OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Michael Duncan
  • Vol. 11, Iss. 5 — Mar. 10, 2003
  • pp: 460–475

Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks

Miguel P. Eckstein, Jay L. Bartroff, Craig K. Abbey, James S. Whiting, and Francois O. Bochud  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 11, Issue 5, pp. 460-475 (2003)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.11.000460


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (213 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We compared the ability of three model observers (nonprewhitening matched filter with an eye filter, Hotelling and channelized Hotelling) in predicting the effect of JPEG and wavelet-Crewcode image compression on human visual detection of a simulated lesion in single frame digital x-ray coronary angiograms. All three model observers predicted the JPEG superiority present in human performance, although the nonprewhitening matched filter with an eye filter (NPWE) and the channelized Hotelling models were better predictors than the Hotelling model. The commonly used root mean square error and related peak signal to noise ratio metrics incorrectly predicted a JPEG inferiority. A particular image discrimination/perceptual difference model correctly predicted a JPEG advantage at low compression ratios but incorrectly predicted a JPEG inferiority at high compression ratios. In the second part of the paper, the NPWE model was used to perform automated simulated annealing optimization of the quantization matrix of the JPEG algorithm at 25:1 compression ratio. A subsequent psychophysical study resulted in improved human detection performance for images compressed with the NPWE optimized quantization matrix over the JPEG default quantization matrix. Together, our results show how model observers can be successfully used to perform automated evaluation and optimization of diagnostic performance in clinically relevant visual tasks using real anatomic backgrounds.

© 2002 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.2000) Image processing : Digital image processing
(330.1880) Vision, color, and visual optics : Detection
(330.4060) Vision, color, and visual optics : Vision modeling

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: December 18, 2002
Revised Manuscript: February 24, 2003
Published: March 10, 2003

Citation
Miguel Eckstein, Jay Bartroff, Craig Abbey, James Whiting, and Francois Bochud, "Automated computer evaluation and optimization of image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms for signal known exactly detection tasks," Opt. Express 11, 460-475 (2003)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-11-5-460


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. V. H. Rigolin, P. A. Robiolio, L.A. Spero, B.P. Harrawood, K.G. Morris, D.F. Fortin, W.A. Baker, T.M. Bashore, and J.T. Cusma, �??Compression of Digital Coronary Angiograms Does Not Affect Visual or Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity,�?? Am. J. of Card. 78, 131-135 (1996). [CrossRef]
  2. W.A. Baker et al., �??Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features,�?? Circ. 96, 1157-1164 (1997). [CrossRef]
  3. J.S. Whiting, M.P. Eckstein, S. Einav, N.L. Eigler, �??Perceptual Evaluation of JPEG compression for medical image sequences,�?? in OSA Annual Meeting Tech. Dig. 23, 161 (1992).
  4. S. Silber, R. Dorr, G. Zindler, H. Muhling, T. Diebel, �??Impact of various compression rates on interpretation of digital coronary angiograms,�?? Int. J. Cardiology 60, 195-200 (1997). [CrossRef]
  5. R.A. Kerensky, J.T. Cusma, P. Kubilis, R. Simon, T.M. Bashore, J.W. Hirshfeld, D.R. Holmes Jr, C.J. Pepine, S.E. Nissen, �??American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography,�?? J. Am. College Cardiology 35, 1370-1379 (2000). [CrossRef]
  6. C.A. Morioka, M.P. Eckstein, J.L. Bartroff, J. Hausleiter , J.S. Whiting, �??Observer performance for JPEG vs. wavelet image compression of x-ray coronary angiograms,�?? Opt. Express 5, 8-19 (1999), <a href="http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-5-1-8">http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-5-1-8</a> [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. A. Zandi, J. Allen, E.L. Schwartz, M. Boliek, �??Crewcode Lossless/Lossy Medical Image Compression,�?? IEEE Data Compression Conference, 212-221 (1995).
  8. H.H. Barrett, J. Yao, J.P. Rolland, K.J. Myers, �??Model observers for assessment of image quality,�?? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9758- 9765 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S.C. Lo, E.L. Shen, K.M. Seong, �??An image splitting and remapping method for radiological image compression,�?? Medical Imaging IV: Image Capture and Display, Proc. SPIE 1232, 312 �?? 321 (1990). [CrossRef]
  10. K.K. Chan, C.C. Lau, S.L. Lou, A. Hayrepatian, B.K.T. Ho, H.K. Huang, �??Three-dimensional Transform Compression of Image from Dynamic Studies,�?? Medical Imaging IV: Image Capture and Display, Proc SPIE 1232, 322-326 (1990). [CrossRef]
  11. M. Goldberg, S. Panchanathan, L.A. Wang, �??Comparison of Lossy Techniques for Digitized Radiographic Images,�?? Medical Imaging IV: Image Capture, Formatting and Display, Proc. SPIE 1987, 269-281 (1993).
  12. J. Lubin, �??The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance,�?? in Digital images and human vision, Ed. A.B. Watson, (MIT Press, 1993) 163-178.
  13. S. Daly, �??The visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity,�?? in Digital images and Human Vision, A.B. Watson, ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993) 162-178.
  14. A.B. Watson, A.P. Gale, J.A. Solomon, A.J. Ahumada. �??Visibility of DCT quantization noise: Effects of display resolution," Proceedings, Society for Information Display, San Jose, CA, Society for Information Display, 697-700 (1995).
  15. H.A. Peterson, A.J. Ahumada, A.B. Watson. �??The visibility of DCT quantization noise, Soc. For Information Display,�?? Digest of Tech. Papers 24, 942-945 (1993).
  16. A.B. Watson, �??DCTune: A Technique for visual optimization of DCT quantization matrices for individual images, Soc. For Information Display,�?? Digest of Tech. Papers XXIV, 946-949 (1993).
  17. A.E. Burgess, R.B. Wagner, R.J. Jennings, and H.B. Barlow, �??Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination,�?? Science 214, 93-94 (1981). [CrossRef]
  18. A.E. Burgess, H. Ghandeharian, �??Visual signal detection. II. Signal location identification,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 900-905 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. A.E. Burgess, B. Colborne. �??Visual Signal Detection IV: Observer inconsistency,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 617-627 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. P.F. Judy, R.G. Swensson. �??Detection of small focal lesions in CT images: effects of reconstruction filters and visual display windows,�?? British J. Radiology 58, 137-145 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. R.G. Swensson, P.F. Judy. �??Detection of noisy visual targets: model for the effects of spatial uncertainty and signal to noise ratio,�?? Percept. Psychophys. 29: 521-534 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. K.J. Myers, H.H. Barrett, M.C. Borgstrom, D.D. Patton, G.W. Seeley. �??Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1752-1759 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. J.P. Rolland, H.H. Barrett. �??Effect of random inhomogeneity on observer detection performance,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 649-658 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. C.K. Abbey, H.H. Barrett. �??Human and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability,�?? J. Opt. Soc. of Am. A 18, 473-488 (2001). [CrossRef]
  25. A.E. Burgess, X. Li, C.K. Abbey. �??Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2420-2442 (1997). [CrossRef]
  26. M.P. Eckstein, J.S. Whiting. �??Lesion detection in structured noise,�?? Academic Radiology 2, 249-253 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. M.P. Eckstein, C.A. Abbey, J.S. Whiting. �??Human vs model observers in anatomic backgrounds,�?? Proceedings SPIE Image Perception 3340, 15-26 (1998).
  28. A.E. Burgess, F.L. Jacobson, P.F. Judy. �??Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise,�?? Med. Phys. 28, 419-437 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. B. Zhao, L.H. Schwarz, P.K. Kijewski. �??Effect of lossy compression on lesion detection: Predictions of the nonprewhitening matched filter,�?? Med. Phys. 25, 1621-1624 (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. M.P. Eckstein, C.K. Abbey, F.O.Bochud. �??Practical guide to model observers in synthetic and real noisy backgrounds,�?? in Handbook of Medical Imaging Vol. I: Physics and Psychophysics, Editors, J. Beutel, Kundel, Van Metter, SPIE Press, 593-628 (2000)
  31. C.K. Abbey, H.H. Barrett, M.P. Eckstein. �??Practical issues and methodology in assessment of image quality using model observers,�?? in Medical Imaging, H. Roerhig, ed., Proc. SPIE, The physics of medical imaging, 3032: 182-194 (1997). [CrossRef]
  32. R.F. Wagner, K.E. Weaver. �??An assortment of image quality indices for radiographic film-screen combinations- can they be resolved?�?? In Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine I, P.L. Carson, WH Hendee, and WC Zarnstorff, eds, Proc. SPIE 35, 83-94 (1972). [CrossRef]
  33. M. Ishida, K. Doi, L.N. Loo, C.E. Metz, J.L. Lehr. �??Digital image processing: effect of detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns,�?? Radiology 150, 569-575 (1984). [PubMed]
  34. A.E. Burgess. �??Statistically defined backgrounds: Performance of a modified nonprewhitening matched filter model,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1237-42 (1994). [CrossRef]
  35. M.A. Webster, E. Miyahara. �??Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 2355-2366 (1997). [CrossRef]
  36. H.H. Barrett, C.K. Abbey, B. Gallas, M.P. Eckstein. �??Stabilized estimates of Hotelling-observer detection performance in patient structured noise,�?? Proc. SPIE 3340 (1998). [CrossRef]
  37. K. Myers, H.H. Barrett. �??Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal observer model,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 2447-2457 (1987). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. J. Yao, H.H. Barrett. �??Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model,�?? Math. Methods Med. Imaging, SPIE 1768, 161-168 (1992).
  39. C.K. Abbey, H.H. Barrett, D.W. Wilson. �??Observer signal to noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm,�?? Proc. SPIE 2712, 47-58 (1996). [CrossRef]
  40. S. Marcelja. �??Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 70, 1297-1300 (1980). [CrossRef]
  41. A.B. Watson. Detection and recognition of simple spatial forms, in Physical and Biological Processing of Images, O.J. Bradick & A.C. Sleigh, Eds. (New York, Springer-Verlag, 1983).
  42. F.O. Bochud, C.K. Abbey, M.P. Eckstein. �??Correlated human responses for visual detection in natural images; Annual Meeting of the Association for Research,�?? in Vision and Ophthalmology; Fort Lauderdale, USA; 40, 4; 350 (1999).
  43. M.P. Eckstein, C.K. Abbey, F.O. Bochud. �??Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds IV. Figures of merit for model observers with internal response correlations,�?? J. Opt. Soc. Am. 17, 2 206-217 (2000). [CrossRef]
  44. D.M. Green, J.A. Swets. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, (Wiley, NewYork, 1966)
  45. A.J. Ahumada, Jr., A.B. Watson, A.M. Rohally. "Models of human image discrimination predict object detection in natural backgrounds," in Human Vision, Visual Proc., and Digital Display VI, ed. B. Rogowitz and J. Allebach , SPIE 2411, 355-362 (1995). [CrossRef]
  46. J.P. Johnson, J. Lubin, J. Nafziger, D. Chakraborty. �??Visual Discrimination Modeling of lesion discriminability,�?? Medical Imaging , Image Percep.and Performance, Ed. E.A. Krupinski, D.P. Chakraborty, Proc. SPIE, 4686, 248-255 (2002). [CrossRef]
  47. W.B. Pennebaker, J.L. Mitchell, The JPEG still image data compression standard, (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993).
  48. W.E. Smith. �??Simulated annealing and estimation theory in coded aperture imaging,�?? PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona (2002).
  49. M.P. Eckstein, C.K Abbey. �??Model observers for signal known statistically tasks,�?? Proc. SPIE, Medical Imaging, Image Percep. and Performance, Ed. E.A. Krupinski, D.P. Chakraborty 4321, 91-102 (2001). [CrossRef]
  50. M.P. Eckstein, C.K. Abbey, B. Pham. �??The effect of image compression on signal known statistically tasks,�?? Proc. SPIE, Medical Imaging, Image Percep . and Performance, Ed. E.A. Krupinski, D.P. Chakraborty 4686, 13-24 (2002). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited