OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Michael Duncan
  • Vol. 13, Iss. 10 — May. 16, 2005
  • pp: 3862–3867
« Show journal navigation

Deterministic approach to the generation of modified helical beams for optical manipulation

J. Lin, X.-C. Yuan, S. H. Tao, X. Peng, and H. B. Niu  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 13, Issue 10, pp. 3862-3867 (2005)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.003862


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (180 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present a deterministic method to generate modified helical beams which create optical vortices with desired dark core intensity patterns in the far-field. The experiments are implemented and verified by a spatial light modulator (SLM), which imprints a phase function onto the incident wavefront of a TEM00 laser mode to transform the incident beam into a modified helical beam. The phase function can be calculated once a specific dark core shape of an optical vortex is required. The modified helical beam is exploited in optical manipulation with verification of its orbital angular momentum experimentally.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

Optical tweezers, pioneered by Arthur Ashkin in the mid-1980s [1

1. A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, “Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles,” Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], utilize a single tightly focused laser beam to create strong gradient force for trapping. Nowadays, optical tweezers have widely been used in various areas such as physics, chemistry and biology in particular. Based on the choice of different laser beam modes, optical tweezers can trap either high-index or low-index particles. For example, a conventional Gaussian beam traps a high-index particle with refractive index higher than that of the surroundings. The low-index particles can be trapped at the dark core of a vortex beam [2

2. K. T. Gahagan and G. A. Swartzlander Jr., “Optical vortex trapping of particles,” Opt. Lett. 21, 827–829 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], which is also commonly known as a helical beam. Apart from the ability of trapping low-index particles, vortex beams usually carry orbital angular momentum which can be transferred to the trapped particles and therefore induces rotation [3

3. H. He, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Optical particle trapping with higher-order doughnut beams produced using high efficiency computer generated holograms,” J. Mod. Opt. 42, 217–223 (1995). [CrossRef]

, 4

4. M. E. J. Friese, J. Enger, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and N. R. Heckenberg, “Optical angular-momentum transfer to trapped absorbing particles,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1593–1596 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

A conventional helical beam can be approximated by the phase function exp(ilθ), where the integer l is the topological charge and θ is the azimuth angle in the polar coordinates. The phase structure represented by the phase function is a |l|-started helicoids and the sign of l determines the spiral direction. The phase function of a modified helical beam can be written in a generalized form of exp[(θ)], where φ(θ) represents the phase values and φ(θ)= in the case of conventional helical beam. According to Ref. [5

5. J. E. Curtis and D. G. Grier, “Modulated optical vortices,” Opt. Lett. 28, 872–874 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the radius of the maximum intensity of optical vortex at certain azimuth angle in the focal plane after the modified helical beam passing through a focusing lens is

RI(θ)=aIλNA[1+1bIdφ(θ)dθ]
(1)

where aI and bI are constants depending on the beam’s radial amplitude profile, λ is the wavelength of light and NA is the numerical aperture of the focusing lens. Obviously, RI (θ) forms a close loop about the origin. Compared to the circumference of dark core of optical vortex, the maximum intensity loop RI (θ) is not easy to be visualized in terms of an intensity pattern. So the main purpose of this paper is to realize optical vortex with a desired dark core shape. Apparently the perimeter of the dark core is not exactly the loop RI (θ). For the sake of brevity, the perimeter of the dark core is referred to as the perimeter below. Since the experimental result in Ref. 5 indicated that the perimeter almost kept the same shape as the maximum intensity loop, it is reasonable to suggest that the perimeter of the dark core R(θ) is also dependent on the phase gradient d φ(θ) linearly

R(θ)=aλNA[1+1bdφ(θ)dθ]=abλNA[b+dφ(θ)dθ]
(2)

where a and b are constants. For conventional helical beams, since the phase gradient is determined as a constant l, the perimeter is formed in a circular shape. For modified helical beams, since the phase values can be modified to increase by the azimuth angle in a nonlinear fashion, it results in different local radii at different angles. The term of (b×NA) in Eq. (2) can be neglected during the calculation of the specific phase function because it does not affect the shape of the perimeter but only the size, whereas the size can be altered by choosing different focusing lens later.

Rewrite Eq. (2)

R(θ)b+dφ(θ)dθ
(3)

Given phase function φ(θ) in a range between 0 and l×2π, where l is the overall topological charge of the modified optical vortex, and in order to keep the overall topological charge as an integer l, we assume

R(θ)=02πR(t)dt2π(l+b)[b+dφ(θ)dθ]
(4)

Now, if a certain shape of the perimeter R(θ) is determined in Eq. (4), then the phase function φ(θ) can be expressed as

φ(θ)=2π(l+b)0θR(t)dt02πR(t)dtbθ
(5)

where we assume φ(0)=0.

In this paper, without losing generality, only polygonal perimeter is discussed because polygons approximate most of the useful shapes. Consider a generalized polygon with n vertices (P 1, P 2,…P n-1, Pn ). For the sake of simplicity, vertex P 1 is rotated onto the axis θ=0.

Fig. 1. Desired polygonal perimeter R(θ) of dark core

The polygonal perimeter can be expressed as follows:

R(θ)={r1r2sinθ2r2sin(θθ2)r1sinθfor0θ<θ2r2r3sin(θ2θ3)r3sin(θθ3)r2sin(θθ2)forθ2θ<θ3riri+1sin(θiθi+1)ri+1sin(θθi+1)risin(θθi)forθiθ<θi+1,2in1rn1rnsin(θn1θn)rnsin(θθn)rn1sin(θθn1)forθn1θ<θnrnr1sinθnr1sinθrnsin(θθn)forθnθ<2π
(6)

Insert Eq. (6) into Eq. (5), the phase function is determined by

φ(θ)=2π(l+b)I(θ)Itotalbθ
(7)

where

I(θ)={D1,2[lntan(θα2)lntan(α2)]for0θ<θ2D2,3lntan(θα2)D1,2lntan(α2)+(D1,2D2,3)lntan(θ2α2)forθ2θ<θ3Di,i+1lntan(θα2)D1,2lntan(α2)+m=1i1(Dm,m+1Dm+1,m+2)lntan(θm+1α2)forθiθ<θi+1Dn1,nlntan(θα2)D1,2lntan(α2)+m=1n2(Dm,m+1Dm+1,m+2)lntan(θm+1α2)forθn1θ<θnDn,1lntan(θα2)D1,2lntan(α2)+(Dn1,nDn,1)lntan(θnα2)+m=1n2(Dm,m+1Dm+1,m+2)lntan(θm+1α2)forθnθ<2π,

α=tan1(r2sinθ2r1sinθ1r2cosθ2r1cosθ1),

Dp,q=rprqsin(θpθq)[(rqcosθqrpcosθp)2+(rqsinθqrpsinθp)2]12,

Itotal=(Dn,1D1,2)lntan(α2)+(Dn1,nDn,1)lntan(θnα2)+m=1n2(Dm,m+1Dm+1,m+2)lntan(θm+1α2)

and 2≤in-1.

Now the only undetermined parameter in Eq. (7) is the constant b. Consider the simplest polygon case, i.e. a triangle with l=10. The amplitude of the modified helical beam is given as ψ(r,θ)=exp(-r 2/w02)×exp[(θ)], where w 0 is the beam waist. It is shown in Fig. 2 that the value of the constant b has a significant effort on the shape of the roundness of the reconstructed perimeter in the far field.

Fig. 2. Far-field intensity distributions of modified helical beam with different b

It is noted that as the value of b decreases the shape of the perimeter tends to be a circle. Obviously an optimized value of b is existed and it can be found out as an empirical formula b=-0.3l valid for l≥10 in the simulation. It is also noted that Eq. (3) is only applied to helical beams with l≫1. So Eq. (7) becomes

φ(θ)=1.4πlI(θ)Itotal0.3θ
(8)

According to Eq. (8) and the technique discussed in Ref. 8, we explored and implemented a series of computer-generated holograms for reconstruction of the modified helical beams with arbitrary dark core shapes using an SLM. A TEM00 laser beam shining onto a reflective type SLM (Boulder Nonlinear Systems P512 with 512×512 pixels) was imposed by the designated phase function φ(θ). Then the modified helical beam passed through a focusing lens to generate the far-field intensity distribution as shown in Fig. 3 captured by a CCD beam profiler in the focal plane. A constant phase can be added to cancel out the Gouy phase shift effect in order to keep the patterns the same orientation with that of the designs.

Fig. 3. Far-field intensity distribution of the modified helical beams with designated shapes of perimeter such as triangle, Greek cross, star and three letters (N, T, and U). The uppermost row shows the desired shapes of perimeter. The middle low shows the far-field distribution of corresponding modified helical beams through simulation. The bottommost is the experimentally observed far-field patterns. All patterns are designed with overall topological charge l=60.

The far-field pattern is also employed for optical trapping if the modified helical beam is directed into an optical tweezers system. In practice, the modified helical beam generated by the SLM passes through a telescope system and enters into an inverted microscope. The far-field pattern is formed in the focal plane of a high-NA objective lens mounted in the microscope. As a result of the optical trapping demonstrated in Fig. 4, an optical vortex with a triangle shape of perimeter is surrounded by 3µm diameter polystyrene spheres dispersed in water.

Fig. 4. Polystyrene spheres are trapped by modified optical vortex with triangle perimeter. Movie (2.5MB) shows eight polystyrene spheres moving along perimeter of triangle.

Similar to the conventional optical vortex, the modified optical vortex exerts a torque on the trapped particles. All these particles circulated along the bright rim of the modified optical vortex in the same direction that is determined by the sign of l, which indicates the existence of orbital angular momentum. The movie in Fig. 4 shows that the orbital angular momentum induced rotation of polystyrene spheres trapped in the bright rim of triangle shape optical vortex.

In conclusion, a deterministic method for generation of the modified helical beam with the desired far-field pattern is demonstrated in this paper. Using this technique, we are able to modify the intensity distribution of optical vortex to match the targeted particle in optical tweezers and assemble particle with a single static diffractive optical element. Furthermore, an array of modified optical vortex may have the potential to sort particles by shape.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) of Singapore under A*STAR SERC Grant No. 032 101 0025. We gratefully acknowledge the invaluable discussion with B. S. Ahluwalia about the trapping experiment.

References and Links

1.

A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, “Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles,” Opt. Lett. 11, 288–290 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

K. T. Gahagan and G. A. Swartzlander Jr., “Optical vortex trapping of particles,” Opt. Lett. 21, 827–829 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

H. He, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Optical particle trapping with higher-order doughnut beams produced using high efficiency computer generated holograms,” J. Mod. Opt. 42, 217–223 (1995). [CrossRef]

4.

M. E. J. Friese, J. Enger, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and N. R. Heckenberg, “Optical angular-momentum transfer to trapped absorbing particles,” Phys. Rev. A 54, 1593–1596 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

J. E. Curtis and D. G. Grier, “Modulated optical vortices,” Opt. Lett. 28, 872–874 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

D. W. Zhang and X.-C. Yuan, “Optical doughnut for optical tweezers,” Opt. Lett. 28, 740–742 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

W. M. Lee, X.-C. Yuan, and W. C. Cheong, “Optical vortex beam shaping by use of highly efficient irregular spiral phase plates for optical micromanipulation,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1796–1798 (2004) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

N. R. Heckenberg, R. McDuff, C. P. Smith, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and M. J. Wegener, “Laser beams with phase singularities,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 24, 951–962 (1992). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(050.1970) Diffraction and gratings : Diffractive optics
(140.3300) Lasers and laser optics : Laser beam shaping
(140.7010) Lasers and laser optics : Laser trapping
(350.5030) Other areas of optics : Phase

ToC Category:
Research Papers

History
Original Manuscript: February 24, 2005
Revised Manuscript: May 10, 2005
Published: May 16, 2005

Citation
J. Lin, X.-C. Yuan, S. H. Tao, X. Peng, and H. B. Niu, "Deterministic approach to the generation of modified helical beams for optical manipulation," Opt. Express 13, 3862-3867 (2005)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-10-3862


Sort:  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, �??Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles,�?? Opt. Lett. 11, 288-290 (1986). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. K. T. Gahagan and G. A. Swartzlander Jr., �??Optical vortex trapping of particles,�?? Opt. Lett. 21, 827-829 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. H. He, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, �??Optical particle trapping with higher-order doughnut beams produced using high efficiency computer generated holograms,�?? J. Mod. Opt. 42, 217-223 (1995). [CrossRef]
  4. M. E. J. Friese, J. Enger, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and N. R. Heckenberg, �??Optical angular-momentum transfer to trapped absorbing particles,�?? Phys. Rev. A 54, 1593-1596 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. J. E. Curtis and D. G. Grier, �??Modulated optical vortices,�?? Opt. Lett. 28, 872-874 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. D. W. Zhang and X.-C. Yuan, �??Optical doughnut for optical tweezers,�?? Opt. Lett. 28, 740-742 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. W. M. Lee, X.-C. Yuan, and W. C. Cheong, �??Optical vortex beam shaping by use of highly efficient irregular spiral phase plates for optical micromanipulation,�?? Opt. Lett. 29, 1796-1798 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. N. R. Heckenberg, R. McDuff, C. P. Smith, H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, and M. J. Wegener, �??Laser beams with phase singularities,�?? Opt. Quantum Electron. 24, 951-962 (1992). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 
Fig. 4.
 

Multimedia

Multimedia FilesRecommended Software
» Media 1: MPG (2346 KB)     

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited