Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Evolutionary algorithm for optimization of nonimaging Fresnel lens geometry

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this study, an evolutionary algorithm (EA), which consists of genetic and immune algorithms, is introduced to design the optical geometry of a nonimaging Fresnel lens; this lens generates the uniform flux concentration required for a photovoltaic cell. Herein, a design procedure that incorporates a ray-tracing technique in the EA is described, and the validity of the design is demonstrated. The results show that the EA automatically generated a unique geometry of the Fresnel lens; the use of this geometry resulted in better uniform flux concentration with high optical efficiency.

©2010 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Design of wavelength selective concentrator for micro PV/TPV systems using evolutionary algorithm

Noboru Yamada and Toshikazu Ijiro
Opt. Express 19(14) 13140-13149 (2011)

High performance Fresnel-based photovoltaic concentrator

Pablo Benítez, Juan C. Miñano, Pablo Zamora, Rubén Mohedano, Aleksandra Cvetkovic, Marina Buljan, Julio Chaves, and Maikel Hernández
Opt. Express 18(S1) A25-A40 (2010)

Miniaturization of Fresnel lenses for solar concentration: a quantitative investigation

Fabian Duerr, Youri Meuret, and Hugo Thienpont
Appl. Opt. 49(12) 2339-2346 (2010)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Flow chart of EA optimization for design of optical geometry of solar concentrator.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Model of nonimaging Fresnel lens: Half of the lens geometry is omitted because of symmetry.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Genetic manipulations, namely, (a) crossover and (b) mutation, which generate new geometries.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Evaluation index E vs. generation (iteration) step for F = 0.3. E is a nondimensional value. E = 0.60 for the conventional Fresnel lens. E = 0.75 for the EA-generated Fresnel lens at the 100th generation. The ideal value of E is 1.0.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Energy distribution on PV cell surface of (a) conventional Fresnel lens, (b) EA-generated Fresnel lens at the 100th generation for F = 0.3, and (c) EA-generated Fresnel lens at the 100th generation for F = 0.5. λ = 0.40 μm (blue), λ = 0.80 μm (green), and λ = 1.20 μm (red); the average of these three wavelengths is shown in black. The corresponding optical efficiency is (a) η = 84.0%, (b) η = 82.7%, and (c) η = 77.4%.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Optical efficiency - uniformity trade-off by tuning F value 0.1 - 0.9. Result for a wider incident angle θin = ± 0.5° is additionally plotted.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Geometry of nonimaging Fresnel lens. (a) Conventional Fresnel lens, (b) EA-generated Fresnel lens at the 100th generation for F = 0.3, and (c) EA-generated Fresnel lens at the 100th generation for F = 0.5. The y-scale is reduced to 1/10th of the original scale.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Specifications of Nonimaging Fresnel Lens

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E = η F D = I t I i n c i d e n t F 1 I i n c i d e n t i = 1 N | I t N I i | ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.