OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 10 — May. 11, 2009
  • pp: 7993–8004

PMD and PDL impairments in polarization division multiplexing signals with direct detection

Zinan Wang, Chongjin Xie, and Xiaomin Ren  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 10, pp. 7993-8004 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.007993


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1405 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We investigate polarization mode dispersion (PMD) and polarization dependent loss (PDL) impairments in polarization division multiplexing (PDM) signals with optical polarization demultiplexing and direct detection. We find that the time alignment between the bits in the two polarizations has a significant impact on the PMD impairments, and PMD impairments also depend on the bandwidth of PDM signals, whereas PDL impairments have little dependence on the relative time alignment between the two polarizations and the signal bandwidth. We show that with a proper configuration of the polarization demultiplexing, the PDL-induced crosstalk between the two polarizations can be completely eliminated. The combined effects of PMD and PDL are also studied, and we find that, in the presence of concatenated PMD and PDL, the impairment from one effect does not enhance that from the other.

© 2009 OSA

OCIS Codes
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications
(060.2360) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics links and subsystems
(060.4230) Fiber optics and optical communications : Multiplexing
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: January 15, 2009
Revised Manuscript: April 16, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: April 27, 2009
Published: April 29, 2009

Citation
Zinan Wang, Chongjin Xie, and Xiaomin Ren, "PMD and PDL impairments in polarization division multiplexing signals with direct detection," Opt. Express 17, 7993-8004 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-10-7993


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. R. Chraplyvy, A. H. Gnauck, R. W. Tkach, J. L. Zyskind, J. W. Sulhoff, A. J. Lucero, Y. Sun, R. M. Jopson, F. Forghieri, R. M. Derosier, C. Wolf, and A. R. McCormick, “1 Tb/s transmission experiment,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 8(9), 1264–1266 (1996). [CrossRef]
  2. A. H. Gnauck, G. Charlet, P. Tran, P. J. Winzer, C. R. Doerr, J. C. Centanni, E. C. Burrows, T. Kawanishi, T. Sakamoto, and K. Higuma, “25.6-Tb/s WDM transmission of polarization-multiplexed RZ-DQPSK signals,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(1), 79–84 (2008). [CrossRef]
  3. G. Charlet, J. Renaudier, M. Salsi, H. Mardoyan, P. Tran, and S. Bigo, “Efficient mitigation of fiber impairments in an ultra-long haul transmission of 40Gbit/s polarization-multiplexed data, by digital processing in a coherent receiver,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and The National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, OSA Technical Digest Series (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2007), paper PDP17. http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OFC-2007-PDP17
  4. H. Sunnerud, M. Karlsson, C. Xie, and P. A. Andrekson, “Polarization mode dispersion in high-speed fiber-optic transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 20(12), 2204–2219 (2002). [CrossRef]
  5. A. Mecozzi and M. Shtaif, “Signal-to-noise-ratio degradation caused by polarization-dependent loss and the effect of dynamic gain equalization,” J. Lightwave Technol. 22(8), 1856–1871 (2004). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Shtaif and A. Mecozzi, “Polarization-dependent loss and its effect on the signal-to-noise ratio in fiber-optic systems,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16(2), 671–673 (2004). [CrossRef]
  7. C. Xie and L. F. Mollenauer, “Performance degradation induced by polarization dependent loss in optical fiber transmission systems with and without polarization mode dispersion,” J. Lightwave Technol. 21(9), 1953–1957 (2003). [CrossRef]
  8. O. Vassilieva, T. Hoshida, X. Wang, J. Rasmussen, H. Miyata, and T. Naito, “Impact of polarization dependent loss and cross-phase modulation on polarization multiplexed DQPSK Signals,”in Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and The National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, OSA Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2008), paper OThU6. http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OFC-2008-OThU6
  9. J. Renaudier, G. Charlet, M. Salsi, O. B. Pardo, H. Mardoyan, P. Tran, and S. Bigo, “Linear fiber impairments mitigation of 40-Gbit/s polarization-multiplexed QPSK by digital processing in a coherent receiver,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(1), 36–42 (2008). [CrossRef]
  10. L. E. Nelson, S. L. Woodward, S. Foo, X. Zhou, M. D. Feuer, D. Hanson, D. McGhan, H. Sun, M. Moyer, M. O. Sullivan, and P. D. Magill, “Performance of a 46-Gbps dual-polarization QPSK transceiver with real-time coherent equalization over high PMD fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(3), 158–167 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. C. Laperle, B. Villeneuve, Z. Zhang, D. McGhan, H. Sun, and M. O’Sullivan, “WDM performance and PMD tolerance of a coherent 40-Gbit/s dual-polarization QPSK transceiver,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(1), 168–175 (2008). [CrossRef]
  12. M. Shtaif, “Performance degradation in coherent polarization multiplexed systems as a result of polarization dependent loss,” Opt. Express 16(18), 13918–13932 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-18-13918 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. L. E. Nelson, T. N. Nielsen, and H. Kogelnik, “Observation of PMD induced coherent crosstalk in polarization-multiplexed transmission,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 13(7), 738–740 (2001). [CrossRef]
  14. L. Nelson and H. Kogelnik, “Coherent crosstalk impairments in polarization multiplexed transmission due to polarization mode dispersion,” Opt. Express 7, 350–361 (2000), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-7-10-350 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. D. van den Borne, N. E. Hecker-Denschlag, G. D. Khoe, and H. de Waardt, “PMD-induced transmission penalties in polarization-multiplexed transmission,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(12), 4004–4015 (2005). [CrossRef]
  16. Z. Wang, and C. Xie, “PMD and PDL tolerance of polarization division multiplexed signals with direct detection,” in Proc. ECOC 2008, Brussels, Belguim, 2008, paper We.3.E.2.
  17. S. Hinz, D. Sandel, F. Wuest, and R. Noé, “PMD tolerance of polarization division multiplex transmission using return-to-zero coding,” Opt. Express 9, 136–140 (2001), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-9-3-136 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. D. van den Borne, S. L. Jansen, E. Gottwald, P. M. Krummrich, G. D. Khoe, and H. de Waardt, “1.6-b/s/Hz spectrally efficient transmission over 1700 km of SSMF using 40×85.6-Gb/s POLMUX-RZ-DQPSK,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(1), 222–232 (2007). [CrossRef]
  19. H. C. Ji, J. H. Lee, H. Kim, P. K. Park, and Y. C. Chung, “Effect of PDL-induced coherent crosstalk on polarization-division-multiplexed direct-detection systems,” Opt. Express 17(3), 1169–1177 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-3-1169 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. M. Shtaif and O. Rosenberg, “Polarization-dependent loss as a waveform-distorting mechanism and its effect on fiber-optic systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23(2), 923–930 (2005). [CrossRef]
  21. C. Xie, L. F. Mollenauer, and L. Möller, “Pulse distortion induced by polarization-mode dispersion and polarization-dependent loss in lightwave transmission systems,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15(8), 1073–1075 (2003). [CrossRef]
  22. L. Chen, Z. Zhang, and X. Bao, “Combined PMD-PDL effects on BERs in simplified optical systems: an analytical approach,” Opt. Express 15(5), 2106–2119 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-5-2106 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. C. R. Menyuk, D. Wang, and A. N. Pilipetskii, “Repolarization of polarization-scrambled optical signals due to polarization dependent loss,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 9(9), 1247–1249 (1997). [CrossRef]
  24. C. Xie, L. Möller, H. Haunstein, and S. Hunsche, “Comparison of system tolerance to polarization-mode dispersion between different modulation formats,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 15(8), 1168–1170 (2003). [CrossRef]
  25. H. Kogelnik, R. M. Jopson, and L. E. Nelson, Optical Fiber Telecommunications IV-B (Academic, 2002), Chap.15.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited