Novel dispersive and focusing device configuration based on curved waveguide grating (CWG)

doi:10.1364/OE.14.008630

« Show journal navigation

Novel dispersive and focusing device configuration based on curved waveguide grating (CWG)

Yinlei Hao, Yaming Wu, Jianyi Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang, and Minghua Wang »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 14, Issue 19, pp. 8630-8637 (2006)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.008630

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (130 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Article Navigation

▸ Article Outline
– Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Device descriptions
3. Theoretical model
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
– References and links

Article Tools
Full Text
Article Info
References
Cited By
Figures
Metrics
Download PDF

Viewing Equations in the
HTML Article

Optimal Viewing Recommendations

Full Text
Article Info
References (7)
Cited By
Figures (6)
Metrics

Abstract

Configuration of a novel compact dispersive and focusing device based on a Curved Waveguide Grating (CWG) is presented, which is essentially an integrated optic wavelength demultiplexer consisting of a curved stripe waveguide with tilted grating, a slab waveguide adjacent to it, and a set of output waveguides locate on focal line of the curved waveguide. Underlying wavelength demultiplexing mechanism of CWG is theoretically illustrated by employing the Fourier optics approach. Analysis shows that device based on CWG possesses fine wavelength resolution, compact configuration, and potentially low cost as well, which make it a promising wavelength demultiplexer, or a network performance monitor, in DWDM optical networks.

1. Introduction

Wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) multiplexers and demultiplexers are indispensable devices for the rapidly overspreading dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) optical telecommunication networks. In the last decades, several integrated wavelength demultiplexer, such as Arrayed Waveguide Grating [1

M. K. Smit and C. van Dam, “PHASAR-based WDM-devices: Principles, design and application,” IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum. Electron. 2, 236–250 (1996). [CrossRef]

] (AWG) and Etched Diffraction Grating [2

E. Gini, W. Hunziker, and H. Melchior, “Polarization independent InP WDM multiplexer/demultiplexer module,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 16, 625–630 (1998). [CrossRef]

] (EDG), have been contrived and successfully employed in multi-wavelength telecommunication systems.

Besides AWG and EDG, a grating based planar waveguide optical analyzer has been proposed by C. K. Madsen, et al. [3

C. K. Madsen, J. Wagener, T. A. Strasser, D. Muehlner, M. A. Milbrodt, E. J. Laskowski, and J. DeMarco, “Planar waveguide optical spectrum analyzer using a UV-induced grating,” IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum. Electron. 4, 925–929 (1998). [CrossRef]

], in which the stripe waveguide with tilted grating provides both dispersive and focusing functionalities. This device possesses more compact configuration than AWG, and avoids the stringent etching control required for high-efficiency EDGs in planar waveguide. However, due to its large imaging aberration over the wavelength range utilized in DWDM network, the imaging performance of the grating could hardly satisfy the wavelength resolution requirement for DWDM applications.

For the first time to our knowledge, we proposed a novel dispersive and focusing device configuration based on a Curved Waveguide Grating (CWG), which tapes out lightwave propagates in the stripe waveguide and focus the diffracted light of different wavelength to separate points on focal line of the curved waveguide, where output waveguides locate. In this paper, we described the CWG configuration, after which, an illustration is given on its wavelength dispersion and focusing mechanism by Fourier optics approach.

2. Device descriptions

Figure 1 shows the schematic layout of the CWG proposed in this paper. Light from an input fiber is launched into a single-mode stripe waveguide, a tilted grating is induced, by UV exposure or other methods, into the curved part of the waveguide, to tap the guided light out. The light taped out is captured by a slab waveguide adjacent to the stripe waveguide, where it is guided to the output waveguides locate on focal line (circumference of the Rowland circle for an arc-shaped waveguide, for instance) of the curved waveguide. Similar to the spectrum analyzer devised by Madsen [3

], the slab waveguide is offset from the stripe waveguide by a reasonable distance, which avoids evanescent coupling between the stripe waveguide and the slab waveguide, and minimizes the distance that the radiated light diffracts before being guided in the slab waveguide as well.

Fig. 1. Schematic of the CWG.

3. Theoretical model

3.1. Bragg diffraction of waveguide with grating

Fig. 2. Bragg diffraction for a local section of the CWG.

Figure 2 shows a local portion of the curved waveguide with grating. According to the grating diffraction theory [4

A. Yariv and M. Nakamura, “Periodic structures for integrated optics,” IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. 13, 233–252 (1977). [CrossRef]

], the longitudinal phase matching condition can be given as

\frac{2 n_{eff} π}{λ} - \frac{2 n_{c} π}{λ} \cos θ = m \frac{2 π}{Λ} .

(1)

Where n_eff is effective index of the guided mode, n_c is the refractive index of stripe waveguide cladding layer, λ is wavelength in vacuum, Λ is the grating period, as shown in Fig. 1, m is known as grating order.

If center wavelength is expected to propagate perpendicular to the stripe waveguide (assuming the center wavelength of the input light and the designed center wavelength of CWG are the same), i.e. θ=π/2, correspondingly, the grating period can be determined from Eq. (1).

Λ = m \frac{λ_{0}}{n_{eff}} = \frac{mc}{n_{eff} ν_{0}},

(2)

Where c is the light velocity, λ₀ and ν₀ are the design wavelength and frequency, respectively.

3.2. Dispersive and focusing mechanism of CWG

The Fourier optics approach has been conveniently and successfully employed to model the AWG by H. Takenouchi et al. [5

H. Takenouchi, H. Tsuda, and T. Kurokawa, “Analysis of optical signal processing using an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Express 6, 124–135 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and P. Munoz et al. [6

P. Munoz, D. Pastor, and J. Capmany, “Analysis and design of arrayed waveguide gratings with MMI coupler,” Opt. Express 9, 328–338 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 7

P. Munoz, D. Pastor, and J. Capmany, “Modeling and design of arrayed waveguide gratings,” IEEE J. Lightwave. Technol. 20, 661–674 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. In this paper, the Fourier model is borrowed and adapted to demonstrate the wavelength demultiplexing mechanism of CWG, which is essentially of similar structure, and thus possesses similar functionality, to the second free propagation region (FPR) in AWG.

3.2.1. Field at the input waveguide

Consider the lightwave propagates in the curved waveguide with grating, represented by its slowly varying amplitude in the longitude direction, as well as spatial field profile in the transverse section.

E (x_{0}, y) = U_{g} (x_{0}) f_{0} (y) e^{- i β (x_{0} + N Λ)} .

(3)

Where y is the coordinate perpendicular to the stripe waveguide in the wafer plane, as shown in Fig. 1, f₀(y) is the power normalized spatial field profile, U(x₀) is amplitude factor, β is propagation constant of the stripe waveguide.

β = \frac{2 π n_{eff}}{λ} = \frac{2 π n_{eff} c}{ν} .

(4)

For the fundamental mode propagation in the stripe waveguide, f₀(y) can be approximately expressed as a power normalized Gaussian function

f_{0} (y) = {(\frac{2}{π ω_{0}^{2}})}^{1 ⁄ 4} e^{- {(\frac{y}{ω_{0}})}^{2}} .

(5)

Where ω₀ is the mode field radius, which depends on particular waveguide parameters, including core layer dimensions, as well as refractive index profile.

3.2.2. Diffraction field of the grating in waveguide

For a grating stated above, it suffices to take only the lightwave coupled from the guided mode to the radiation mode into consideration. According to the coupled-mode theory for guided-wave optics, amplitude of the guided mode would decrease exponentially in the propagation direction along the stripe waveguide, given a uniform coupling coefficient C. Therefore, amplitude factor of the guided mode is expressed as

U_{g} (x_{0}) = U_{g} (- N Λ) e^{- C (x_{0} + N Λ)},

(6)

assuming a uniform grating consists of 2N+1 grating lines in the arc-shaped waveguide, with the N+1th one at x₀=0.

Correspondingly, power flow through the waveguide can be written as

P_{g} (x_{0}) = \frac{1}{2} {(\frac{ε}{μ_{0}})}^{1 ⁄ 2} U_{g}^{2} (x_{0}) .

(7)

Where ε and µ₀ are permittivity and permeability, of the waveguide material, respectively.

Substituting Eq. (6) into Eq. (7), we get

P_{g} (x_{0}) = \frac{1}{2} {(\frac{ε}{μ_{0}})}^{1 ⁄ 2} U_{g}^{2} (- N Λ) e^{- 2 C (x_{0} + N Λ)} .

(8)

Considering the law of energy conservation, power flow of the diffracted light is expressed in terms of differential of the guided light power flow.

P_{d} (x_{0}) = - d P_{g} (x_{0}) = - \frac{d P_{g} (x_{0})}{d x_{0}} d x_{0} .

(9)

For convenience, each grating line in the waveguide is equivalent to a partially reflective “mirror”, with reflecting power flow given as

P_{d}^{'} (x_{0}) = - \frac{d P_{g} (x_{0})}{d x_{0}} Λ .

(10)

Substituting (8) into (10), we obtain

P_{d}^{'} (x_{0}) = \frac{1}{2} 2 C Λ {(\frac{ε}{μ_{0}})}^{1 ⁄ 2} U^{2} (- N Λ) e^{- 2 C (x_{0} + N Λ)} .

(11)

Compared with (8), we can get amplitude factor of diffracted light of grating line at x0

U_{d} (x_{0}) = {(2 C Λ)}^{1 ⁄ 2} U (- N Λ) e^{- C (x_{0} + N Λ)} (- N Λ \leq x_{0} \leq N Λ),

(12)

as depicted in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Schematic of amplitude factor of diffraction field.

For grating line at x₀ , phase factor of diffractive light can be written as

φ (x_{0}, ν) = ϕ (ν) e^{- i \frac{2 π n_{eff} ν}{c} x_{0}},

(13)

with

ϕ (ν) = e^{- i (\frac{2 π n_{eff} ν}{c} N Λ + κ)} .

(14)

Where κ represents phase shift of diffraction light with respect to the guided light, due to “reflection” at each single grating line.

We can now write diffraction field of the grating as

E_{d} (x_{0}, ν) = [U_{d} (x_{0}) φ (x_{0}, ν) δ_{Λ} (x_{0})] * g (x_{0}) .

(15)

Where ∗ denotes convolution, δ_Λ(x₀) is a summation of delta functions.

δ_{Λ} (x_{0}) = \sum_{r = - \infty}^{+ \infty} δ (x_{0} - r Λ) .

(16)

g(x₀) is the spatial field distribution of the central grating line (at x0=0), which is determined by the specific grating structure on the waveguide, and will be discussed in more detail in section 4.

3.2.3. Spatial distribution on the focal plane

To obtain the spatial distribution at the focal plane, coordinate x ₁, the Fourier transformation of (15) is calculated, yielding

f_{1} (x_{1}, ν) = [E_{1} (x_{1}) * Φ (x_{1}, ν) * Δ_{Λ} (x_{1})] G (x_{1}),

(17)

where the different terms are

E_{1} (x_{1}) = FT {[U_{d} (x_{0})] ∣}_{u = x_{1} ⁄ α},

(18)

with analytical expression given as

E_{1} (x_{1}) = \frac{{(2 C Λ)}^{1 ⁄ 2} U (- N Λ)}{{[C^{2} + {(2 π x_{1} ⁄ α)}^{2}]}^{1 ⁄ 2}} e^{- i \tan^{- 1} (\frac{2 π x_{1}}{C α})} (e^{CN Λ} e^{i (\frac{2 π x_{1} N Λ}{α})} - e^{- CN Λ} e^{- i (\frac{2 π x_{1} N Λ}{α})}),

(19)

and depicted in terms of amplitude and phase factor respectively in Fig. 4.

Φ (x_{1}, ν) = FT {[φ (x_{0}, ν)] ∣}_{u = x_{1} ⁄ α} = \frac{c L_{f}}{n_{s} ν_{0}} ϕ (ν) δ (x_{1} + \frac{n_{eff} L_{f}}{n_{s} ν_{0}} ν) .

(20)

Δ_{Λ} (x_{1}) = FT {[δ_{Λ} (x_{0})] ∣}_{u = x_{1} ⁄ α} = \sum_{r = - \infty}^{+ \infty} δ (x_{1} - r \frac{n_{eff} L_{f}}{n_{s} m}) .

(21)

G (x_{1}) = FT {[g (x_{0})] ∣}_{u = x_{1} ⁄ α} .

(22)

In Eq. (18), Eq. (20) to (22), u is the spatial frequency domain variable of the Fourier transformation and α_ν is equivalent to the wavelength focal length product in Fourier optics propagation

α_{ν} = \frac{c L_{f}}{n_{s} ν} = \frac{λ L_{f}}{n_{s}},

(23)

where n_s is refractive index of the slab waveguide, L_f is focal length (radius of curvature) of the arc-shaped waveguide grating.

If ν-ν₀≪ν₀ , the approximation ν=ν₀ holds, and then

α_{ν} = α_{ν_{0}} = α .

(24)

By substitute Eq. (20) and Eq. (21) in to Eq. (17), the spatial distribution at the focal plane can be rewritten as

f_{1} (x_{1}, ν) = G (x_{1}) \sum_{r = - \infty}^{+ \infty} E_{1} (x_{1} - r \frac{n_{eff} L_{f}}{n_{c} m} + \frac{ν}{γ}) .

(25)

Fig. 4. Amplitude (left) and phase (right) factor of E₁(x₁).

As can be observed, the field at the focal plane is composed of a summation of terms, each one be univocally characterized by an integer value r, known as the diffraction order.

For each diffraction order, the CWG directs input light of different temporal frequency to a different spatial position on the focal line, according to the specific value of r and γ. The Frequency Spatial Dispersion Parameter (FSDP) given by

γ = \frac{n_{s} ν_{0}}{n_{eff} L_{f}} .

(26)

Each output waveguide on the focal line selects a temporal frequency bandpass, the shape of which is given by E₁(x₁), the term G(x₁) introduces the loss nonuniformity, and the term φ(ν) incorporates the phase delay information.

For CWG, similar to AWG, Spatial Free Spectral Range (SFSR), referred as the distance on the focal line corresponding to the focusing points of a fixed input frequency ν by two consecutive diffractions (i.e., k and k+1), can be acquired from Eq. (25) and given as

Δ_{x_{1}, FSR} = \frac{n_{eff} L_{f}}{n_{c} m} .

(27)

4. Discussion

From the deduction above, we know that CWG possesses dispersive and focusing functionalities in a manner similar to AWG.

As mentioned above, loss nonuniformity, G(x₁), is related by Fourier transformation relationship to g(x₀), which is in turn dependent on specific grating structure on the waveguide. A waveguide grating with structure given in Fig. 5, g(x₀) can be approximated as a truncated f(x₀), given by

g (x_{0}) = \frac{W_{L}}{W_{T}} rect (\frac{x_{0}}{W_{T}}) f (x_{0}) .

(28)

Where, W_T and W_L are projection of grating line in the direction perpendicular to the propagation direction of the guided light and the diffracted light, respectively. f₀(x₀) is the power normalized spatial field profile, as given in Eq. (5). rect(x₀/W_T) is given by

rect (\frac{x_{0}}{W_{T}}) = {\begin{matrix} 1 & for ∣ x_{0} ∣ \leq \frac{W_{T}}{2} \\ 0 & others \end{matrix} .

(29)

Fig. 5. Relationship between diffracted light field and grating structure.

For a special case with a tilted angle of π/4, W_T=W_L , and grating lines with sufficiently large length to partially “reflect” guided light over all its transverse section spatially, g(x₀) can be reasonably approximated as a power normalized Gaussian function

g (x_{0}) = {(\frac{2}{π ω_{g}^{2}})}^{1 ⁄ 4} e^{- {(\frac{x_{0}}{ω_{g}})}^{2}} .

(30)

Substituting (30) into (22), we can get

G (x_{1}) = {(2 π ω_{g}^{2})}^{1 ⁄ 4} e^{- {(\frac{π ω_{g} x_{1}}{α})}^{2}} .

(31)

with ω_g the field radius of diffracted light at x₀ .

Similar to the planar optical spectrum analyzer proposed in [3

], CWG is a promising candidate configuration for wavelength demultiplexing in DWDM optical networks, especially for network performance monitoring. Compared with the device proposed by Madsen, CWG have the same advantages that the spectrum analyzer enjoys, including simple configuration, minimal fabrication complexity, and therefore potentially low cost. Besides these advantages, CWG possesses finer spectrum resolution than the device proposed in Ref. [3

The planar optical spectrum analyzer proposed in Ref. [3

] focus diffracted light by a chirping grating. Because the ideal chirp for focusing is wavelength dependent and only one chirp function, ideally for center wavelength, for instance, can be realized in the device, the bandwidth over which high resolution will be obtained is limited. As a result, the resolution is affected heavily by imaging aberration, and will be imaging limited, rather than diffraction limited, for long grating length. As an instance, for a grating length of 20mm, the focused spot size is limited by the imaging aberration at longer wavelength, as demonstrated in Ref. [3

On the other hand, by adopting a curved waveguide configuration, rather than a chirped tilted waveguide phase grating, as in Ref. [3

], to focus the defracted light onto focal line of the curved waveguide with grating, CWG have a magnificently improved imaging functionality over a much wider wavelength range, which spells much finer wavelength resolution. This advantage is demonstrated by a numerical simulation, performed on size of focused spot (main lobe) for the CWG with Rowland circle configuration, results being given in Fig. 6. For convenience of contrasting, main CWG configuration parameters are chosen to be of the same value as, or close to, corresponding parameters of the device proposed in Ref. [3

], with: focal length L_f=107mm, slab waveguide refractive index n_s=1.45, center wavelength λ₀=1540nm, grating length L_g=10mm, 20mm. As shown in Fig. 6, for grating length of 10mm, resulted spots sizes are in good agreement with corresponding diffraction-limited values; for grating length of 20mm, resulted spot sizes deviate gradually from diffraction-limited values as wavelength depart from center wavelength, owning to imaging aberration of Rowland circle configuration. However, the spot sizes deviation from diffraction limited value over 1515~1565nm is sufficiently slight, a good reason for the CWG configuration to be regarded as diffraction-limited. In addition, for grating length of 10mm, the focused spot size is 22.9 µ m, much finer in contrast with corresponding value of ~100 µ m in Ref. [3

], which demonstrate a finer resolution capability of the CWG configuration.

Fig. 6. Diffraction-limited and calculated focused spot size for Rowland circle configuration for grating length 10mm and 20mm.

It is worthy to note that E₁(x₁) possesses big sidelobes, as shown in Fig. 4, which means reduced coupling efficiency from grating to output waveguides, and high cross-talk between adjacent channels. Therefore, apodization approaches, through chirping or other technologies, are indispensable for obtaining high performance devices. Obviously, U_d(x₀) could be tailored by designing a grating with a varying coupling coefficient in its longitude direction. One possible approach is to tailor U_d(x₀), envelop of the grating diffraction field amplitude factor, to a Gaussian profile, or a truncated Gaussian profile, as that at the end of the arrayed waveguide in AWG. Correspondingly, according to Eq. (18), we can get a E₁(x₁) of the form of a Gaussian form, or M function, as shown in Ref. [7

P. Munoz, D. Pastor, and J. Capmany, “Modeling and design of arrayed waveguide gratings,” IEEE J. Lightwave. Technol. 20, 661–674 (2002). [CrossRef]

], which matches highly to the mode field of the fundamental mode of output waveguide, and thus gives high coupling efficiency to output waveguides, and low cross-talk between adjacent channels as well, as the instance for AWG.

5. Conclusions

A novel dispersive and focusing device configuration, CWG, has been proposed. A theoretical analysis on its wavelength demultiplexing mechanism is conducted by Fourier optics approach. Compared with the spectrum proposed by Madsen, imaging functionality of CWG is magnificently improved over a wide wavelength range, which make it a potentially competitive device configuration for wavelength demultiplexing and network monitoring in DWDM optical networks.

References and links

1.	M. K. Smit and C. van Dam, “PHASAR-based WDM-devices: Principles, design and application,” IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum. Electron. 2, 236–250 (1996). [CrossRef]
2.	E. Gini, W. Hunziker, and H. Melchior, “Polarization independent InP WDM multiplexer/demultiplexer module,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 16, 625–630 (1998). [CrossRef]
3.	C. K. Madsen, J. Wagener, T. A. Strasser, D. Muehlner, M. A. Milbrodt, E. J. Laskowski, and J. DeMarco, “Planar waveguide optical spectrum analyzer using a UV-induced grating,” IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum. Electron. 4, 925–929 (1998). [CrossRef]
4.	A. Yariv and M. Nakamura, “Periodic structures for integrated optics,” IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. 13, 233–252 (1977). [CrossRef]
5.	H. Takenouchi, H. Tsuda, and T. Kurokawa, “Analysis of optical signal processing using an arrayed waveguide grating,” Opt. Express 6, 124–135 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.	P. Munoz, D. Pastor, and J. Capmany, “Analysis and design of arrayed waveguide gratings with MMI coupler,” Opt. Express 9, 328–338 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.	P. Munoz, D. Pastor, and J. Capmany, “Modeling and design of arrayed waveguide gratings,” IEEE J. Lightwave. Technol. 20, 661–674 (2002). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(050.0050) Diffraction and gratings : Diffraction and gratings
(130.0130) Integrated optics : Integrated optics

ToC Category:
Integrated Optics

History
Original Manuscript: June 19, 2006
Revised Manuscript: July 30, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: August 6, 2006
Published: September 18, 2006

Citation
Yinlei Hao, Yaming Wu, Jianyi Yang, Xiaoqing Jiang, and Minghua Wang, "Novel dispersive and focusing device configuration based on curved waveguide grating (CWG)," Opt. Express 14, 8630-8637 (2006)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-19-8630

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

M. K. Smit and C. van Dam, "PHASAR-based WDM-devices: Principles, design and application," IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum.Electron. 2, 236-250 (1996). [CrossRef]
E. Gini, W. Hunziker, H. Melchior, "Polarization independent InP WDM multiplexer/demultiplexer module," IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 16, 625-630 (1998). [CrossRef]
C. K. Madsen, J. Wagener, T. A. Strasser, D. Muehlner, M. A. Milbrodt, E. J. Laskowski, and J. DeMarco, "Planar waveguide optical spectrum analyzer using a UV-induced grating," IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum Electron. 4, 925-929 (1998). [CrossRef]
A. Yariv, M. Nakamura, "Periodic structures for integrated optics," IEEE J. Quantum. Electron. 13, 233-252 (1977). [CrossRef]
H. Takenouchi, H. Tsuda and T. Kurokawa, "Analysis of optical signal processing using an arrayed-waveguide grating," Opt. Express 6, 124-135 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Munoz, D. Pastor and J. Capmany, "Analysis and design of arrayed waveguide gratings with MMI coupler," Opt. Express 9, 328-338 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
P. Munoz, D. Pastor and J. Capmany, "Modeling and design of arrayed waveguide gratings," IEEE J. Lightwave. Technol. 20, 661-674 (2002). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper