OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 16, Iss. 13 — Jun. 23, 2008
  • pp: 9958–9965

Comparison and validation of point spread models for imaging in natural waters

Weilin Hou, Deric J. Gray, Alan D. Weidemann, and Robert A. Arnone  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 16, Issue 13, pp. 9958-9965 (2008)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.009958


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1125 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

It is known that scattering by particulates within natural waters is the main cause of the blur in underwater images. Underwater images can be better restored or enhanced with knowledge of the point spread function (PSF) of the water. This will extend the performance range as well as the information retrieval from underwater electro-optical systems, which is critical in many civilian and military applications, including target and especially mine detection, search and rescue, and diver visibility. A better understanding of the physical process involved also helps to predict system performance and simulate it accurately on demand. The presented effort first reviews several PSF models, including the introduction of a semi-analytical PSF given optical properties of the medium, including scattering albedo, mean scattering angles and the optical range. The models under comparison include the empirical model of Duntley, a modified PSF model by Dolin et al, as well as the numerical integration of analytical forms from Wells, as a benchmark of theoretical results. For experimental results, in addition to that of Duntley, we validate the above models with measured point spread functions by applying field measured scattering properties with Monte Carlo simulations. Results from these comparisons suggest it is sufficient but necessary to have the three parameters listed above to model PSFs. The simplified approach introduced also provides adequate accuracy and flexibility for imaging applications, as shown by examples of restored underwater images.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(010.4450) Atmospheric and oceanic optics : Oceanic optics
(110.4850) Imaging systems : Optical transfer functions

ToC Category:
Atmospheric and ocean optics

History
Original Manuscript: April 8, 2008
Revised Manuscript: May 30, 2008
Manuscript Accepted: June 12, 2008
Published: June 20, 2008

Virtual Issues
Vol. 3, Iss. 7 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Weilin Hou, Deric J. Gray, Alan D. Weidemann, and Robert A. Arnone, "Comparison and validation of point spread models for imaging in natural waters," Opt. Express 16, 9958-9965 (2008)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-13-9958


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. G. D. Gilbert and R. C. Honey, "Optical turbulence in the sea," in Underwater photo-optical instrumentation applications (SPIE, 1972), pp. 49-55.
  2. D. J. Bogucki, J. A. Domaradzki, R. E. Ecke, and C. R. Truman, "Light scattering on oceanic turbulence," Appl. Opt. 43, 5662-5668 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. C. D. Mobley, Light and Water: radiative transfer in natural waters (Academic Press, New York, 1994).
  4. D. Gray, "Order-of-Scattering Point Spread and Modulation Transfer Functions for Natural Waters," to be submitted to OE (2008).
  5. I. L. Katsev, E. P. Zege, A. S. Prikhach, and I. N. Polonsky, "Efficient technique to determine backscattered light power for various atmospheric and oceanic sounding and imaging systems," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 14, 1338-1346 (1997). [CrossRef]
  6. W. Hou, D. Gray, A. Weidemann, G. R. Fournier, and J. L. Forand, "Automated underwater image restoration and retrieval of related optical properties," in IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS (2007), pp. 1889-1892.
  7. R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2002).
  8. L. E. Mertens, and J. F. S. Replogle, "Use of point spread and beam spread functions for analysis of imaging systems in water," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 1105-1117 (1977). [CrossRef]
  9. J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and G. He, "Blind deconvolution: multiplicative iterative algorithm," Opt. Lett. 33, 25-27 (2008). [CrossRef]
  10. S. Q. Duntley, "Underwater lighting by submerged lasers and incandescent sources," (Scripts Instituition of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 1971).
  11. K. Voss, "Simple empirical model of the oceanic point spread function," Appl. Opt. 30, 2647-2651 (1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. L. S. Dolin, G. D. Gilbert, I. Levin, and A. Luchinin, Theory of imaging through wavy sea surface (Russian Academy of Sciences, Inst of Applied Physics, Nizhniy Novgorod, 2006).
  13. W. Hou, D. Gray, A. Weidemann, and R. A. Arnone, "A PRACTICAL POINT SPREAD MODEL FOR OCEAN WATERS," in IV International Conf. Current Problems in Optics of Natural Waters (N. Novgorod, Russia, 2007), pp. 86-90.
  14. A. Gordon, "Practical approaches to underwater multiple-scattering problems," in Ocean Optics (SPIE, 1975), pp. 85-93.
  15. W. H. Wells, "Theory of small angle scattering," in AGARD Lec. Series No. 61(NATO, 1973).
  16. W. Hou, Z. Lee, and A. Weidemann, "Why does the Secchi disk disappear? An imaging perspective," Opt. Express 15, 2791-2802 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. W. Hou, A. Weidemann, D. Gray, and G. R. Fournier, "Imagery-derived modulation transfer function and its applications for underwater imaging," Proc. SPIE 6696, 6696221-6696228 (2007).
  18. J. Jaffe, "Monte Carlo modeling of underwater image formation: validity of the linear and small-angle approximations," Appl. Opt. 34, 5421-5421 (1995). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited