OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 22, Iss. 11 — Jun. 2, 2014
  • pp: 12924–12934

Fizeau interferometric cophasing of segmented mirrors: experimental validation

Anthony Cheetham, Nick Cvetojevic, Barnaby Norris, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, and Peter Tuthill  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 22, Issue 11, pp. 12924-12934 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.012924


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (741 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present an optical testbed demonstration of the Fizeau Interferometric Cophasing of Segmented Mirrors (FICSM) algorithm. FICSM allows a segmented mirror to be phased with a science imaging detector and three filters (selected among the normal science complement). It requires no specialised, dedicated wavefront sensing hardware. Applying random piston and tip/tilt aberrations of more than 5 wavelengths to a small segmented mirror array produced an initial unphased point spread function with an estimated Strehl ratio of 9% that served as the starting point for our phasing algorithm. After using the FICSM algorithm to cophase the pupil, we estimated a Strehl ratio of 94% based on a comparison between our data and simulated encircled energy metrics. Our final image quality is limited by the accuracy of our segment actuation, which yields a root mean square (RMS) wavefront error of 25 nm. This is the first hardware demonstration of coarse and fine phasing an 18-segment pupil with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) geometry using a single algorithm. FICSM can be implemented on JWST using any of its scientic imaging cameras making it useful as a fall-back in the event that accepted phasing strategies encounter problems. We present an operational sequence that would co-phase such an 18-segment primary in 3 sequential iterations of the FICSM algorithm. Similar sequences can be readily devised for any segmented mirror.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(120.3180) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Interferometry
(120.6085) Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology : Space instrumentation
(110.1080) Imaging systems : Active or adaptive optics

ToC Category:
Instrumentation, Measurement, and Metrology

History
Original Manuscript: February 5, 2014
Revised Manuscript: April 4, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: April 10, 2014
Published: May 21, 2014

Citation
Anthony Cheetham, Nick Cvetojevic, Barnaby Norris, Anand Sivaramakrishnan, and Peter Tuthill, "Fizeau interferometric cophasing of segmented mirrors: experimental validation," Opt. Express 22, 12924-12934 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-22-11-12924


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. E. Nelson, “The University of California 10-m telescope project,” J. Opt. Soc. Am., 69, 1436 (1979).
  2. J. E. Nelson, “Design concepts for the California extremely large telescope (CELT)”, Proc. SPIE, 4004, 282–289 (2000). [CrossRef]
  3. R. Gilmozzi, “Science and technology drivers for future giant telescopes”, Proc. SPIE, 5489, 1–10 (2000). [CrossRef]
  4. G. Chanan, M. Troy, F. Dekens, S. Michaels, J. Nelson, T. Mast, D. Kirkman, “Phasing the mirror segments of the Keck telescopes: the broadband phasing algorithm,” Appl. Opt. 37, 140–155 (1998). [CrossRef]
  5. G. Chanan, C. Ohara, M. Troy, “Phasing the mirror segments of the Keck telescopes II: the narrow-band phasing algorithm,” Appl. Opt. 39, 4706–4714 (2000). [CrossRef]
  6. D. S. Acton, T. Towell, J. Schwenker, J. Swensen, D. Shields, E. Sabatke, L. Klingemann, A. R. Contos, B. Bauer, K. Hansen, “Demonstration of the James Webb Space Telescope commissioning on the JWST testbed telescope”, Proc. SPIE, 6265, 62650R (2006). [CrossRef]
  7. D. S. Acton, T. Towell, J. Schwenker, D. Shields, E. Sabatke, A. R. Contos, K. Hansen, S. Fang, D. Bruce, S. Smith, “End-to-end commissioning demonstration of the James Webb Space Telescope”, Proc. SPIE, 6687, 6687E (2007).
  8. J. R. Fienup, J. C. Marron, T. J. Schulz, J. H. Seldin, “Hubble Space Telescope characterized by using phase-retrieval algorithms”, Appl. Opt., 32, 1747–1767 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. A. Sivaramakrishnan, R. Soummer, L. Pueyo, J. K. Wallace, M. Shao, “Sensing phase aberrations behind Lyot coronagraphs”, Astrophys. J., 688, 701–708 (2008). [CrossRef]
  10. J. E. Krist, C. J. Burrows, “Phase-retrieval analysis of pre-and post-repair Hubble Space Telescope images”, Appl. Opt., 34, 4951–4964 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. Cheetham, Cophasing JWST’s segmented mirror using sparse aperture interferometry (University of Sydney Hons. Thesis, 2011).
  12. A. Cheetham, P. Tuthill, A. Sivaramakrishnan, J. Lloyd, “Fizeau interferometric cophasing of segmented mirrors,” Opt. Express 20, 29457–29471 (2012). [CrossRef]
  13. A. Wirth, “Dispersed Hartmann sensor and method for mirror segment alignment and phasing”, https://www.google.com/patents/US6649895 , US Patent 6, 649,895 (2003).
  14. F. Shi, C. M. Ohara, G. Chanan, M. Troy, D. C. Redding, “Experimental verification of dispersed fringe sensing as a segment-phasing technique using the Keck Telescope”, Proc. SPIE, 5489, 1061–1073 (2004). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Monnier, P. Tuthill, M. Ireland, R. Cohen, A. Tannirkulam, M. Perrin, “Mid-infrared size survey of young stellar objects: description of Keck segment-tilting experiment and basic results,” Astrophys. J. 700, 491 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. E. Sabatke, J. Burge, D. Sabatke, “Analytic diffraction analysis of a 32-m telescope with hexagonal segments for high-contrast imaging,” Appl. Opt. 44, 1360–1365 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. M. Helmbrecht, M. He, T. Juneau, M. Hart, N. Doble, “Segmented MEMS deformable-mirror for wavefront correction”, Proc. SPIE, 6376, 63760D (2006). [CrossRef]
  18. J. Daniel, T. Hull, J. B. Barentine, “JWST: Tinsley achievements on the largest beryllium polishing project”, Proc. SPIE, 8450, 845021 (2012). [CrossRef]
  19. C. Neyman, R. Flicker, S. Panteleev, “Effect of Keck segment figure errors on Keck AO performance”, Keck Adaptive Optics Note469 (2007).
  20. M. Helmbrecht, M. He, C. Kempf, M. Besse, “MEMS DM development at Iris AO, Inc.”, Proc. SPIE, 7931, 793108 (2011). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1: Fig. 2: Fig. 3:
 
Fig. 4:
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited