Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Two-photon excitation selective plane illumination microscopy (2PE-SPIM) of highly scattering samples: characterization and application

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this work we report the advantages provided by two photon excitation (2PE) implemented in a selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM) when imaging thick scattering samples. In particular, a detailed analysis of the effects induced on the real light sheet excitation intensity distribution is performed. The comparison between single-photon and two-photon excitation profiles shows the reduction of the scattering effects and sample-induced aberrations provided by 2PE-SPIM. Furthermore, uniformity of the excitation distribution and the consequent improved image contrast is shown when imaging scattering phantom samples in depth by 2PE-SPIM. These results show the advantages of 2PE-SPIM and suggest how this combination can further enhance the SPIM performance. Phantom samples have been designed with optical properties compatible with biological applications of interest.

©2013 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Light-sheet microscopy in thick media using scanned Bessel beams and two-photon fluorescence excitation

Florian O. Fahrbach, Vasily Gurchenkov, Kevin Alessandri, Pierre Nassoy, and Alexander Rohrbach
Opt. Express 21(11) 13824-13839 (2013)

Supplementary Material (1)

Media 1: AVI (394 KB)     

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Scheme of the Selective Plane Illumination Microscope (A) adapted from [5]. Figure B and fig. C show the adaptation of the system for the experimental measurements. With the cylindrical lens in its standard position, a light sheet is produced in the focus of the objective lens, and a homogeneous fluorescent image of the phantom sample is produced on the CCD Camera (B). Rotating the cylindrical lens by 90 degrees, the axial section of the intensity excitation distribution appears on the CCD sensor.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Experiments performed on various phantom samples mimicking the different optical properties of biological tissues (5, 10, 30, 50 mm−1 respectively), considering the intensity excitation profile in the direction of propagation. Schematic representation (A-C) of the peak shift (green dot) of the excitation intensity distribution for single photon excitation (blue) and two-photon (red) excitation configurations. The arrows underline how the peak tends to shift back from the ideal case. While keeping constant the travel within the sample in the detection path (150μm) and varying both illumination depth and the scattering properties of the phantom sample, we were able to measure a significant shift for the single photon excitation configuration with respect to the two-photon configuration. D shows an example of the axial section of the measured intensity excitation distributions for the 1P and 2P excitation lightsheets for a phantom sample with 5 mm−1 scattering coefficient at 400 μm illumination depth. E shows the relative peak position of the uniform region with respect to the supposed focus (in a non-scattering sample) for single photon excitation at different illumination depths (400,600 and 800μm deep within the sample) while increasing the scattering coefficient of the phantom sample. 2PE allows the shift of the uniform region to be reduced. Excitation Wavelengths: λ = 488 nm (1P) and λ = 790 nm (2P) Intensity used in 1P experiments: I = 0.13 kW/cm2; Intensity used in 2P experiments: I = 19.78 kW/cm2. Detection Objective: Leica 20x, NA 0.5.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Images of different homogeneously scattering phantom samples with fluorescent beads (diameter = 0.17 μm) by means of single photon and two-photon excitation SPIM. Increasing the scattering coefficient within the sample, it is possible to appreciate how signal to noise ratio in 2PE-SPIM degrades much less in comparison to the single photon case. All images are acquired at 600 μm illumination depth within the samples. Scale bar is 5 μm. Detection objective Leica HCX APO L U-V-I 12 40X, NA 0.8.Additional magnification introduced:2,5X to get a total magnification of 100X. Intensity used in single photon experiments: I = 0.11 kW/cm2; intensity used in 2P experiments: I = 19.23 kW/cm2
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Z-stack of mammary epithelial acini (zstep 1 µm) has been acquired (see Suppl. Media 1). Only representative planes within the cell spheroids (spaced 3μm) are shown (A). Scale bar: 10 µm . Maximum intensity projection of the entire volume (B). Excitation wavelength λ = 750nm, I = 54.94 KW/cm2. Objective lens: HCX APO L U-V-I 40x/0.8 WATER.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Summary of the values obtained from the relative shift of the excitation intensity distributions peaks for both excitation schemes. Scattering coefficient is 50 mm−1.

Tables Icon

Table 2 Summary of the dimensions of the uniform intensity region within the exciting light sheet. The data shown are the mean values of 15 measurements made on calibrated samples. In the single photon excitation configuration, the area of uniformity reduces significantly by approximately 40 microns, while in the two photon excitation configuration there is no significant variation. This means that the two photon excitation light sheet is preserved more while travelling in deep scattering samples. Data refer to an illumination depth of 400μm.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

I 1P (x,y,z)= I 0 (x) e ( y 2 2 σ y 2 z 2 2 σ z 2 ) e μ s x
I 2P (x,y,z) I 0 2 (x) e ( y 2 σ y 2 z 2 σ z 2 ) e 2 μ s x
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.