OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 6 — Mar. 25, 2013
  • pp: 7222–7239

Simultaneous multiple view high resolution surface geometry acquisition using structured light and mirrors

Hector R.A. Basevi, James A. Guggenheim, Hamid Dehghani, and Iain B. Styles  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 6, pp. 7222-7239 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.007222


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (6887 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Knowledge of the surface geometry of an imaging subject is important in many applications. This information can be obtained via a number of different techniques, including time of flight imaging, photogrammetry, and fringe projection profilometry. Existing systems may have restrictions on instrument geometry, require expensive optics, or require moving parts in order to image the full surface of the subject. An inexpensive generalised fringe projection profilometry system is proposed that can account for arbitrarily placed components and use mirrors to expand the field of view. It simultaneously acquires multiple views of an imaging subject, producing a cloud of points that lie on its surface, which can then be processed to form a three dimensional model. A prototype of this system was integrated into an existing Diffuse Optical Tomography and Bioluminescence Tomography small animal imaging system and used to image objects including a mouse-shaped plastic phantom, a mouse cadaver, and a coin. A surface mesh generated from surface capture data of the mouse-shaped plastic phantom was compared with ideal surface points provided by the phantom manufacturer, and 50% of points were found to lie within 0.1mm of the surface mesh, 82% of points were found to lie within 0.2mm of the surface mesh, and 96% of points were found to lie within 0.4mm of the surface mesh.

© 2013 OSA

OCIS Codes
(120.2830) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Height measurements
(120.6650) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Surface measurements, figure
(170.0110) Medical optics and biotechnology : Imaging systems

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: December 19, 2012
Revised Manuscript: March 5, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: March 7, 2013
Published: March 14, 2013

Virtual Issues
Vol. 8, Iss. 4 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Hector R.A. Basevi, James A. Guggenheim, Hamid Dehghani, and Iain B. Styles, "Simultaneous multiple view high resolution surface geometry acquisition using structured light and mirrors," Opt. Express 21, 7222-7239 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-6-7222


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Guggenheim, H. Dehghani, H. Basevi, I. Styles, and J. Frampton, “Development of a multi-view, multi-spectral bioluminescence tomography small animal imaging system,” Proc. SPIE8088, 80881K (2011). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Guggenheim, H. Basevi, I. Styles, J. Frampton, and H. Dehghani, “Multi-view, multi-spectral bioluminescence tomography,” in Biomedical Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, 2012), paper BW4A.7.
  3. C. Kuo, O. Coquoz, T. Troy, H. Xu, and B. Rice, “Three-dimensional reconstruction of in vivo bioluminescent sources based on multispectral imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt.12, 024007 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. Gibson, J. Hebden, and S. Arridge, “Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol.50, R1–R43 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. Cong, W. Cong, Y. Lu, P. Santago, A. Chatziioannou, and G. Wang, “Differential evolution approach for regularized bioluminescence tomography,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.57, 2229–2238 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. S. Arridge and M. Schweiger, “Image reconstruction in optical tomography.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B352, 717–726 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. B. Brooksby, H. Dehghani, B. Pogue, and K. Paulsen, “Near-infrared (nir) tomography breast image reconstruction with a priori structural information from mri: algorithm development for reconstructing heterogeneities,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron.9, 199–209 (2003). [CrossRef]
  8. M. Allard, D. Côté, L. Davidson, J. Dazai, and R. Henkelman, “Combined magnetic resonance and bioluminescence imaging of live mice,” J. Biomed. Opt.12, 034018 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. T. Lasser, A. Soubret, J. Ripoll, and V. Ntziachristos, “Surface reconstruction for free-space 360° fluorescence molecular tomography and the effects of animal motion,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.27, 188–194 (2008). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Li, G. Mitchell, J. Dutta, S. Ahn, R. Leahy, and S. Cherry, “A three-dimensional multispectral fluorescence optical tomography imaging system for small animals based on a conical mirror design,” Opt. Express17, 7571–7585 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. Kumar, S. Raymond, A. Dunn, B. Bacskai, and D. Boas, “A time domain fluorescence tomography system for small animal imaging,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.27, 1152–1163 (2008). [CrossRef]
  12. R. Lange and P. Seitz, “Solid-state time-of-flight range camera,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.37, 390–397 (2001). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Dorrington, M. Cree, A. Payne, R. Conroy, and D. Carnegie, “Achieving sub-millimetre precision with a solid-state full-field heterodyning range imaging camera,” Meas. Sci. Technol.18, 2809–2816 (2007). [CrossRef]
  14. K. Kraus, Photogrammetry: Geometry from Images and Laser Scans (de Gruyter, 2007). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Salvi, J. Pages, and J. Batlle, “Pattern codification strategies in structured light systems,” Pattern Recogn.37, 827–849 (2004). [CrossRef]
  16. J. Geng, “Structured-light 3d surface imaging: a tutorial,” Adv. Opt. Photon.3, 128–160 (2011). [CrossRef]
  17. V. Srinivasan, H. Liu, and M. Halioua, “Automated phase-measuring profilometry of 3-d diffuse objects,” Appl. Opt.23, 3105–3108 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. S. Gorthi and P. Rastogi, “Fringe projection techniques: whither we are?” Opt. Laser. Eng.48, 133–140 (2010). [CrossRef]
  19. X. Su and W. Chen, “Fourier transform profilometry:: a review,” Opt. Laser. Eng.35, 263–284 (2001). [CrossRef]
  20. M. Takeda and K. Mutoh, “Fourier transform profilometry for the automatic measurement of 3-d object shape,” Appl. Opt.22, 3977–3982 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. M. Takeda, H. Ina, and S. Kobayashi, “Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A72, 156–160 (1982). [CrossRef]
  22. T. Judge and P. Bryanston-Cross, “A review of phase unwrapping techniques in fringe analysis,” Opt. Laser. Eng.21, 199–239 (1994). [CrossRef]
  23. H. Saldner and J. Huntley, “Temporal phase unwrapping: application to surface profiling of discontinuous objects,” Appl. Opt.36, 2770–2775 (1997). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. E. Zappa and G. Busca, “Comparison of eight unwrapping algorithms applied to fourier-transform profilometry,” Opt. Laser. Eng.46, 106–116 (2008). [CrossRef]
  25. G. Sansoni, M. Carocci, and R. Rodella, “Three-dimensional vision based on a combination of gray-code and phase-shift light projection: analysis and compensation of the systematic errors,” Appl. Opt.38, 6565–6573 (1999). [CrossRef]
  26. F. Berryman, P. Pynsent, and J. Cubillo, “A theoretical comparison of three fringe analysis methods for determining the three-dimensional shape of an object in the presence of noise,” Opt. Laser. Eng.39, 35–50 (2003). [CrossRef]
  27. Z. Wang, H. Du, and H. Bi, “Out-of-plane shape determination in generalized fringe projection profilometry,” Opt. Express14, 12122–12133 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Z. Wang, H. Du, S. Park, and H. Xie, “Three-dimensional shape measurement with a fast and accurate approach,” Appl. Opt.48, 1052–1061 (2009). [CrossRef]
  29. X. Mao, W. Chen, and X. Su, “Improved fourier-transform profilometry,” Appl. Opt.46, 664–668 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. H. Dehghani, M. Eames, P. Yalavarthy, S. Davis, S. Srinivasan, C. Carpenter, B. Pogue, and K. Paulsen, “Near infrared optical tomography using nirfast: Algorithm for numerical model and image reconstruction,” Commun. Numer. Methods En.25, 711–732 (2009). [CrossRef]
  31. R. Schulz, J. Ripoll, and V. Ntziachristos, “Noncontact optical tomography of turbid media,” Opt. Lett.28, 1701–1703 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Z. Geng, “Method and apparatus for omnidirectional three dimensional imaging,” U.S. Patent 6,744,569 (2004).
  33. R. Schulz, J. Ripoll, and V. Ntziachristos, “Experimental fluorescence tomography of tissues with noncontact measurements,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.23, 492–500 (2004). [CrossRef]
  34. Z. Geng, “Diffuse optical tomography system and method of use,” U.S. Patent 7,242,997 (2007).
  35. D. Nilson, M. Cable, B. Rice, and K. Kearney, “Structured light imaging apparatus,” U.S. Patent 7,298,415 (2007).
  36. H. Meyer, A. Garofalakis, G. Zacharakis, S. Psycharakis, C. Mamalaki, D. Kioussis, E. Economou, V. Ntziachristos, and J. Ripoll, “Noncontact optical imaging in mice with full angular coverage and automatic surface extraction,” Appl. Opt.46, 3617–3627 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. X. Jiang, L. Cao, W. Semmler, and J. Peter, “A surface recognition approach for in vivo optical imaging applications using a micro-lens-array light detector,” in Biomedical Optics, OSA Technical Digest (Optical Society of America, 2012), paper BTu3A.1.
  38. G. Zavattini, S. Vecchi, G. Mitchell, U. Weisser, R. Leahy, B. Pichler, D. Smith, and S. Cherry, “A hyperspectral fluorescence system for 3d in vivo optical imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol.51, 2029–2043 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. B. Rice, M. Cable, and K. Kearney, “3d in-vivo imaging and topography using structured light,” U.S. Patent 7,797,034 (2010).
  40. D. Stearns, B. Rice, and M. Cable, “Method and apparatus for 3-d imaging of internal light sources,” U.S. Patent 7,860,549 (2010).
  41. PerkinElmer, “Ivis 200 series,” http://www.perkinelmer.com/Catalog/Product/ID/IVIS200 .
  42. Berthold Technologies, “Nightowl lb 983 in vivo imaging system,” https://www.berthold.com/en/bio/in_vivo_imager_NightOWL_LB983 .
  43. Biospace Lab, “Photonimager,” http://www.biospacelab.com/m-31-optical-imaging.html .
  44. A. Chaudhari, F. Darvas, J. Bading, R. Moats, P. Conti, D. Smith, S. Cherry, and R. Leahy, “Hyperspectral and multispectral bioluminescence optical tomography for small animal imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol.50, 5421–5441 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Biospace Lab, “4-view module,” http://www.biospacelab.com/m-89-4-view-module.html .
  46. E. Li, X. Peng, J. Xi, J. Chicharo, J. Yao, and D. Zhang, “Multi-frequency and multiple phase-shift sinusoidal fringe projection for 3d profilometry,” Opt. Express13, 1561–1569 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. P. Cignoni, “Meshlab home page,” http://meshlab.sourceforge.net/ .

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited