Abstract

The dip in the absorption-coefficient curve calculated by the Kramers–Kronig method is analyzed. Methods of removing the dip are proposed and used for Zn₃P₂. Roughness of the sample surface is suggested to be a cause of the dip.

© 1984 Optical Society of America

Investigation of the Kramers–Kronig analysis: revised optical constants of AgCl

R. S. Bauer, W. E. Spicer, and J. J. White
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64(6) 830-833 (1974)

3d⁸4s, 3d⁸4p, and 3p⁵3d¹⁰ configurations in the As vii spectrum

Y. N. Joshi, Th. A. M. VanKleef, and V. N. Sarma
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1(2) 279-283 (1984)

Rh i isoelectronic sequence: analysis of the 4d⁹–4d⁸5p transition array in La xiii

J. L. Tech, V. Kaufman, and J. Sugar
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1(1) 41-44 (1984)

Surface roughness measurements of low-scatter mirrors and roughness standards

Karl H. Guenther, Peter G. Wierer, and Jean M. Bennett
Appl. Opt. 23(21) 3820-3836 (1984)

Determination of the x-ray anomalous dispersion of titanium made with a titanium–carbon layered synthetic microstructure

Troy W. Barbee, William K. Warburton, and James H. Underwood
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1(5) 691-698 (1984)