Single-shot autocorrelator for extreme-ultraviolet radiation

G. Kolliopoulos; P. Tzallas; B. Bergues; P. A. Carpeggiani; P. Heissler; H. Schröder; L. Veisz; D. Charalambidis; G. D. Tsakiris

doi:10.1364/JOSAB.31.000926

Journal of the Optical Society of America B
Vol. 31,
Issue 5,
pp. 926-938
(2014)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.31.000926

Single-shot autocorrelator for extreme-ultraviolet radiation

G. Kolliopoulos, P. Tzallas, B. Bergues, P. A. Carpeggiani, P. Heissler, H. Schröder, L. Veisz, D. Charalambidis, and G. D. Tsakiris

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
G. Kolliopoulos, P. Tzallas, B. Bergues, P. A. Carpeggiani, P. Heissler, H. Schröder, L. Veisz, D. Charalambidis, and G. D. Tsakiris, "Single-shot autocorrelator for extreme-ultraviolet radiation," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 31, 926-938 (2014)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

A novel single-shot second-order autocorrelation scheme for extreme-ultraviolet radiation (XUV) is proposed. It is based on an ion-imaging technique, which provides spatial information of ionization products in the focal volume of the XUV beam. Using simple analytical and detailed numerical modeling, an evaluation toward selecting an optimum configuration has been performed. The implementation of the concept to characterize attosecond pulses is discussed, and the proposed setups are assessed.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

Quantum theory of single subfemtosecond extreme-ultraviolet pulse measurements

Markus Kitzler, Christian Fabian, Nenad Milosevic, Armin Scrinzi, and Thomas Brabec
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20(3) 591-596 (2003)

Single-shot extreme-ultraviolet wavefront measurements of high-order harmonics

Hugo Dacasa, Hélène Coudert-Alteirac, Chen Guo, Emma Kueny, Filippo Campi, Jan Lahl, Jasper Peschel, Hampus Wikmark, Balázs Major, Erik Malm, Domenico Alj, Katalin Varjú, Cord L. Arnold, Guillaume Dovillaire, Per Johnsson, Anne L’Huillier, Sylvain Maclot, Piotr Rudawski, and Philippe Zeitoun
Opt. Express 27(3) 2656-2670 (2019)

Time-resolved and spectrally resolved ionization with a single ultrashort XUV-IR beamline

V. Loriot, L. Quintard, G. Karras, A. Marciniak, F. Catoire, M. Hervé, I. Compagnon, G. Renois-Predelus, B. Schindler, B. Concina, G. Celep, R. Brédy, C. Bordas, F. Lépine, and E. Constant
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35(4) A67-A74 (2018)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (11)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (2)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (23)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

$I_{peak}$ $[W / {cm}^{2}]$	$ρ_{He} [\times 10^{18} {cm}^{- 3}]$	$N_{ions}$
$10^{11}$	1.2	1
$10^{11}$	6.2	7
$10^{12}$	1.2	130
$10^{12}$	6.2	650
$10^{13}$	1.2	$1.3 \times 10^{4}$
$10^{13}$	6.2	$6.5 \times 10^{4}$

Setup	Characteristic Dimensions	$f$ [cm]	$F$	Interaction Volume Dimensions (Second Order) [μm]	Mean Intensity at Focus [ $W / {cm}^{2}$ ]	Number of Ions
Case (a) Two-aperture mask	$D = 100 μm$ $d = 3 mm$	5	$\sim 10^{- 7}$	$L_{x} \sim 28$ $L_{y} \sim 35$ $L_{z} \sim 1350$	$\sim 10^{8}$	$\sim 0$
Case (b) Two-slit mask	$l_{x} = 100 μm$ $l_{y} = 5 mm$ $d = 3 mm$	5	$\sim 10^{- 4}$	$L_{x} \sim 1$ $L_{y} \sim 30$ $L_{z} \sim 35$	$\sim 10^{11}$	$\sim 6$
Case (c) Beam splitter	$θ = 2^{°}$	100	$\sim 10^{- 3}$	$L_{x} \sim 10$ $L_{y} \sim 20$ $L_{z} \sim 400$	$\sim 10^{12}$	$\sim 650$

$I_{peak}$ $[W / {cm}^{2}]$	$ρ_{He} [\times 10^{18} {cm}^{- 3}]$	$N_{ions}$
$10^{11}$	1.2	1
$10^{11}$	6.2	7
$10^{12}$	1.2	130
$10^{12}$	6.2	650
$10^{13}$	1.2	$1.3 \times 10^{4}$
$10^{13}$	6.2	$6.5 \times 10^{4}$

Setup	Characteristic Dimensions	$f$ [cm]	$F$	Interaction Volume Dimensions (Second Order) [μm]	Mean Intensity at Focus [ $W / {cm}^{2}$ ]	Number of Ions
Case (a) Two-aperture mask	$D = 100 μm$ $d = 3 mm$	5	$\sim 10^{- 7}$	$L_{x} \sim 28$ $L_{y} \sim 35$ $L_{z} \sim 1350$	$\sim 10^{8}$	$\sim 0$
Case (b) Two-slit mask	$l_{x} = 100 μm$ $l_{y} = 5 mm$ $d = 3 mm$	5	$\sim 10^{- 4}$	$L_{x} \sim 1$ $L_{y} \sim 30$ $L_{z} \sim 35$	$\sim 10^{11}$	$\sim 6$
Case (c) Beam splitter	$θ = 2^{°}$	100	$\sim 10^{- 3}$	$L_{x} \sim 10$ $L_{y} \sim 20$ $L_{z} \sim 400$	$\sim 10^{12}$	$\sim 650$

Abstract

Cited By

Figures (11)

Tables (2)

Equations (23)

Journal of the Optical Society of America B