OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 25 — Dec. 16, 2013
  • pp: 30204–30220

Analysis and experimental demonstration of novel 8PolSK-QPSK modulation at 5 bits/symbol for passive mitigation of nonlinear impairments

Mathieu Chagnon, Mohamed Osman, Qunbi Zhuge, Xian Xu, and David V. Plant  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 25, pp. 30204-30220 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.030204


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1631 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We propose a new modulation format providing 5 bits of information per recovered symbol while maintaining constant the total optical power. The proposed format applies a simple power constrain to the DP-8QAM format. This modulation format provides a passive way to mitigate nonlinear impairments due to Kerr effects occurring during propagation, and most specifically in the first 40 km. This report presents, to the authors’ knowledge, a new transmission format using solely phase and polarization as modulation methods. The performance of this format, named 8PolSK-QPSK, is experimentally compared with that of the DP-8QAM format as both require equal transmitter complexity and implementation penalty, at the expense of a 20% increase in signaling baud rate. The greater nonlinear tolerance of this format is experimentally demonstrated. Moreover, thorough analysis of the Manakov-PDM propagation equation applied to both formats provides analytic explanation of the 8PolSK-QPSK’s improved performance. The constant power property of the symbol set of the proposed format mitigates self- and cross-phase modulation (SPM, XPM) nonlinear effects and is experimentally validated over a long-haul transmission system in a WDM scenario. A total throughput of 7 × 129 Gbps is maintained for the transmission format comparison. Simulation of the same transmission system allows separate analysis of the strength of SPM, XPM and Cross-Polarization Modulation (XPolM) nonlinear effects and demonstrate reduced nonlinear impairments for the proposed format in the first span. We show an experimental reduction of the required OSNR for a BER threshold of 1.4 × 10−2 of 0.5 dB for 8PolSK-QPSK compared to DP-8QAM in back-to-back. After 1920 km of SMF fiber, we demonstrate a required OSNR (ROSNR) diminution for increasing launch power, allowing a ROSNR relief of 0.95 dB at optimal launch power of −1 dBm for the proposed format. Using the same threshold, we show an increased reach by more than 34%, or 975 km, at optimal launch power. We also demonstrate that the relative reach increase for 8PolSK-QPSK compared to DP-8QAM monotonically increases with increasing BER threshold and that the BER growth with distance, after the first span, is equal for both formats.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(060.0060) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics and optical communications
(060.1660) Fiber optics and optical communications : Coherent communications
(060.2330) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics communications
(190.3270) Nonlinear optics : Kerr effect

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: September 13, 2013
Revised Manuscript: November 10, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: November 14, 2013
Published: December 2, 2013

Citation
Mathieu Chagnon, Mohamed Osman, Qunbi Zhuge, Xian Xu, and David V. Plant, "Analysis and experimental demonstration of novel 8PolSK-QPSK modulation at 5 bits/symbol for passive mitigation of nonlinear impairments," Opt. Express 21, 30204-30220 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-25-30204


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset

References

  1. G. P. Agrawal, Lightwave Technology Telecommunication Systems (Wiley-Interscience, 2005).
  2. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, 2001).
  3. D. S. Millar, D. Lavery, S. Makovejs, C. Behrens, B. C. Thomsen, P. Bayvel, and S. J. Savory, “Generation and long-haul transmission of polarization-switched QPSK at 42.9 Gb/s,” Opt. Express19(10), 9296–9302 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. E. Agrell and M. Karlsson, “Power-efficient modulation formats in coherent transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol.27(22), 5115–5126 (2009). [CrossRef]
  5. Z. Chen, L. Yan, W. Pan, B. Luo, Y. Guo, H. Jiang, A. Yi, Y. Sun, and X. Wu, “Transmission of multipolarization-multiplexed signals: another freedom to explore?” Opt. Express21(9), 11590–11605 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. I. B. Djordjevic, A. Z. Jovanovic, M. Cvijetic, and Z. Peric, “Multidimensional Vector Quantization-Based Signal Constellation Design Enabling Beyond 1 Pb/s Serial Optical Transport Networks,” IEEE Photonics J.5(4), 7901312 (2013). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Chagnon, M. Osman, X. Xu, Q. Zhuge, and D. V. Plant, “Blind, fast and SOP independent polarization recovery for square dual polarization-MQAM formats and optical coherent receivers,” Opt. Express20(25), 27847–27865 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. D. Marcuse, C. R. Menyuk, and P. K. A. Wai, “Application of the Manakov-PMD equation to studies of signal propagation in optical fibers with randomly varying birefringence,” J. Lightwave Technol.15(9), 1735–1746 (1997). [CrossRef]
  9. J. Proakis, Digital Communications, 4th ed. (McGraw-Hill Science, 2000).
  10. S. Benedetto, R. Gaudino, and P. Poggiolini, “Direct detection of optical digital transmission based on polarization shift keying modulation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm.13(3), 531–542 (1995). [CrossRef]
  11. S. Benedetto and P. Poggiolini, “Theory of polarization shift keying modulation,” IEEE Trans. Commun.40(4), 708–721 (1992). [CrossRef]
  12. E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, “Carrier synchronization for 3- and 4-bit-per-symbol optical transmission,” J. Lightwave Technol.23(12), 4110–4124 (2005). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Winter, C.-A. Bunge, D. Setti, and K. Petermann, “A statistical treatment of cross-polarization modulation in DWDM systems,” J. Lightwave Technol.27(17), 3739–3751 (2009). [CrossRef]
  14. P. K. A. Wai and C. R. Menyuk, “Polarization mode dispersion, decorrelation, and diffusion in optical fibers with randomly varying birefringence,” J. Lightwave Technol.14(2), 148–157 (1996). [CrossRef]
  15. J. P. Gordon and H. Kogelnik, “PMD fundamentals: polarization mode dispersion in optical fibers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.97(9), 4541–4550 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. J. H. Lee, K. J. Park, C. H. Kim, and Y. C. Chung, “Effects of nonlinear crosstalk in optical PMD compensation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.14(8), 1082–1084 (2002). [CrossRef]
  17. M. Winter, “A statistical treatment of cross-polarization modulation in DWDM systems & its application,” Techn. Univ, Berlin, Deutsche National Bibliothek, http://d-nb.info/1009105868 (2010).
  18. M. Karlsson and H. Sunnerud, “Effects of nonlinearities on PMD-induced system impairments,” J. Lightwave Technol.24(11), 4127–4137 (2006). [CrossRef]
  19. K.-P. Ho and J. M. Kahn, “Electronic compensation technique to mitigate nonlinear phase noise,” J. Lightwave Technol.22(3), 779–783 (2004). [CrossRef]
  20. S. Kumar, “Effect of dispersion on nonlinear phase noise in optical transmission systems,” Opt. Lett.30(24), 3278–3280 (2005). [CrossRef]
  21. K.-P. Ho, “Asymptotic probability density of nonlinear phase noise,” Opt. Lett.28(15), 1350–1352 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. M. Nazarathy, W. V. Sorin, D. M. Baney, S. A. Newton, D. M. Baney, and S. A. Newton, “Spectral analysis of optical mixing measurements,” J. Lightwave Technol.7(7), 1083–1096 (1989). [CrossRef]
  23. M. Shtaif, “Analytical description of cross-phase modulation in dispersive optical fibers,” Opt. Lett.23(15), 1191–1193 (1998). [CrossRef]
  24. A. Carena, V. Curri, G. Bosco, P. Poggiolini, and F. Forghieri, “Modeling of the impact of nonlinear propagation effects in uncompensated optical coherent transmission links,” J. Lightwave Technol.30(10), 1524–1539 (2012). [CrossRef]
  25. ITU-T Rec. G. 975.1, “Forward error correction for high bit-rate DWDM submarine systems,” (2004).
  26. D. Lavery, C. Behrens, and S. J. Savory, “A comparison of modulation formats for passive optical networks,” Opt. Express19(26), B836–B841 (2011). [CrossRef]
  27. D. Chang, F. Yu, Z. Xiao, Y. Li, and N. Stojanovic, “FPGA verification of a single QC-LDPC code for 100 Gb/s optical systems without error floor down to BER of 10−15,” Proc. OFC 2011, Paper OTuN2, March2012.
  28. X. Zhou, L. Nelson, R. Isaac, P. Magill, B. Zhu, and D. Peckham, “1200km transmission of 50GHz spaced, 5×504-Gb/s PDM-32-64 hybrid QAM using electrical and optical spectral shaping,” Proc. OFC 2012, Paper OM2A.2, March2012.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited