OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Journal of the Optical Society of America B


  • Vol. 14, Iss. 5 — May. 1, 1997
  • pp: 1043–1047

Engineering of the nonradiative transition rates in nonpolar modulation-doped multiple quantum wells

J. V. D. Veliadis and J. B. Khurgin  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA B, Vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 1043-1047 (1997)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (241 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The feasibility of population inversion, by impurity-scattering enhancement of the acoustic-phonon-limited lower-laser-level intersubband relaxation rate, is theoretically investigated in nonpolar three-level SiGe/Si systems. The dependence of the acoustic-phonon depopulating rate on the barrier thickness and the effect of the position of a δ-doped region on the impurity scattering are treated rigorously. A 10-Å-doped region with a 1010 or a 5×1010 cm−2 sheet carrier density enhances the acoustic-phonon-limited depopulating rate by more than one or two orders of magnitude, respectively. Thus for equal barrier widths between the depopulating and the lasing levels, the depopulating rate becomes at least an order of magnitude (1010 cm−2 doping) or a factor of 2–4 (5×1010 cm−2 doping) faster than the lasing transition's acoustic- or optical-phonon limit, respectively. This allows for the design of nonpolar intersubband lasers, in which population inversion between discrete valence-band states is achieved by impurity-scattering enhancement of the acoustic-phonon-limited depopulating rate.

© 1997 Optical Society of America

J. V. D. Veliadis and J. B. Khurgin, "Engineering of the nonradiative transition rates in nonpolar modulation-doped multiple quantum wells," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14, 1043-1047 (1997)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. A. Kastalsky, V. J. Goldman, and J. Abeles, “Possibility of infrared laser in a resonant tunneling structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2636 (1991); J. P. Loehr, J. Singh, R. K. Mains, and G. I. Haddad, “Theoretical studies of the applications of resonant tunneling diodes as intersubband laser and interband excitonic modulators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2070 (1991); S. I. Borenstain and J. Katz, “Evaluation of the feasibility of a far-infrared laser based on intersubband transitions in GaAs quantum wells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 55, 654 (1989); J. Faist, F. Capasso, C. Sirtori, D. Sivco, A. L. Hutchinson, S. N. G. Chu, and A. Y. Cho, “Mid-infrared field-tunable intersubband electroluminescence at room temperature by photon-assisted tunneling in coupled-quantum wells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. APPLAB 64, 1144 (1994); J. Faist, F. Capasso, C. Sirtori, D. L. Sivco, A. L. Hutchinson, S. N. G. Chu, and A. Y. Cho, “Quantum-well intersubband electroluminescent diode at λ=5 μm,” Electron. Lett. ELLEAK 29, 2230 (1993).
  2. G. Sun and J. B. Khurgin, “Optically pumped four-level infrared laser based on intersubband transitions in multiple quantum wells: feasibility study,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 1104 (1993).
  3. J. Faist, F. Capasso, D. L. Sivco, C. Sirtori, A. L. Hutchinson, and A. Y. Cho, “Quantum cascade laser,” Science 264, 553 (1994).
  4. R. A. Soref, “Silicon based optoelectronics,” Proc. IEEE 81, 1687 (1993).
  5. G. Sun, L. Friedman, and R. A. Soref, “Intersubband lasing lifetimes of SiGe/Si and GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum well structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 3425 (1995).
  6. J. V. D. Veliadis, J. B. Khurgin, and Y. J. Ding, “Engineering of the nonradiative transition rates in modulation doped multiple quantum wells,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32, 1155 (1996).
  7. B. K. Ridley, “The electron-phonon interaction in quasi-two-dimensional semiconductor quantum well structures,” J. Phys. C 15, 5899 (1982); P. J. Price, “Two-dimensional electron transport in semiconductor layers,” Ann. Phys. 133, 217 (1981).
  8. R. Ferreira and G. Bastard, “Evaluation of some scattering times for electrons in unbiased and biased single- and multiple-quantum-well structures,” Phys. Rev. B 40, 1074 (1989).
  9. The three-dimensional (3D) screening parameter λ is defined as λ2=4πn3De2/εkBT with n3D=n2D/d= kF2/2πd. Thus λ2=kF2 rexd 2e2εrex 1kBT=kF2 rexd 2EbindkBT≈kF2, where rex and Ebind are the exciton radius and the binding energy, respectively. To neglect screening, Δk≫λ(≅kF), where Δk is the change in the in-plane wave vector that is due to the impurity scattering. Δk≫kF=(2πn2D)1/2⇒ n2D≪Δk2/2π=9.2×1011 cm−2. In the impurity-scattering calculations, doping concentrations of 1010 and 5×1010 cm−2 were assumed. Therefore according to the rough calculation outlined above, we can neglect the screening effect.
  10. J. F. Young, D. J. Lockwood, J. M. Baribeau, and P. J. Kelly, in Light Scattering in Semiconductor Structures and Superlattices, D. J. Lockwood and J. F. Young, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1991), Vol. 41; A. Blancha, H. Presting, and M. Cardona, “Deformation potentials of k=0 states of tetrahedral semiconductors,” Phys. Status Solidi B 126, 11 (1984); B. K. Ridley, Quantum Processes in Semiconductors (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982).
  11. G. Bastard, Wave Mechanics Applied to Semiconductors Heterostructures (Les Editions de Physique, Paris, 1990), Chap. 3.
  12. G. Sun and L. Friedman, “Heavy-hole scattering by confined nonpolar optical phonons in a single Si1−xGex/Si quantum well,” Phys. Rev. B 53, 3966 (1996).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited