OSA's Digital Library

Journal of Optical Technology

Journal of Optical Technology


  • Vol. 78, Iss. 12 — Dec. 1, 2011
  • pp: 808–816

Using neuroimaging methods to localize mechanisms for making decisions concerning the ordering of textures

Yu. E. Shelepin, V. A. Fokin, N. Foreman, A. K. Kharauzov, S. V. Pronin, O. A. Vakhrameeva, and V. N. Chikhman  »View Author Affiliations

Journal of Optical Technology, Vol. 78, Issue 12, pp. 808-816 (2011)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (985 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The development of methods of digitally synthesizing and processing images has made it possible to use the methods of iconics to deliberately create test images that selectively activate various structures of the visual system. The methods of processing neurophysiological data, including not only images of the activity of the entire brain but also so-called neuroimaging methods, have made it possible to discriminate the brain structures activated as a result of this selective action. The goal of this study is the spatiotemporal localization (mapping) of the regions of the brain that participate in making decisions concerning the shape of textures. It is established that a subject’s reaction time correlates with the degree of ordering of the textures and with the latency of the late components of the induced potentials in the frontal cortex. The time for a person to make decisions in the task of recognizing a specified class of textures is thereby determined. Mapping of the brain by the method of functional magnetic-resonance tomography showed that the activity of the brain in the process of making decisions involving recognition occurs in the frontal cortex of the human brain.

© 2011 OSA

Original Manuscript: December 1, 2011
Published: December 31, 2011

Yu. E. Shelepin, V. A. Fokin, N. Foreman, A. K. Kharauzov, S. V. Pronin, O. A. Vakhrameeva, and V. N. Chikhman, "Using neuroimaging methods to localize mechanisms for making decisions concerning the ordering of textures," J. Opt. Technol. 78, 808-816 (2011)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset


  1. M. M. Miroshnikov and V. F. Nesteruk, “Further development of the methodological bases of iconics,” Tr. Gos. Opt. Inst. 64, No. 198, 5 (1987).
  2. M. G. Philiastides, R. Ratcliff, and P. Sajda, “Neural representation of task difficulty and decision making during perceptual categorization: a timing diagram,” J. Neurosci. 26, 8965 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. H. R. Heerkeren, S. Marrett, P. A. Bandettini, and L. G. Ungerleider, “A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain,” Nature 431, No. 7010, 859 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. N. N. Krasil’nikov, Theory of Image Transport and Perception (Radio i Svyaz’, Moscow, 1986).
  5. N. N. Krasil’nikov and Yu. E. Shelepin, “A functional model of vision,” Opt. Zh. 64, No. 2, 72 (1997). [J. Opt. Technol. 64, 136 (1997)].
  6. N. N. Krasil’nikov, Yu. E. Shelepin, and O. I. Krasil’nikova, “The use of the principles of the optimal observer in modelling the human visual system,” Opt. Zh. 66, No. 9, 17 (1999). [J. Opt. Technol. 66, 782 (1999)].
  7. I. Kovacs and B. Jules, “A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 7495 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. J. Field, A. Hayes, and R. F. Hess, “Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local ‘association field’,” Vision Res. 33, 173 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. D. J. Field, “Matched filters, wavelets and the statistics of natural scenes,” Opt. Zh. 66, No. 9, 25 (1999). [J. Opt. Technol. 66, 788 (1999)].
  10. D. J. Field and A. Hayes, “Contour integration and the lateral connections of V1 neurons,” in The Visual Neurosciences, eds., L. M. Chalupa and J. S. Werner(MIT Press, 2004).
  11. V. Fokin, G. Trufanov, A. Sevostyanov, Y. Shelepin, A. Harauzov, and S. Pronin, “Occipital-parietal interaction in incomplete pattern discrimination,” Perception 25, 18 (2006).
  12. Y. Shelepin, N. Krasilnikov, E. Trufanov, A. Harauzov, S. Pronin, and V. Fokin, “The principle of least action and visual perception,” Perception 35, 125 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. V. A. Fokin, Yu. E. Shelepin, A. K. Kharauzov, A. V. Sevost’yanov, G. E. Trufanov, and S. V. Pronin, “Activation of regions of the human cerebral cortex activated when ordered and random images are being perceived,” Ross. Fiziolog. Zh. 93, 1089 (2007).
  14. A. K. Kharauzov, Yu .E. Shelepin, S. V. Pronin, T. V. Sel’chenkova, and Ya. A. Noskov, “Electrophysiological study of the mechanisms of texture recognition,” Ross. Fiziolog. Zh. 93, 3 (2007).
  15. Yu. E. Shelepin, V. A. Fokin, A. K. Kharauzov, S. V. Pronin, and V. N. Chikhman, “Localization of the decision-making center when the shape of visual stimuli is being perceived,” Dok. Akad. Nauk 429, 835 (2009).
  16. A. Bechara and A. R. Damasio, “The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision,” Games Econ. Behav. 52, 336 (2005). [CrossRef]
  17. N. P. Bechtereva, N. V. Shemyakina, M. G. Starchenko, S. G. Danko, and S. V. Medvedev, “Error-detection mechanisms of the brain: background and prospects,” Int. J. Psychophysiol. 58, 227 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
  19. T. L. Saaty, Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process (RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2005).
  20. V. V. Kochetkov and I. G. Skotnikova, Individual Psychological Problems of Decision Making (Nauka, Moscow, 1993), p. 144.
  21. V. M. Shendyapin, V. A. Barabanshchikov, and I. G. Skotnikova, “Confidence in a decision: Modelling and experimental verification,” Éksp. Psikhol. 3, No. 1, 30 (2010).
  22. A. Tversky and D. Kahneman, “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice,” Science 211, No. 4481, 453 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. D. Clark, Framing Effects Exposed (Pearson Education Ltd., New York, 2009).
  24. A. Damasio, “Category-related recognition defects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge,” Trends Neurosci. 13, No. 3, 95 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. G. Northoff, A. Heinzel, F. Bermpohl, R. Niese, A. Pfennig, A. Pascual-Leone, and G. Schlaug, “Reciprocal modulation and attenuation in the prefrontal cortex: an fMRI study on emotional-cognitive interaction,” Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 202 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. D. Bernoulli, “Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sorti,” Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5, 175 (1738).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited