OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 22, Iss. 3 — Feb. 10, 2014
  • pp: 2193–2206

3D holographic printer: Fast printing approach

Alexander V. Morozov, Andrey N. Putilin, Sergey S. Kopenkin, Yuriy P. Borodin, Vladislav V. Druzhin, Sergey E. Dubynin, and German B. Dubinin  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 2193-2206 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.002193


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (1756 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

This article describes the general operation principles of devices for synthesized holographic images such as holographic printers. Special emphasis is placed on the printing speed. In addition, various methods to increase the printing process are described and compared.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(210.2860) Optical data storage : Holographic and volume memories
(230.3120) Optical devices : Integrated optics devices
(230.7370) Optical devices : Waveguides

ToC Category:
Holography

History
Original Manuscript: October 24, 2013
Revised Manuscript: December 13, 2013
Manuscript Accepted: December 15, 2013
Published: January 27, 2014

Citation
Alexander V. Morozov, Andrey N. Putilin, Sergey S. Kopenkin, Yuriy P. Borodin, Vladislav V. Druzhin, Sergey E. Dubynin, and German B. Dubinin, "3D holographic printer: Fast printing approach," Opt. Express 22, 2193-2206 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-22-3-2193


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S.A. Benton, V.M. Bove, Holographic Imaging (Wiley-Interscience, 2008), 1. [CrossRef]
  2. H. Kogelnik, “Couple wave theory for thick hologram gratings,” Bell System Technical Journal 48, 2909–2949 (1969). [CrossRef]
  3. Michael Klug, Mark Holzbach, Alejandro Ferdman, “Method and apparatus for recording one-step, full-color, full-parallax, holographic stereograms,” (2001). US patent 6330088 B1, Dec. 11, 2001.
  4. David Brotherton-Ratcliffe, Stanislovas J. Zacharovas, Ramunas J. Bakanas, Julius Pileckas, Andrej Nikolskij, Jevgenij Kuchin, “Digital holographic printing using pulsed RGB lasers,” Opt. Eng. 50(9), 091307 (2011).
  5. Craig Newswanger, Pankaj Lad, Robert L. Sitton, Qiang Huang, Michael A. Klug, Mark E. Holzbach, “Pulsed-laser systems and methods for producing holographic stereograms,” (19-Oct.-2004). US 6806982 B2.
  6. Michael J. Kidger, Fundamental Optical Design (Society of Photo Optical, 2002).
  7. Equation (2) is written in the square hogel form.
  8. Keehoon Hong, Soon-gi Park, Jiwoon Yeom, Jonghyun Kim, Ni Chen, Kyungsuk Pyun, Chilsung Choi, Sunil Kim, Jungkwuen An, Hong-Seok Lee, U-in Chung, Byoungho Lee, “Resolution enhancement of holographic printer using a hogel overlapping method,” Opt. Express 21, 14047–14055 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. David Brotherton-Ratcliffe, Florian Michael Robert Vergnes, Alexey Rodin, Mikhail Grichine, “Holographic printer,” (2005). US patent 6930811 B2, Aug. 16, 2005.
  10. Equation (6) is written for the case when the speed of the material is the same in each direction.
  11. H.I. Bjelkhagen, “Silver Halide Recording Materials for Holography and Their Processing,” Springer Series in Optical Sciences, Vol. 66(Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York1993).
  12. Friedrich-Karl Bruder, Francois Deuber, Thomas Fcke, Rainer Hagen, Dennis Hnel, David Jurbergs, Thomas Rlle, Marc-Stephan Weiser, “Reaction-diffusion model applied to high resolution Bayfol HX photopolymer,”Proceedings of SPIE 7619, 76190I(2010). [CrossRef]
  13. Horst Berneth, Friedrich-Karl Bruder, Thomas Fcke, Rainer Hagen, Dennis Hnel, Thomas Rlle, Gnther Walze, Marc-Stephan Weiser, “Holographic recordings with high beam ratios on improved Bayfol HX photopolymer,”Proceedings of SPIE 8776, 877603 (2013). [CrossRef]
  14. Viktor N. Mikhailov, K. T. Weitzel, Vitaly N. Krylov, Urs P. Wild, “Pulse hologram recording in dupont’s photopolymer films,” Proc. SPIE 3011, 200–202 (1997). [CrossRef]
  15. Viktor N. Mikhailov, K. T. Weitzel, Tatiana Y. Latychevskaia, Vitaly N. Krylov, Urs P. Wild, “Pulse recording of slanted fringe holograms in dupont photopolymer,” Proceedings of SPIE 3294, 132–135 (1998). [CrossRef]
  16. H.J. Caulfield, Handbook of Optical Holography (Academic Press, 1980).
  17. The coefficient 2 before root sign takes into account the situation when the acceleration and deceleration are equal.
  18. In our experimental setup we are using 4F optical system to be able to simple modify it for implementing different multi-hogel printing techniques.
  19. Kyungsuk Pyun, Chilsung Choi, Alexander Morozov, Sunil Kim, Jungkwuen An, Hong-seok Lee, Uni Chung, “Integrated Hologram Optical Head for Holographic Printer,” in Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Imaging, OSA Technical Digest (online), Optical Society of America (2013), paper DW4A.2. [CrossRef]
  20. Note that, the total exposure time has not changed. However, the time required to record one hogel will depend on the number of simultaneous recorded hogels and will be equal to τM2=d2SPεM2. Therefore, the required waiting time must be increased because of the increased single hogel exposure time. It is impossible to define the changes in the waiting time because it depends on the real exposure time, wavelength, and rigidity of the entire system. As such, in the future, we will not take into account the waiting time changes, which is true for very short exposure times as well as a low M.
  21. Andrew N. Putilin, Alexander V. Morozov, Ivan V. Bovsunovskiy, “Optical device with Fourier transforming optical components for one step multi-micro-hologram recording using wedge system,” (2012). Russian Patent Application RU 2012127529, July 03, 2012.
  22. Eqs. (15), (17), and (19) are true for the case for the field of view of a synthesized holographic image recorded using the single hogel printing technique and is equal to the field of view of the image recoded using the spatial hogel spectra splitting technology if and only if both designs used the same SLM.
  23. The maximum permissible value of the numerical aperture for the Fourier transforming system containing a large linear field was 0.76.
  24. For simplicity, a SLM with a pixel number equal to N and an aspect ratio of 1:1 is used.
  25. Andrew N. Putilin, Alexander V. Morozov, Ivan V. Bovsunovskiy, “Optical device with multi aperture Fourier transforming optical components for one step multi-micro-hologram recording,” (2012). Russian Patent Application RU 2012120356, May 17, 2012.
  26. In the above calculations, the exposure time (τ), moving time (tmove), waiting time (twait), and time for scheme shift (tshift) are 0, 10, 50, and 5 ms, respectively. The maximum numerical aperture of the Fourier transforming optical system was set to 0.76.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited