OSA's Digital Library

Journal of the Optical Society of Korea

Journal of the Optical Society of Korea

| PUBLISHED BY THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF KOREA

  • Vol. 18, Iss. 2 — Apr. 1, 2014
  • pp: 110–117

Double-Pass System (Optical Quality Analysis System) for Analysis of the Multifocal Function of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof ReSTOR®) Compared to a Monofocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IQ®)

Ho Sik Hwang, Hye Young Shin, and Choun-Ki Joo  »View Author Affiliations


Journal of the Optical Society of Korea, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 110-117 (2014)


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1375 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations
  • Export Citation/Save Click for help

Abstract

In this study, we objectively determined whether the ReSTOR as a multifocal IOL (intraocular lens) has a multifocal function compared to the IQ as a monofocal IOL in vivo by OQAS (Optical Quality Analysis System). Eighteen patients who had cataract surgery with implantation of ReSTOR (27 eyes) and 15 patients with IQ (21 eyes), were included inthis study. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA)and distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were measured. After setting the artificial pupil size to 3 mm, we performed 'Optical quality'. We inputted defocus diopters of (objective spherical refraction)(far), (objective spherical refraction-1.25 D)(intermediate),(objective spherical refraction-2.5 D)(near), and (objective spherical refraction-3.5 D)(very near) into 'selected spherical refraction' simulating the optical quality at far, intermediate, and near distance. We changed the pupil size to 5 mm and repeated the same measurements. The UCDVA and CDVA did not show significant differences between the 2 groups. But, the UCNVA and DCNVA of the ReSTOR group were better than those of the IQ group (p=0.000, p=0.000). For 3 mm pupil, at far distance, modulation transfer function (MTF) cut off and point spread function (PSF) width at 50% of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ (p=0.039, p=0.020). At intermediate distance, MTF cut off, Strehl ratio and PSF width at 50% of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ (p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.000). At near distance, MTF cut off of ReSTOR was worse than that of IQ (p=0.033). At very near distance, MTF cut off and Strehl ratio of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ (p=0.002, p=0.002), but PSF width at 50% of ReSTOR was better than that of IQ. For 5 mm pupil, most parameters at each distance, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Only PSF width at 50% of ReSTOR were worse than those of IQ at intermediate distance (p=0.013). It was impossible to show the multifocal function of ReSTOR compared to the IQ byOQAS.

© 2014 Optical Society of Korea

OCIS Codes
(170.4460) Medical optics and biotechnology : Ophthalmic optics and devices
(170.4470) Medical optics and biotechnology : Ophthalmology
(050.1965) Diffraction and gratings : Diffractive lenses
(330.7328) Vision, color, and visual optics : Visual optics, ophthalmic appliances
(330.7335) Vision, color, and visual optics : Visual optics, refractive surgery

History
Original Manuscript: September 3, 2013
Revised Manuscript: February 25, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: February 28, 2014
Published: April 25, 2014

Citation
Ho Sik Hwang, Hye Young Shin, and Choun-Ki Joo, "Double-Pass System (Optical Quality Analysis System) for Analysis of the Multifocal Function of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof ReSTOR®) Compared to a Monofocal Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IQ®)," J. Opt. Soc. Korea 18, 110-117 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josk/abstract.cfm?URI=josk-18-2-110


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset

References

References are not available for this paper.

Cited By

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited