OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Michael Duncan
  • Vol. 14, Iss. 7 — Apr. 3, 2006
  • pp: 2851–2863
« Show journal navigation

Two-dimensional self-trapped nonlinear photonic lattices

Anton S. Desyatnikov, Nina Sagemerten, Robert Fischer, Bernd Terhalle, Denis Träger, Dragomir N. Neshev, Alexander Dreischuh, Cornelia Denz, Wieslaw Krolikowski, and Yuri S. Kivshar  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 14, Issue 7, pp. 2851-2863 (2006)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.002851


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1679 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We predict theoretically and generate experimentally in pho-torefractive crystal two-dimensional self-trapped periodic waves of different symmetries, including vortex lattices – patterns of phase dislocations with internal energy flows. We demonstrate that these nonlinear waves exist with nonlocal nonlinearity even when the optically-induced periodic refractive index becomes highly anisotropic, and it depends on the orientation of the two-dimensional lattice relative to the crystallographic c-axis.

© 2006 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Many novel possibilities to control light propagation, as well as steering and trapping of optical beams, become accessible in nonlinear periodic photonic structures [1

1. Yu. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, San Diego, 2003), 540 pp., and references therein.

]. Periodic modulation of the refractive index changes dramatically the wave band-gap spectrum and diffraction. The interplay between diffraction and periodicity consequently strongly affects the propagation and localization of light, leading to the formation of novel types of self-trapped optical beams, discrete and gap spatial solitons [2

2. S. F. Mingaleev, Yu. S. Kivshar, and R. Sammut, in: Soliton-driven Photonics, A. D. Boardman and A. P. Sukho-rukov, Eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001), pp. 487–504. [CrossRef]

].

Photonic lattices can be induced optically in photorefractive crystals employing their anisotropic electro-optic properties [3

3. N. K. Efremidis, S. Sears, D. N. Christodoulides, J. W. Fleischer, and M. Segev, “Discrete solitons in photore-fractive optically induced photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. E 66, 046602 (2002). [CrossRef]

, 4

4. J. W. Fleischer, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of two-dimensional discrete solitons in optically induced nonlinear photonic lattices,” Nature 422, 147 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 5

5. D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, and W. Krolikowski, “Spatial solitons in optically induced gratings,” Opt. Lett. 28, 710–712 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In this approach, an ordinary-polarized periodic light pattern created by several interfering plane waves induces a change of the refractive index via the strong electro-optic effect, while propagating linearly along the crystal. The induced periodic refractive index follows the light intensity distribution and it forms a two-dimensional (2D) photonic lattice, being uniform in the direction of propagation. On the other hand an extraordinary polarized signal beam propagates in the periodically modulated medium and simultaneously is affected by the strong photorefractive screening nonlinearity.

Another important possibility to create stationary two-dimensional light patterns for all-optical induction is offered by the self-trapped periodic waves. Indeed, the diffractionless light patterns in the form of stationary nonlinear periodic waves can propagate without change in their profile, becoming the eigenmodes of the self-induced periodic potentials. This behavior is generic, since nonlinear periodic waves can exist in any type of nonlinear media, not restricted to photorefractive crystals. Such nonlinear periodic waves can be considered as flexible structures because the lattice is modified and shaped by the nonlinear medium. Such flexible nonlinear photonic lattices offer many novel possibilities for the study of nonlinear effects in periodic systems, because they can interact with localized signal beams via the cross-phase modulation and can form composite bound states [6

6. A. S. Desyatnikov, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, and C. Denz, “Composite band-gap solitons in nonlinear optically induced lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 153902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 7

7. D. Neshev, Yu. S. Kivshar, H. Martin, and Z. G. Chen, “Soliton stripes in two-dimensional nonlinear photonic lattices,” Opt. Lett. 29, 486 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 8

8. H. Martin, E. D. Eugenieva, Z. Chen, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Discrete solitons and soliton-induced dislocations in partially coherent photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Nonlinear photonic lattices created by two-dimensional arrays of pixel-like spatial solitons have been demonstrated experimentally in parametric systems [9

9. S. Minardi, S. Sapone, W. Chinaglia, P. Di Trapani, and A. Berzanskis, “Pixellike parametric generator based on controlled spatial-soliton formation,” Opt. Lett. 25, 326 (2000). [CrossRef]

], and in photorefractive crystals [10

10. Z. Chen and K. McCarthy, “Spatial soliton pixels from partially incoherent light,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2019 (2002). [CrossRef]

, 11

11. J. Petter, J. Schröder, D. Träger, and C. Denz, “Optical control of arrays of photorefractive screening solitons,” Opt. Lett. 28, 438 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For the latter case of two-dimensional arrays of in-phase spatial solitons created by the amplitude modulation, every pixel of the lattice induces a waveguide which can be manipulated by an external steering beam [11

11. J. Petter, J. Schröder, D. Träger, and C. Denz, “Optical control of arrays of photorefractive screening solitons,” Opt. Lett. 28, 438 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 12

12. M. Petrović, D. Träger, A. Strinić, M. Belić, J. Schröder, and C. Denz, “Solitonic lattices in photorefractive crystals,” Phys. Rev. E 68, 055601R (2003). [CrossRef]

]. However, the spatial periodicity of these two-dimensional soliton lattices is limited by attractive interaction of the neighboring solitons that generates their strong instability. In contrast, the recently suggested two-dimensional square lattices created by out-of-phase spatial solitons were demonstrated to be robust in the isotropic saturable model [13

13. Ya. V. Kartashov, V. A. Visloukh, and L. Torner, “Two-dimensional cnoidal waves in Kerr-type saturable nonlinear media,” Phys. Rev. E 68, 015603 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. The phase profile of such self-trapped waves resembles a chessboard pattern with the lines of π-phase jumps between the neighboring sites.

Recently, we demonstrated experimentally the generation of lattices with the four-fold symmetry in an anisotropic photorefractive crystal [14

14. A. S. Desyatnikov, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Sagemerten, D. Träger, J. Jägers, C. Denz, and Y. V. Kartashov, “Nonlinear photonic lattices in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 869 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Changing the orientation of the lattice with respect to the c-axis of the photorefractive crystal, we distinguish two types of nonlinear periodic waves: the square pattern, with one high symmetry axis oriented parallel to the c-axis, and diamond pattern, tilted by 45° with respect to the c-axis. Anisotropy of the photorefractive media was shown to affect significantly the diffraction of the propagating waves [15

15. Z. Chen, H. Martin, E. D. Eugenieva, J. Xu, and A. Bezryadina, “Anisotropic enhancement of discrete diffraction and formation of two-dimensional discrete-soliton trains,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 143902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], but even more importantly, it changes the symmetry properties of the induced refractive index pattern because of the combined effect of saturation and nonlocality [14

14. A. S. Desyatnikov, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Sagemerten, D. Träger, J. Jägers, C. Denz, and Y. V. Kartashov, “Nonlinear photonic lattices in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 869 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

In this paper, we perform a generic study on the different symmetry-types of two-dimensional nonlinear periodic waves and reveal their rich variety of symmetries and nontrivial phase structures. We demonstrate, that such periodic waves can be generated in anisotropic photorefrac-tive materials, possessing orientational-dependent structure. First, we study theoretically the phase-modulated two-dimensional structures of a square geometry, using an anisotropic nonlocal model of photorefractive nonlinearity, in both self-focusing and self-defocusing nonlinear media. We then expand our analysis and introduce novel symmetry-types of two-dimensional nonlinear modes with edge-type phase dislocations and three-fold symmetry, triangular lattices. Similar to the two distinct orientations for square lattices, we distinguish the triangular patterns with one of the three dislocation lines oriented parallel or perpendicular to the crystal axis. Again the differences appear in the distribution of the refractive index, and they became more pronounced for larger intensities of the lattice wave, i.e., in the regime of higher saturation. We demonstrate experimentally how this orientational dependence changes the guiding properties of the photonic lattice.

2. Phase-modulated lattices: theoretical background

Spatially periodic nonlinear modes appear naturally due to a combined action of self-focusing and modulational instability [1

1. Yu. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, San Diego, 2003), 540 pp., and references therein.

]. When the self-focusing effect compensates for diffraction of the optical beams, it may support both isolated spatial solitons and periodic soliton-type lattices. The latter can be identified as stationary periodic nonlinear waves, and they include well studied cnoidal waves, described by the cn and dn Jacobi elliptic functions as the stationary solutions of the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation [1

1. Yu. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, San Diego, 2003), 540 pp., and references therein.

],

iEz+2Ex2+2Ey2+n(I)E=0,
(1)

where I ≡ |E|2 is the light intensity. Similar nonlinear waves appear as periodic solutions of different nonlinear models, including quadratic, Kerr-type saturable, and photorefractive anisotropic nonlocal models.

In the case of photorefractive, anisotropic and nonlocal model, the nonlinear contribution to the refractive index in Eq. (1

1. Yu. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, San Diego, 2003), 540 pp., and references therein.

) is given by [24

24. A. A. Zozulya, D. Z. Anderson, A. V. Mamaev, and M. Saffman, “Solitary attractors and low-order filamentation in anisotropic self-focusing media,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 522 (1997). [CrossRef]

]

n(I)=σΓφx,
(2)

where the parameter Γ = x02κ2 n02 r effℰ is defined through the effective electro-optic coefficient reff and externally applied bias electrostatic field ℰ. The dimensionless parameter σ = ± 1 indicates the polarity of the applied voltage that changes the character of the photorefractive screening nonlinearity: self-focusing, for σ = +1, or self-defocusing otherwise. The electrostatic potential φ of the optically-induced space-charge field pattern satisfies the equation:

2φ+φIn(1+I)=xIn(1+I),
(3)

where we use the standard notation ∇ for the two-dimensional gradient operator such that 2 = x2 + y2, and the intensity I is measured in units of the background (dark) illumination intensity, required for the formation of spatial solitons in this medium. The physical variables , , and correspond to their dimensionless counterparts as (x̃,ỹ) = x 0(x,y) and = 2κx02 z, here x 0 is the transverse scale factor and κ = 2π n 0/λ is the carrier wave vector with the linear refractive index n 0. Stationary solutions to the system (1)-(3) are sought in the standard form, E(x,y,z) = U(x,y) exp(ikz), where the field envelope U satisfies the equation

kU+2Ux2+2Uy2+ΓUφx=0.
(4)

Following Ref. [14

14. A. S. Desyatnikov, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Sagemerten, D. Träger, J. Jägers, C. Denz, and Y. V. Kartashov, “Nonlinear photonic lattices in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 869 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], first we look for periodic solutions of a square symmetry, U(X,Y) = U(X + 2π,Y + 2π), and solve Eqs. (3), (4) using the relaxation technique [24

24. A. A. Zozulya, D. Z. Anderson, A. V. Mamaev, and M. Saffman, “Solitary attractors and low-order filamentation in anisotropic self-focusing media,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 522 (1997). [CrossRef]

] with the initial ansatz in the form of a linear periodic mode,

UlinXY=AsinXsinY.
(5)
Fig. 1. Comparison between the nonlinear square lattices in self-focusing (b, σ = +1), and self-defocusing (c, σ = - 1) media. The field U(x,y) in (a) and refractive index ∂xφ in (b,c) are shown for three distinct values of the mode amplitude max U(x,y), or the propagation constant k, from low (k= -1.9 and k = -2.1) to high (k= -1.2 and k = -2.8) saturation. Colors are scaled, and the information about the absolute values of the mode amplitude, power density, and the refractive index modulation is summarized in (d).

We find that at least two distinct families of such solutions bifurcate from the linear wave U lin(X, Y), depending on its spatial orientation: a square lattice parallel to the c -axis with X = x and Y = y, and a diamond lattice oriented diagonally, in the latter case X = (x+y)/√2 and Y = (x - y)√2. Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 show the field and refractive index for the three values of the lattice intensity, corresponding to the low, moderate, and high saturation regimes for both families of periodic modes, respectively. In a general case Γ ≠ 1, the existence region of these two families occupy a band k ∈ [-2,Γ - 2] with the amplitude A(k) and power density P(k) vanishing in the linear limit k → -2, see Fig. 1(d) and Fig. 2(d). Here the power density is defined as the power of a unit cell, P = 4 0π U 2 dXdY. The main difference between the solutions with different orientations comes from the structure of the refractive index, as is clearly seen comparing Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 2(b). In the regime of high saturation of nonlinearity the regions with the effective focusing lenses are well separated for the diamond lattice [see Fig. 2(a-d)], and fuse effectively to vertical lines for the square lattice [see Fig. 1(a-d)]; this happens due to larger nonlocality in the limit of strong nonlinearity saturation. In Fig. 1(d) and Fig. 2(d), we plot the maximum and minimum values (extrema) of the refractive index, Extr(∂φ/∂x).

The model (2) includes the self-defocusing nonlinearity which can be realized with reversing the polarity of the bias external field applied to a photorefractive crystal. In this case σ = - 1 and we also find numerically the stationary periodic square lattices, a two-dimensional analog of the sn-type one-dimensional cnoidal waves. The corresponding families of such periodic solutions [Fig. 1(c) and Fig. 2(c)] are compared to the four-fold symmetry lattices in a self-focusing medium. We notice that, while the field distribution is almost identical in both cases, the refractive index is opposite: the positive maxima in the self-focusing case (focusing lenses) is inverted for σ = - 1, and it represents defocusing lenses (induced potential maxima). Parameters of two families for σ = ±1 in Fig. 1(d) and Fig. 2(d) are almost symmetric with respect to the linear solution at k = -2, however, these two families correspond to different existence domains.

Fig. 2. Same as in Fig. 1 but for the diamond lattices.

3. Experimental approach

To demonstrate experimentally both the existence and stability of the nonlinear periodic lattices generated in anisotropic and nonlocal photorefractive media, we use an experimental setup similar to that employed earlier [14

14. A. S. Desyatnikov, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Sagemerten, D. Träger, J. Jägers, C. Denz, and Y. V. Kartashov, “Nonlinear photonic lattices in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 869 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], shown in Fig. 3. We use a cw frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser at a wavelength of 532 nm. The laser beam is originally expanded in a beam expander combined with a spatial filter and is subsequently sent through a combination of a quarter wave plate, a programmable spatial light modulator and a polarizer in order to induce the desired phase structure onto the beam. In the inset of Fig. 3 two patterns imprinted onto the modulator are depicted, with bright fields representing zero phase change and dark fields representing phase change of π. The output of the modulator is then imaged by a high numerical aperture telescope onto the front face of our 20 mm long Strontium Barium Niobate (SBN) photorefractive crystal. The polarization of the beam is orientated parallel to the crystalline c-axis, thus the beam will experience a strong photorefractive nonlinearity (the electro-optic coefficient r 33 ≈ 200 pm/V). The crystal is biased by an externally applied electric field and uniformly illuminated with a white-light source to control the dark irradiance. Either the front face or the back face of the crystal can be imaged with a lens onto the CCD-camera. The periodic pattern generated by the modulator is filtered in its Fourier plane by an iris diaphragm. The input then represents a non-diffracting wave, and it experiences robust linear propagation inside the crystal (at zero bias voltage). When bias voltage is applied onto the crystal, the output intensity pattern changes and nonlinear index change is induced in the crystal. In order to probe this refractive index change and establish correspondence to the numerical simulations of the refractive index, the modulator can be switched off so that a broad plane wave illuminates the crystal. Due to the slow response of the photorefractive nonlinearity, we can quickly monitor the output of the plane wave without modifying the induced refractive index change. The plane wave is guided by the periodic array of waveguides induced in the medium and the output intensity pattern of the guided beam qualitatively maps the induced refractive index modulation.

Fig. 3. Experimental setup, QWP – quarter wave plate, SLM – spatial light modulator, P – polarizer, L – lens, ID – iris diaphragm, BGI – background illumination, HV – High voltage, CCD – CCD camera. The insets show the chessboard-like phase patterns for square (left) and diamond (right) lattices, phase values are σ (black) and 0 (white).
Fig. 4. Experimentally generated light intensity patterns with chessboard-like phase: square (upper row) and diamond (lower row). (a) linear output without applied electric field, (b) nonlinear output with applied electric field, (d) guiding of a plane wave in photonic lattice. (c) and (e) demonstrate the far field structure of the lattice and guided waves in (b) and (d) respectively.

In Fig. 4, we summarize our experimental results for the four-fold symmetry self-trapped lattices: square (top) and diamond (bottom) patterns. Both were measured at a bias field of 1kV/cm and a total power 1.4μW. The lattices have the period of 65μm and their linear output, i.e. output intensity distribution at zero applied voltage, is shown in Fig. 4(a). The intensity distribution for square and diamond patterns is nearly the same and only differs in spatial orientation. When bias voltage is applied on the crystal, the lattice transforms into an eigenmode of its self-induced waveguiding structure and the nonlinear outputs are shown in Fig. 4(b).

We also monitor the far field (Fourier image) of the lattice wave [see Fig. 4(c)]. In the case of a four-fold lattice symmetry, the far field is represented by four beams, which also determine the boundaries of the first Brillouin zone [25

25. G. Bartal, O. Cohen, H. Buljan, J. W. Fleischer, O. Manela, and M. Segev, “Brillouin zone spectroscopy of nonlinear photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 163902 (2005) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The intensity of the plane wave guided by the photonic lattice is shown in Fig. 4(d) and its Fourier image in Fig. 4(e). Accordingly to the theory of the excitation of Bloch waves in periodic structures [26

26. A. A. Sukhorukov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear Bloch-wave interaction and Bragg scattering in optically induced lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093901 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the plane wave with zero transverse wave-vector corresponds to the central high-symmetry point of the first Brillouin zone [central dominating peak in Fig. 4(e)] and, due to periodicity, it also excites the central points in higher-order bands of the transmission spectrum. Thus, the four side beams, visible in Fig. 4(e), indicate the central points of the second band from the extended Brillouin zone.

At the same time, the output intensity of the guided wave matches the induced nonlinear refractive index change and can be compared to the profiles of the numerically calculated refractive index in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. One can clearly see the difference in the refractive indices for two orientations caused by the anisotropy of the photorefractive crystal. Figs. 4(d) demonstrate this difference in the guiding properties of both lattices. Indeed, for square intensity pattern in Fig. 4(d,top), neighboring spots fuse into vertical lines because of nonlocality and do so preferably in one direction because of anisotropy. Corresponding Fourier image demonstrates two dominant side beams generated by the resonant reflections in the guiding structure, corresponding to the one-dimensional periodic pattern oriented vertically. This experimental result supports the numerical predictions, compare with Fig. 1(b) for k = -1.5. In contrast, the diamond pattern shows well-pronounced 2D array of waveguiding channels, see Fig. 4(d,bottom) and Fig. 2(b), and its Fourier image contains all four side beams.

4. Triangular lattices

If we expand our theoretical analysis to the studies of the nonlinear stationary structures with the real envelope U(x,y), then the only type of the phase modulations allowed is the edge-type πphase jumps that produce the lines of zero intensity in the lattice. The simplest pattern of this kind with the three-fold symmetry is a triangular lattice. The corresponding linear mode can be constructed by interference of six plane waves, and it can be presented in the following form:

U3XY=Asin(2Y3)sin(Y3+X)sin(Y3X),
(6)

where we assume that one of the dislocation lines is parallel to the X-axis, so that two orientations of this pattern with respect to the crystal c-axis in Eq. (4

4. J. W. Fleischer, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of two-dimensional discrete solitons in optically induced nonlinear photonic lattices,” Nature 422, 147 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

) will correspond to (X, Y) = (x,y) for the parallel orientation, and, e.g., (X, Y) = (y,x), for the perpendicular orientation. For the linear wave, the value of k is given by 2 U 3/U 3 = -16/3 ≈= - 5.3. The periodicity of the refractive index pattern is defined by the intensity distribution, not by the field, and in our notation this distance between the closest neighboring peaks of the intensity is π/2.

We find two distinct families of triangular stationary waves in the self-focusing photorefractive media from low to high saturation regimes, k > -5.(3). We summarize our numerical and experimental data in Fig. 5, where we compare numerical results with experimental images, for both parallel and perpendicular orientations, and for low and high saturations. Experimentally, for switching from low to high saturation, the total power of the lattice-governing beam as well as the intensity of the background illumination are changed. In the nonlinear output, the lattice period is about 48 μm.

Lattices with parallel orientation display distinct features in their refractive index profile, namely two out-of-phase lobes of the field distribution, which are the closest neighbors in the vertical direction, induce joined humps or focusing “islands”. These structures resemble bound dipole pairs studied earlier in Ref [24

24. A. A. Zozulya, D. Z. Anderson, A. V. Mamaev, and M. Saffman, “Solitary attractors and low-order filamentation in anisotropic self-focusing media,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 522 (1997). [CrossRef]

]. In the high saturation regime [see Fig. 5(top)], these dipole-islands form a pattern with essentially square symmetry, similar to the diamond pattern discussed above. Experimentally measured intensity of the guided waves confirms this prediction. Therefore, the triangular lattice with the parallel orientation can be seen as a higher-order generalization of the diamond lattice. Furthermore, comparing far field images of the lattice and guided waves allow us to conclude that the actual refractive index pattern has the reduced symmetry with respect to the lattice. Indeed, instead of six side-beams forming the lattice wave, there is only four side-beams in the guided wave meaning that the induced potential is unable to trap two side beams (top and bottom), and the guided-mode symmetry is reduced.

Fig. 5. Theoretical (color) and experimental (grayscale) results for triangular lattices created by interference of six plane waves, see far field images in the top panel. Two distinct orientations of the triangular lattices are compared (top and middle panel) as well as low (left) and high (right) saturation regimes. LW, field U(x,y) (color) and intensity (grayscale) of the lattice wave. GW, calculated profiles of the refractive index (color) and measured intensity of the guided wave (grayscale).

In contrast, the triangular lattices oriented perpendicular to the crystal axis display more complex transition from low to high saturation regimes, see Fig. 5(middle). Now we find that the “dipoles” are oriented parallel to the c-axis, and the guided wave has an essentially two-dimensional modulation. Even in the high-saturation regime when the refractive index profile resembles vertical stripes [cf. the square pattern in Fig. 1], the guided wave still has a visible modulation in the vertical direction. This is in contrast to the square pattern shown in Fig. 4 where the guided wave modulation also has the reduced symmetry.

Summarizing our theoretical and experimental results for different patterns with the edge-type phase dislocations induced in anisotropic photorefractive crystals, we would like to stress that the combined effect of anisotropy, saturation, and nonlocality can reduce significantly the symmetry of the optically-induced refractive index patterns. That is the case for the square and triangular lattices oriented parallel to the crystal axis. Nevertheless, as is found for the diamond and perpendicular triangular lattices, essentially two-dimensional modulation can be achieved, so that the isotropic saturable model can be employed to study this type of lattices.

5. Vortex lattices

Expanding the concept of the phase-modulated self-trapped nonlinear lattices, we follow the recent theoretical work [21

21. A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, and Yu. Kivshar, “Vortex solitons, soliton clusters, and vortex lattices,” Ukr. J. Phys. Optics 6, 71 (2005). [CrossRef]

] and introduce the so-called vortex lattices. Theoretically, these nonlinear waves bifurcate from the corresponding linear modes, that can be easily found from the linear paraxial equation 1 without nonlinear term, i.e. n(I) = 0. A linear superposition of two azimuthal modes sinφ and cosφ with azimuthal coordinate φ is known to give rise to a vortex beam with a phase dislocation, ~ x+iy = rexp(iφ). Similarly, superimposing two linear modes U lin from Eq. (5), we obtain a vortex lattice of a square geometry,

Uvsxy=A(sinxsiny+icosxcosy).
(7)

Numerical procedure to find the families of stationary nonlinear periodic waves with the vortex structure is similar to that described above. In Fig. 6 we present two examples of such lattices and compare low (a) and high (b) saturation regimes for the vortex lattice with a diamond-type intensity pattern. The parameters chosen are close to our experimental situation, in particular the relatively large periodicity of the lattice results in strong localization of separate lattice sites for large intensity, see Fig. 6(b,left).

Experimentally, we generate a square-type vortex lattice oriented diagonally to the principal axis of the crystal with a period of 57μm. Applying an external DC electric field (ℰ = 1300V/cm) across the crystal provides the conditions for the formation of spatial solitons of ~ 15μm size and also influences the propagation of the periodic modes. Even at this high voltage and nonlinearity strength the output of the lattice does not deviate significantly from the shape of a linear wave [see Fig. 6(c, left)] and the position of the vortices is generally preserved, as shown in Fig. 6(c, middle). This is due to the fact that the profile of the nonlinear periodic lattice is fairly close to the corresponding non-diffracting linear wave.

In order to verify that the lattice indeed propagates in a truly nonlinear fashion, we probe the induced changes to the crystal refractive index. To do this, we send a broad plane-wave trough the crystal, by switching-off the SLM, and observe the modulation of the plane-wave at the output. In the case of four-fold symmetry vortex lattice the generated plane wave is propagating exactly along the induced waveguides, e.g. in the middle of the first Brillouin zone. Output intensity distribution of the guided wave is shown in Fig. 6(c,right). As clearly seen, the plane wave is indeed modulated by the induced periodic potential, and we observe guiding of the probe beam at the maxima of the refractive index. This experimental observation is in a good agreement with the corresponding numerical simulations [see Fig. 6(a,b)].

Fig. 6. Diagonally-oriented square vortex lattices in photorefractive self-focusing media. Numerically calculated stationary solutions are shown for Γ = 11.8 close to linear diffraction-free wave with k = -0.1 and I max ≃ 0.42 in (a), and in higher saturation regime with k = 1.2 and I max ≃ 1.24 in (b). (c) Experimentally observed vortex lattice with the period 57μm: left - nonlinear output for bias 1.3kV, middle - magnified top right part of the lattice interfering with a reference broad beam to monitor the position of the vortex dislocations (marked by arrows), right - intensity of the guided plane wave launched from the edge of the first Brillouin zone.

The idea of generating vortex lattices as non-diffracting linear waves can be extended further to include more complex geometries such as hexagonal lattices shown in Fig. 7. Remarkably, despite the complex internal energy flows, these lattices can be seen as probably the simplest patterns with the three-fold symmetry created by the interference of only three plane waves [18

18. J. Masajada and B. Dubik, “Optical vortex generation by three plane wave interference,” Opt. Commun. 198, 21 (2001). [CrossRef]

] [cf. triangular patterns with six waves Eq. (7

7. D. Neshev, Yu. S. Kivshar, H. Martin, and Z. G. Chen, “Soliton stripes in two-dimensional nonlinear photonic lattices,” Opt. Lett. 29, 486 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

)],

Uvhxy=A[exp(ix)+exp(ix2+i3y2)+exp(ix2i3y2)].
(8)

In this type of patterns, the lattice sites create hexagonal closely packed lattice while the vortex-type dislocations form a honeycomb lattice with smaller spacing. Even though the vortices in the lattice are very closely packed, we demonstrate that such lattices can be experimentally generated and observed for rather small lattice periods, as shown in Fig. 7(c, left) for the period of 22μm. The positions of the vortices in the lattice are also well preserved, as seen by the interferogramm in Fig. 7(c, middle). In order to probe the refractive index modulation in experiment, we send a plane wave trough the photorefractive crystal. By fast reprogramming of the modulator, we sent a plane wave propagating at the edge of the Brillouin zone, thus probing the bang-gap structure of the induced periodic refractive index modulation. In this way, we test not only the periodic modulations but also the inhomogeneities of the periodic pattern, since the gap in the transmission spectrum depends strongly on the structural defects and disorder. In our experiments, we observe a strong periodic modulation of the output wave with the maxima of the pattern located in between the lattice sites. This indicates an efficient excitation of the Bloch waves corresponding to the second band of the transmission spectrum. In addition, this observation proves that the induced nonlinear vortex lattice is homogeneous and stable.

Fig. 7. Self-trapped hexagonal pattern with nested honeycomb vortex lattice, stationary solutions in isotropic saturable medium. The soliton constant k = -0.8 and peak intensity I max ≃ 0.42 in (a), and k = -0.4 and I max ≃ 3.58 in high saturation regime in (b). (c) Experimentally observed hexagonal vortex lattice of a period 22μm: left - nonlinear output for bias 1.3kV, middle - magnified bottom right part of the lattice interfering with a reference beam to identify the position of the vortices (marked by arrows), right - plane wave launched at the edge of the Brillouin zone and modulated by the induced index lattice.

6. Conclusions

We have studied theoretically and generated experimentally, in a biased photorefractive crystal, two-dimensional nonlinear photonic lattices of several different symmetries. Employing a nonlocal anisotropic nonlinear model, we have described the structure and properties of the self-trapped spatially-periodic nonlinear photonic lattices with out-of-phase neighboring sites, as well as chessboard-like and triangular nonlinear patterns. For the triangular lattices, we have found two distinct classes of optically-induced refractive index patterns with one of the edge dislocation lines oriented parallel or perpendicular to the c-axis of the crystal. We have demonstrated that the highly anisotropic periodic refractive index induced by the lattices differs significantly from its isotropic counterpart, and it depends strongly on the lattice orientation. We have expanded our theoretical approach to the periodic lattices with nested arrays of vortex-type phase dislocations, or vortex lattices, and have generated experimentally vortex lattices with two different symmetries. The square vortex lattice acquires a diamond-like intensity pattern, while for the six-fold symmetry we have demonstrated that a hexagonal intensity pattern can be generated with the vortices arranged in a honeycomb lattice.

Acknowledgments

This work was produced with the assistance of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the framework of the graduate school “Nonlinear Continuous Systems”. We thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Australia-Germany Exchange Program of the Australian Academy of Science, and the Australian Research Council. DT acknowledges support by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. We thank Andrey Sukhorukov for critical reading of this manuscript and useful comments. Anton Desyatnikov acknowledges Sergei Odoulov for enlightening discussions of the triangular patterns.

References and links

1.

Yu. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, San Diego, 2003), 540 pp., and references therein.

2.

S. F. Mingaleev, Yu. S. Kivshar, and R. Sammut, in: Soliton-driven Photonics, A. D. Boardman and A. P. Sukho-rukov, Eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001), pp. 487–504. [CrossRef]

3.

N. K. Efremidis, S. Sears, D. N. Christodoulides, J. W. Fleischer, and M. Segev, “Discrete solitons in photore-fractive optically induced photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. E 66, 046602 (2002). [CrossRef]

4.

J. W. Fleischer, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of two-dimensional discrete solitons in optically induced nonlinear photonic lattices,” Nature 422, 147 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, and W. Krolikowski, “Spatial solitons in optically induced gratings,” Opt. Lett. 28, 710–712 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

A. S. Desyatnikov, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, and C. Denz, “Composite band-gap solitons in nonlinear optically induced lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 153902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

D. Neshev, Yu. S. Kivshar, H. Martin, and Z. G. Chen, “Soliton stripes in two-dimensional nonlinear photonic lattices,” Opt. Lett. 29, 486 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

H. Martin, E. D. Eugenieva, Z. Chen, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Discrete solitons and soliton-induced dislocations in partially coherent photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

S. Minardi, S. Sapone, W. Chinaglia, P. Di Trapani, and A. Berzanskis, “Pixellike parametric generator based on controlled spatial-soliton formation,” Opt. Lett. 25, 326 (2000). [CrossRef]

10.

Z. Chen and K. McCarthy, “Spatial soliton pixels from partially incoherent light,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2019 (2002). [CrossRef]

11.

J. Petter, J. Schröder, D. Träger, and C. Denz, “Optical control of arrays of photorefractive screening solitons,” Opt. Lett. 28, 438 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

M. Petrović, D. Träger, A. Strinić, M. Belić, J. Schröder, and C. Denz, “Solitonic lattices in photorefractive crystals,” Phys. Rev. E 68, 055601R (2003). [CrossRef]

13.

Ya. V. Kartashov, V. A. Visloukh, and L. Torner, “Two-dimensional cnoidal waves in Kerr-type saturable nonlinear media,” Phys. Rev. E 68, 015603 (2003). [CrossRef]

14.

A. S. Desyatnikov, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Sagemerten, D. Träger, J. Jägers, C. Denz, and Y. V. Kartashov, “Nonlinear photonic lattices in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media,” Opt. Lett. 30, 869 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

Z. Chen, H. Martin, E. D. Eugenieva, J. Xu, and A. Bezryadina, “Anisotropic enhancement of discrete diffraction and formation of two-dimensional discrete-soliton trains,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 143902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

A. Sukhorukov, “Soliton dynamics in deformable nonlinear lattices,” arXiv:nlin.PS/0507050 (2005).

17.

A. S. Desyatnikov, Yu. S. Kivshar, and L. Torner, “Optical vortices and vortex solitons,” in Progress in Optics, Vol. 47, Ed. E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amstredam, 2005), pp. 219–319.

18.

J. Masajada and B. Dubik, “Optical vortex generation by three plane wave interference,” Opt. Commun. 198, 21 (2001). [CrossRef]

19.

D. Neshev, A. Dreischuh, M. Assa, and S. Dinev, “Motion control of ensembles of ordered optical vortices generated on finite extent background,” Opt. Commun. 151, 413 (1998). [CrossRef]

20.

A. Dreischuh, S. Chervenkov, D. Neshev, G. G. Paulus, and H. Walther, “Generation of lattice structures of optical vortices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 550–556 (2002). [CrossRef]

21.

A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, and Yu. Kivshar, “Vortex solitons, soliton clusters, and vortex lattices,” Ukr. J. Phys. Optics 6, 71 (2005). [CrossRef]

22.

D. Jović, D. Arsenović, A. Strinić, M. Belić, and M. Petrović, “Counterpropagat-ing optical vortices in photorefractive crystals,” Opt. Express 13, 4379–4389 (2005), http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-13-12-4379. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

See, e.g., N. R. Cooper, E. H. Rezayi, and S. H. Simon, “Vortex lattices in rotating atomic Bose gases with dipolar interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 200402 (2005), and references therein. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

24.

A. A. Zozulya, D. Z. Anderson, A. V. Mamaev, and M. Saffman, “Solitary attractors and low-order filamentation in anisotropic self-focusing media,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 522 (1997). [CrossRef]

25.

G. Bartal, O. Cohen, H. Buljan, J. W. Fleischer, O. Manela, and M. Segev, “Brillouin zone spectroscopy of nonlinear photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 163902 (2005) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26.

A. A. Sukhorukov, D. Neshev, W. Krolikowski, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear Bloch-wave interaction and Bragg scattering in optically induced lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093901 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

A. S. Desyatnikov and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Rotating optical soliton clusters,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 053901 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28.

A. S. Desyatnikov, A. A. Sukhorukov, and Yu. S. Kivshar, “Azimuthons: spatially modulated vortex solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 203904 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

29.

D. N. Neshev, T. J. Alexander, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, H. Martin, I. Makasyuk, and Z. Chen, “Observation of discrete vortex solitons in optically-induced photonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123903 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

30.

J. W. Fleischer, G. Bartal, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, J. Hudock, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of vortex-ring discrete solitons in 2D photonic attices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123904 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(090.7330) Holography : Volume gratings
(190.5330) Nonlinear optics : Photorefractive optics

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: January 3, 2006
Revised Manuscript: March 12, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: March 23, 2006
Published: April 3, 2006

Citation
Anton S. Desyatnikov, Nina Sagemerten, Robert Fischer, Bernd Terhalle, Denis Träger, Dragomir N. Neshev, Alexander Dreischuh, Cornelia Denz, Wieslaw Krolikowski, and Yuri S. Kivshar, "Two-dimensional self-trapped nonlinear photonic lattices," Opt. Express 14, 2851-2863 (2006)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-7-2851


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Yu. S. Kivshar and G. P. Agrawal, Optical Solitons: From Fibers to Photonic Crystals (Academic, San Diego, 2003), 540 pp., and references therein.
  2. S. F. Mingaleev, Yu. S. Kivshar, and R. Sammut, in: Soliton-driven Photonics, A. D. Boardman and A. P. Sukhorukov, Eds. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001), pp. 487-504. [CrossRef]
  3. N. K. Efremidis, S. Sears, D. N. Christodoulides, J. W. Fleischer, and M. Segev, "Discrete solitons in photorefractive optically induced photonic lattices," Phys. Rev. E 66, 046602 (2002). [CrossRef]
  4. J.W. Fleischer, M. Segev, N. K. Efremidis, and D. N. Christodoulides, "Observation of two-dimensional discrete solitons in optically induced nonlinear photonic lattices," Nature 422, 147 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. D. Neshev, E. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, and W. Krolikowski, "Spatial solitons in optically induced gratings," Opt. Lett. 28, 710-712 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. A. S. Desyatnikov, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, and C. Denz, "Composite band-gap solitons in nonlinear optically induced lattices, " Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 153902 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. D. Neshev, Yu. S. Kivshar, H. Martin, and Z. G. Chen, "Soliton stripes in two-dimensional nonlinear photonic lattices," Opt. Lett. 29, 486 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. H. Martin, E. D. Eugenieva, Z. Chen, and D. N. Christodoulides, "Discrete solitons and soliton-induced dislocations in partially coherent photonic lattices," Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. Minardi, S. Sapone, W. Chinaglia, P. Di Trapani, and A. Berzanskis, "Pixellike parametric generator based on controlled spatial-soliton formation," Opt. Lett. 25, 326 (2000). [CrossRef]
  10. Z. Chen, and K. McCarthy, "Spatial soliton pixels from partially incoherent light," Opt. Lett. 27, 2019 (2002). [CrossRef]
  11. J. Petter, J. Schröder, D. Träger, and C. Denz, "Optical control of arrays of photorefractive screening solitons," Opt. Lett. 28, 438 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. M. Petrović, D. Träger, A. Strinić, M. Belić, J. Schröder, and C. Denz, "Solitonic lattices in photorefractive crystals," Phys. Rev. E 68, 055601R (2003). [CrossRef]
  13. Ya. V. Kartashov, V. A. Visloukh, and L. Torner, "Two-dimensional cnoidal waves in Kerr-type saturable nonlinear media," Phys. Rev. E 68, 015603 (2003). [CrossRef]
  14. A. S. Desyatnikov, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, N. Sagemerten, D. Träger, J. Jägers, C. Denz, and Y. V. Kartashov, "Nonlinear photonic lattices in anisotropic nonlocal self-focusing media," Opt. Lett. 30, 869 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Z. Chen, H. Martin, E. D. Eugenieva, J. Xu, and A. Bezryadina, "Anisotropic enhancement of discrete diffraction and formation of two-dimensional discrete-soliton trains," Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 143902 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. A. Sukhorukov, "Soliton dynamics in deformable nonlinear lattices," arXiv:nlin.PS/0507050 (2005).
  17. A. S. Desyatnikov, Yu. S. Kivshar, and L. Torner, "Optical vortices and vortex solitons," in Progress in Optics, Vol. 47, Ed. E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amstredam, 2005), pp. 219-319.
  18. J. Masajada and B. Dubik, "Optical vortex generation by three plane wave interference," Opt. Commun. 198, 21 (2001). [CrossRef]
  19. D. Neshev, A. Dreischuh, M. Assa, and S. Dinev, "Motion control of ensembles of ordered optical vortices generated on finite extent background," Opt. Commun. 151, 413 (1998). [CrossRef]
  20. A. Dreischuh, S. Chervenkov, D. Neshev, G. G. Paulus, and H. Walther, "Generation of lattice structures of optical vortices," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 550-556 (2002). [CrossRef]
  21. A. Desyatnikov, D. Neshev, and Yu. Kivshar, "Vortex solitons, soliton clusters, and vortex lattices," Ukr. J. Phys. Optics 6, 71 (2005). [CrossRef]
  22. D. Jovic, D. Arsenovic, A. Strinić, M. Belić, and M. Petrović, "Counterpropagating optical vortices in photorefractive crystals," Opt. Express 13, 4379-4389 (2005), http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-13-12-4379 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. N. R. Cooper, E. H. Rezayi, and S. H. Simon, "Vortex lattices in rotating atomic Bose gases with dipolar interactions," Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 200402 (2005), and references therein. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. A. A. Zozulya, D. Z. Anderson, A. V. Mamaev, and M. Saffman, "Solitary attractors and low-order filamentation in anisotropic self-focusing media," Phys. Rev. A 57, 522 (1997). [CrossRef]
  25. G. Bartal, O. Cohen, H. Buljan, J. W. Fleischer, O. Manela, and M. Segev, "Brillouin zone spectroscopy of nonlinear photonic lattices," Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 163902 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. A. A. Sukhorukov, D. Neshev,W. Krolikowski, and Yu. S. Kivshar, "Nonlinear Bloch-wave interaction and Bragg scattering in optically induced lattices, " Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 093901 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. A. S. Desyatnikov and Yu. S. Kivshar, "Rotating optical soliton clusters," Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 053901 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. A. S. Desyatnikov, A. A. Sukhorukov, and Yu. S. Kivshar, "Azimuthons: spatially modulated vortex solitons," Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 203904 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. D. N. Neshev, T. J. Alexander, E. A. Ostrovskaya, Yu. S. Kivshar, H. Martin, I. Makasyuk, and Z. Chen, "Observation of discrete vortex solitons in optically-induced photonic lattices," Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123903 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. J. W. Fleischer, G. Bartal, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, J. Hudock, and D. N. Christodoulides, "Observation of vortex-ring discrete solitons in 2D photonic lattices," Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 123904 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited