OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 21, Iss. 9 — May. 6, 2013
  • pp: 11227–11236

Optical coupling to nanoscale optomechanical cavities for near quantum-limited motion transduction

Justin D. Cohen, Seán M. Meenehan, and Oskar Painter  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 21, Issue 9, pp. 11227-11236 (2013)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.011227


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (4062 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A significant challenge in the development of chip-scale cavity-optomechanical devices as testbeds for quantum experiments and classical metrology lies in the coupling of light from nanoscale optical mode volumes to conventional optical components such as lenses and fibers. In this work we demonstrate a high-efficiency, single-sided fiber-optic coupling platform for optomechanical cavities. By utilizing an adiabatic waveguide taper to transform a single optical mode between a photonic crystal zipper cavity and a permanently mounted fiber, we achieve a collection efficiency for intracavity photons of 52% at the cavity resonance wavelength of λ ≈ 1538 nm. An optical balanced homodyne measurement of the displacement fluctuations of the fundamental in-plane mechanical resonance at 3.3 MHz reveals that the imprecision noise floor lies a factor of 2.8 above the standard quantum limit (SQL) for continuous position measurement, with a predicted total added noise of 1.4 phonons at the optimal probe power. The combination of extremely low measurement noise and robust fiber alignment presents significant progress towards single-phonon sensitivity for these sorts of integrated micro-optomechanical cavities.

© 2013 OSA

OCIS Codes
(230.3120) Optical devices : Integrated optics devices
(350.4238) Other areas of optics : Nanophotonics and photonic crystals
(280.4788) Remote sensing and sensors : Optical sensing and sensors
(230.5298) Optical devices : Photonic crystals
(120.4880) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Optomechanics

ToC Category:
Optical Devices

History
Original Manuscript: February 8, 2013
Revised Manuscript: April 22, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: April 22, 2013
Published: May 1, 2013

Citation
Justin D. Cohen, Seán M. Meenehan, and Oskar Painter, "Optical coupling to nanoscale optomechanical cavities for near quantum-limited motion transduction," Opt. Express 21, 11227-11236 (2013)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-9-11227


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. Eichenfield, J. Chan, R. M. Camacho, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, “Optomechanical crystals,” Nature462, 78–82 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. J. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. Harlow, M. Allman, K. Cicak, A. Siroi, J. Whittaker, K. Lehnert, and R. Simmonds, “Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state,” Nature475, 359–363 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. J. Chan, T. Mayer-Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gröblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, “Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state,” Nature478, 89–92 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. M. Eichenfield, R. Camacho, J. Chan, K. J. Vahala, and O. J. Painter, “A picogram- and nanometre-scale photonic-crystal optomechanical cavity,” Nature459, 550–555 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Introduction to quantum noise, measurement and amplification,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155–1208 (2010). [CrossRef]
  6. J. Teufel, T. Donner, M. Castellanos-Beltran, J. Harlow, and K. Lehnert, “Nanomechanical motion measured with an imprecision below that at the standard quantum limit,” Nature Nanotech.4, 820–823 (2009). [CrossRef]
  7. G. Anetsberger, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, Q. Unterreithmeier, E. Weig, M. Gorodetsky, J. Kotthaus, and T. Kippenberg, “Measuring nanomechanical motion with an imprecision below the standard quantum limit,” Phys. Rev. A82, 061804 (2010). [CrossRef]
  8. R. Rivière, S. Deléglise, S. Weis, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. Kippenberg, “Optomechanical sideband cooling of a micromechanical oscillator close to the quantum ground state,” Phys. Rev. A83, 063835 (2011). [CrossRef]
  9. S. Gröblacher, J. B. Hertzberg, M. R. Vanner, G. D. Cole, S. Gigan, K. C. Schwab, and M. Aspelmeyer, “Demonstration of an ultracold micro-optomechanical oscillator in a cryogenic cavity,” Nature Phys.5, 485–488 (2009). [CrossRef]
  10. C. Michael, M. Borselli, T. Johnson, C. Chrystal, and O. Painter, “An optical fiber-taper probe for wafer-scale microphotonic device characterization,” Opt. Express15, 4745–4752 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. S. Spillane, T. Kippenberg, O. Painter, and K. Vahala, “Ideality in a fiber-taper-coupled microresonator system for application to cavity quantum electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 043902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. O. Mitomi, K. Kasaya, and H. Miyazawa, “Design of a single-mode tapered waveguide for low-loss chip-to-fiber coupling,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.30, 1787–1793 (1994). [CrossRef]
  13. V. R. Almeida, R. R. Panepucci, and M. Lipson, “Nanotaper for compact mode conversion,” Opt. Lett.28, 1302–1304 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. S. J. McNab, N. Moll, and Y. A. Vlasov, “Ultra-low loss photonic integrated circuit with membrane-type photonic crystal waveguids,” Opt. Express11, 2927–2939 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. L. Chen, C. R. Doerr, Y.-K. Chen, and T.-Y. Liow, “Low-loss and broadband cantilever couplers between standard cleaved fibers and high-index-contrast Si3N4 or Si waveguides,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.22, 1744–1746 (2010). [CrossRef]
  16. COMSOL Multiphysics http://www.comsol.com/ .
  17. A. W. Snyder and J. D. Love, Optical Waveguide Theory (Springer, 1983).
  18. Lumerical Solutions Inc., http://www.lumerical.com/tcad-products/fdtd/ .
  19. Potentially, the use of a lensed or small-mode-field-diameter fiber could allow for a larger initial waveguide width, correspondingly shorter tapering region, and the ability to eliminate the support tether. However such an approach would be less robust to slight fiber misalignments arising from fabrication variability of the V-groove size on the order of 100 – 200 nm. These misalignments are small relative to the 10 μm mode diameter used in the reported device, but would cause substantial mode-mismatch in any scheme with a short waveguide taper. The optimal mode-matching of the junction would also likely be diminished, as increased mode confinement in the waveguide tip would render the profile less circularly symmetric.
  20. Q. Lin, J. Rosenberg, X. Jiang, K. Vahala, and O. Painter, “Mechanical Oscillation and cooling actuated by the optical gradient force,” Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 10360 (2009). [CrossRef]
  21. While in principle both intensity and phase noise of the laser can contribute to the heating of the mechanical mode, for an optically resonant measurement of position in the sideband unresolved regime the phase noise does not contribute to backaction and only intensity noise affects the mechanics. In this regime the phase noise adds a small component to the imprecision noise floor. Measurements of the phase and intensity noise of our laser reveal no excess intensity noise and a flat frequency NPSD of Sωω= 5 × 103rad2Hz in the frequency range of interest. Consequently, for the probe powers used in this work, the excess back-action due to technical laser noise is negligible, and the phase noise contribution to the noise floor lies roughly 60 dB below the shot noise.
  22. P. Rabl, C. Genes, K. Hammerer, and M. Aspelmeyer, “Phase-noise induced limitations on cooling and coherent evolution in optomechanical systems,” Phys. Rev. A80, 063819 (2009). [CrossRef]
  23. A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. Chan, J. T. Hill, S. Gröblacher, H. Miao, Y. Chen, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, “Laser noise in cavity-optomechanical cooling and thermometry,” New J. Phys.15, 035007 (2013). [CrossRef]
  24. A. M. Jayich, J. C. Sankey, K. Bjorke, D. Lee, C. Yang, M. Underwood, L. Childress, A. Petrenko, S. M. Girvin, and J. G. E. Harris, “Cryogenic optomechanics with a Si3N4 membrane and classical laser noise,” New J. Phys.14, 115018 (2012). [CrossRef]
  25. T. P. Purdy, R. W. Peterson, and C. A. Regal, “Observation of radiation pressure shot noise on a macroscopic object,” Science339, 801–804 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, S. Gigan, and M. Aspelmeyer, “Ground-state cooling of a micromechanical oscillator: Comparing cold damping and cavity-assisted cooling schemes,” Phys. Rev. A77, 033804 (2008). [CrossRef]
  27. K. D. Bouwmeester and D. Bouwmeester, “Sub-kelvin optical cooling of a micromechanical resonator,” Nature444, 75–78 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited