OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 20, Iss. 1 — Jan. 2, 2012
  • pp: 17–31

Mueller matrix roots algorithm and computational considerations

H. D. Noble and R. A. Chipman  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 17-31 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.000017


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1331 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Recently, an order-independent Mueller matrix decomposition was proposed in an effort to elucidate the nine depolarization degrees of freedom [Handbook of Optics, Vol. 1 of Mueller Matrices (2009)]. This paper addresses the critical computational issues involved in applying this Mueller matrix roots decomposition, along with a review of the principal matrix root and common methods for its calculation. The calculation of the pth matrix root is optimized around p = 105 for a 53 digit binary double precision calculation. A matrix roots algorithm is provided which incorporates these computational results. It is applied to a statistically significant number of randomly generated physical Mueller matrices in order to gain insight on the typical ranges of the depolarizing Matrix roots parameters. Computational techniques are proposed which allow singular Mueller matrices and Mueller matrices with a half-wave of retardance to be evaluated with the matrix roots decomposition.

© 2011 OSA

OCIS Codes
(120.5410) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Polarimetry
(260.5430) Physical optics : Polarization
(290.5855) Scattering : Scattering, polarization
(240.2130) Optics at surfaces : Ellipsometry and polarimetry

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: August 2, 2011
Revised Manuscript: October 13, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: October 21, 2011
Published: December 19, 2011

Citation
H. D. Noble and R. A. Chipman, "Mueller matrix roots algorithm and computational considerations," Opt. Express 20, 17-31 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-1-17


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S.-Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman, “Interpretation of mueller matrices based on polar decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A13, 1106–1113 (1996). [CrossRef]
  2. R. Ossikovski, “Analysis of depolarizing mueller matrices through a symmetric decomposition,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A26, 1109–1118 (2009). [CrossRef]
  3. S. R. Cloude, “Conditions for the physical realisability of matrix operators in polarimetry,” Proc. SPIE1166, 177–185 (1989).
  4. R. A. Chipman, Handbook of Optics, Vol. 1 of Mueller Matrices (McGraw Hill, 2009), 3rd ed.
  5. R. C. Jones, “A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems. vii. properties of the n-matrices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.38, 671–683 (1948). [CrossRef]
  6. N. J. Higham, Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2008). [CrossRef]
  7. D. A. Bini, N. J. Higham, and B. Meini, “Algorithms for the matrix pth root,” Num. Algor.39, 349–378 (2005). [CrossRef]
  8. C.-H. Guo, “On newton’s method and halley’s method for the principal pth root of a matrix,” Linear Algebra Appl.432, 1905–1922 (2010). [CrossRef]
  9. R. D. Skeel and J. B. Keiper, Elementary Numerical Computing with Mathematica, Chapter 2 (McGraw Hill, 1993).
  10. R. A. Chipman, “Depolarization index and the average degree of polarization,” Appl. Opt.44, 2490–2495 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. J. J. Gil and E. Bernabeu, “Depolarization and polarization indices of an optical system,” Opt. Acta33, 185–189 (1986). [CrossRef]
  12. H. D. Noble, “Mueller matrix roots,” Doctoral dissertation (2011).
  13. N. J. Higham, “Stable iterations for the matrix square root,” Num. Algor.15, 227–242 (1997). [CrossRef]
  14. M. H. Smith, “Optimization of a dual-rotating-retarder mueller matrix imaging polarimeter,” Appl. Opt.41, 2488–2493 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. S.-Y. Lu and R. A. Chipman, “Homogeneous and inhomogeneous jones matrices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A11, 766–773 (1994). [CrossRef]
  16. D. Goldstein, Polarized Light, 2nd ed. (Marcel Dekker, 2003). [CrossRef]
  17. R. Barakat, “Conditions for the physical realizability of polarization matrices characterizing passive systems,” J. Mod. Opt.34, 1535–1544 (1987). [CrossRef]
  18. K. M. Twietmeyer, R. A. Chipman, A. E. Elsner, Y. Zhao, and D. VanNasdale, “Mueller matrix retinal imager with optimized polarization conditions,” Opt. Express16, 21339–21354 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited