OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

| OPTICAL PHYSICS

  • Editor: Henry van Driel
  • Vol. 29, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 2012
  • pp: 2243–2248

Analysis of the effects and causes of numerical error in four-wave mixing simulations

Christopher A. Sapiano, J. Stewart Aitchison, and Li Qian  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA B, Vol. 29, Issue 8, pp. 2243-2248 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.29.002243


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (562 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present an investigation of accumulated numerical error in the simulation of four-wave mixing, which is frequently used to model a variety of nonlinear optical devices. The Dormand-Prince method (commonly used by commercial solving software such as MATLAB) has been found to be susceptible to numerical error, which manifests itself in a 3.8% increase in the total power over 200 m of nonlinear interaction length. This numerical error can lead to qualitatively mistaken physical interpretations of simulation results, which are similar to those found in previously published materials. We use a home-built Adams-Bashforth solver to simulate four-wave mixing, which produces results that do not lead to unphysical results, even for simulation over a large nonlinear interaction length. By comparing the results of these two methods we were able to illustrate the qualitative effects of the accumulated numerical error in the former. The source of this cumulative power error is traced to the solutions provided by the Dormand-Prince method for the self- and cross-phase modulation terms of the coupled mode equations; this error increases for larger nonlinearities or if step size increases. Even when this power accumulates from infinitesimal per-step errors, significant changes occur that could lead to qualitative differences in generated power values and conversion efficiencies. This reveals the potential danger of applying commonly used numerical solvers in simulating nonlinear optical processes.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(000.4430) General : Numerical approximation and analysis
(190.4380) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, four-wave mixing

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: March 21, 2012
Revised Manuscript: June 29, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: June 29, 2012
Published: August 1, 2012

Citation
Christopher A. Sapiano, J. Stewart Aitchison, and Li Qian, "Analysis of the effects and causes of numerical error in four-wave mixing simulations," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29, 2243-2248 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josab/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-29-8-2243


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Vatarescu, “Light conversion in nonlinear monomode optical fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 1652–1659 (1987). [CrossRef]
  2. Z. Vujicic, N. B. Pavlovic, G. Parca, and A. Teixeira, “Effect of four-wave mixing spatial dependence on idler residual modulation,” Phys. Scr. T149, 014045 (2012). [CrossRef]
  3. X. Xu, Y. Yao, X. Zhao, and D. Chen, “Multiple four-wave-mixing processes and their application to multiwavelength erbium-doped fiber lasers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27, 2876–2885 (2009). [CrossRef]
  4. P. Parolari, L. Marazzi, E. Rognoni, and M. Martinelli, “Influence of pump parameters on two-pump optical parametric amplification,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23, 2524–2530 (2005). [CrossRef]
  5. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics 4E (Academic, 2007), Chap. 10.
  6. J. Hansryd, P. A. Andrekson, M. Westlund, J. Li, and P. O. Hedekvist, “Fiber-based optical parametric amplifiers and their applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 506–520 (2002). [CrossRef]
  7. H. Itoh, G. M. Davis, and S. Sudo, “Continuous-wave-pumped modulation instability in an optical fiber,” Opt. Lett. 14, 1368–1370 (1989). [CrossRef]
  8. G. Cappellini and S. Trillo, “Third order three-wave mixing in single-mode fibers: Exact solutions and spatial instability effects,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 8, 824–838 (1991). [CrossRef]
  9. N. Shibata, R. P. Braun, and R. G. Waarts, “Phase-mismatch dependence of efficiency of wave generation through four-wave mixing in a single-mode optical fiber,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23, 1205–1210 (1987). [CrossRef]
  10. Thompson Reuters, “ISI Web of knowledge,” http://www.webofknowledge.com .
  11. R. H. Stolen and J. E. Bjorkholm, “Parametric amplification and frequency conversion in optical fibers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 18, 1062–1072 (1982). [CrossRef]
  12. Y. Chen and A. W. Snyder, “Four-photon parametric mixing in optical fibers: effect of pump depletion,” Opt. Lett. 14, 87–89 (1989). [CrossRef]
  13. L. F. Shampine, “Some practical Runge-Kutta formulas,” Math. Comput. 46, 135–150 (1986). [CrossRef]
  14. J. C. Butcher, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations (Wiley, 2003), Chap. 2.
  15. K. E. Atkinson, An Introduction to Numerical Analysis (Wiley, 1989), Chap. 6.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited