OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Journal of the Optical Society of America B


  • Vol. 18, Iss. 2 — Feb. 1, 2001
  • pp: 218–224

Conical emission by 2-ps excitation of potassium vapor

D. Sarkisyan, B. D. Paul, S. T. Cundiff, E. A. Gibson, and A. Gallagher  »View Author Affiliations

JOSA B, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 218-224 (2001)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (329 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Conical emission, redshifted from the atomic resonance, is observed when a ∼2-ps laser beam, blueshifted from resonance, propagates through potassium vapor. In contrast, no cone is visible when a 150-fs pulse is used. The 2-ps-pulse-induced cone has a unique, small, angular spread of Δθ/θ≈0.1, compared with Δθ/θ≈0.3 from other pulsed experiments, which used 25-ps–5-ns-excitation pulses. In addition, the fraction of the 2-ps-pulse power emitted in the cone reached 7.5%, far exceeding this fraction from the longer-pulse experiments. An additional, unexpected result is that the spectral width of the laser pulse is narrower, without significant intensity loss, after propagation through the vapor. The vapor densities and laser detunings that yield cones in the present experiment are similar to those from the longer-pulse experiments. Although the 2-ps-pulse spectrum partially overlaps the resonance, the cone spectrum and cone angles versus density and laser detuning are similar to those previously reported for nanosecond pulses. The fourth (blue-detuned) wave required for satisfying four-wave mixing is absent, again equivalent to what is observed in the nanosecond experiments. The physical origin of cone emission by pulsed excitation of atomic vapors is still largely unknown, and this high efficiency and narrow angular spread of a spectrally broad cone further contradicts existing models, perhaps ultimately providing a clue to a correct explanation.

© 2001 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(190.2620) Nonlinear optics : Harmonic generation and mixing
(190.4410) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, parametric processes
(190.5890) Nonlinear optics : Scattering, stimulated
(320.5390) Ultrafast optics : Picosecond phenomena

D. Sarkisyan, B. D. Paul, S. T. Cundiff, E. A. Gibson, and A. Gallagher, "Conical emission by 2-ps excitation of potassium vapor," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18, 218-224 (2001)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. C. A. Sacchi, C. H. Townes, and J. R. Lifsitz, “Anti-Stokes generation in trapped filaments of light,” Phys. Rev. 174, 439–447 (1968).
  2. R. R. Alfano and S. L. Shapiro, “Emission in the region 4000 to 7000 Å via four-photon coupling in glass,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 584–587 (1970).
  3. V. M. Aruntunyan, N. N. Badalyan, V. A. Iradyan, and M. E. Movsessyan, “Some nonlinear optical effects in potassium vapor,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 58, 37–44 (1970).
  4. V. M. Aruntunyan, N. N. Badalyan, V. A. Iradyan, and M. E. Movsessyan, “Three-photon interaction in counter-running waves and the Stark effect in potassium vapor,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 60, 62–65 (1971).
  5. C. H. Skinner and P. D. Kleiber, “Observation of anomalous conical emission from laser-excited barium vapour,” Phys. Rev. A 21, 151–156 (1980).
  6. G. L. Burdge and C. H. Lee, “Characterization of sideband emission generated by near-resonant radiation in sodium vapor,” Appl. Phys. B. 28, 197 (1982). We interpret these spectra as four-wave mixing from the initially excited region, and red-detuned cones from downstream, self-focused regions. This is consistent with their brief interpretations.
  7. D. J. Harter and R. W. Boyd, “Four-wave mixing resonantly enhanced by ac-Stark-split levels in self-trapped filaments of light,” Phys. Rev. A 29, 739–748 (1984).
  8. D. G. Sarkisyan and S. O. Sapondzhyan, “Four-wave parametric interaction of ultrashort optical pulses in a two-level system of barium atoms,” Kvant. Elektron. (Moscow) 11, 830 (1984) [ Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 14, 561–563 (1984)].
  9. A. I. Plekhanov, S. G. Rautian, V. P. Safonov, and B. M. Chernobrod, “The nature of frequency-angular diffusion of powerful quasi-resonant radiation,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 88, 426 (1985) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 61, 249–254 (1985)].
  10. I. Golub, G. Erez, and R. Shuker, “Cherenkov emission due to laser-induced moving polarization in sodium,” J. Phys. B 19, L115–L120 (1986).
  11. V. I. Vaichaitis, M. V. Ignatavichyus, V. A. Kudryashov, and Y. N. Pimenov, “Observation of a Cerenkov-type radiation during the propagation of picosecond light pulses in so-dium vapor,” Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 45, 416 (1987) [JETP Lett. 45, 414–417 (1987)].
  12. Y. Shevy and M. Rosenbluh, “Multiple conical emissions from a strongly driven atomic system,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 116–122 (1988).
  13. V. M. Avakyan, B. V. Kryzhanovsky, and D. H. Sarkisyan, “Investigation of transient electronic SRS by the excitation and probing technique using a double train of picosecond pump pulses,” Opt. Commun. 74, 223–227 (1908); B. V. Kryzhanovsky, S. O. Sapondzhyan, D. H. Sarkisyan, and G. A. Torosyan, “Influence of ac-Stark effect in transient SERS,” Opt. Commun. 71, 381–384 (1989).
  14. I. S. Zeilikovich, S. A. Pulkin, L. S. Gaida, and V. N. Komar, “Susceptibility spectrum and parametric generation in an atomic vapor in a resonant light field,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 94, 76–89 (1989) [Transl. JETP 67, 2434 (1989)].
  15. F. Valley, G. Khitrova, H. M. Gibbs, J. W. Grantham, and Xu Jianin, “Cw conical emission: first comparison and agreement between theory and experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 2362–2365 (1990).
  16. W. Chalupczak, W. Gawlik, and J. Zachorowski, “Conical emission in barium vapour,” Opt. Commun. 99, 49–54 (1993); W. Chalupczak, W. Gawlik, and J. Zachorowski, “Four-wave mixing in strongly driven two level systems,” Phys. Rev. A 49, 4985–4901 (1994).
  17. D. I. Chekhov, D. V. Gaidarenko, A. G. Leonov, A. A. Panteleev, and A. N. Starostin, “Conical emission and spectral behavior of strong near resonant laser wave at low-frequency detuning,” Opt. Commun. 105, 209–213 (1994).
  18. R. C. Hart, Li You, A. Gallagher, and J. Cooper, “Failures of the four-wave mixing model for cone emission,” Opt. Commun. 111, 331–337 (1994).
  19. M. Fernandez-Guasti, J. L. Hernandez-Pozos, E. Haro-Poniatowski, and L. A. Julio-Sanchez, “Anomalous conical emission in calcium vapour,” Opt. Commun. 108, 367–376 (1994); “Anomalous conical emission: two-beam experiments,” Phys. Rev. A 49, 613–615 (1994).
  20. B. D. Paul, M. L. Dowell, A. Gallagher, and J. Cooper, “Observation of conical emission from a single self-trapped beam,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 4784–4796 (1999).
  21. B. D. Paul, J. Cooper, A. Gallagher, and M. G. Raymer, “Theory of optical cone emission in near-resonant atomic vapor,” Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
  22. D. H. Sarkisyan, “Use of an intracavity cell containing Cs2 for Q switching and stabilizing the frequency of a laser utilizing concentrated neodymium phosphate glass,” Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 19, 1092–1095 (1989).
  23. P. Wang, A. Gallagher, and J. Cooper, “Selective reflection by Rb,” Phys. Rev. A 56, 1598–1606 (1997).
  24. R. H. Stolen and Ch. Lin, “Quantitative assessment of the many-body interaction in the M-shell photoionization of argon,” Phys. Rev. A 17, 1448–1453 (1978).
  25. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic, Boston, 1989).
  26. D. J. Bradley, G. M. Gale, and P. D. Smith, “Self-induced transparency and dispersion delays in potassium vapor,” Nature (London) 225, 719–721 (1971).
  27. N. L. Markaryan, L. Kh. Muradyan, and T. A. Papazyan, “Spectral compression of ultrashort laser pulses,” Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 27, 783–785 (1991).
  28. D. Grishkowsky, “Self-focusing of light by potassium vapor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 866–869 (1970).
  29. O. G. Kosareva, V. P. Kandidov, A. Brodeur, C. Y. Chien, and S. L. Chin, “Conical emission from laser–plasma interactions in the filamentation of powerful ultrashort laser pulses in air,” Opt. Lett. 22, 1332–1334 (1997), and references therein.
  30. V. M. Avakyan, B. V. Kryzhanovsky, and D. H. Sarkisyan, “Investigation of transient electronic SRS by the excitation and probing technique using a double train of picosecond pump pulses,” Opt. Commun. 74, 223–227 (1908).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited