OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: Michael Duncan
  • Vol. 14, Iss. 8 — Apr. 17, 2006
  • pp: 3594–3601
« Show journal navigation

Dynamics of two coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate solitons in an optical lattice

Yongshan Cheng, Rongzhou Gong, and Hong Li  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 14, Issue 8, pp. 3594-3601 (2006)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.003594


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (185 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The characteristics of two coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) bright solitons trapped in an optical lattice are investigated with the variational approach and direct numerical simulations of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. It is found that the optical lattice can be controllably used to capture and drag the coupled BEC solitons. Its effect depends on the initial location of the BEC solitons, the lattice amplitude and wave-number, and the amplitude of the coupled BEC solitons. The effective interaction between the two coupled solitons is the attractive effect.

© 2006 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

After the first experimental realization of Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in dilute alkali metal vapors[1

1. M. H. Anderson, J. R. Matthews, and C. E. Wieman, “Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor,” Science 269,198 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]
, their study has experienced enormous experimental and theoretical advancements. The observation of the bright solitons and the quantum interference phenomena between two coupled BEC have yielded a stunning new demonstration of the wave-like behavior of atoms and provided us with the perspective of getting a better understanding of the complicated behavior of quantum many-body systems and with the hope of realizing novel concrete applications of quantum mechanics, such as atom interferometers and atom lasers[2

2. K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, and A. G. Truscott, “Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains,” Nature 417, 150(2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]
.

Currently, the entire experiment of the BEC is carried out at ultralow temperatures and takes place in an electromagnetic trap of the order of millimetres or smaller. In most experiments, a harmonic potential, or very nearly so, is employed, but a wide variety of potentials can now be constructed experimentally. In recent experiments BECs have been successfully loaded in optical lattices[3

3. L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, and G. Ferrari, “Formation of a Matter-Wave Bright Soliton,” Science 296, 1290(2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]
(OL) and, ever since, this field has attracted considerable attention. A periodic OL potential is created along the waveguide axis (x axis) by interference patterns from multiple laser beams[4

4. I. Carusotto, D. Embriaco, and G. C. La Rocca, “Nonlinear atom optics and bright-gap-soliton generation in finite optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 053611(2002) [CrossRef]

]
. It can be modeled byVopt (x)=V 0 cos(kx). The longitudinal envelope of the OL potential is determined by the profile of the laser beam waist and the lattice wave-number k can be tuned by the geometry of laser beams. The great flexibility of an OL potential arises from the fact that the above parameters can be tuned experimentally, providing precise control over the shape and time-variation of the external potential. OL potentials are, therefore, of particular interest to a number of BEC applications—ranging from matter-wave optics to precision measurements and quantum information processing.

Using highly anisotropic traps, it is possible to produce quasi-one-dimensional (1D) BECs (cigar-shaped). The 1D regime is valid when the transverse dimensions of the condensate are of the order of or less than the atomic interaction length, and both are much smaller than its longitudinal dimension. Thus the condensate has the form of an ellipsoid stretched along one of its major axes. In this regime the BEC remains phase coherent. For shorter times the nonlinear Schrodinger equation (NLSE), also called Gross-Pitaevskii equation(GPE), provides an accurate description of the BEC soliton dynamics.[5

5. Y. S. Cheng, H. Li, and R. Z. Gong, “Effects of parameters on the stationary state and self-trapping of three coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate solitons,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 3, 715(2005)

, 6

6. P. Massignan and M. Modugno, “One-dimensional model for the dynamics and expansion of elongated Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 023614(2003) [CrossRef]

]

2. Formalism

To consider the dynamics of BECs trapped in an OL, we start with a cigar-shaped condensate. If considering only two-body, mean-field interactions, a dilute Bose-Einstein gas dynamics can be modeled using an effective 1D NLSE in the following dimensionless form[15

15. R. Carretero-Gonzalez and K. Promislow, “Localized breathing oscillations of Bose-Einstein condensates in periodic traps,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 033610(2002) [CrossRef]

]

jut=122ux+gu2u+V(x)u,
(1)

where uu(x, t) is the mean-field BEC wave-function, and the nonlinearity coefficient g=±1 accounts for repulsive(+) and attractive(-) interatomic interactions, respectively, and relates to the s-wave scattering length as. In this paper, we study the coherent evolution of bright solitons (for g=-1). V(x) is the normalized external confining potential. It is convenient to decompose the potential V(x) as follows

V(x)=Vcon+Vopt=12Ω2x2+V0cos(kx),
(2)

where the term Vcon describes the magnetic trap(MT). The periodic potential, Vopt , is formed by an OL, k is the wave-number and V 0 is the lattice depth measured in units of the lattice recoil energy, Erec . The parameter Ω = ωx, where ωx and ω are the confining frequencies of MT in the axial and transverse directions. In Eq. (1), t is the dimensionless time measured in terms of ω1 and x is the longitudinal spatial variable measured in units of the transverse harmonic-oscillator length, a (h/ )1/2. Accordingly, |u|2 corresponds to the rescaled population density of the condensate measured in units of /4πħ|as |, and m is the atomic mass. In practice, the MT has a flat central portion supporting several hundreds of periods of the periodic potential. The whole potential is sufficient to satisfy the desired near-periodic potential. It is also possible to load the condensate onto V(x) and then adiabatically remove Vcon , leaving only the periodic potential. In this work, we let Vcon = 0 and focus on optical lattices, viz.

V(x)=Vopt=V0cos(kx).
(3)

For the wave-function u of two well-separated BECs we can write u=u 1+u 2 and assuming mutual coupling only through intensity overlap in the |u|2 term we find the following coupled equations

ju1t+122u1x2+(u12+2u22)u1=V(x)u1
ju2t+122u2x2+(2u12+u22)u2=V(x)u2,
(4)

where ui (i=1,2) is the wave-function of the two BECs respectively and ui is normalized to the number of particles in the i-th BECs. N=N 1+N 2=+|u 1|2 dx+∫+∞-∞|u 2|2 dx is the rescaled total number of atoms(a conserved quantity). In Eq. (4), we have neglected the fast varying term u3i2 ui* (i=1,2), where * denotes the complex conjugate. Compared with Ref. [7

7. C. Lee, W. Hai, and X. Luo, “Quasispin model for macroscopic quantum tunneling between two coupled Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 053614(2003) [CrossRef]

, 16

16. C. Pare and M. Florjariczyk, “Approximate model of soliton dynamics in all-optical couplers,” Phys. Rev. A 41, 6287–6295(1990) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], Eq. (4) is a specific case in which the two BECs are symmetrical and there is no linear coupling.

3. Computation and discussion

In the absence of any potential and mutual coupling, Eq. (4) possesses the stationary bright soliton solutions in the general form of

ui(x,t)=Aisech[Ai(xx0i)]exp[jx˙0j(xx0j)2+jϕi].i=1,2
(5)

The parameter Ai represents the amplitude (and inverse width), x 0i and oi = dx 0i/dt represent the location and the velocity of the soliton center, and ϕi is the phase. During the evolution of the two coupled BEC solitons, we assume that the wave-function ui retains the Sech-shape given by Eq. (5), but Ai ,x 0ii are the functions of time as a result of the weak interaction. The condition of the normalization is N=+|u 1|2 dx + +|u 1|2 dx = 2(A 1+A 2).

The averaged Lagrangian of Eq. (4) can be obtained with the usual variational approach[17–19

17. H. Li, Y. S. Cheng, and D. X. Huang, “Effects of traps on dynamics of two coupled Bose-Einstein condensates,” Opt. Commun. 258, 306–314 (2006) [CrossRef]

]

L(t)=+{i=12[j2(uiui*tui*uit)+12uiz212ui4+V(x)ui2]2u12u22}dx
=i=12[34Aix˙0i213Ai3+2Aiϕ˙i+kπV0sinh(kπ2Ai)cos(kx0i)]+L12,
(6)

where

L12=2A12A22sech2[A1(xx01)]sech2[A2(xx02)]dx.
(7)

Using L(t)σddt(L(t)σ˙)=0,(σ=ϕ1,ϕ2,A1,A2,x01,x02), then

dAidt=0,
(8a)
32Aid2x0idt2=x0i[kπV0sinh(kπ2Ai)cos(kx0i)+L12],
(8b)
34x˙0i2Ai2+2ϕ˙i+cosh(kπ2Ai)sinh2(kπ2Ai)k2π2V02Ai2cos(kx0i)+L12Ai=0.
(8c)

Equations (8a)~(8c) determine the evolution characteristics of the two coupled BEC solitons. Although from Eq. (8a) we infer that Ai is still a constant, Eq. (8c) can be regarded as an equation determining the phase ϕ i and the amplitude Ai once the other parameters are known so that the equations are self-consistent. We assume that the system of the BEC solitons is symmetric, A 1 = A 2 = A, x 01 = Δ/2 and x 02 = -Δ/2, viz. Δ = x 01 - x 02 is the separation between the BEC solitons. From Eq. (8b), we can obtain

d2Δdt2=83AΔ[kπV0sinh(kπ2A)cos(kΔ2)+L12].
(9)

According to Eq. (7), then

L12=8A3[1sinh2(AΔ)+cosh(AΔ)sinh2(AΔ)lncosh(AΔ)+1+sinh(AΔ)cosh(AΔ)+1sinh(AΔ)],
(10)

An anharmonic effective potential is derived using the mechanical analogy,

Veff=83A[kπV0sinh(kπ2A)cos(kΔ2)+L12]Veff1+Veff2,
(11)

where, Veff1=83AkπV0sinh(kπ2A)cos(kΔ2) is the effective potential resulting from the OL, and Veff2=83AL12=643A2[1sinh2(AΔ)+cosh(AΔ)sinh3(AΔ)lncosh(AΔ)+1+sinh(AΔ)cosh(AΔ)+1sinh(AΔ)] arises from the weak mutual interaction of two BEC solitons. From Eq. (9), we can conclude that this interaction will lead to changes in the BEC soliton dynamic characteristics.

Fig. 1 The effective potential V eff2 resulting from the weak mutual interaction of two BEC solitons versus the separation Δ of the two BEC solitons

By numerical simulations, V eff2 versus the separation Δ is plotted in Fig. 1 which indicates that the interaction between the two coupled BEC solitons forms a potential well. The separation within which the two solitons can interact is finite, and the effective potential is approximately equal to zero beyond the special separation (see Fig. 1). This is because that the wave-functions of the two BEC solitons do not overlap in that case. We can also conclude that the interaction of two BEC solitons is attractive, and that the solitons will move down the potential slope towards x=0, an equilibrium point, and oscillate around the equilibrium point. Beyond the potential field, the two solitons are in neutral equilibrium. From Fig. 1, we find that the width and depth of the effective potential well are very sensitive to the amplitude A of a soliton. For example, the effective potential well becomes deeper and narrower as A increases. The separation where the two solitons can interact becomes smaller. This is because that the amplitude A reflects the number of atoms in a BEC soliton, and the bigger the number of atoms is, the greater the ability of the self-focusing is. On the other hand, in the absence of mutual coupling, the OL leads to a periodical potential field V eff1. The periodical potential is relative to the parameters of the OL and solitons. At the same time, the wave-number k has a greater effect on the amplitude of the effective potential V eff1. The larger the wave-number is, the smaller the amplitude becomes.

In Fig. 2, we plot the effective potential Veff versus the separationΔaccording to Eq. (11) when both the coupling effects between the two BEC solitons and the OL are present to the effective potential. The parameters of the system are A=1, and V 0=0.5. The solid, dashed and dotted lines correspond to the wave-number k=0.1, 0.5, 1.5 respectively. We find that the wave-number k plays an important role. It deforms the shape of the effective potential, and changes the dynamic characteristics of the system.

Fig. 2 The effective potential Veff versus the separation Δof the two coupled BEC solitons

In the case of long-period OL, the effective potential of the OL compensates that of the two mutually coupled solitons. V eff1 is dominant and its shape is fluted with V eff2 around the point x=0. Apart from the flute, the whole effective potential is similar to the case without mutual coupling. The system is in a stable equilibrium at the minimum of the effective potential or in a vibration around the stable equilibrium point.

In the case of intermediate OL period, V eff2 is dominant within the separation where the two solitons can interact because the amplitude of V eff1 is smaller and two small-peak values appear whose amplitude depends on the amplitude of the OL and the slope of V eff2. When the peaks of the effective potential are low, the BEC solitons may cross over the peaks and meet at the bottom of the effective potential if the solitons possess larger initial energy. In that situation, the separation within which the two solitons can meet by mutual attraction becomes much wider. We notice that the OL potential will be considered as a perturbation parameter if the OL period is much smaller than the width of the BEC soliton. Then the variational approach is non-effective and the perturbation theory will be employed[20

20. D. J. Frantzeskakis, G. Theocharis, and F. K. Diakonos, “Interaction of dark solitons with localized impurities in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 053608(2002) [CrossRef]

]
. Hence our investigations are valid when the OL is assumed to be smooth and slowly varying on the soliton scale.

In order to get an understanding of the novel phenomena, in Fig. 3, we show the motion of the two coupled solitons by a direct numerical integration of Eq. (4). In our numerical simulations, the initial input pulse is ui (t=0)=Asech(x - x 0i) and the other parameters are k=0.5, and A=1 for Fig. 3(a) and A=2 for Fig. 3(b, c, d). The initial locations of the motionless BEC soliton center x 0i (i=1, 2) and the lattice depth of the OL V 0 are indicated in the figures. When Δ is smaller, the two solitons will meet at x=0 because of the attractive interaction as shown in Fig. 3(a). In the case of a larger Δ, the interaction between the two solitons is sufficiently small, and each of the two solitons evolves independently. When we initialize the solitons at the respective minimum of the potential, the solitons remain steady and are in stable equilibrium, which is indicated in Fig. 3(b). If the initial position of the soliton center is around the bottom of the potential, the corresponding soliton will vibrate around the minimum, and the frequency of the vibration is relative to V 0 and A (see Fig. 3(c) and (d)).

Fig. 3 The two coupled BEC soliton density evolve in an OL. The initial locations of the motionless BEC soliton center x 0i (i=1, 2) , the amplitude A and the lattice depth of the OL V 0 are: (a) x 01,2=±1, A=1 and V 0=0.5, (b) x 01,2=±6.28, A=2 and V 0=0.5, (c) x 01,2=±8, A=2 and V 0=0.5, (d) x 01,2=±8, A=2 and V 0=1.5.
Fig. 4 The two coupled BEC soliton density evolve in a slowly tuning OL. The OL drags the solitons and takes them to another location. The center of the solitons is initialized at the respective effective potential minimum.

From the above investigation, we can conclude that an OL may capture a coupled BEC soliton. On the other hand, the OL potential can be tuned by changing the lattice wave-number k. Hence, we can change the separation of the two coupled BEC solitons by slowly changing the OL, as long as the OL tuning is slow enough to ensure adiabatic change. Fig. 4 shows that a slowly tuning OL drags two BEC solitons and takes them to another position. The initial input pulse is ui (t=0)=Asech(x-x 0i), the parameters of the system are selected as A=2, V 0=0.5, and k=1.5-0.01t, and the initial location of the motionless BEC soliton center is x 0i=±6.28. We notice that a moving localized attractive impurity or a moving OL (a total OL is moved) may drag a stationary soliton[20

20. D. J. Frantzeskakis, G. Theocharis, and F. K. Diakonos, “Interaction of dark solitons with localized impurities in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 053608(2002) [CrossRef]

, 21

21. R. G. Scott, A. M. Martin, and S. Bujkiewicz, “Transport and disruption of Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 033605(2004) [CrossRef]

]
, but here our aim is to drag the soliton by tuning the wave-number k of an OL. Apparently, this issue is important for applications of the BEC.

4. Conclusions

The characteristics of two coupled BEC solitons trapped in an OL are investigated with the variational approach and direct numerical simulations of the GPE. Our investigation shows that an OL may be used not only to sustain two coupled solitons but also to manipulate them at will. Its effect depends on the initial location of the BEC soliton, the lattice amplitude and wave-number, and the amplitude of the coupled BEC solitons. Furthermore, the interaction between two nonlinear coupled BEC solitons is the attractive effect within some separation. Either in view of understanding their dynamic evolution or in view of their practical application, these properties are important.

Acknowledgments

The authors undertook this work with the support of the Science and Technology Program of Education Department of Hubei Province, China, under Grant No. B200522002, the Fund of Natural Science of Hubei Province, China, under Grant No. 2004ABA112, and the Important Program of Education Department of Hubei Province, China, under Grant No. 2002Z00005.

References

1.

M. H. Anderson, J. R. Matthews, and C. E. Wieman, “Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Atomic Vapor,” Science 269,198 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge, and A. G. Truscott, “Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains,” Nature 417, 150(2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, and G. Ferrari, “Formation of a Matter-Wave Bright Soliton,” Science 296, 1290(2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

I. Carusotto, D. Embriaco, and G. C. La Rocca, “Nonlinear atom optics and bright-gap-soliton generation in finite optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 65, 053611(2002) [CrossRef]

5.

Y. S. Cheng, H. Li, and R. Z. Gong, “Effects of parameters on the stationary state and self-trapping of three coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate solitons,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 3, 715(2005)

6.

P. Massignan and M. Modugno, “One-dimensional model for the dynamics and expansion of elongated Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 67, 023614(2003) [CrossRef]

7.

C. Lee, W. Hai, and X. Luo, “Quasispin model for macroscopic quantum tunneling between two coupled Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 68, 053614(2003) [CrossRef]

8.

E. A. Ostrovskaya and Y. S. Kivshar, “Localization of Two-Component Bose-Einstein Condensates in Optical Lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 180405(2004) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi, and S. R. Shenoy, “Quantum Coherent Atomic Tunneling between Two Trapped Bose-Einstein Condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4950(1997) [CrossRef]

10.

S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, and S. R. Shenoy, “Coherent oscillations between two weakly coupled Bose-Einstein condensates: Josephson effects, π oscillations, and macroscopic quantum self-trapping,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 620(1999) [CrossRef]

11.

G. J. Milburn, J. Corney, E. M. Wright, and D. F. Walls, “Quantum dynamics of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate in a double-well potential,” Phys. Rev. A 55, 4318(1997) [CrossRef]

12.

J. Williams, R. Walser, J. Cooper, E. Cornell, and M. Holland, “Nonlinear Josephson-type oscillations of a driven, two-component Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 59, R31(1999) [CrossRef]

13.

B. P. Anderson and M. A. Kasevich, “Macroscopic Quantum Interference from Atomic Tunnel Arrays,” Science 282, 1686(1998) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

D. S. Hall, M. R. Matthews, J. R. Ensher, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, “Dynamics of Component Separation in a Binary Mixture of Bose-Einstein Condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1538(1998)

D. S. Hall, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, “Measurements of Relative Phase in Two-Component Bose-Einstein Condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1543(1998)

15.

R. Carretero-Gonzalez and K. Promislow, “Localized breathing oscillations of Bose-Einstein condensates in periodic traps,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 033610(2002) [CrossRef]

16.

C. Pare and M. Florjariczyk, “Approximate model of soliton dynamics in all-optical couplers,” Phys. Rev. A 41, 6287–6295(1990) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

H. Li, Y. S. Cheng, and D. X. Huang, “Effects of traps on dynamics of two coupled Bose-Einstein condensates,” Opt. Commun. 258, 306–314 (2006) [CrossRef]

18.

S. Raghavan and G. P. Agrawal, “Switching and self-trapping dynamics of Bose-Einstein solitons,” J. Mod. Opt. 47, 1155(2000)

19.

P. Ohberg and L. Santos, “Dark Solitons in a Two-Component Bose-Einstein Condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2918–2921(2001) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

D. J. Frantzeskakis, G. Theocharis, and F. K. Diakonos, “Interaction of dark solitons with localized impurities in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 66, 053608(2002) [CrossRef]

21.

R. G. Scott, A. M. Martin, and S. Bujkiewicz, “Transport and disruption of Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 033605(2004) [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(020.7010) Atomic and molecular physics : Laser trapping
(190.4410) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics, parametric processes
(270.5530) Quantum optics : Pulse propagation and temporal solitons

ToC Category:
Quantum Optics

History
Original Manuscript: February 15, 2006
Revised Manuscript: April 3, 2006
Manuscript Accepted: April 11, 2006
Published: April 17, 2006

Citation
Yongshan Cheng, Rongzhou Gong, and Hong Li, "Dynamics of two coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate solitons in an optical lattice," Opt. Express 14, 3594-3601 (2006)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-8-3594


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. H. Anderson, J. R. Matthews and C. E. Wieman, "Observation of Bose-Einstein Condensation in a dilute atomic vapor," Science 269,198 (1995) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. K. E. Strecker, G. B. Partridge and A. G. Truscott, "Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains," Nature 417,150 (2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck and G. Ferrari, "Formation of a matter-wave bright soliton," Science 296,1290 (2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. I. Carusotto, D. Embriaco and G. C. La Rocca, "Nonlinear atom optics and bright-gap-soliton generation in finite optical lattices," Phys. Rev. A 65, 053611 (2002) [CrossRef]
  5. Y. S. Cheng, H. Li, and R. Z. Gong, "Effects of parameters on the stationary state and self-trapping of three coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate Solitons," Chin. Opt. Lett. 3,715 (2005)
  6. P. Massignan and M. Modugno, "One-dimensional model for the dynamics and expansion of elongated Bose-Einstein Condensates," Phys. Rev. A 67,023614 (2003) [CrossRef]
  7. C. Lee, W. Hai and X. Luo, "Quasispin model for macroscopic quantum tunneling between two coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates," Phys. Rev. A 68,053614 (2003) [CrossRef]
  8. E. A. Ostrovskaya and Y. S. Kivshar, "Localization of two-component Bose-Einstein Condensates in optical lattices," Phys. Rev. Lett. 92,180405 (2004) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni, S. Giovanazzi and S. R. Shenoy, "Quantum coherent atomic tunneling between two trapped Bose-Einstein Condensates," Phys. Rev. Lett. 79,4950 (1997) [CrossRef]
  10. S. Raghavan, A. Smerzi, S. Fantoni and S. R. Shenoy, "Coherent oscillations between two weakly coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates: Josephson effects, oscillations, and macroscopic quantum self-trapping," Phys. Rev. A 59, 620 (1999) [CrossRef]
  11. G. J. Milburn, J. Corney, E. M. Wright and D. F. Walls, "Quantum dynamics of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate in a double-well potential," Phys. Rev. A 55,4318 (1997) [CrossRef]
  12. J. Williams, R. Walser, J. Cooper, E. Cornell and M. Holland, "Nonlinear Josephson-type oscillations of a driven, two-component Bose-Einstein Condensate," Phys. Rev. A 59,R31 (1999) [CrossRef]
  13. B. P. Anderson and M. A. Kasevich, "Macroscopic quantum interference from atomic tunnel arrays," Science 282, 1686 (1998) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. D. S. Hall, M. R. Matthews, J. R. Ensher, C. E. Wieman and E. A. Cornell, "Dynamics of component separation in a binary mixture of Bose-Einstein Condensates," Phys. Rev. Lett. 81,1538 (1998),
  15. D. S. Hall, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman and E. A. Cornell, "Measurements of relative phase in two-component Bose-Einstein Condensates," Phys. Rev. Lett. 81,1543 (1998) [CrossRef]
  16. R. Carretero-Gonzalez and K. Promislow, "Localized breathing oscillations of Bose-Einstein condensates in periodic traps," Phys. Rev. A 66,033610 (2002) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. C. Pare and M. Florjariczyk, "Approximate model of soliton dynamics in all-optical couplers," Phys. Rev. A 41,6287-6295(1990) [CrossRef]
  18. H. Li, Y. S. Cheng and D. X. Huang, "Effects of traps on dynamics of two coupled Bose-Einstein Condensates," Opt. Commun. 258, 306-314 (2006)
  19. S. Raghavan and G. P. Agrawal, "Switching and self-trapping dynamics of Bose-Einstein Solitons," J. Mod. Opt. 47,1155 (2000) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. P. Ohberg and L. Santos, "Dark Solitons in a two-component Bose-Einstein Condensate," Phys. Rev. Lett. 86,2918-2921(2001) [CrossRef]
  21. D. J. Frantzeskakis, G. Theocharis and F. K. Diakonos, "Interaction of dark solitons with localized impurities in Bose-Einstein Condensates," Phys. Rev. A 66,053608 (2002) [CrossRef]
  22. R. G. Scott, A. M. Martin and S. Bujkiewicz, "Transport and disruption of Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices," Phys. Rev. A 69,033605 (2004)

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited