OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Technology

Journal of Optical Technology


  • Vol. 78, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2011
  • pp: 803–807

Experimental study of invariant perception of wavelet images

V. Chikhman, Y. Shelepin, and S. Pronin  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Technology, Vol. 78, Issue 12, pp. 803-807 (2011)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (302 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



Psychophysical studies of the visual perception of incomplete contour images have been carried out. The images were synthesized by means of wavelets. The wavelets consisted of the difference-of-Gaussians (DoG) function and oriented wavelets whose spectrum is limited both in the frequency range and in the orientation range. The image size and the number and angular size of the wavelets were varied. The dependence between the characteristics of the wavelets and the recognition thresholds of the incomplete images was established.

© 2011 OSA

Original Manuscript: August 4, 2011
Published: December 31, 2011

V. Chikhman, Y. Shelepin, and S. Pronin, "Experimental study of invariant perception of wavelet images," J. Opt. Technol. 78, 803-807 (2011)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. A. Ghosh and N. Petkov, “Robustness of shape descriptors to incomplete contour representations,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 1793 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. C. Mehanian and S. Rak, “Bidirectional log–polar mapping for invariant object recognition,” Proc. SPIE 1471, 200 (1991).
  3. C. F. R. Weiman, “Log–polar vision for mobile robot navigation,” in Proc. Electronic Imaging Conferences, Boston, Nov. 1990, pp. 382–385.
  4. S. Zokai and G. Wolberg, “Image registration using log–polar mappings for recovery of large-scale similarity and projective transformations,” IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14, 1422 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. N. N. Krasil’nikov and Yu. E. Shelepin, “A functional model of vision,” Opt. Zh. 64, No. 2, 72 (1997). [J. Opt. Technol. 64, 136 (1997)].
  6. V. V. Aleksandrov and N. D. Gorskiĭ, Image Representation and Processing. A Recursive Approach (Nauka, Leningrad, 1985).
  7. Yu. E. Shelepin, V. M. Bondarko, and M. V. Danilova, “Design of the fovea and model of pyramidal organization of the visual system,” Sens. Sist. 9, No. 1, 87 (1995).
  8. P. Burt and E. Adelson, “The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code,” IEEE Trans. Commun. Com-31, 532 (1983). [CrossRef]
  9. V. Cantoni and A. Petrosino, “Neural recognition in a pyramidal structure,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13, 472 (2002). [CrossRef]
  10. Y. Shelepin, O. Vahromeeva, A. Harauzov, S. Pronin, N. Foreman, and V. Chihman, “Recognition of incomplete contour and half-tone figures,” Perception 33, 85 (2004).
  11. V. Chikhman, Y. Shelepin, N. Foreman, A. Merkuljev, and S. Pronin, “Incomplete figure perception and invisible masking,” Perception 35, 1441 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yu. E. Shelepin, V. N. Chikhman, and N. Foreman, “Analysis of studies of the perception of fragmented images: Integral perception and perception from local attributes,” Ross. Fiziolog. Zh. 94, 758 (2008).
  13. Yu. E. Shelepin, V. N. Chikhman, O. A. Vakhrameeva, S. V. Pronin, N. Foreman, and P. Pésmor, “Invariance of visual perception,” Éksp. Psikhol. No. 1, 7 (2008).
  14. E. Gollin, “Developmental studies of visual recognition of incomplete objects,” Percept. Mot. Skills No. 11, 289 (1960).
  15. O. A. Vakhrameeva, Yu. E. Shelepin, A. Yu. Mezentsev, and S. V. Pronin, “Study of the perception of incomplete-contour images of various sizes,” Ross. Fiziolog. Zh. 94, 1158 (2008).
  16. R. L. DeValois, D. G. Albrecht, and L. G. Thorell, “Spatial-frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex,” Vision Res. 22, 545 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yu. E. Shelepin, “Filtration properties of the receptor fields of the neurons of the visual cortex,” Dok. Akad. Nauk SSSR 261, 1506 (1981).
  18. Yu. E. Shelepin, “Spatial-frequency characteristics of the receptor fields of the neurons of the lateral suprasylvian region,” Neĭrofiz. 14, 608 (1982).
  19. A. Ginsburg, “Spatial filtering and visual form perception,” in Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, ed., K. Boff(John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986), vol. 34, pp. 1–41.
  20. Yu. E. Shelepin, L. N. Kolesnikova, and Yu. I. Levkovich, Visual Contrastometry. Measurement of the Spatial Transfer Functions of the Visual System (Nauka, Leningrad, 1985).
  21. S. V. Alekseenko, S. N. Toporova, and F. N. Makarov, “Microtopography of cortical fields 17 and 18,” Sens. Sist. 13, 278 (1999).
  22. C. D. Gilbert, “Microcircuitry of the visual cortex,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 217 (1983). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited