OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: J. H. Eberly
  • Vol. 4, Iss. 1 — Jan. 4, 1999
  • pp: 33–42

Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with clustered lumpy backgrounds

François O. Bochud, Craig K. Abbey, and Miguel P. Eckstein  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 33-42 (1999)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.4.000033


View Full Text Article

Enhanced HTML    Acrobat PDF (262 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Realistic anatomical images are useful for assessment and improvement of medical image quality. The use of synthesized images has the advantage of providing the user with a large number of independent samples, in a controlled environment. We propose a method to generate medical textures that are fully defined by a set of adjustable parameters and a random number generator, and which statistical properties are analytically tractable. This method, called the “clustered lumpy background”, is a generalization of the original lumpy background described by Rolland and Barrett (1992). A detailed application of the method in the case of mammography is presented. It is shown that the synthesized images are visually very similar and that their first and second order statistics can be considered as being equivalent.

© Optical Society of America

OCIS Codes
(100.0100) Image processing : Image processing
(170.3830) Medical optics and biotechnology : Mammography
(170.7440) Medical optics and biotechnology : X-ray imaging

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: November 16, 1998
Published: January 4, 1999

Citation
Francois Bochud, Craig Abbey, and Miguel Eckstein, "Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds," Opt. Express 4, 33-42 (1999)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-4-1-33


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Petrosian, H. P. Chan, M. A. Helvie, M. M. Goodsitt and D. D. Adler, "Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: classification of mass and normal tissue by texture analysis," Phys. Med. Biol. 39, 2273-2288 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. H. P. Chan, W. Wei, M. A. Helvie, B. Sahiner, D.D. Adler, M. M. Goodsitt and N. Petrick, "Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture space," Phys. Med. Biol. 40, 857-876 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. P. Caligiuri, M. L. Giger and M. Favus, "Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis," Med. Phys. 21, 503- 508 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. G. Revesz, H. L. Kundel and M. A. Graber, "The influence of structured noise on the detection of radiologic abnormalities," Am. J. Roentgenol. 9, 479-486 (1974).
  5. J. Moshita, K. Doi, S. Katsuragawa, L. Monnier-Cholley and H. MacMahon, "Computer aided diagnostic for interstitial infiltrates in chest radiographs: Optical-density dependence of texture measures," Med. Phys. 22, 1515- 1523 (1995). [CrossRef]
  6. J. W. Allison, L.L. Barr, R. J. Massoth, G. P. Berg, B. H. Krasner and B. S. Garra, "Understanding the process of quantitative ultrasonic tissue characterization," RadioGraphics 14, 1099-1108 (1994). [PubMed]
  7. T. Kobayashi, X. W. Xu, H. MacMahon, C. E. Metz and K. Doi, "Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs," Radiology 199, 843-848 (1996). [PubMed]
  8. E. Samei, M. J. Flynn and W. R. Eyler, "Simulation of subtle lung Nodules in projection chest radiography," Radiology 202, 117-124 (1997). [PubMed]
  9. A. J. Mendez, P. G. Tahoces, M. J. Lado, M. Souto and J. J. Vidal, "Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms," Med. Phys. 25, 957-964, (1998). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. W. Zhang, K. Doi, M. L. Giger, Y. Wu, R. M. Nishikawa and R. A. Schmidt, "Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network," Med. Phys. 21, 517-524 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. C. Kimme-Smith, M. McCombs, R. H. Gold and L. W. Bassett, "Mammography fixed grid versus reciprocating grid: Evaluation using cadaveric breasts as test objects," Med. Phys. 23, 141-147 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. R. F. Wagner and K. E. Weaver, "An assortment of image quality indices for radiographic film-screen combinations - can they be resolved?," proceedings SPIE 35, 83-94 (1972). [CrossRef]
  13. A. E. Burgess, "Statistically defined backgrounds: Performance of a modified nonprewhitening observer model," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1237-1242 (1994). [CrossRef]
  14. M. P. Eckstein, C. K. Abbey and J. S. Whiting, "Human versus model observers in anatomic backgrounds," proceedings SPIE 3340, 16-26 (1998). [CrossRef]
  15. H. H. Barrett, "Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7, 1266-1278 (1990). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. E. Burgess and H. Ghandeharian, "Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1, 900-905 (1984). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. K. J. Myers, H. H. Barrett, M. C. Borgstrom, D. D. Patton and G. W. Seeley, "Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1752-1759 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. M. P. Eckstein and J. S. Whiting, "Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13, 1777-1787 (1996). [CrossRef]
  19. J. P. Rolland and H. H. Barrett, "Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9, 649-658 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. C. K. Abbey, H. H. Barrett, and D. W. Wilson, "Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm," proceedings SPIE 2712, 47-58 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. J. P. Rolland and R. N. Strickland, "An approach to the synthesis of biological tissue," Opt. Express 1, 414-423 (1997). http://epubs.osa.org/oearchive/source/2850.htm [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. E. P. Simoncelli, W. T. Freeman, E. H. Adelson and D. J. Heeger, "Shiftable multi-scale transforms," Trans. on Info. Theory, Special Issue on Wavelets 38, 587-607 (1992).
  23. B. Picinbono, Random Signals and systems (Prentice Hall International, 1993), p.182.
  24. A. Papoulis, Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes (McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1991), p.453.
  25. A. Papoulis, Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes (McGraw-Hill, Inc, 1991), p.419.
  26. J. P. Rolland, Factors influencing lesion detection in medical imaging (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, 1990).
  27. F. O. Bochud, F. R. Verdun, C. Hessler and J. F. Valley, "Detectability on radiological images: The effect of the anatomical noise," proceedings SPIE 2436, 156-164 (1995). [CrossRef]
  28. H. H. Barrett, J. L. Denny, R. F. Wagner and K. J. Myers, "Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 834-852 (1995). [CrossRef]
  29. A. E. Burgess, X. Li, and C. K. Abbey, "Visual signal detectability with two noise components: anomalous masking effects," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2420-2442 (1997). [CrossRef]
  30. J. C. Dainty and R. Shaw, Image Science (Academic, London, 1974).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 

« Previous Article

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited