|
|
Camera calibration under optimal conditions |
Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 11, pp. 10769-10775 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.010769
Enhanced HTML
Acrobat PDF (869 KB)
Abstract
Different methods based on photogrammetry or self-calibration exist to calibrate intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters and also for data pre- and post-processing. From a practical viewpoint, it is quite difficult to decide which calibration method gives accurate results and even whether any data processing is necessary. This paper proposes a set of optimal conditions to resolve the calibration process accurately. The calibration method uses several images of a 2D pattern. Optimal conditions define the number of points and the number of images to resolve the calibration accurately, as well as positions and orientations from where images should be taken.
© 2011 OSA
OCIS Codes
(150.0155) Machine vision : Machine vision optics
(150.1135) Machine vision : Algorithms
(150.1488) Machine vision : Calibration
ToC Category:
Machine Vision
History
Original Manuscript: February 11, 2011
Revised Manuscript: March 23, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: March 29, 2011
Published: May 18, 2011
Citation
Carlos Ricolfe-Viala and Antonio-Jose Sanchez-Salmeron, "Camera calibration under optimal conditions," Opt. Express 19, 10769-10775 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-11-10769
Sort: Year | Journal | Reset
References
- P. D. Lin and C. K. Sung, “Comparing two new camera calibration methods with traditional pinhole calibrations,” Opt. Express 15(6), 3012–3022 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- M. Bauer, D. Grießbach, A. Hermerschmidt, S. Krüger, M. Scheele, and A. Schischmanow, “Geometrical camera calibration with diffractive optical elements,” Opt. Express 16(25), 20241–20248 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- K. S. Choi, E. Y. Lam, and K. K. Y. Wong, “Automatic source camera identification using the intrinsic lens radial distortion,” Opt. Express 14(24), 11551–11565 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- J. Weng, P. Cohen, and M. Herniou, “Camera calibration with distortion models and accuracy evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14(10), 965–980 (1992). [CrossRef]
- S. Kopparapu and P. Corke, “The effect of noise on camera calibration parameters,” Graph. Models 63(5), 277–303 (2001). [CrossRef]
- J. Lavest, M. Viala, and M. Dhome, “Do we really need accurate calibration pattern to achieve a reliable camera calibration,” in Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision 1, (1998) 158–174.
- Z. Zhang, “A flexible new technique for camera calibration,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000). [CrossRef]
- D. Huynh, R. Hartley, and A. Heyden, “Outlier correction in image sequences for the affine camera,” in Proceedings of 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 1, (2003) 585–591.
- G. Stewart, “Perturbation theory for the singular value,” University of Maryland, (Tech. Report TR90 −124, 1990).
- R. Hartley, “In defence of the eight point algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19(6), 580–593 (1997). [CrossRef]
- R. Tsai, “A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-self TV camera lenses,” IEEE J. Robot. Autom. RA-3, 323–344 (1997).
- J. Salvi, X. Armangué, and J. Batlle, “A Comparative review of camera calibrating methods with accuracy evaluation,” Pattern Recognit. 35(7), 1617–1635 (2002). [CrossRef]
- W. Sun and J. Cooperstock, “An empirical evaluation of factors influencing camera calibration accuracy using three publicly available techniques,” Mach. Vis. Appl. 17(1), 51–67 (2006). [CrossRef]
Cited By |
OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.





OSA is a member of 