OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 20, Iss. 16 — Jul. 30, 2012
  • pp: 17722–17733

Ultrastable heterodyne interferometer system using a CMOS modulated light camera

Rikesh Patel, Samuel Achamfuo-Yeboah, Roger Light, and Matt Clark  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 20, Issue 16, pp. 17722-17733 (2012)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.017722


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1162 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A novel ultrastable widefield interferometer is presented. This uses a modulated light camera (MLC) to capture and stabilise the interferogram in the widefield heterodyne interferometer. This system eliminates the contribution of piston phase to the interferogram without the need for common path optics and results in a highly stable widefield interferometer. The MLC uses quadrature demodulation circuitry built into each pixel to demodulate the light signal and extract phase information using an electronic reference signal. In contrast to the work previously presented [Opt. Express 19, 24546 (2011)], the reference signal is derived from one of the pixels on board the MLC rather than an external source. This local reference signal tracks the instantaneous modulation frequency detected by the other pixels and eliminates the contribution of piston phase to the interferogram, substantially removing the contributions of unwanted vibrations and microphonics to the interferogram. Interferograms taken using the ultrastable system are presented with one of the interferometer mirrors moving at up to 85 mm s−1 over a variety of frequencies from 18 Hz to 20 kHz (giving a variation in optical path length of 220 μm, or 350 wavelengths at 62 Hz). This limit was the result of complex motion in the mirror mount rather than the stability limit of the system. The system is shown to be insensitive to pure piston phase variations equivalent to an object velocity of over 3 m s−1.

© 2012 OSA

OCIS Codes
(100.3175) Image processing : Interferometric imaging
(110.3175) Imaging systems : Interferometric imaging

ToC Category:
Image Processing

History
Original Manuscript: May 25, 2012
Revised Manuscript: July 5, 2012
Manuscript Accepted: July 9, 2012
Published: July 19, 2012

Citation
Rikesh Patel, Samuel Achamfuo-Yeboah, Roger Light, and Matt Clark, "Ultrastable heterodyne interferometer system using a CMOS modulated light camera," Opt. Express 20, 17722-17733 (2012)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-16-17722


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. H. Osterberg, “An interferometer method of studying the vibrations of an oscillating quartz plate,” J. Opt. Soc. Am.22, 19–34 (1932). [CrossRef]
  2. R. Patel, S. Achamfuo-Yeboah, R. Light, and M. Clark, “Widefield heterodyne interferometry using a custom CMOS modulated light camera,” Opt. Express19, 24546–24556 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. F. Ghebremichael and R. Knize, “Polymer relaxations determined by use of a temporally and thermally stable interferometer,” Opt. Lett.24, 1481–1483 (1999). [CrossRef]
  4. K. Birch and M. Okaji, “Stable interferometer supporting system,” J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum.19, 361–363 (1986). [CrossRef]
  5. W. Lehmann, P. Gattinger, M. Keck, F. Kremer, P. Stein, T. Eckert, and H. Finkelmann, “Inverse electromechanical effect in mechanically oriented sc*-elastomers examined by means of an ultra-stable Michelson interferometer,” Ferroelectr.208, 373–383 (1998). [CrossRef]
  6. H. Kikuta, S. Asai, H. Yasukochi, and K. Iwata, “Force microscopy using common-path optical-heterodyne interferometer,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 130, 587–590 (1991). [CrossRef]
  7. Y. Park and K. Cho, “Heterodyne interferometer scheme using a double pass in an acousto-optic modulator,” Opt. Lett.36, 331–333 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. N. A. Riza, M. A. Arain, and F. N. Ghauri, “Self-calibrating hybrid wavelength, polarization, and time-multiplexed heterodyne interferometers for angstrom precision measurements,” Opt. Eng.45, 125603 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. J. Chieh, S. Yang, H.-E. Horng, C.-Y. Hong, and H. Yang, “Measurements of the complex transmission/reflection coefficient of a material using mixed-type common-path heterodyne interferometery,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.58, 1878–1885 (2009). [CrossRef]
  10. N. Sawyer, C. See, M. Clark, M. Somekh, and J. Goh, “Ultrastable absolute-phase common-path optical profiler based on computer-generated holography,” Appl. Opt.37, 6716–6720 (1998). [CrossRef]
  11. M. J. Offside, M. Somekh, and C. See, “Common path scanning heterodyne optical profilometer for absolute phase measurement,” Appl. Phys. Lett.55, 2051–2053 (1989). [CrossRef]
  12. M. Takeda and K. Mutoh, “Fourier transform profilometry for the automatic measurement of 3-D object shapes,” Appl. Opt.22, 3977–3982 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. R. Smythe and R. Moore, “Common path scanning heterodyne optical profilometer for absolute phase measurement,” Opt. Eng.23, 361–364 (1984).
  14. B. K. A. Ngoi, K. Venkatakrishnan, and N. R. Sivakumar, “Phase-shifting interferometry immune to vibration,” Appl. Opt.40, 3211–3214 (2001). [CrossRef]
  15. P. Dmochowski, B. Hayes-Gill, M. Clark, J. Crowe, M. Somekh, and S. Morgan, “Camera pixel for coherent detection of modulated light,” Electron. Lett.40, 1403–1404 (2004). [CrossRef]
  16. M. J. Griffin, “An introduction to whole body vibration,” in Handbook of Human Vibration, (Academic Press, 1996), 27–42.
  17. A. Ismail, M. Nuawi, N. Kamaruddin, and R. Bakar, “Comparative assessment of the whole-body vibration exposure under different car speed based on Malaysian road profile,” J. Appl. Sci.10, 1428–1434 (2010). [CrossRef]
  18. C. Gordon, “Generic criteria for vibration-sensitive equipment,” Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.1619, 71–85 (1992).
  19. W. W. Hays (U.S.), Facing Geologic and Hydrologic Hazards: Earth-Science Considerations (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Geological Survey, 1981).
  20. P. Stafford, F. Strasser, and J. Bommer, “An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region,” Bull. Earthquake Eng.6, 149–1772008. [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited