Abstract

A set of animated stimuli (Lissajous figures), each element of which is physically consistent with two different three-dimensional shapes undergoing rigid rotations about orthogonal axes, is described. Human observers typically show a preference for one shape or the other; this preference may be biased by manipulating various parameters of the stimulus. Fairly good predictions of which shape will be seen are made by using an adaptation of Hildreth’s smoothest-velocity-field computation. When a given stimulus is rotated 90° in the picture plane, the resolution of the ambiguity is often different, demonstrating anisotropy in the processing of the figures. The nature of this bias is such that for certain figures subjects see a three-dimensional object rotating about a vertical axis regardless of which two-dimensional orientation is used to present the stimulus. This bias is not predicted by the Hildreth model. One interpretation of the results is that the ambiguity in two-dimensional visual motion (i.e., the aperture problem) is not resolved before the interpretation of the three-dimensional structure.

© 1992 Optical Society of America

Parallel model of the kinetic depth effect using local computations

Michael S. Landy
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(5) 864-877 (1987)

Decoding of depth and motion in ambiguous binocular perception

Ko Sakai, Mitsuharu Ogiya, and Yuzo Hirai
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28(7) 1445-1452 (2011)

Analysis of two- and three-dimensional rigid and nonrigid motions in the stereokinetic effect

Dejan Todorović
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10(5) 804-826 (1993)

Perceptual motion transparency: the role of geometrical information

R. Jasinschi, A. Rosenfeld, and K. Sumi
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9(11) 1865-1879 (1992)

Neural dynamics of motion grouping: from aperture ambiguity to object speed and direction

Jonathan Chey, Stephen Grossberg, and Ennio Mingolla
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(10) 2570-2594 (1997)