OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Michael Duncan
  • Vol. 14, Iss. 20 — Oct. 2, 2006
  • pp: 8989–8994
« Show journal navigation

Demonstration of low-noise frequency conversion by Bragg Scattering in a Fiber

A. H. Gnauck, R. M. Jopson, C. J. McKinstrie, J. C. Centanni, and S. Radic  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 14, Issue 20, pp. 8989-8994 (2006)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.008989


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (146 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We experimentally examine the noise properties of a two-pump optical parametric amplifier when converting frequencies using the Bragg-scattering (BS) and phase-conjugation (PC) processes. Using co-polarized pumps and signal, we show that the noise performance is limited by spontaneous Raman scattering. The noise performance of BS is superior to that of PC, and should improve with larger frequency excursions.

© 2006 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Optical parametric amplifiers (OPAs), based on four-wave mixing (FWM), can be used to perform a wide variety of functions in fiber-optic communication systems [1

1. J. Hansryd, P. A. Andrekson, M. Westlund, J. Li, and P. O. Hedekvist, “Fiber-based optical parametric amplifiers and their applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 506–520 (2002). [CrossRef]

, 2

2. S. Radic and C. J. McKinstrie, “Optical amplification and signal processing in highly nonlinear optical fiber,” IEICE Trans. Electron. E88C, 859–869 (2005).

]. These functions include amplification, frequency conversion (FC), phase conjugation, and switching on a bit-by-bit or packet basis. However, amplification is inevitably accompanied by noise [3

3. W. H. Louisell, Radiation and Noise in Quantum Electronics (McGraw-Hill, 1964).

]. An OPA driven by two pump waves involves four product waves that are coupled by what may be characterized as three distinct FWM processes: Modulation instability (MI), phase conjugation (PC), and Bragg scattering (BS) [4

4. C. J. McKinstrie, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Quantum noise properties of parametric amplifiers driven by two pump waves,” Opt. Express 12, 5037–5066 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In MI and PC, pump photons are destroyed in pairs and sideband (signal and idler) photons are produced in pairs. This enables signal amplification and idler generation. However, it also enables the vacuum fluctuations at the frequencies of the signal and idler to be amplified, producing excess noise. In BS, for each idler photon that is created, a signal photon is destroyed. Power is transferred from the signal to the idler. Because the total sideband power is constant, the vacuum fluctuations are not amplified and no excess noise is produced. Recently, it was suggested that this feature might make BS suitable for FC in few-photon systems [5

5. C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Opt. Express 13, 9131–9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

FC of many-photon signals utilizing the BS process was demonstrated over a decade ago [6

6. K. Inoue, “Tunable and selective wavelength conversion using fiber four-wave mixing with two pump lights,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 6, 1451–1453 (1994). [CrossRef]

], but the noise properties were not examined. In this letter we report the demonstration of low-noise frequency conversion using the BS process. Using co-polarized pumps and signal in a highly nonlinear fiber (HNF), we achieve a wavelength translation of 32 nm, comparable to the wavelength shifts observed in a recent experiment [7

7. T. Tanemura, C. S. Goh, K. Kikuchi, and S. Y. Set, “Highly efficient arbitrary wavelength conversion within entire C-band based on nondegenerate fiber four-wave mixing,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16, 551–553 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Noise performance is currently limited by spontaneous Raman scattering (SRS) of the pump light [8

8. J. Mostowski and M. G. Raymer, “Quantum statistics in nonlinear optics,” in Contemporary Nonlinear Optics, G. P. Agrawal and R. W. Boyd, eds., (Academic Press, 1992).

10

10. R. Tang, P. L. Voss, J. Lasri, P. Devgan, and P. Kumar, “Noise-figure limit of fiber-optical parametric amplifiers and wavelength convertors: experimental investigation,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2372–2374 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) of the translated signal is found to be better than that of a PC signal, and should improve with increases in the pump-signal frequency separation, and with the use of other OPA polarization configurations.

2. Experiment

The apparatus used to demonstrate frequency translation via BS is shown in Fig. 1. A two-pump OPA configuration was used. The pumps were two tunable lasers that were separately amplified and filtered, and then combined in a wavelength-division-multiplexing (WDM) coupler. Stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) suppression was achieved using a phase-modulation technique [11

11. S. Radic, R. M. Jopson, A. Gnauck, C. J. McKinstrie, J. C. Centanni, and A. R. Chraplyvy, “Stimulated-Brillouin-scattering suppression using a single modulator in two-pump parametric architectures,” in Proc. OFC 2005, Anaheim, CA, paper OWN5 (2005).

]. The pumps were then separated, individually amplified and filtered, and recombined in a WDM coupler. Finally, the signal, also from a tunable laser, was combined with the pumps in a 10% coupler, and launched into a 1-km HNF. The output of the second port of the coupler was passed through a polarizing beamsplitter (polarizer) for monitoring on an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) to insure that the pumps and signal were co-polarized.

Fig. 1. Experimental layout. EDFA=Erbium-doped fiber amplifier, WDM=Wavelength-division multiplexer, PM=Phase modulator, POL=Polarization controller, HNF=Highly nonlinear fiber, OSA=Optical spectrum analyzer.

The nonlinearity coefficient γ of the HNF was about 17/km-W, and the zero-dispersion wavelength, λ0, was about 1577 nm. The loss, including splices and connectors, was 1.3 dB. For efficient BS, the signal and pump 1 are placed symmetrically about λ0. Due to several constraints, such as amplifier response and WDM coupler passbands, a pump wavelength of 1566 nm and a signal wavelength of 1588 nm were chosen. Pump 2 was placed at 1598 nm. Consequently, the idler produced by BS was generated at about 1556 nm, resulting in a 32-nm (4-THz) translation of the input signal.

Fig. 2. Optical spectrum at the output of the HNF for two cases.

The signal was first transmitted through the HNF without the pumps. The power launched into the HNF, measured after the 10% coupler, was -12 dBm, and the power at the output of the HNF was -13.3 dBm. The OSNR of the signal was over 60 dB, measured in a 0.1-nm resolution bandwidth. The optical spectrum at the output of the HNF, taken with a resolution bandwidth of 0.5 nm, is shown in Fig. 2 for two pump scenarios. First, the signal and pump 1, symmetrically placed with respect to the dispersion zero, were transmitted. Second, the signal and both pumps were transmitted. The traces were taken with the pump powers that were found to yield maximum extinction of the signal (and therefore, theoretically, provide maximum transference of power to the idler). About 190 mW (+22.8 dBm) was launched into the HNF at each pump wavelength. Adding pump 1 alone at 1566 nm had almost no impact on the signal power. However, as shown in the second trace, when both pumps were present, signal extinction of about 22 dB was obtained as the signal power was transferred to the idler at 1556 nm. A PC signal at about 1576 nm is also present in the second trace, even though the efficiency of the PC process is reduced by poor phase matching. Moving the second pump to a longer wavelength, and thereby increasing the wavelength shift between the signal and the BS idler, can further reduce the PC idler. Accurate OSNR measurements cannot be directly obtained from the traces, due to a small amount of pump-light scattering in the OSA. OSNR measurements of the idler were made by placing a 3-nm-wide optical bandpass filter (centered at 1556 nm) in front of the OSA to reduce greatly the pump light entering the OSA. The idler OSNR at the optimal pump power was 45.0 dB (measured in a 0.2-nm resolution bandwidth, and normalized to 0.1 nm).

Figure 3 shows the extinction of the signal and growth of the idler with increasing pump power. The signal is maximally extinguished at the optimal pump power. As the pump power is increased beyond this point, the signal begins to grow again as power is transferred back from the idler [5

5. C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Opt. Express 13, 9131–9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Fig. 3. Signal and idler power at the output of the HNF as a function of the total pump power launched into the fiber. Signal input: -12 dBm.

3. Discussion

The limiting noise source for the BS process in an OPA is SRS of the pump light [5

5. C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Opt. Express 13, 9131–9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 8

8. J. Mostowski and M. G. Raymer, “Quantum statistics in nonlinear optics,” in Contemporary Nonlinear Optics, G. P. Agrawal and R. W. Boyd, eds., (Academic Press, 1992).

10

10. R. Tang, P. L. Voss, J. Lasri, P. Devgan, and P. Kumar, “Noise-figure limit of fiber-optical parametric amplifiers and wavelength convertors: experimental investigation,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2372–2374 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The amount of Raman noise is dependent on the wavelength offset from the pump, and also dependent on polarization [12

12. R. H. Stolen, “Polarization effects in fiber Raman and Brillouin lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15, 1157–1160 (1979). [CrossRef]

14

14. X. Li, P. L. Voss, J. Chen, K. F. Lee, and P. Kumar, “Measurement of co- and cross-polarized Raman spectra in silica fiber for small detunings,” Opt. Express 13, 2236–2244 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We measured the noise produced by launching pump 1 alone into the HNF (the pump wavelength was in the normal dispersion regime). A tunable 0.6-nm bandpass filter and a polarizer were placed after the HNF, and the output was monitored on the OSA using a 0.2-nm resolution bandwidth. The polarizer was adjusted for both maximal and minimal readings at wavelengths from 1520 nm to 1620 nm (corresponding to polarizations that were parallel or orthogonal to the pump polarization). The results are shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Measurement of the parallel and orthogonal noise produced by the 1566-nm pump.

The noise at our idler wavelength of 1556 nm varies by about 2 dB with polarization. Of course, additional Raman noise at the signal wavelength of 1588 nm is generated by both pump 1 and pump 2, and some of this is transferred to the idler along with the signal power.

These noise sources are also polarization dependent. We confirmed the effect of the partially polarized noise by observing the idler OSNR through the polarizer (adjusted for maximal idler power). If the noise were not polarization dependent, the OSNR would be expected to increase by 3 dB when the polarizer was present. Instead, the OSNR increased by only 2 dB, to 47.0 dB, demonstrating the effect of partially polarized noise. The results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of OSNR measurements

table-icon
View This Table

In addition to measuring the noise produced by a pump at 1566 nm, we also measured the noise produced by launching a single pump at other wavelengths. In particular, we measured the noise for a pump at 1578 nm (about 1 nm from λ0) and a pump at 1590 nm (in the anomalous dispersion regime). Figure 5 summarizes the measurements for all three wavelengths. In order to facilitate a fair comparison, the results are plotted in frequency offset from the pump frequency in each case. For reference, a frequency offset of 1 THz corresponds to a wavelength offset of about -8 nm. The combination of fiber nonlinearity and chromatic dispersion causes the total parallel noise to differ dramatically in the three cases, as seen in Fig. 5(a). The orthogonal noise, however, is almost identical within experimental error, as seen in Fig. 5(b). The difference in parallel and orthogonal noise levels can have important consequences in the performance of particular BS implementations, as will be discussed later.

Fig. 5. (a). Parallel and (b) orthogonal noise as a function of frequency offset from the pump at three wavelengths.

Finally, we measured the OSNR performance of a low-noise erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA). The EDFA had a small-signal gain of 20 dB and a noise figure of about 4 dB. Using an input power of -12 dBm, we obtained OSNR measurements of 41.5 dB (44.7 dB) without (with) a polarizer. For completeness, the results are also shown in Table 1. Note that for an ideal EDFA without a polarizer and with a noise figure of 3 dB, the output OSNR is approximately given by: OSNR (dB)=55 dB+input power (dBm) [15

15. J. L. Zyskind, J. A. Nagel, and H. D. Kidorf, “Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers for optical communications,” in Optical Telecommunications IIIBI. P. Kaminow and T. L. Koch, eds., (Academic Press, 1997).

]. For our input power of -12 dBm, this would produce an output OSNR of 43 dB (46 dB) without (with) a polarizer. Thus, even in the ideal case, amplification results in an OSNR that is worse than the OSNR we obtained using BS.

The noise floor in the BS process arises from SRS of the pump light, which has a bandwidth of about ±100 nm. The Raman noise orthogonal to a pump is less than the parallel component. There are BS configurations in which the polarizations of the signal and pumps can be judiciously arranged to take advantage of this lower noise [5

5. C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Opt. Express 13, 9131–9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For example, the launch state of the signal can be aligned orthogonal to the two pumps. In this case, the BS idler is also generated orthogonal to the pumps. The parallel pump noise can then be removed with a polarizer. Although such a configuration is less efficient [5

5. C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Opt. Express 13, 9131–9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], it may be that it can further improve our OSNR results when using a polarizer. Also, as technology improves to allow translations well beyond 100 nm, SRS should no longer impose a noise floor on the BS process.

4. Conclusion

We have experimentally investigated the performance of an optical parametric amplifier when used in the Bragg-scattering (BS) mode to translate optical frequencies. We have demonstrated noise performance better than that achieved with phase conjugation, and limited in the present setup by spontaneous Raman scattering (SRS). We expect the BS noise performance to improve as advances in the manufacturing of highly nonlinear fiber allow larger frequency excursions.

References and links

1.

J. Hansryd, P. A. Andrekson, M. Westlund, J. Li, and P. O. Hedekvist, “Fiber-based optical parametric amplifiers and their applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 506–520 (2002). [CrossRef]

2.

S. Radic and C. J. McKinstrie, “Optical amplification and signal processing in highly nonlinear optical fiber,” IEICE Trans. Electron. E88C, 859–869 (2005).

3.

W. H. Louisell, Radiation and Noise in Quantum Electronics (McGraw-Hill, 1964).

4.

C. J. McKinstrie, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Quantum noise properties of parametric amplifiers driven by two pump waves,” Opt. Express 12, 5037–5066 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, “Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers,” Opt. Express 13, 9131–9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

K. Inoue, “Tunable and selective wavelength conversion using fiber four-wave mixing with two pump lights,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 6, 1451–1453 (1994). [CrossRef]

7.

T. Tanemura, C. S. Goh, K. Kikuchi, and S. Y. Set, “Highly efficient arbitrary wavelength conversion within entire C-band based on nondegenerate fiber four-wave mixing,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16, 551–553 (2004). [CrossRef]

8.

J. Mostowski and M. G. Raymer, “Quantum statistics in nonlinear optics,” in Contemporary Nonlinear Optics, G. P. Agrawal and R. W. Boyd, eds., (Academic Press, 1992).

9.

P. L. Voss and P. Kumar, “Raman-noise-induced noise-figure limit for χ(3) parametric amplifiers,” Opt. Lett. 29, 445–447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

R. Tang, P. L. Voss, J. Lasri, P. Devgan, and P. Kumar, “Noise-figure limit of fiber-optical parametric amplifiers and wavelength convertors: experimental investigation,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2372–2374 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

S. Radic, R. M. Jopson, A. Gnauck, C. J. McKinstrie, J. C. Centanni, and A. R. Chraplyvy, “Stimulated-Brillouin-scattering suppression using a single modulator in two-pump parametric architectures,” in Proc. OFC 2005, Anaheim, CA, paper OWN5 (2005).

12.

R. H. Stolen, “Polarization effects in fiber Raman and Brillouin lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15, 1157–1160 (1979). [CrossRef]

13.

D. J. Dougherty, F. X. Kaertner, H. A. Haus, and E. P. Ippen, “Measurement of the Raman gain spectrum of optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 20, 31–33 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

X. Li, P. L. Voss, J. Chen, K. F. Lee, and P. Kumar, “Measurement of co- and cross-polarized Raman spectra in silica fiber for small detunings,” Opt. Express 13, 2236–2244 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

J. L. Zyskind, J. A. Nagel, and H. D. Kidorf, “Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers for optical communications,” in Optical Telecommunications IIIBI. P. Kaminow and T. L. Koch, eds., (Academic Press, 1997).

OCIS Codes
(060.4370) Fiber optics and optical communications : Nonlinear optics, fibers
(190.2620) Nonlinear optics : Harmonic generation and mixing
(270.2500) Quantum optics : Fluctuations, relaxations, and noise

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: July 27, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: August 31, 2006
Published: October 2, 2006

Citation
A. H. Gnauck, R. M. Jopson, C. J. McKinstrie, J. C. Centanni, and S. Radic, "Demonstration of Low-Noise Frequency Conversion by Bragg Scattering in a Fiber," Opt. Express 14, 8989-8994 (2006)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-20-8989


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. J. Hansryd, P. A. Andrekson, M. Westlund, J. Li and P. O. Hedekvist, "Fiber-based optical parametric amplifiers and their applications," IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 8, 506-520 (2002). [CrossRef]
  2. <jrn>. S. Radic and C. J. McKinstrie, "Optical amplification and signal processing in highly nonlinear optical fiber," IEICE Trans. Electron. E88C, 859-869 (2005).</jrn>
  3. W. H. Louisell, Radiation and Noise in Quantum Electronics (McGraw-Hill, 1964).
  4. C. J. McKinstrie, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, "Quantum noise properties of parametric amplifiers driven by two pump waves," Opt. Express 12, 5037-5066 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. C. J. McKinstrie, J. D. Harvey, S. Radic, and M. G. Raymer, "Translation of quantum states by four-wave mixing in fibers," Opt. Express 13, 9131-9142 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. K. Inoue, "Tunable and selective wavelength conversion using fiber four-wave mixing with two pump lights," IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 6, 1451-1453 (1994). [CrossRef]
  7. T. Tanemura, C. S. Goh, K. Kikuchi, and S. Y. Set, "Highly efficient arbitrary wavelength conversion within entire C-band based on nondegenerate fiber four-wave mixing," IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 16, 551-553 (2004). [CrossRef]
  8. J. Mostowski and M. G. Raymer, "Quantum statistics in nonlinear optics," in Contemporary Nonlinear Optics, G. P. Agrawal and R. W. Boyd, eds., (Academic Press, 1992).
  9. P. L. Voss and P. Kumar, "Raman-noise-induced noise-figure limit for χ(3) parametric amplifiers," Opt. Lett. 29, 445-447 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. R. Tang, P. L. Voss, J. Lasri, P. Devgan, and P. Kumar, "Noise-figure limit of fiber-optical parametric amplifiers and wavelength convertors: experimental investigation," Opt. Lett. 29, 2372-2374 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. <jrn>. S. Radic, R. M. Jopson, A. Gnauck, C. J. McKinstrie, J. C. Centanni, and A. R. Chraplyvy, "Stimulated-Brillouin-scattering suppression using a single modulator in two-pump parametric architectures," in Proc. OFC 2005, Anaheim, CA, paper OWN5 (2005).</jrn>
  12. R. H. Stolen, "Polarization effects in fiber Raman and Brillouin lasers," IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15, 1157-1160 (1979). [CrossRef]
  13. D. J. Dougherty, F. X. Kaertner, H. A. Haus, and E. P. Ippen, "Measurement of the Raman gain spectrum of optical fibers," Opt. Lett. 20, 31-33 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. X. Li, P. L. Voss, J. Chen, K. F. Lee, and P. Kumar, "Measurement of co- and cross-polarized Raman spectra in silica fiber for small detunings," Opt. Express 13, 2236-2244 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J. L. Zyskind, J. A. Nagel, and H. D. Kidorf, "Erbium-doped fiber amplifiers for optical communications," in Optical Telecommunications IIIB I. P. Kaminow and T. L. Koch, eds., (Academic Press, 1997).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited