OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

| OPTICAL PHYSICS

  • Vol. 5, Iss. 8 — Aug. 1, 1988
  • pp: 1563–1572

High-resolution femtosecond pulse shaping

A. M. Weiner, J. P. Heritage, and E. M. Kirschner  »View Author Affiliations


JOSA B, Vol. 5, Issue 8, pp. 1563-1572 (1988)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.5.001563


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1306 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The synthesis of arbitrarily shaped femtosecond pulses by spectral filtering in a temporally nondispersive grating apparatus is demonstrated. Spectral filtering is accomplished by utilizing spatially patterned masks to modify the amplitude and the phase of the optical frequency components that are spatially dispersed within the apparatus. We are able to pattern spectra over a large dynamic range (approaching 104) and with unprecedented resolution. We illustrate the power of this technique by synthesizing a number of femtosecond waveforms, including femtosecond tone bursts with terahertz repetition rates, picosecond square pulses with 100-fsec rise times, and highly complex pseudonoise bursts produced by spectral phase encoding.

© 1988 Optical Society of America

History
Original Manuscript: February 8, 1988
Manuscript Accepted: April 25, 1988
Published: August 1, 1988

Citation
A. M. Weiner, J. P. Heritage, and E. M. Kirschner, "High-resolution femtosecond pulse shaping," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 1563-1572 (1988)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josab/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-5-8-1563


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. R. Skaug, J. F. Hjelmstad, Spread Spectrum in Communications (Peregrinus, London, 1985). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Desbois, F. Gires, P. Tournois, “A new approach to picosecond laser pulse analysis, shaping and coding,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-9, 213 (1973). [CrossRef]
  3. J. Agostinelli, G. Harvey, T. Stone, C. Gabel, “Optical pulse shaping with a grating pair,” Appl. Opt. 18, 2500 (1979). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. C. Froehly, B. Colombeau, M. Vampouille, “Shaping and analysis of picosecond light pulses,” in Progress in Optics XX, E. Wolf, ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 65–153.
  5. J. P. Heritage, R. N. Thurston, W. J. Tomlinson, A. M. Weiner, R. H. Stolen, “Spectral windowing of frequency-modulated optical pulses in a grating compressor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 87 (1985). [CrossRef]
  6. J. P. Heritage, A. M. Weiner, R. N. Thurston, “Picosecond pulse shaping by spectral phase and amplitude manipulation,” Opt. Lett. 10, 609 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. A. M. Weiner, J. P. Heritage, R. N. Thurston, “Synthesis of phase coherent, picosecond optical square pulses,” Opt. Lett. 11, 153 (1986). [CrossRef]
  8. R. N. Thurston, J. P. Heritage, A. M. Weiner, W. J. Tomlinson, “Analysis of picosecond pulse shape synthesis by spectral masking in a grating pulse compressor,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-22, 682 (1986). [CrossRef]
  9. M. Haner, W. S. Warren, “Generation of programmable, picosecond-resolution-shaped laser pulses by fiber-grating pulse compression,” Opt. Lett. 12, 398 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. R. L. Fork, B. I. Greene, C. V. Shank, “Generation of optical pulses shorter than 0.1 psec by colliding pulse mode-locking,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 671 (1981). [CrossRef]
  11. J. A. Valdmanis, R. L. Fork, J. P. Gordon, “Generation of optical pulses as short as 27 femtoseconds directly from a laser balancing self-phase modulation, group-velocity dispersion, saturable absorption, and saturable gain,” Opt. Lett. 10, 131 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. A. M. Weiner, J. P. Heritage, “Picosecond and femtosecond Fourier pulse shape synthesis,” Rev. Phys. Appl. 22, 1619 (1987). [CrossRef]
  13. A. M. Weiner, J. P. Heritage, J. A. Salehi, “Encoding and decoding of femtosecond pulses,” Opt. Lett. 13, 300 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. E. B. Treacy, “Optical pulse compression with diffracton gratings,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-5, 454 (1969). [CrossRef]
  15. A. M. Johnson, R. H. Stolen, W. M. Simpson, “80X single-stage compression of frequency doubled Nd:yttrium aluminum garnet laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 729 (1984). [CrossRef]
  16. O. E. Martinez, “3000 times grating compressor with positive group velocity dispersion: application to fiber compensation in 1.3–1.6μm region,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-23, 59 (1987). [CrossRef]
  17. J. P. Heritage, A. M. Weiner, O. E. Martinez, “Stabilized subpicosecond pulse compression due to multiple-order stimulated Raman scattering,” J. Opt. Soc. Am A 4(13), P69 (1987).
  18. M. Pessot, P. Maine, G. Mourou, “1000 times expansion/ compression of optical pulses for chirped pulse amplification,” Opt. Commun. 62, 419 (1987). [CrossRef]
  19. K. Tai, A. Tomita, J. L. Jewell, A. Hasegawa, “Generation of subpicosecond solitonlike optical pulses at 0.3 THz repetition rate by induced modulational instability,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 236 (1986). [CrossRef]
  20. J. P. Heritage, A. M. Weiner, R. N. Thurston, “Fourier transform picosecond pulse shaping and spectral phase measurement in a grating pulse-compressor,” in Ultrafast Phenomena V, G. R. Fleming, A. E. Siegman, eds. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986), pp. 33–37.
  21. J. E. Rothenberg, D. Grischkowsky, A. C. Balant, “Observation of the formation of the 0π pulse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 552 (1984). [CrossRef]
  22. A. Hasegawa, F. Tappert, “Transmission of stationary nonlinear optical pulses in dispersive dielectric fibers. II. Normal dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 23, 171 (1973). [CrossRef]
  23. P. Emplit, J. P. Hamaide, F. Reynaud, C. Froehly, A. Barthelemy, “Picosecond steps and dark pulses through nonlinear single mode fibers,” Opt. Commun. 62, 374 (1987). [CrossRef]
  24. D. Krokel, N. J. Halas, G. Giuliani, D. Grischkowsky, “Dark pulse propagation in optical fibers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 29 (1988). [CrossRef]
  25. M. R. Schroeder, Number Theory in Science and Communication (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986). [CrossRef]
  26. Y.-X. Yan, E. B. Gamble, K. A. Nelson, “Impulsive stimulated scattering: general importance in femtosecond laser pulse interactions with matter, and spectroscopic applications,” J. Chem. Phys. 83, 5391 (1985). [CrossRef]
  27. K. A. Nelson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (personal communication).
  28. The relations Bδt≃ 0.44 and δfT≃ 0.44 are derived assuming Gaussian line shapes for the power spectrum and for the finest achievable spectral feature, with B, δf, T,and δt all referring to FWHM intensity widths. If, instead, the power spectrum is rectangular, then Bδt≃ 0.886, and we obtain T/δt≃ 0.5B/δf= 0.5η.
  29. In Ref. 8 a slightly different complexity measure m was introduced, defined in terms of spatial factors, such as the laser spot size at the mask, and the physical width of the spatially dispersed spectrum. The complexity measure used here, η,is defined in Eq. (4) in terms of spectral features. The relationship is η= m/(ln 2)1/2.
  30. In the present setup, encoding and decoding masks are placed adjacent to each other; in a real CDMA system the two masks would be located apart from each other at separate pulse-shaping stations. As a result, the contrast between correctly and incorrectly addressed information will be somewhat different in a real system than in the present data. The difference arises because of scattering from the edges of individual pixels on the phase masks. In a real system, frequency components impinging upon the edges of pixels will be attenuated by scattering, and decoded pulses will have narrow holes in their frequency spectra. The primary effect of these holes is to diminish the intensity of decoded pulses. When an encoding and a matching decoding mask are adjacent, however, much of the scattering is eliminated. Under the present circumstances, with length 127 M sequences and with a resolving power η= 250, we calculate that the intensity of decoded pulses would be diminished by ≃50% in a real system. The contrast in second-harmonic intensity generated by correctly and incorrectly decoded pulses would be ≃67:1, as opposed to the ratio of ≃130:1 evident in Fig. 12. For the case of high resolving power (η/P≫ 1), the distinction discussed above disappears.
  31. E. P. Ippen, C. V. Shank, “Techniques for measurement,” in Ultrashort Light Pulses, S. L. Shapiro, ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977), pp. 85–88.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited