OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Journal of the Optical Society of America B


  • Vol. 15, Iss. 3 — Mar. 1, 1998
  • pp: 1177–1186

Conversion of laser phase noise to amplitude noise in an optically thick vapor

J. C. Camparo  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA B, Vol. 15, Issue 3, pp. 1177-1186 (1998)

View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (293 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



As laser light propagates through a resonant vapor, laser phase noise (PM) is converted to laser intensity noise (AM) because of the sensitivity of atomic coherence to laser phase fluctuations. In experiments reported here it is shown that this PM-to-AM conversion process is highly efficient and can cause the relative intensity noise of transmitted diode laser light to be 1 to 2 orders of magnitude larger than the laser’s intrinsic relative intensity noise. By use of a semiclassical description of the phenomenon, including the effect of optical pumping, reasonably good agreement between theory and experiment is obtained. The PM-to-AM conversion process discussed here has important consequences for atomic clock development, in which diode-laser optical pumping in thick alkali vapors holds the promise for orders-of-magnitude improvement in atomic clock performance.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(110.4280) Imaging systems : Noise in imaging systems
(140.3460) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers
(300.1030) Spectroscopy : Absorption
(300.6360) Spectroscopy : Spectroscopy, laser

J. C. Camparo, "Conversion of laser phase noise to amplitude noise in an optically thick vapor," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 1177-1186 (1998)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. T. Yabuzaki, T. Mitsui, and U. Tanaka, “New type of high-resolution spectroscopy with a diode laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2453 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. R. Walser and P. Zoller, “Laser-noise-induced polarization fluctuations as a spectroscopic tool,” Phys. Rev. A 49, 5067 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. D. H. McIntyre, C. E. Fairchild, J. Cooper, and R. Walser, “Diode-laser noise spectroscopy of rubidium,” Opt. Lett. 18, 1816 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. R. J. McLean, P. Hannaford, C. E. Fairchild, and P. L. Dyson, “Tunable diode-laser heterodyne spectroscopy of atmospheric oxygen,” Opt. Lett. 18, 1675 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. K. V. Vasavada, G. Vemuri, and G. S. Agarwal, “Diode-laser-noise-based spectroscopy of allowed and crossover resonances,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 4159 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. R. Walser, J. Cooper, and P. Zoller, “Saturated absorption spectroscopy using diode-laser phase noise,” Phys. Rev. A 50, 4303 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. C. Camparo and R. P. Frueholz, “A nonempirical model of the gas-cell atomic frequency standard,” J. Appl. Phys. 59, 301 (1986); “Fundamental stability limits for the diode-laser-pumped rubidium atomic frequency standard,” J. Appl. Phys. 59, 3313 (1986). [CrossRef]
  8. See, for example, T. G. Vold, F. J. Raab, B. Heckel, and E. N. Fortson, “Search for a permanent electric dipole moment on the 129Xe atom,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2229 (1984); S. Appelt, G. Wackerle, M. Mehring, “A magnetic resonance study of non-adiabatic evolution of spin quantum numbers,” Z. Phys. D 34, 75 (1995). [CrossRef]
  9. See, for example, M. H. Anderson, R. D. Jones, J. Cooper, S. J. Smith, D. S. Elliot, H. Ritsch, and P. Zoller, “Variance and spectra of fluorescence-intensity fluctuations from two-level atoms in a phase-diffusing field,” Phys. Rev. A 42, 6690 (1990), and references therein. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. P. Meystre and M. Sargent III, Elements of Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991), Chap. 1.
  11. Note that (1/v)(∂E/∂t)≈(δtp/L)(E/τc), where L is the length of the medium, δtp is the propagation time of a wave front through the medium, and τc is the correlation time of the field’s stochastic variations. For a medium with a length of a few centimeters, δtp~10−10 s, whereas for the lasers of interest in our study τc~10−8 s. Thus the temporal variation of the electric field will be roughly 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the spatial variation for an optically thick medium where (∂E/∂z)≈E/L.
  12. It should be noted that in addition to Eq. (1) there is a propagation equation for the phase of the field: ∂Φ/∂z+ (1/v)(∂Φ/∂t)=−[(2πk)/n2(z, E). Inasmuch as the laser’s phase noise yields fluctuations in both χ and χ, the optical field’s phase fluctuations grow in a complicated fashion as the field propagates through the medium. The greater degree of phase noise further enhances the fluctuations of χ, which in turn results in larger variations of the laser’s transmitted intensity. However, because χ is proportional to the real part of the atomic coherence, which is generally small unless the laser has frequency excursions of the order of the optical homogeneous linewidth, it seems reasonable to ignore this additional source of laser phase noise in the PM-to-AM conversion process associated with the present experimental conditions: laser linewidth, ≅60 MHz and atomic homogeneous linewidth, ≅200 MHz. It is worth noting, though, that there will be experimental conditions in which this additional phase noise could be an important aspect of the PM-to-AM conversion process.
  13. The acronyms TJS and CSP stand for transverse junction stripe and channeled substrate planar, respectively, and refer to the physical construction of the diode laser. See D. Botez, “Single-mode AlGaAs diode lasers,” J. Opt. Commun. 1, 42 (1980) for a more detailed discussion. [CrossRef]
  14. J. C. Camparo, “The diode laser in atomic physics,” Contemp. Phys. 26, 443 (1985); C. E. Wieman and L. Hollberg, “Using diode lasers for atomic physics,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 62, 1 (1991). [CrossRef]
  15. W. Happer, “Optical pumping,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 169 (1972). [CrossRef]
  16. V. N. Belov, “Application of the magnetic-scanning method to the measurement of the broadening and shift constants of the rubidium D2 line (780.0 nm) by foreign gases,” Opt. Spectrosc. (USSR) 51, 22 (1981).
  17. P. Minguzzi and A. Di Lieto, “Simple Padé approximations for the width of a Voigt profile,” J. Mol. Spectrosc. 109, 388 (1985). [CrossRef]
  18. I. Botev, “A new conception of Bouguer–Lambert–Beer’s law,” Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 297, 419 (1979). [CrossRef]
  19. N. D. Bhaskar, M. Hou, B. Suleman, and W. Happer, “Propagating, optical-pumping wave fronts,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 519 (1979). [CrossRef]
  20. A. C. G. Mitchell and M. W. Zemansky, Resonance Radiation and Excited Atoms (Cambridge U. Press, London, 1971), Chap. IV.
  21. L. Krause, “Sensitized fluorescence and quenching,” in The Excited State in Chemical Physics, J. W. McGowan, ed. (Wiley, New York, 1975), Vol. XXVIII, Chap. 4.
  22. See J. C. Camparo and S. B. Delcamp, “Optical pumping with laser-induced-fluorescence,” Opt. Commun. 120, 257 (1995), and the discussion regarding C. H. Volk, J. C. Camparo, and R. P. Frueholz, “Investigations of laser pumped gas cell atomic frequency standard,” in Proceedings of the 13th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval (PTTI) Applications and Planning Meeting (U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C., 1981), pp. 631–640. [CrossRef]
  23. See, for example, A. F. Molisch, W. Schupita, B. P. Oehry, B. Sumetsberger, and G. Magerl, “Modeling and efficient computation of nonlinear radiation trapping in three-level atomic vapors,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 3576 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. D. Tupa, L. W. Anderson, D. L. Huber, and J. E. Lawler, “Effect of radiation trapping on the polarization of an optically pumped alkali-metal vapor,” Phys. Rev. A 33, 1045 (1986); D. Tupa and L. W. Anderson, “Effect of radiation trapping on the polarization of an optically pumped alkali-metal vapor in a weak magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. A 36, 2142 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Y. Yamamoto, S. Saito, and T. Mukai, “AM and FM quantum noise in semiconductor lasers. II. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results for AlGaAs lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-19, 47 (1983). [CrossRef]
  26. H. Tsuchida and T. Tako, “Relation between frequency and intensity stabilities in AlGaAs semiconductor laser,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, 1152 (1983). [CrossRef]
  27. P. Minguzzi, F. Strumia, and P. Violino, “Temperature effects in the relaxation of optically oriented alkali vapors,” Nuovo Cimento 46B, 145 (1966). [CrossRef]
  28. Because of the presence of the buffer gas, the atoms are essentially frozen in place. Thus individual atoms experience local values of the electric field amplitude rather than averaging the electric field amplitude over the resonance cell volume. See J. C. Camparo, R. P. Frueholz, and C. H. Volk, “Inhomogeneous light shift in alkali-metal atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 27, 1914 (1983); R. P. Frueholz and J. C. Camparo, “Microwave field strength measurement in a rubidium clock cavity via adiabatic rapid passage,” J. Appl. Phys. 57, 704 (1985). [CrossRef]
  29. J. C. Camparo and P. Lambropoulos, “Monte Carlo simulation of field fluctuations in strongly driven resonant transitions,” Phys. Rev. A 47, 480 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. P. Zoller and P. Lambropoulos, “Non-Lorentzian laser lineshapes in intense field–atom interaction,” J. Phys. B 12, L547 (1979). [CrossRef]
  31. W. Cheney and D. Kincaid, Numerical Mathematics and Computing (Brooks Cole, Monterey, Calif., 1985); W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, “Adaptive stepsize Runge–Kutta integration,” Comput. Phys. 6, 188 (1992). [CrossRef]
  32. R. H. Pennington, Introductory Computer Methods and Numerical Analysis (Macmillan, London, 1970).
  33. Note that with 10 Torr of N2 the time between velocity-changing collisions is ~10−7 s, based on a gas kinetic cross section for velocity-changing collisions, whereas the propagation time of a wave front through a 3-cm medium is ~10−10 s. Thus, on the time scale of a wave front’s propagation through the medium, each atom has a specific, essentially constant, velocity.
  34. F. A. Franz, “Relaxation at cell walls in optical pumping experiments,” Phys. Rev. A 6, 1921 (1972). [CrossRef]
  35. The Allan standard deviation, or Allan variance, is a statistic that is typically employed to describe precise frequency standards; it has the attractive property that it converges for certain nonstationary noise processes. Essentially, a fluctuating parameter is averaged over some time τ, and differences between neighboring averages are computed. The Allan variance is the variance associated with these differences. In the present work we take advantage of the ease with which the Allan variance may be computed and its well-known relationship to the noise process’s spectral density.
  36. J. Rutman, “Characterization of phase and frequency instabilities in precision frequency sources: fifteen years of progress,” Proc. IEEE 66, 1048 (1978); J. A. Barnes, A. R. Chi, L. S. Cutler, D. J. Healey, D. B. Leeson, T. E. McGuningal, J. A. Mullen, Jr., W. L. Smith, R. L. Sydnor, R. F. C. Vessot, and G. M. R. Winkler, “Characterization of frequency stability,” IEEE Trans Instrum. Meas. IM-20, 105 (1971). [CrossRef]
  37. N. W. Ressler, R. H. Sands, and T. E. Stark, “Measurement of spin-exchange cross sections for Cs133, Rb87, Rb85, K39, and Na23,” Phys. Rev. 184, 102 (1969). [CrossRef]
  38. F. A. Franz and C. Volk, “Spin relaxation of rubidium atoms in sudden and quasimolecular collisions with light-noble-gas atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 14, 1711 (1976). [CrossRef]
  39. T. J. Killian, “Thermionic phenomena caused by vapors of rubidium and potassium,” Phys. Rev. 27, 578 (1926). [CrossRef]
  40. C. Szekely, F. L. Walls, J. P. Lowe, R. E. Drullinger, and A. Novick, “Reducing local oscillator phase noise limitations on the frequency stability of passive frequency standards: tests of a new concept,” IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 41, 518 (1994); Y. Saburi, Y. Koga, S. Kinugawa, T. Imamura, H. Suga, and Y. Ohuchi, “Short-term stability of laser-pumped rubidium gas cell frequency standard,” Electron. Lett. 30, 633 (1994); P. J. Chantry, I. Liberman, W. R. Verbanets, C. F. Petronio, R. L. Cather, and W. D. Partlow, “Miniature laser-pumped cesium cell atomic clock oscillator,” in Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Frequency Control Symposium (IEEE Press, Piscataway, N.J., 1996), pp. 1002–1010; L. A. Budkin, V. L. Velichanski, A. S. Zibrov, A. A. Lyalyaskin, M. N. Penenkov, and A. I. Pikhtelev, “Double radio-optical resonance in alkali metal vapors subjected to laser excitation” Sov. J. Quantum Elecron. SJGCDU 20, 301 (1990); M. Hashimoto and M. Ohtsu, “Experiments on a semiconductor laser pumped rubidium atomic clock,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. IEJQA7 QE-23, 446 (1987). [CrossRef]
  41. G. Miletti, J. Q. Deng, F. L. Walls, J. P. Lowe, and R. E. Drullinger, “Recent progress in laser-pumped rubidium gas-cell frequency standard,” in Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (IEEE Press, Piscataway, N.J., 1996), pp. 1066–1072.
  42. J. C. Camparo and W. F. Buell, “Laser PM to AM conversion in atomic vapors and short term clock stability,” in Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium (IEEE Press, Piscataway, N.J., 1997), pp. 253–258.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited