OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Andrew M. Weiner
  • Vol. 22, Iss. 9 — May. 5, 2014
  • pp: 10761–10774

Edge effect modeling and experiments on active lap processing

Haitao Liu, Fan Wu, Zhige Zeng, Bin Fan, and Yongjian Wan  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 22, Issue 9, pp. 10761-10774 (2014)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.010761


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (2267 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Edge effect is regarded as one of the most difficult technical issues for fabricating large primary mirrors, especially for large polishing tools. Computer controlled active lap (CCAL) uses a large size pad (e.g., 1/3 to 1/5 workpiece diameters) to grind and polish the primary mirror. Edge effect also exists in the CCAL process in our previous fabrication. In this paper the material removal rules when edge effects happen (i.e. edge tool influence functions (TIFs)) are obtained through experiments, which are carried out on a Φ1090-mm circular flat mirror with a 375-mm-diameter lap. Two methods are proposed to model the edge TIFs for CCAL. One is adopting the pressure distribution which is calculated based on the finite element analysis method. The other is building up a parametric equivalent pressure model to fit the removed material curve directly. Experimental results show that these two methods both effectively model the edge TIF of CCAL.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(220.0220) Optical design and fabrication : Optical design and fabrication
(220.4610) Optical design and fabrication : Optical fabrication
(220.5450) Optical design and fabrication : Polishing

ToC Category:
Geometric Optics

History
Original Manuscript: January 6, 2014
Revised Manuscript: March 27, 2014
Manuscript Accepted: April 3, 2014
Published: April 28, 2014

Citation
Haitao Liu, Fan Wu, Zhige Zeng, Bin Fan, and Yongjian Wan, "Edge effect modeling and experiments on active lap processing," Opt. Express 22, 10761-10774 (2014)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-22-9-10761


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. Johns, “The Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT),” Proc. SPIE 6986, 698603 (2008). [CrossRef]
  2. M. Cayrel, “E-ELT optomechanics: Overview,” Proc. SPIE 8444, 84441X (2012). [CrossRef]
  3. M. Clampin, “Status of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST),” Proc. SPIE 7010, 70100L (2008). [CrossRef]
  4. R. A. Jones, “Computer-controlled optical surfacing with orbital tool motion,” Opt. Eng. 25(6), 785–790 (1986). [CrossRef]
  5. E. Luna-Aguilar, A. Cordero-Davila, J. Gonzalez Garcia, M. Nunez-Alfonso, V. H. Cabrera-Pelaez, C. Robledo-Sanchez, J. Cuautle-Cortez, M. H. Pedrayes-Lopez, “Edge effects with Preston equation,” Proc. SPIE 4840, 598–603 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. A. Cordero-Dávila, J. González-García, M. Pedrayes-López, L. A. Aguilar-Chiu, J. Cuautle-Cortés, C. Robledo-Sánchez, “Edge effects with the Preston equation for a circular tool and workpiece,” Appl. Opt. 43(6), 1250–1254 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Y. Han, F. Wu, Y. J. Wan, “Pressure distribution model in edge effect,” Proc. SPIE 7282, 72822Q (2009). [CrossRef]
  8. D. W. Kim, W. H. Park, S. W. Kim, J. H. Burge, “Parametric modeling of edge effects for polishing tool influence functions,” Opt. Express 17(7), 5656–5665 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. H. Hu, Y. Dai, X. Peng, J. Wang, “Research on reducing the edge effect in magnetorheological finishing,” Appl. Opt. 50(9), 1220–1226 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. D. D. Walker, G. Yu, H. Li, W. Messelink, R. Evans, A. Beaucamp, “Edges in CNC polishing: from mirror-segments towards semiconductors, paper 1: edges on processing the global surface,” Opt. Express 20(18), 19787–19798 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. H. Li, G. Yu, D. Walker, R. Evans, “Modelling and measurement of polishing tool influence functions for edge control,” J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rap. Publ. 6, 110480 (2011).
  12. H. Li, D. Walker, G. Yu, A. Sayle, W. Messelink, R. Evans, A. Beaucamp, “Edge control in CNC polishing, paper 2: simulation and validation of tool influence functions on edges,” Opt. Express 21(1), 370–381 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. L. Haitao, Z. Zhige, W. Fan, F. Bin, W. Yongjian, “Study on active lap tool influence function in grinding 1.8 m primary mirror,” Appl. Opt. 52(31), 7504–7511 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. F. Preston, “The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines,” J. Soc. Glass Technol. 9, 214–256 (1927).
  15. D. W. Kim, S. W. Kim, J. H. Burge, “Non-sequential optimization technique for a computer controlled optical surfacing process using multiple tool influence functions,” Opt. Express 17(24), 21850–21866 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. H. Liu, Z. Zeng, F. Wu, B. Fan, Y. Wan, “Improvement of active lap in the grinding of a 1.8m honeycomb primary mirror,” AOMMAT, in press.

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited