Sampled Bragg gratings in chalcogenide (As<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>) rib-waveguides

doi:10.1364/OE.14.009451

Sampled Bragg gratings in chalcogenide (As₂S₃) rib-waveguides

Neil J. Baker, Ho W. Lee, Ian C. Littler, C. Martijn de Sterke, Benjamin J. Eggleton, Duk-Yong Choi, Steve Madden, and Barry Luther-Davies »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 14, Issue 20, pp. 9451-9459 (2006)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.009451

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (772 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Full Text
Article Info
References (33)
Cited By
Figures (5)
Metrics

Abstract

We have written a sampled Bragg grating into a highly photosensitive chalcogenide (As₂S₃) rib-waveguide using a scanning Sagnac interferometer. The grating exhibits evenly spaced rejection peaks over a 40 nm bandwidth. We estimate the induced refractive index change of the waveguide to be over 0.03 by matching the measured spectrum to numerical solutions of the coupled mode equations while accounting for an induced chirp. The sampled Bragg grating presented is comparable in strength and bandwidth to the best sampled Bragg gratings obtained to date in silica optical fibre.

1. Introduction

Chalcogenides are an amorphous glass containing at least one of the chalcogen elements (S, Se or Te), that have, for the past five decades, been used primarily for mid-IR free-space optics [1

A.R. Hilton, “Nonoxide Chalcogenide Glass as Infrared Optical Materials,” Appl. Opt. 5, 1877–1882 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Following recent processing advances, chalcogenides can now be fabricated into low loss waveguide structures [2

Y. Ruan, W. Li, R. Jarvis, N. Madsen, A. Rode, and B. Luther-Davies, “Fabrication and characterization of low loss rib chalcogenide waveguides made by dry etching,” Opt. Express 12, 5140–5145 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 3

W. T. Li, Y. L. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, A. Rode, and R. Boswell, “Dry-etch of As₂S₃ thin films for optical waveguide fabrication,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 26, 1626–1632 (2005). [CrossRef]

], making it possible for the development of chip-based all-optical devices for both telecom and mid-IR applications. Chalcogenide glasses have a number of attractive properties: they are transparent across the telecom range and through the mid-IR [1

A.R. Hilton, “Nonoxide Chalcogenide Glass as Infrared Optical Materials,” Appl. Opt. 5, 1877–1882 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 4

N. Hô, M. C. Phillips, H. Qiao, P. J. Allen, K. Krishnaswami, B. J. Riley, T. L. Myres, and N. C. Anheier Jr., “Single-mode low-loss chalcogenide glass waveguides for the mid-infrared,” Opt. Lett. 31, 1860–1862 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]; they can be processed into rib-waveguide or photonic crystal structures using the same equipment and similar techniques as with conventional silicon lithography [2

, 5

C. Grillet, C. Smith, D. Freeman, S. Madden, B. Luther-Davies, E. Magi, D. Moss, and B. J. Eggleton, “Efficient coupling to chalcogenide glass photonic crystal waveguides via silica optical fiber nanowires,” Opt. Express 14, 1070–1078 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]; they possess a large refractive index contrast that enables strong optical confinement in narrow waveguides; they possess an ultrafast Kerr nonlinearity which, depending on composition and stoichiometry, can range from 100–1000x larger than in silica [2

] making them useful for nonlinear signal processing [6

G. Lenz, J. Zimmermann, T. Katsufuji, M. E. Lines, H. Y. Hwang, S. Spälter, R. E. Slusher, S. -W Cheong, J. S. Sanghera, and I. D. Aggarwal, “Larger Kerr effect in bulk Se-based chalcogenide glasses,” Opt. Lett. 25, 254–256 (2000). [CrossRef]

], such as all-optical switching [7

M. Asobe, H. Kobayashi, H. Itoh, and T. Kanamori, “Laser-diode-driven ultrafast all-optical switching by using highly nonlinear chalcogenide glass fiber,” Opt. Lett. 18, 1056–1058 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and alloptical signal regeneration [8

V. G. Ta’eed, M. Shokooh-Saremi, L. Fu, D. J. Moss, M. Rochette, I. C. M. Littler, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, “Integrated all-optical pulse regenerator in chalcogenide waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 2900–2902 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]; and they are strongly photosensitive with photo-induced refractive index changes as large as 0.04 typically available [2

, 9

K. Tanaka and Y. Ohtsuka, “Measurements of photoinduced transformations in amorphous As₂S₃ films by optical waveguiding,” J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6132–6135 (1978). [CrossRef]

,10

M. Shokooh-Saremi, V. G. Ta’eed, N. J. Baker, I. C. M. Littler, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, “High-performance Bragg gratings in chalcogenide rib-waveguides written with a modified Sagnac Interferometer,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 1323–1331 (2006). [CrossRef]

The photosensitivity of a chalcogenide glass is comparable only to the “hero” results observed in specially processed silica optical fibre [11

K. O. Hill, B. Malo, F. Bilodeau, and D. C. Johnson, “Photosensitivity in Optical Fibers,” Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 23, 125–157 (1993). [CrossRef]

] and is among one of its most striking properties. Some devices have already taken advantage of this large photosensitivity, including laser-written waveguides [12

C. Meneghini and A. Villeneuve, “As₂S₃ photosensitivity by two-photon absorption: holographic gratings and self-written channel waveguides,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 2946–2950 (1998). [CrossRef]

,13

A. Zoubir, M. Richardson, C. Rivero, A. Schulte, C. Lopez, K. Richardson, N. Hô, and R. Vallée, “Direct femtosecond laser writing of waveguides in As₂S₃ thin films,” Opt. Lett. 29, 748–750 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], surface gratings [14

T. V. Galstyan, J.-F. Viens, A. Villeneuve, K. Richardson, and M. A. Duguay, “Photoinduced Self-Developing Relief Gratings in Thin Film Chalcogenide As₂S₃ Glasses,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13, 1343–1347 (1997). [CrossRef]

] and integrated Bragg gratings [10

, 15

K. Tanaka, N. Toyosawa, and H. Hisakuni, “Photoinduced Bragg gratings in As₂S₃ optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1976–1978 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

–17

A. Saliminia, K. Le Foulgoc, A. Villeneuve, T. Galstian, and K. Richardson, “Photoinduced Bragg Reflectors in As-S-Se/As-S Based Chalcogenide Glass Multilayer Channel Waveguides,” Fiber & Integrated Optics 20, 151–158 (2001). [CrossRef]

], although none have yet offered an improvement to what is currently available in silica fibre or silicon waveguides. Structures that can benefit particularly well from the large refractive index change in chalcogenides are sampled Bragg gratings (SBGs) [18

B. J. Eggleton, P. A. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, “Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 30, 1620–1622 (1994). [CrossRef]

]. These provide a comb shaped transmission spectrum for which a large index change can extend the useable bandwidth and increase the strength beyond that possible in silica or silicon. SBGs open a new platform for WDM on-chip signal processing, providing a larger bandwidth response in a short, integrated device. Since chalcogenides can also be doped with rare-earth elements [19

P. N. Kumta and S. H. Risbud, “Review: Rare-earth chalcogenides - an emerging class of optical materials,” J. Materials Science 29, 1135–1158 (1994). [CrossRef]

] and exhibit strong Raman gain [20

S. D. Jackson and G. Anzueto-Sánchez, “Chalcogenide glass Raman fiber laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 221106 (2006).. [CrossRef]

] they show potential for hosting on-chip multi-wavelength lasers.

In this paper we explore the linear spectral response of a holographically written SBG in a chalcogenide-based As₂S₃ rib-waveguide. We describe the fabrication of high-quality As2S3 rib-waveguides and the scanning Sagnac interferometer used to write the SBG. We find the spectrum to be comparable to the broadest and strongest SBGs written in silica to date, and, by matching the measured spectrum to numerical results, we estimate the photo-induced refractive index change to be approximately 0.03.

2. Background

SBGs are formed by the on/off modulation of a Bragg grating written holographically into the core of a waveguide. Figure 1(a) is a schematic of the resulting refractive index profile of a typical SBG, outlining the key parameters of its design: the period of the underlying Bragg grating, Λ; the overall device length, L; the sampled period by which the Bragg grating is modulated, P; the “on” length of each Bragg region, P_o; the nominal waveguide refractive index n_o; the average (“DC”) refractive index in the on-part of the grating, n_dc; and finally the amplitude of the refractive index change, Δn, in these regions.

Fig.1. . a) Schematic of a SBG outlining: Bragg period Λ, overall length L, sampled period P, “on” length P_o, background index, n_dc, nominal material index n_o, and index modulation Δn. (b)–(d) show the calculated spectral response for P=500 µm, L=17 mm, Δn=5×10^-4 and duty cycles of 50%, 20% and 5%, respectively.

The comb-like spectral response of an SBG is illustrated in Fig. 1(b)–(d), which show the calculated transmission spectra of three SBGs each having P=500 µm, L=18 mm, Δn=5×10^-4 and duty cycles of 50%, 20% and 5%, respectively. These spectra, calculated numerically from the coupled mode equations [21

R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg gratings (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999), Section 4.2

], consist of evenly spaced rejection peaks separated by [18

B. J. Eggleton, P. A. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, “Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 30, 1620–1622 (1994). [CrossRef]

]

Δ λ_{s} \approx \frac{λ_{B}^{2}}{2 n_{d c} P},

(1)

where λ_B is the underlying Bragg wavelength and corresponds to the central rejection peak. Note that the rejection peaks are bound to an outer envelope which, to first order, is the Fourier transform of the modulating function [18

B. J. Eggleton, P. A. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, “Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 30, 1620–1622 (1994). [CrossRef]

]; here, a square wave modulation profile yields a sinc shaped spectral envelope. By using a more complex modulation function the spectral response can be tailored to follow any desired envelope [22

M. Ibsen, K. Durkin, J. Cole, and R. I. Laming, “Sinc-sampled fiber Bragg gratings for identical multiple wavelength operation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 842–844 (1998). [CrossRef]

]. The bandwidth of the central rejection band can be increased by lowering the duty cycle of the square wave, albeit reducing the strength of the grating in the process. As is the case for Bragg gratings, the strength of the individual rejection peaks of a SBG is proportional to the product of L and Δn, but where for a Bragg grating L is its entire length, it is the sum of the “on” sections, i.e., L·P_o/P, for a SBG. This is evident in Fig. 1(b)–(d) where the response weakens as the duty cycle is reduced.

Since the objective is to integrate SBGs eventually into compact on-chip devices, the natural aim is to obtain a strong comb filter response over a wide bandwidth, while keeping the device length small. Chalcogenides are able to compensate a short device length and low duty cycle through a large Δn.

3. Waveguide Fabrication

A detailed description of As₂S₃ waveguide fabrication has been given by Ruan et al [2

] and Li et al [3

W. T. Li, Y. L. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, A. Rode, and R. Boswell, “Dry-etch of As₂S₃ thin films for optical waveguide fabrication,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 26, 1626–1632 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. Briefly, waveguides are fabricated via ultra-fast pulsed laser deposition (UFPLD) of As₂S₃ onto an oxidized silicon wafer and processed into rib structures using standard photolithography and reactive ion etching. Figure 2(a) shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a typical waveguide prior to the application of its protective inorganic polymer glass (IPG) coating. Using the convention shown in Fig. 2(b), the SEM image shows a rib-waveguide having a rib width, w=7.0 µm, rib height, H=3.3 µm and slab height, h=2.1 µm. Propagation loss through these waveguides has been reported as low as 0.25 dB/cm [2

], but, likewise with silicon waveguides, the loss is strongly influenced by the surface quality of the sidewalls [23

Y. A. Vlasov and S. J. McNab, “Losses in single-mode silicon-on-insulator strip waveguides and bends,” Opt. Express 12, 1622–1631 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Figure 2(c) demonstrates the very smooth sidewall profiles that can be obtained in these waveguides, thus minimizing surface scattering losses.

Fig. 2. (a) SEM image of a rib-waveguide prior to the IPG application. (b) schematic of a rib-waveguide structure. c) enlarged image from (a) showing minimal sidewall roughness.

4. Experiment

The set-up used to write SBGs is shown in Fig. 3(a) and is based on the system previously described by Shokooh-Saremi et al. for writing short Bragg gratings into As₂S₃ rib-waveguides [17

]. In this system, an incoming laser beam is split by a phase mask into two equal ±1 orders that form the arms of a modified Sagnac interferometer with an As₂S₃ waveguide mounted at the point where the two arms interfere. Using a 532 nm CW frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser (with a photon energy below the material bandgap), a photo-induced refractive index change occurs within the waveguide at each maximum of the incident fringe pattern. The angle at which the two beams overlap determines the spacing of the fringe pattern and sets the Bragg period, Λ.

A few changes to this system were necessary to permit the writing of long SBGs. Since the interference pattern formed by the overlapping beams results from a path-length difference within the two arms of the interferometer, a single longitudinal mode 532 nm CW laser was selected to ensure a coherence length much longer than the grating being written, while the footprint of the grating writing area was increased by switching to 100 mm diameter mirrors in the Sagnac loop. A stepper-motor driven translation stage was included to scan the incoming beam across the phase mask, allowing for the localized control of Δn by adjusting the stage velocity throughout the scan. While a photolithographically etched chrome amplitude mask with periodic vertical slits was positioned directly in front of the waveguide to modulate the Bragg grating, resulting in a SBG.

In our experiment the shadow mask had 25 µm wide slits periodically separated by period, P=500 µm, giving a duty cycle of 5%. The waveguide used was 18 mm long and of similar dimensions to that shown in Fig. 2, except we chose w=2.3 µm to minimize contributions from modes other than the fundamental [24

V. Ta’eed, D. Moss, B. Eggleton, D. Freeman, S. Madden, M. Samoc, B. Luther-Davies, S. Janz, and D. Xu, “Higher order mode conversion via focused ion beam milled Bragg gratings in Silicon-on-Insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express 12, 5274–5284 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The output of the laser was spatially filtered and then collimated to a diameter of 0.5 mm with each interfering arm carrying 3 mW of optical power. It was scanned across the waveguide at 10 µm/s for 30 minutes.

Fig. 3. (a) Scanning Sagnac interferometric grating writing system showing modulating shadow mask for sampled Bragg grating fabrication. The irradiating beams move in the opposite direction to the translation stage as shown by the solid and dashed lines; (b) waveguide characterization system for measuring throughput of chalcogenide waveguide

The waveguide was characterized before, during and after writing using two butt-coupled optical fibres. The first was used to inject C-band light from a broadband EDFA source into the waveguide while the second fibre collected the transmitted spectrum and delivered it to an optical signal analyzer (OSA). The insertion loss caused by a mode-field diameter mismatch between the 2.3 µm wide waveguide and 10 µm diameter core SMF-28 fibre was quite large, so an intermediate stage was used to step-down the mode size and provide more efficient coupling. This was accomplished by fusion splicing a short length of high-NA fibre, having a 4 µm core diameter, to each end of the butt-coupled fibre. The insertion loss was further reduced through the precision alignment of the fibre to waveguide using an in-house built auto-alignment system. A polarization controller was used at the input to isolate the desired polarization state (TE) and to mitigate any polarization mode dependence that may have been present in the waveguide. The characterization system is shown in Fig. 3(b).

5. Results and analysis

The spectral response of a SBG written into an As₂S₃ rib-waveguide is shown in Fig. 4(a). This spectrum has Δλ_s=0.966 nm and a 3 dB bandwidth that spans almost 40 nm, where the central 11 rejection peaks are each over 20 dB strong. To our knowledge the strength and bandwidth of this grating is comparable to the best results observed in optical fibre [18

B. J. Eggleton, P. A. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, “Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 30, 1620–1622 (1994). [CrossRef]

, 25

M. Ibsen, J. Hübner, J. E. Pedersen, R. Kromann, L. -U. A. Anderson, and M. Kristensen, “30 dB sampled gratings in germanosilicate planar waveguides,” Electron. Lett. 32, 2233–2235 (1996). [CrossRef]

, 26

J. Hübner, D. Zauner, and M. Kristensen, “Strong sampled Bragg gratings for WDM applications,” IEEE. Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 552–554 (1998). [CrossRef]

]. Using Eq. (1), with λ_B=1548.8 nm and P=500 µm, we determine n_dc=2.48, which is independently confirmed as the effective modal index by measuring the free spectral range of the Fabry-Perot cavity formed by the end facets of an adjacent, unexposed waveguide.

Fig 4. (a) Measured spectrum from an SBG, and (b) the calculated spectrum using P=500 µm, duty cycle=5% and Δn=0.002. Inset: an enlargement of one rejection peak showing (i) the measured spectrum, and the calculated effect of tilting the mask by (ii) 0° with Δn=0.002, (iii) 0.075° with Δn=0.01, and (iv) 0.125° with Δn=0.016.

Figure 4(b) shows the calculated spectrum for two SBGs having L=18 mm, P=500 µm and a duty cycle of 5%. The blue dashed line represents the calculated spectrum for a grating written having a slight misalignment of the shadow mask, such that the normal to the mask has been offset from the normal to the As₂S₃ waveguide by 0.125°, while the red solid line represents the ideal case where the mask and As₂S₃ waveguide are parallel. Though the effect of tilting the mask is discussed in detail below, it is briefly mentioned here to emphasize that since we have positioned the shadow mask manually in front of the As₂S₃ waveguide, it is unlikely that perfect parallelism between the two has been obtained, and this has a detrimental effect on the resulting spectrum. For a given tilt of the shadow mask, the only unknown parameter required in calculating the grating spectrum [21

R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg gratings (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999), Section 4.2

] is the modulation depth of the refractive index, Δn, and is therefore used as a fitting parameter to match the strengths at λ_B to the measured value of -23 dB. A best fit to the measured spectrum is found by calculating the resulting spectra over a wide range of mask tilts. Returning to Fig. 4 (b), in the ideal case with 0° tilt, setting Δn=0.002 provides the desired -23 dB response at λ_B but the widths of the individual peaks and the span of the total bandwidth do not match well to the measured spectrum. Incorporating a tilt of only 0.125° and setting Δn=0.016, a good match is found in both strength and width. Although this represents a net refractive index change equal to 0.032, which compared to silica fibre is very large, it remains within the reported range for this material [2

K. Tanaka and Y. Ohtsuka, “Measurements of photoinduced transformations in amorphous As₂S₃ films by optical waveguiding,” J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6132–6135 (1978). [CrossRef]

] and is consistent with our previous measurements [10

An enlargement of one of the rejection peaks is shown in the inset to Fig. 4(a). Note how the measured width, (i), is substantially broader than that for the ideal spectrum where the waveguide and shadow mask are parallel, (ii). By incorporating a slight tilt to the mask, at 0.075° and 0.125° for (iii) and (iv), respectively, the width of the calculated profile is shown to increase substantially with the latter providing a satisfactory fit to (i).

To explain the observed broadening we determine that the SBG has been inadvertently chirped, which would result in precisely such broadening [27

F. Ouelllette, P. A. Krug, T. Stephens, G. Dhosi, and B. J. Eggleton, “Broadband and WDM dispersion compensation using chirped sampled fibre Bragg gratings,” Electron. Lett 31, 899–901 (1995). [CrossRef]

]. However, chirping is usually achieved through the variation of P over the length of the grating [27

] whereas the period of the shadow mask is known to be uniform throughout. We believe that the chirping results from an effective change in P within the waveguide, whereby the background refractive index actually changes between each of the “on” regions of the SBG over its entire length. This causes the effective optical path length to differ between each “on” region, hence chirping the grating. We discuss below how a slight misalignment of the shadow mask can cause this effect.

To understand this effect, note that at the waveguide where the two incident beams overlap their angles of incidence are the same giving each an identical spot size. However, at the mask, as it is tilted towards one of the incoming beams, the angle of incidence between each beam and the mask will differ and, consequently, so too will their spot size. Since at the waveguide the spot sizes are the same but each beam has passed through a different fraction of the mask, both beams have effectively been modulated with a different period. Where the modulated beams do overlap at the waveguide they interfere to form an “on” region, but from their difference in periods the overlap is not maintained along the length of the waveguide (as it would in the ideal case) and instead walks apart. The first effect is then a reduction in the actual length of the SBG. The second effect comes from a non-interfering “DC” refractive index change within the walk-off region and is the cause of the effective optical path length change. Figure 5 is an exaggerated illustration showing the resulting DC refractive index change formed in a 4.5 mm length of waveguide by two incident beams, the red (dot-dashed) and green (dashed), passing through a shadow mask tilted towards the green beam. Here the mask has P=500 µm and, for illustration purposes, a duty cycle of 30% and a tilt of 1°. Where the two beams overlap they interfere to form a SBG, outlined by the solid black line. Note the regions where the interference zone becomes narrower and where the refractive index change on either side is purely DC. Then, in terms of the effective optical path length, P does in fact change from one interference region to the next. This is analogous to chirp and leads to the observed spectral broadening.

In matching the calculated spectrum to the one measured we have had to account for both the tilt and Δn parameters. Although the width of the individual rejection peaks are partially influenced by the magnitude of Δn, they are most strongly influenced by the chirp. And so, in matching the calculated and measured widths, we determine the mask has been tilted by approximately 0.125°. The walk-off from the mismatched periods explains why Δn becomes so large for such a marginal tilt. For the ideal case, with a tilt of 0°, the overlap is maintained over the entire 18 mm length of waveguide, while for a tilt of 0.125° and a 5% duty cycle the device length reduces to only 8 mm and hence Δn must be increased to compensate [21

R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg gratings (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999), Section 4.2

Fig. 5. Schematic demonstrating the interference walk-off caused by a misalignment of the shadow mask. Top: two incident beams (green and red) are modulated through a shadow mask, tilted towards the green beam by 1°. Below; the corresponding DC refractive index within the waveguide caused by the green (dashed) and red (dot-dashed) incident beams. The regions where two beams interfere to form the SBG is represented by the solid black line.

6. Discussion

To eliminate the chirping effect and to realize a long, uniform SBG would require a more elaborate mask positioning system than currently available. Alternatively, it may be possible to pattern the mask directly onto the waveguide which would eliminate the need for such precise alignment altogether. In either case, if a Δn of approximately 0.03 could be observed in a SBG longer than 8 mm, the resulting spectrum’s strength and bandwidth would increase well beyond that possible in silica fibre. Additionally, through the elimination of chirp the spectral features become narrower and the SBG is much better suited for applications to devices such as the on-chip multi-wavelength Raman laser mentioned previously.

However, prior to any such major advancement, further investigations need to be made into the stability and robustness of chalcogenides in general. Although they display very promising optical properties, chalcogenides are still very much in their infancy in terms of hosting integrated all-optical signal processing devices. To date, very little has been reported on the long term stability of the photorefractive index change, including its response to standard processing techniques such as annealing, or even the fluence threshold dividing the reversible and irreversible photorefractive index change regimes. Some common problems that have been reported in As₂S₃ chalcogenides include: photodarkening of the material by moderate intensities of the carrier signal at frequencies well below the material’s bandgap (1.5 µm) [28

N. Hô, J. M. Laniel, R. Vallée, and A. Villeneuve, “Photosensitivity of As₂S₃ chalcogenide thin films at 1.5 µm,” Opt. Lett. 28, 965–967 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], which leads to a low damage threshold and a possible photo-induced crystallization [29

Y. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, W. Li, A. Rode, V. Kolev, and S. Madden, “Large phase shifts in As₂S₃ waveguides for all-optical processing devices,” Opt. Lett. 19, 2605–2607 (2005). [CrossRef]

]; positive or negative photorefractive index changes reported in similarly prepared materials where the as-deposited film stoichiometry varied by only a few percent [30

K. Petov and P. J. S. Ewen, “Photoinduced changes in the linear and non-linear optical properties of chalcogenide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 249, 150–159 (1999). [CrossRef]

], as well as a host of other interesting phenomena that are not well understood, though all seem to depend heavily on all the subtleties of the material preparation and handling [31

M. Popescu, “Disordered chalcogenide optoelectronics materials: phenomena and applications,” J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7, 2189–2210 (2005).

]. Of the many different groups reporting on chalcogenides, most employ slightly different processing techniques and material stoichiometries [31

M. Popescu, “Disordered chalcogenide optoelectronics materials: phenomena and applications,” J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7, 2189–2210 (2005).

], making direct across-the-board comparisons of results difficult. Needless to say, as progress is made into proof-of-principle devices (such as the SBG discussed here) and the potential uses of chalcogenides continues to gain interest amongst those with a focus on commercial applications, further studies into their viability are bound to result. This was the case with the commercialization of fibre Bragg gratings, which led to not only a better understanding of the photo-refractive index change, but also to enhancements in photosensitivity through fibre-hydrogenation [32

P. J. Lemaire, R. M. Atkins, V. Mizrahi, and W. A. Reed, “High pressure H₂ loading as a technique for achieving ultrahigh UV photosensitivity and thermal sensitivity in GeO₂ doped optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 29, 1191–1193 (1993). [CrossRef]

] and improvements long-term stability through post-process annealing [33

I. Riant and B. Poumellec, “Thermal decay of gratings written in hydrogen-loaded germanosilicate fibres,” Electron. Lett. 34, 1603–1604 (1998). [CrossRef]

7. Conclusion

We present a sampled Bragg grating written into a highly photosensitive As₂S₃ rib-waveguide that is 23 dB deep and has a 3 dB bandwidth spanning 40 nm. From it we infer a net refractive index change of approximately 0.03 by accounting for the induced chirp and a resulting 8 mm long grating. We believe that through a modest modification to the writing system a significantly stronger and broader response can be obtained, well surpassing what can be achieved in silica fibre or silicon waveguides. The integration of SBGs into a chalcogenide waveguides provides a new platform to both IR and telecommunications based WDM systems, and provided the material proves robust enough for commercial use, has a wide range of practical applications.

Acknowledgments

This work was produced with the assistance of the Australian Research Council (ARC). The Centre for Ultrahigh-bandwidth Devices for Optical Systems (CUDOS) is an ARC Centre of Excellence.

References and Links

1.	A.R. Hilton, “Nonoxide Chalcogenide Glass as Infrared Optical Materials,” Appl. Opt. 5, 1877–1882 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.	Y. Ruan, W. Li, R. Jarvis, N. Madsen, A. Rode, and B. Luther-Davies, “Fabrication and characterization of low loss rib chalcogenide waveguides made by dry etching,” Opt. Express 12, 5140–5145 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.	W. T. Li, Y. L. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, A. Rode, and R. Boswell, “Dry-etch of As₂S₃ thin films for optical waveguide fabrication,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 26, 1626–1632 (2005). [CrossRef]
4.	N. Hô, M. C. Phillips, H. Qiao, P. J. Allen, K. Krishnaswami, B. J. Riley, T. L. Myres, and N. C. Anheier Jr., “Single-mode low-loss chalcogenide glass waveguides for the mid-infrared,” Opt. Lett. 31, 1860–1862 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5.	C. Grillet, C. Smith, D. Freeman, S. Madden, B. Luther-Davies, E. Magi, D. Moss, and B. J. Eggleton, “Efficient coupling to chalcogenide glass photonic crystal waveguides via silica optical fiber nanowires,” Opt. Express 14, 1070–1078 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6.	G. Lenz, J. Zimmermann, T. Katsufuji, M. E. Lines, H. Y. Hwang, S. Spälter, R. E. Slusher, S. -W Cheong, J. S. Sanghera, and I. D. Aggarwal, “Larger Kerr effect in bulk Se-based chalcogenide glasses,” Opt. Lett. 25, 254–256 (2000). [CrossRef]
7.	M. Asobe, H. Kobayashi, H. Itoh, and T. Kanamori, “Laser-diode-driven ultrafast all-optical switching by using highly nonlinear chalcogenide glass fiber,” Opt. Lett. 18, 1056–1058 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8.	V. G. Ta’eed, M. Shokooh-Saremi, L. Fu, D. J. Moss, M. Rochette, I. C. M. Littler, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, “Integrated all-optical pulse regenerator in chalcogenide waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 2900–2902 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9.	K. Tanaka and Y. Ohtsuka, “Measurements of photoinduced transformations in amorphous As₂S₃ films by optical waveguiding,” J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6132–6135 (1978). [CrossRef]
10.	M. Shokooh-Saremi, V. G. Ta’eed, N. J. Baker, I. C. M. Littler, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, “High-performance Bragg gratings in chalcogenide rib-waveguides written with a modified Sagnac Interferometer,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 1323–1331 (2006). [CrossRef]
11.	K. O. Hill, B. Malo, F. Bilodeau, and D. C. Johnson, “Photosensitivity in Optical Fibers,” Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 23, 125–157 (1993). [CrossRef]
12.	C. Meneghini and A. Villeneuve, “As₂S₃ photosensitivity by two-photon absorption: holographic gratings and self-written channel waveguides,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 2946–2950 (1998). [CrossRef]
13.	A. Zoubir, M. Richardson, C. Rivero, A. Schulte, C. Lopez, K. Richardson, N. Hô, and R. Vallée, “Direct femtosecond laser writing of waveguides in As₂S₃ thin films,” Opt. Lett. 29, 748–750 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	T. V. Galstyan, J.-F. Viens, A. Villeneuve, K. Richardson, and M. A. Duguay, “Photoinduced Self-Developing Relief Gratings in Thin Film Chalcogenide As₂S₃ Glasses,” J. Lightwave Technol. 13, 1343–1347 (1997). [CrossRef]
15.	K. Tanaka, N. Toyosawa, and H. Hisakuni, “Photoinduced Bragg gratings in As₂S₃ optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1976–1978 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.	M. Asobe, T. Ohara, I. Yokohama, and T. Kaino, “Fabrication of Bragg grating in chalcogenide glass fibre using the transverse holographic method,” Electron. Lett. 32, 1611–1613 (1996). [CrossRef]
17.	A. Saliminia, K. Le Foulgoc, A. Villeneuve, T. Galstian, and K. Richardson, “Photoinduced Bragg Reflectors in As-S-Se/As-S Based Chalcogenide Glass Multilayer Channel Waveguides,” Fiber & Integrated Optics 20, 151–158 (2001). [CrossRef]
18.	B. J. Eggleton, P. A. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, “Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 30, 1620–1622 (1994). [CrossRef]
19.	P. N. Kumta and S. H. Risbud, “Review: Rare-earth chalcogenides - an emerging class of optical materials,” J. Materials Science 29, 1135–1158 (1994). [CrossRef]
20.	S. D. Jackson and G. Anzueto-Sánchez, “Chalcogenide glass Raman fiber laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 221106 (2006).. [CrossRef]
21.	R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg gratings (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999), Section 4.2
22.	M. Ibsen, K. Durkin, J. Cole, and R. I. Laming, “Sinc-sampled fiber Bragg gratings for identical multiple wavelength operation,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 842–844 (1998). [CrossRef]
23.	Y. A. Vlasov and S. J. McNab, “Losses in single-mode silicon-on-insulator strip waveguides and bends,” Opt. Express 12, 1622–1631 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24.	V. Ta’eed, D. Moss, B. Eggleton, D. Freeman, S. Madden, M. Samoc, B. Luther-Davies, S. Janz, and D. Xu, “Higher order mode conversion via focused ion beam milled Bragg gratings in Silicon-on-Insulator waveguides,” Opt. Express 12, 5274–5284 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25.	M. Ibsen, J. Hübner, J. E. Pedersen, R. Kromann, L. -U. A. Anderson, and M. Kristensen, “30 dB sampled gratings in germanosilicate planar waveguides,” Electron. Lett. 32, 2233–2235 (1996). [CrossRef]
26.	J. Hübner, D. Zauner, and M. Kristensen, “Strong sampled Bragg gratings for WDM applications,” IEEE. Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 552–554 (1998). [CrossRef]
27.	F. Ouelllette, P. A. Krug, T. Stephens, G. Dhosi, and B. J. Eggleton, “Broadband and WDM dispersion compensation using chirped sampled fibre Bragg gratings,” Electron. Lett 31, 899–901 (1995). [CrossRef]
28.	N. Hô, J. M. Laniel, R. Vallée, and A. Villeneuve, “Photosensitivity of As₂S₃ chalcogenide thin films at 1.5 µm,” Opt. Lett. 28, 965–967 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29.	Y. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, W. Li, A. Rode, V. Kolev, and S. Madden, “Large phase shifts in As₂S₃ waveguides for all-optical processing devices,” Opt. Lett. 19, 2605–2607 (2005). [CrossRef]
30.	K. Petov and P. J. S. Ewen, “Photoinduced changes in the linear and non-linear optical properties of chalcogenide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 249, 150–159 (1999). [CrossRef]
31.	M. Popescu, “Disordered chalcogenide optoelectronics materials: phenomena and applications,” J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7, 2189–2210 (2005).
32.	P. J. Lemaire, R. M. Atkins, V. Mizrahi, and W. A. Reed, “High pressure H₂ loading as a technique for achieving ultrahigh UV photosensitivity and thermal sensitivity in GeO₂ doped optical fibres,” Electron. Lett. 29, 1191–1193 (1993). [CrossRef]
33.	I. Riant and B. Poumellec, “Thermal decay of gratings written in hydrogen-loaded germanosilicate fibres,” Electron. Lett. 34, 1603–1604 (1998). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(090.2880) Holography : Holographic interferometry
(160.2750) Materials : Glass and other amorphous materials
(230.1480) Optical devices : Bragg reflectors

ToC Category:
Optical Devices

History
Original Manuscript: August 7, 2006
Revised Manuscript: September 20, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: September 25, 2006
Published: October 2, 2006

Citation
Neil J. Baker, Ho W. Lee, Ian C. Littler, C. Martijn de Sterke, Benjamin J. Eggleton, Duk-Yong Choi, Steve Madden, and Barry Luther-Davies, "Sampled Bragg gratings in chalcogenide (As₂S₃) rib-waveguides," Opt. Express 14, 9451-9459 (2006)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-20-9451

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

A. R. Hilton, "Nonoxide Chalcogenide Glass as Infrared Optical Materials," Appl. Opt. 5, 1877-1882 (1966). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Y. Ruan, W. Li, R. Jarvis, N. Madsen, A. Rode, and B. Luther-Davies, "Fabrication and characterization of low loss rib chalcogenide waveguides made by dry etching," Opt. Express 12, 5140-5145 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
W. T. Li, Y. L. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, A. Rode, and R. Boswell, "Dry-etch of As2S3 thin films for optical waveguide fabrication," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 26, 1626-1632 (2005). [CrossRef]
N. Hô, M. C. Phillips, H. Qiao, P. J. Allen, K. Krishnaswami, B. J. Riley, T. L. Myres, and N. C. AnheierJr., "Single-mode low-loss chalcogenide glass waveguides for the mid-infrared," Opt. Lett. 31, 1860-1862 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Grillet, C. Smith, D. Freeman, S. Madden, B. Luther-Davies, E. Magi, D. Moss, and B. J. Eggleton, "Efficient coupling to chalcogenide glass photonic crystal waveguides via silica optical fiber nanowires," Opt. Express 14, 1070-1078 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
G. Lenz, J. Zimmermann, T. Katsufuji, M. E. Lines, H. Y. Hwang, S. Spälter, R. E. Slusher, S.-W, Cheong, J. S. Sanghera, and I. D. Aggarwal, "Larger Kerr effect in bulk Se-based chalcogenide glasses," Opt. Lett. 25, 254-256 (2000). [CrossRef]
M. Asobe, H. Kobayashi, H. Itoh, and T. Kanamori, "Laser-diode-driven ultrafast all-optical switching by using highly nonlinear chalcogenide glass fiber," Opt. Lett. 18, 1056-1058 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
V. G. Ta’eed, M. Shokooh-Saremi, L. Fu, D. J. Moss, M. Rochette, I. C. M. Littler, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, "Integrated all-optical pulse regenerator in chalcogenide waveguides," Opt. Lett. 30, 2900-2902 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
K. Tanaka, and Y. Ohtsuka, "Measurements of photoinduced transformations in amorphous As2S3 films by optical waveguiding," J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6132-6135 (1978). [CrossRef]
M. Shokooh-Saremi, V. G. Ta’eed, N. J. Baker, I. C. M. Littler, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, Y. Ruan, and B. Luther-Davies, "High-performance Bragg gratings in chalcogenide rib-waveguides written with a modified Sagnac Interferometer," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 1323-1331 (2006). [CrossRef]
K. O. Hill, B. Malo, F. Bilodeau, and D. C. Johnson, "Photosensitivity in Optical Fibers," Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 23, 125-157 (1993). [CrossRef]
C. Meneghini and A. Villeneuve, "As2S3 photosensitivity by two-photon absorption: holographic gratings and self-written channel waveguides," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 15, 2946-2950 (1998). [CrossRef]
A. Zoubir, M. Richardson, C. Rivero, A. Schulte, C. Lopez, K. Richardson, N. Hô, and R. Vallée, "Direct femtosecond laser writing of waveguides in As2S3 thin films," Opt. Lett. 29, 748-750 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
T. V. Galstyan, J.-F. Viens, A. Villeneuve, K. Richardson, and M. A. Duguay, "Photoinduced Self-Developing Relief Gratings in Thin Film Chalcogenide As2S3 Glasses," J. Lightwave Technol. 13, 1343-1347 (1997). [CrossRef]
K. Tanaka, N. Toyosawa, and H. Hisakuni, "Photoinduced Bragg gratings in As2S3 optical fibers," Opt. Lett. 20, 1976-1978 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. Asobe, T. Ohara, I. Yokohama, and T. Kaino, "Fabrication of Bragg grating in chalcogenide glass fibre using the transverse holographic method," Electron. Lett. 32, 1611-1613 (1996). [CrossRef]
A. Saliminia, K. Le Foulgoc, A. Villeneuve, T. Galstian, and K. Richardson, "Photoinduced Bragg Reflectors in As-S-Se/As-S Based Chalcogenide Glass Multilayer Channel Waveguides," Fiber Integr. Opt. 20, 151-158 (2001). [CrossRef]
B. J. Eggleton, P. A. Krug, L. Poladian, and F. Ouellette, "Long periodic superstructure Bragg gratings in optical fibres," Electron. Lett. 30, 1620-1622 (1994). [CrossRef]
P. N. Kumta, and S. H. Risbud, "Review: Rare-earth chalcogenides-an emerging class of optical materials," J. Materials Science 29, 1135-1158 (1994). [CrossRef]
S. D. Jackson, and G. Anzueto-Sánchez, "Chalcogenide glass Raman fiber laser," Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 221106 (2006). [CrossRef]
R. Kashyap, Fiber Bragg gratings (Academic Press, San Diego, 1999), Section 4.2
M. Ibsen, K. Durkin, J. Cole, and R. I. Laming, "Sinc-sampled fiber Bragg gratings for identical multiple wavelength operation," IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 842-844 (1998). [CrossRef]
Y. A. Vlasov, and S. J. McNab, "Losses in single-mode silicon-on-insulator strip waveguides and bends," Opt. Express 12, 1622-1631 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
V. Ta'eed, D. Moss, B. Eggleton, D. Freeman, S. Madden, M. Samoc, B. Luther-Davies, S. Janz, and D. Xu, "Higher order mode conversion via focused ion beam milled Bragg gratings in Silicon-on-Insulator waveguides," Opt. Express 12, 5274-5284 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. Ibsen, J. Hübner, J. E. Pedersen, R. Kromann, L.-U. A. Anderson, and M. Kristensen, "30 dB sampled gratings in germanosilicate planar waveguides," Electron. Lett. 32, 2233-2235 (1996). [CrossRef]
J. Hübner, D. Zauner, and M. Kristensen, "Strong sampled Bragg gratings for WDM applications," IEEE. Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 552-554 (1998). [CrossRef]
F. Ouelllette, P. A. Krug, T. Stephens, G. Dhosi, B. J. Eggleton, "Broadband and WDM dispersion compensation using chirped sampled fibre Bragg gratings," Electron. Lett 31, 899-901 (1995). [CrossRef]
N. Hô, J. M. Laniel, R. Vallée, and A. Villeneuve, "Photosensitivity of As2S3 chalcogenide thin films at 1.5 μm," Opt. Lett. 28, 965-967 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Y. Ruan, B. Luther-Davies, W. Li, A. Rode, V. Kolev, and S. Madden, "Large phase shifts in As2S3 waveguides for all-optical processing devices," Opt. Lett. 19, 2605-2607 (2005). [CrossRef]
K. Petov, and P. J. S. Ewen, "Photoinduced changes in the linear and non-linear optical properties of chalcogenide glasses," J. Non-Cryst. Solids 249, 150-159 (1999). [CrossRef]
M. Popescu, "Disordered chalcogenide optoelectronics materials: phenomena and applications," J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 7, 2189-2210 (2005).
P. J. Lemaire, R. M. Atkins, V. Mizrahi, and W. A. Reed, "High pressure H2 loading as a technique for achieving ultrahigh UV photosensitivity and thermal sensitivity in GeO2 doped optical fibres," Electron. Lett. 29, 1191-1193 (1993). [CrossRef]
I. Riant, and B. Poumellec, "Thermal decay of gratings written in hydrogen-loaded germanosilicate fibres," Electron. Lett. 34, 1603-1604 (1998). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper

Figures


Fig.1. .	Fig. 2.	Fig. 3.


Fig 4.	Fig. 5.

« Previous Article | Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

OpticsInfoBase

Optics Express

Sampled Bragg gratings in chalcogenide (As₂S₃) rib-waveguides

Article Tools