics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
  30. J. C. Christou, E. K. Hege, J. D. Freeman, E. Ribak, “Self-calibrating shift-and-add technique for speckle imaging,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. 3, 204–209 (1986). [CrossRef]
  31. T. S. McKechnie, “Propagation of the spectral correlation function in a homogeneous medium,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 339–345 (1991), Eqs. (26) and (28). [CrossRef]
  32. R. Crawford, D. Anderson, “Polishing and aspherizing a 1.8-meter F/2.7 paraboloid,” in Advances in Fabrication and Metrology for Optics and Large Optics, J. B. Arnold, R. E. Parks, eds., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.966, 322–331 (1988). [CrossRef]
  33. Beckers and Williams6do not actually use the word “core.” Instead they refer to “elements” in the image “which remain stationary” in good seeing conditions. This description suggests a core formed by a telescope with less than diffraction-limited performance.
  34. R. E. Good, R. R. Beland, E. A. Murphy, J. H. Brown, E. M. Dewan, “Atmospheric models of optical turbulence,” in Modeling of the Atmosphere (Critical Reviews), L. S. Rothman, ed., Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng.928, 165–186 (1981).
  35. M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics, 6th ed. (Pergamon, London, 1980), Sec. 9.1.3, Eq. (22).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited