OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of Korea

Journal of the Optical Society of Korea

| PUBLISHED BY THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF KOREA

  • Vol. 10, Iss. 1 — Mar. 25, 2006
  • pp: 16–22

Investigation of Performance Degradation of Shack Hartmann Wavefront Sensing Due to Pupil Irradiance Profile

Jun-Ho Lee, Yaung-Cheol Lee, and Eung-Cheol Kang  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of the Optical Society of Korea, Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 16-22 (2006)


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (517 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations
  • Export Citation/Save Click for help

Abstract

Wavefront sensing using a Shack-Hartmann sensor has been widely used for estimating wavefront errors or distortions. The sensor combines the local slopes, which are estimated from the centroids of each lenslet image, to give the overall wavefront reconstruction. It was previously shown that the pupil-plane irradiance profile effects the centroid estimation. Furthermore, a previous study reported that the reconstructed wavefront from a planar wavefront with a Gaussian pupil irradiance profile contains large focus and spherical aberration terms when there is a focus error. However, it has not been reported yet how seriously the pupil irradiance profiles, which can occur in practical applications, effect the sensing errors. This paper considered two cases when the irradiance profiles are not uniform: 1) when the light source is Gaussian and 2) when there is a partial interference due to a double reflection by a beam splitting element. The images formed by a Shack-Hartmann sensor were simulated through fast Fourier transform and were then supposed to be detected by a noiseless CCD camera. The simulations found that sensing errors, due to the Gaussian irradiance profile and the partial interference, were found to be smaller than RMS <TEX>${\lambda}/50$</TEX> when <TEX>${\lambda}$</TEX> is <TEX>$0.6328\;{\mu}m$</TEX>, which can be ignored in most practical cases where the reference and test beams have the same irradiance profiles.

© 2006 Optical Society of Korea

OCIS Codes
(070.2580) Fourier optics and signal processing : Paraxial wave optics
(120.5050) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Phase measurement
(220.4840) Optical design and fabrication : Testing

History
Original Manuscript: December 2, 2005
Revised Manuscript: January 5, 2006
Published: March 1, 2006

Citation
Jun-Ho Lee, Yaung-Cheol Lee, and Eung-Cheol Kang, "Investigation of Performance Degradation of Shack Hartmann Wavefront Sensing Due to Pupil Irradiance Profile," J. Opt. Soc. Korea 10, 16-22 (2006)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josk/abstract.cfm?URI=josk-10-1-16


Sort:  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. J. M. Beckers, "Adaptive Optics for Astronomy: Principles, Performance and Applications," Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 31, pp. 13-22, 1993 [CrossRef]
  2. H. Canabal, J. Alonso, and E. Bernabeu, "Laser beam deflectometry based on a subpixel resolution algorithm," Opt. Eng., vol. 40, pp. 2517-2523, 2001 [CrossRef]
  3. E. Moreno-Barriuso and R. Navarro, "Laser ray tracing versus Hartmann-Shack sensor for measuring optical aberrations in the human eye," J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 17, pp. 974-985, 2000 [CrossRef]
  4. J. S. Morgan, D. C. Slater, J. G. Timothy, and E. B. Jenkins, "Centroid position measurements and subpixel sensitivity variations with the MAMA detector," Appl. Opt., vol. 28, pp.1178-1192, 1989 [CrossRef]
  5. G. Cao and X. Yin, "Accuracy analysis of a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor operated with a faint object," Opt. Eng., vol. 33, pp. 2331-2335, 1994 [CrossRef]
  6. F. Roddier, Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)
  7. R. Irwan and R. G. Lane, "Analysis of optimal centroid estimation applied Shack-Hartmann sensing," Appl. Opt., vol. 38, pp. 6737-6743, 1999 [CrossRef]
  8. J. Arines and J. Ares, "Significance of thresholding process in centroid based gradient wavefront sensors: effective modulation of the wavefront derivative," Opt. Commun., vol. 237, pp. 257-266, 2004 [CrossRef]
  9. W.-Y. V. Leung, M. Tallon, and R.G. Lane, "Centroid estimation by model-fitting from undersampled wavefront sensing images," Opt. Commun., vol. 201, pp. 11-20, 2002 [CrossRef]
  10. J. Primot, "Theoretical description of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor," Opt. Commun., vol. 222, pp. 81-92, 2003 [CrossRef]
  11. M. R. Whiteley, "Apparent wavefront aberration of a Gaussian source in a Hartmann wavefront sensor with focus error," Proc. SPIE, vol. 4007, pp. 470-480, 2000 [CrossRef]
  12. V. I. Tatarskii, "The Effects of the Turbulent Atmosphere on Wave Propagation," (U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, 1971)
  13. Adaptive Optics Associates (Ltd).
  14. R. J. Noll, "Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence," J. Opt. Soc. Am., vol. 66(3), p. 207-211, 1976 [CrossRef]
  15. J. H. Lee, D. D. Walker, and A. P. Doel, "Pupil plane wavefront sensing with a static pyramidal prism : Simulation and preliminary evaluation," J. Opt. Soc. Korea, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2000 [CrossRef]

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited