OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 15, Iss. 11 — May. 28, 2007
  • pp: 6651–6663
« Show journal navigation

Imaging interferometric microscopy–approaching the linear systems limits of optical resolution

Yuliya Kuznetsova, Alexander Neumann, and S. R. J. Brueck  »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 15, Issue 11, pp. 6651-6663 (2007)

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1015 KB)

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools



The linear systems optical resolution limit is a dense grating pattern at a λ/2 pitch or a critical dimension (resolution) of λ/4. However, conventional microscopy provides a (Rayleigh) resolution of only ~ 0.6λ/NA, approaching λ/1.67 as NA → 1. A synthetic aperture approach to reaching the λ/4 linear-systems limit, extending previous developments in imaging-interferometric microscopy, is presented. Resolution of non-periodic 180-nm features using 633-nm illumination (λ/3.52) and of a 170-nm grating (λ/3.72) is demonstrated. These results are achieved with a 0.4-NA optical system and retain the working distance, field-of-view, and depth-of-field advantages of low-NA systems while approaching ultimate resolution limits.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Optical microscopy is a well-established field with many important applications. Despite a long and rich history, much effort and significant advances continue. Many newly demonstrated techniques take advantage of nonlinearities associated with fluorescence to achieve resolutions well beyond the diffraction limit, for example: stimulated-emission-depletion (STED; λ/50) [1

1. G..Donnert J. Keller, R. Medda, M. A. Andrei, S. O. Rizzoli, R. Lührmann, R. Jahn, C. Eggeling, and S. W. Hell “Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11440–11445 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 2

2. V. Westphal and S. W. Hell, “Nanoscale resolution in the focal plane of an optical microscope,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 143903 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and structured illumination and saturation (λ/10) [3

3. M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13081–13086 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In another direction, efforts have continued to enhance resolution using synthetic aperture approaches that extend the collected spatial frequency content towards the 2/λ limit of the transmission medium [4–13

4. W. Lukosz and M. Marchant, “Optischen Abbildung Unter Ueberschreitung der Beugungsbedingten Aufloesungsgrenze,” Opt. Acta 10, 241–255 (1963). [CrossRef]


The resolution of a traditional microscopy system is given by the well-known Rayleigh criterion, CD ~ 0.6×λ/NA where, borrowing from lithographic terminology, CD is the critical dimension or the smallest resolvable linear dimension, λ is the optical wavelength, and NA is the numerical aperture of the optical system. This limit directly arises from the low-pass spatial bandwidth constraints of the optical system, which extend to NA/λ for coherent illumination and to 2NA/λ with reduced fidelity at high spatial frequencies for incoherent illumination [14

14. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd Ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 1998).


In contrast, the transmission medium (assuming air or vacuum with a unity refractive index, immersion will be discussed below) has a bandpass of 2/λ corresponding to the highest angle at which diffracted light from an object is available (incident beam at grazing incidence and diffraction in the backward direction). If an optical system could record the scattering from a 1-D structure object for frequencies up to 2/λ, a higher resolution image, extending to CDs as small as λ/4 would be achievable. For arbitrary patterns, the resolution is somewhat lower as a result of the need to capture an extended range of frequencies around the center frequency to define the image; in the same spirit as Rayleigh’s criterion, this limit is CD ~ λ/3.3.

In this paper, we first describe a straightforward extension of the frequency space coverage by using multiple offset partial images in each direction and introduce a signal-processing algorithm to deal with the resulting overlaps in the frequency space coverage. With the same NA = 0.4 optical system, the resolution is extended to ~ λ/2.76 (230 nm at λ = 633 nm), well beyond the capability of a traditional microscopy system with the same objective lens, and better than the resolution accessible even using a high-NA objective with conventional illumination as a result of the decreasing modulation transfer function at high frequencies (the Rayleigh resolution for a 0.9-NA objective at a 633-nm wavelength is 422 nm). Access to additional frequency space coverage by tilting the object plane is then demonstrated. Image distortion is associated with this non-collinear, multi-axis optical configuration; additional image processing is introduced to compensate this distortion. Using this approach a resolution for non-periodic objects to 180 nm (λ/3.52), with some limitations due to the loss of the highest frequencies of the image, and to 170 nm for simple gratings (λ/3.72) is demonstrated, extending optical microscopy close to the linear systems limits of the optical transmission medium. Importantly these techniques are applicable to standard transmission/reflection microscopy configurations and do not rely on fluorescent transitions or nonlinear response (except for the square-law intensity detection of the camera). These results are achieved with modest optics and retain the depth-of-field, field of view and working distance advantages of low-NA microscopy.

2. Imaging interferometric microscopy

The key to IIM is oblique (off-axis) illumination, which shifts the higher spatial frequencies diffracted from the object in one spatial direction into the bandpass of the objective lens as shown in Fig. 1. A 0-order beam is brought around the objective lens with an auxiliary optical system and interferometrically reintroduced on the low NA side. The interference between this 0-order beam and the diffracted beams transmitted through the objective shifts the collected diffracted information back to high frequency. As a result of the square-law intensity response, the resulting frequency coverage is represented by a pair of circles of radius NA/λ shifted away from zero frequency as shown in Fig. 2(b). A collimated illumination beam is incident on the object at an angle of incidence β. In the illustrated case, β is beyond the collection angle of the objective lens and an auxiliary optical system is used to collect the zero-order transmission, appropriately adjust its divergence, direction, and phase and re-inject it onto the image plane where it interferes with the diffracted beams from the object to reconstruct a partial image. Alternatively, instead of using the zero-order transmission, which might be blocked by the objective-lens mount, a portion of the illumination beam is split off before the object and directed around the objective lens. For convenience of presentation, Fig. 1 is drawn for a ~ 2× magnification, although a 20× objective is used in the present experiments. As an aside, IIM is not directly applicable to fluorescence microscopy because of the need for interferometric introduction of the coherent 0-order beam.

Fig. 1. Optical arrangement for imaging interferometric microscopy: α = sin-1(NA), β is the incident beam angle of incidence, and βref is the angle of the reference beam onto the image plane.

The frequency-space conceptualization of IIM is shown in Fig. 2 which presents the frequency space coverage of our partial images using a NA = 0.4 objective mapped against the Fourier amplitude coefficients of a 240-nm CD Manhattan (x, y) geometry structure [shown in Fig. 2(a)]. At the He-Ne laser wavelength of 633 nm, the resolution limit of this objective with conventional illumination is ~ 0.6λ/NA (~ 950 nm). The two circles at radii of NA/λ (0.4/λ) and 2NA/λ (0.8/λ) correspond to the approximate frequency space limits for coherent and incoherent illumination, respectively, and reflect the low-pass transmission characteristic of the objective lens. The inner sets of small shifted circles (radius NA/λ) in Fig. 2, that extend from -3NA/λ to 3NA/λ (±1.2/λ) in the x- and y-directions, show the frequency space coverage added with two offset partial images, one in each direction. The imaging is single side-band, only the diffracted plane waves to one side of the object are collected (opposite to the tilt of the illumination beam), the square law (intensity) response of the image formation and detection process restores the conjugate frequency space components, resulting in the two symmetrically displaced circles in Fig. 2(b) for each partial image. The offset (off-axis tilt) for these images was chosen to ensure that there was no overlap between the spectral coverage of the low-frequency partial image (extending out to NA/λ) and the offset images. As discussed previously, improved images can be obtained by subtracting the dark-field components of the image (with the zero-order transmission blocked) [4

4. W. Lukosz and M. Marchant, “Optischen Abbildung Unter Ueberschreitung der Beugungsbedingten Aufloesungsgrenze,” Opt. Acta 10, 241–255 (1963). [CrossRef]

]. In the present experiments, this provided a cosmetic, not a dramatic, improvement to the images.

Fig. 2. (a). Manhattan geometry pattern used for image resolution exploration consisting of five nested “ells” and a large box. The lines and spaces of the “ells” are 240 nm. (b). intensity Fourier space components of the pattern, mapped onto the frequency space coverage of the imaging system.

Additional frequency space coverage is available with a second pair of off-axis images, represented by the outer sets of shifted circles, with a larger tilt of the illumination plane wave, approaching grazing incidence (limited to 80° in the present experiment). The maximum frequency coverage in these images extends to [sin(80)+NA]/λ = (0.98+NA)/λ (1.38/λ). Clearly, the frequency-space coverage of the outer circles is necessary to capture the fundamental frequency components of the line-space portion of this pattern. There is significant overlap between the frequency coverage of the first and second set of partial images as illustrated in Fig 2. To provide a faithful image, it is necessary to exclude the double coverage of frequency space associated with the image spectral overlaps. This can be accomplished by filtering the images either optically (with appropriate apertures in the back focal plane) or electronically once the images are recorded. Importantly, since each of the partial images involves only the NA of the objective, this imaging concept retains the working distance, depth-of-field and field-of-view associated with the low-NA objective, but has a resolution beyond that achievable with even the highest NA objective using traditional illumination approaches.

3. Experimental results

The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 3. A TEM00, 633-nm He-Ne laser illumination source, beam splitters and shutters (not shown) are used to produce and sequence the various illumination and reference beams. The object is illuminated with a 2-mm diameter collimated Gaussian beam. The ~40-μm diameter field (limited by the size of the CCD camera) is imaged by a microscope objective (NA=0.4, 20X, ~ 1-cm working distance) along with a tube lens. A set of lenses in a confocal arrangement is used to relay an accessible Fourier plane where the zero-order beam is reintroduced. The image is then magnified with a second microscope objective (NA=0.25, 10X). Finally, the image (200X) is recorded with a 640×480 pixel CCD camera with ~ 12×12 μm2 pixel size. The coherent reference beam is transmitted around the microscope objective using an optical fiber and reintroduced in the Fourier plane on the low NA side of the objective. As a result of the long coherence length of the HeNe laser, balancing the lengths of the various interferometric optical paths is straightforward. Intensities of the beams are adjusted by filters.

Fig. 3. Experimental setup for off-axis images and interferometric reconstruction.

The angles of the off-axis illumination and the reference beam are adjusted to capture different ranges of frequency space. For NA = 0.4, we first take a picture with on-axis illumination, then illuminate the object at an angle of 53° and then at an angle of 80°.

An adjusting stage controlling the end of the fiber in the Fourier plane is used to mode-match the reference beam to the off-axis characteristics of the illumination beam, such as angle of incidence and phase. A reference grating on the mask is used to determine the correct angle and phase.

Blocking beams 2 and 3 provides the on-axis illumination partial image. The dark field image is taken by blocking the 0-order in the Fourier plane, and the background is taken by moving the object slightly to a nearby unpatterned area. Blocking beam 1 and opening beams 2 and 3 provides the high frequency partial image. The high-frequency dark field is obtained by illuminating the object only with beam 2 and the background of the reference beam is taken by using only beam 3. The corresponding dark field and background images are subtracted from each partial image without changing their amplitudes and, finally, the baseline and contrast are adjusted in correspondence to a reference object. The pattern is rotated to provide additional frequency coverage in the orthogonal spatial direction while keeping the polarization fixed (TE) for optimal contrast.

Experimental results for Manhattan (x, y) structures (20-nm thick chrome-on-glass) with a CD of 240 nm (high-frequency period of 480 nm) are shown in Fig. 4. The coherent low-frequency image [Fig. 4(a)] corresponds to the spatial frequency coverage of the center circle [Fig. 2(b)]. By adding high-frequency images corresponding to the inner pairs of offset circles of Fig. 2(b) in the x- and y-directions to the low-frequency image and subtracting darkfields and backgrounds the image in Fig. 4(b) is obtained. As expected, there is insufficient resolution to image the pattern, since the frequency space coverage does not include the significant spectral content near the outer edges of the frequency-space circle that correspond to the fundamental frequency components of the periodic line:space structures in the object.

Adding the high-frequency content images corresponding to outer pairs of offset circles of Fig. 2(b) the reconstructed image shown in Fig. 4(c) is obtained. Finally, Fig. 4(d) shows the result of electronically eliminating the overlap in spectral frequencies, by taking Fourier transforms of the partial images, filtering appropriately, and inverse transforming back to real space. Somewhat better images were achieved with electronic filtering than by eliminating the overlap with spatial filters in the back focal plane. This may be due to the difficulty of precisely aligning the pupil-plane filters in the optical system. While these images clearly reflect the major features of the object, there remains significant image modulation associated with an abrupt cut-off in frequency space (Gibbs phenomenon) coupled with a finite signal/noise and the difficulty in precisely matching the experimental partial images in both amplitude and phase. For the present case of a binary image, applying a nonlinear threshold to the image provides significant improvement. This procedure will be discussed in more detail in a subsequent publication.

Fig. 4. (a). Low-frequency and (b) reconstructed images with the high frequency images taken at an offset illumination of 53, (c) reconstructed image with high frequency images taken at 53° and 80° without filtering, and d) reconstructed image using electronic spatial filtering.

4. Extension to frequency space limits using a tilted object plane

The spatial frequency space coverage can be increased beyond (1+NA)/λ by tilting the mask and capturing higher spatial frequencies, up to the transmission medium band pass limit of 2/λ as shown schematically in Fig. 5. The incident beam, the tilt axis, and the reference beam are all in the same (≡ x, z) plane. In our experimental case, the object tilt was θtilt = 39° and NA = 0.4, so α is between -23.6° and +23.6°; the incident beam angle is β= 80° and the effective aperture sin(θtilt)+ sinβ is between 1.25 and 1.87; βref- is the incident angle of the reference beam for the reconstruction of the partial image.

Fig. 5. Optical arrangement using a tilted object (with respect to the objective image plane) to enhance the frequency space information.

The frequency space coverage using a NA = 0.4 objective is shown in Fig. 6(a) superimposed on the frequency space intensity plot for a 180-nm CD object of the same pattern as shown in Fig. 2(a). The second pair of off-axis images with the object tilted extends the frequency space coverage out to ~1.87/λ. As a result of the non-collinear, multi-axis conditions of this arrangement, the frequency coverage is distorted from circles to ellipses, and a frequency-mapping algorithm, described below, is required to relate the measured spatial frequencies to the actual image frequencies. As the object linewidth is decreased to 170 nm, the corresponding frequency peak extends beyond the collection limit [Fig. 6(b)] and the image is distorted.

Since this multi-axis optical system is non-paraxial, sin[θtilt±α] ≠ sin(θtilt)± sin(α), it is necessary to correct the measured frequencies. First, the range of captured frequencies versus mask tilt f min,max = [sin(β) + sin(θtilt ∓ sin-1 NA)]/λ is shown in Fig. 7 for an incident angle β = 80°. The vertical dashed line corresponds to the experimental conditions with a frequency extent in the plane of the tilt from NAmin = 1.25 to NAmax = 1.87 [the minor axes of the ellipses in Fig. 6(a)]. The effective aperture in the direction along the tilt decreases as the tilt increases. In the orthogonal direction the effective aperture is invariant to the tilt, so the covered frequency region becomes elliptical rather than circular. More generally, the measurement gives offsets from the origin of the tilted coordinate system of normalized frequencies fx’ [≡ sin(αobs)/λ] and fy’ where fx’ is in the plane of the tilt. These frequencies are in the laboratory measurement coordinate system, within the NA of the lens. fy’ is unaffected by the tilt; after some algebra the corrected frequencies are:

Fig. 6. Frequency space coverage with tilted mask, a) for 180-nm CD structure, b) location of high frequency spectral components for a 170-nm CD structure.

The conversion between measured frequencies and actual frequencies is shown in Fig. 8 where the measured spatial frequencies are referenced to their position in the pupil of the objective. The calculation is for the experimental situation: θtilt, β, and NA as described (39°, 80°, 0.4). Results are shown for different values of fy’. As fy’ increases, the range of accessible spatial frequencies along fx’ (fx) decreases as a consequence of the circular pupil aperture of the objective. Experimentally, we measure the spatial frequencies in real space by adding in a reference beam and monitoring the interference pattern between the reference beam and the collected diffracted beams. The angle of the reference beam, βref, and its phase are set using a reference grating positioned around the object of interest.

Fig. 7. Range of captured frequencies versus tilt mask angle, β = 80°. The vertical dashed line corresponds to the present experiment. The shaded region is the accessible frequency space coverage along the tilt direction.
Fig. 8. Mapping between spatial frequencies in tilted/offset image and actual object spatial frequencies. Curves correspond to the indicated spatial frequencies in the y-direction. The decreasing extent of the curves with increasing transverse wave vector is a result of the circular aperture of the objective.

The measured image frequencies must be corrected before reconstructing the complete image. This is accomplished in several steps: first, the dark field real space image is subtracted; then a fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the experimental (distorted) real space high-frequency image is taken to provide a frequency space image; and the experimental frequencies are corrected according to Fig. 8. The resulting frequency space information is not immediately suitable for an inverse FFT since the new frequencies are no longer on a regular (integer) grid. The corrected frequencies were assigned to the nearest frequencies on the appropriate grid and the inverse transform was taken to convert back to real space. The procedure is simpler and more robust if the focal point and the spatial origin of the FFT are coincident, since the phase is invariant to image tilt around this point. By comparing the final images with corresponding filtered model images using a mean-square-error metric we find the optimum position, angle and intensity of the partial images. This procedure is necessary as a consequence of experimental uncertainties in defining both the focal position for the tilted object and its relative translation from the optical axis. For an unknown object, a nearby test structure will be necessary to allow the same manipulations. Finally the total image is reconstructed [Fig 9(a)] by adding restored high frequency images with low and middle frequency images and compared with the model [Fig 9(b)].

Fig. 9. Experiment for a 180-nm CD: a) reconstructed image, b) reconstructed model
Fig. 10. Comparison of cross cuts for the experiment (reconstructed total image) and a Fourier optics model (along the line indicated line in Fig. 8).

A crosscut of the reconstructed image [along the red line in Fig. 9(a)] compared with the crosscut of the model is shown in Fig. 10. The crosscut of the reconstructed image has additional peaks on the background due to the lack of accuracy in phase and amplitude matching in conjunction with Gibbs effect and the impact of system noise.

The results of experiments with 170-nm structures are shown in Fig. 11(a). The reconstructed image is not as well resolved as for the 180-nm structures as this image is closer to the limit of resolution [Fig. 6(b)], but the image of a grating with the same period [Fig. 11(b)] is quite good and provides a technique to observe large scale grating defects, which might be useful for grating inspection. As discussed above, both of these structures are beyond the traditional Rayleigh limit (~λ/3.3) for the transmission medium.

Tilting the object plane introduces significant distortions into the optical system. Empirically, the most noticeable is that the in-focus field-of-view is decreased in the direction of the tilt. If the depth of focus of the objective is 6 μm, inclination of the mask to 39° will make the field of view in focus only about 9-μm wide. This is a direct consequence of the non-paraxial effects discussed above that distort the observed spatial frequencies of the diffracted fields in a nonlinear fashion. Correcting this frequency space distortion also restores the field of view.

Fig. 11. Reconstructed images of: a) a 170-nm CD structure; b) a 170-nm CD grating, obtained using multiple partial images including one with a tilted object plane.
Fig. 12. Experiment (a, c) and simulation (b, d) results showing the impact of the frequency restoration on the high frequency partial image. The dotted lines are visual guides showing the significant shift of the out-of-focus object (left) in the laboratory frame.

In light of the precision required, an alternate algorithm to that described above was used. Instead of shifting to the nearest discrete frequencies in the inverse transform, to allow an FFT, the corrected, non-integer frequencies were used for numerical evaluation of the inverse transform. The result is illustrated in Fig. 12 which shows the x-offset high frequency partial images of two adjacent test structures (the one on the left is the 180-nm object (Fig. 9) while the one on the right is the 170-nm test structure, each structure is about 20 CD wide (3.6 μm) and their separation is 12 μm. The optical system was adjusted so that for the experimental image the smaller (right hand) structure was approximately in focus while the larger (left hand) structure was behind the focal plane and substantially blurred. The dotted lines and arrows show the significant shifting of the positions of the intense features arising from the transform from the laboratory frame to the image frame.

The final reconstructed images are shown in Fig. 13. The reconstruction procedure restores both images and clearly improves the field of view that was limited by the tilt of the object plane relative to the focal plane. This method requires very precision knowledge of the mask tilt and incident illumination offset in order to obtain high-quality, extended-field images.

5. Conclusion

This approach requires only modest optical components. We have demonstrated resolution of a 240-nm CD Manhattan geometry (x, y pattern) object with a 0.4 NA objective at a wavelength of 633 nm (CD ~ 0.14λ/NA ~ λ/2.9) without tilt of the object plane and of a 180-nm CD pattern with λ = 633 nm and NA = 0.4 (CD ~ 0.11λ/NA ~ λ/3.52) with tilt of the object plane.

Each of the partial images retains the depth-of-field, working distance and field-of-view advantages of the low-NA objective, but the composite image has a resolution superior by almost a factor of two to that achievable with any possible single objective using conventional illumination. For a tilted object plane partial image, an algorithm is described to restore the field-of-view that is restricted by geometric optics with some decrease in quality as the field is extended due to experimental accuracy limitations and noise.

Another advantage of IIM is the possibility of using signal-processing enhancements on the partial images. Examples are the subtraction of dark-field images; the use of Fourier-transform filtering techniques to eliminate double coverage of the same spectral components in two partial images; and the nonlinear frequency transformation for the tilted images. The full apparatus of digital image processing is quite rich and many additional techniques will find application in IIM, although care must be exercised to avoid the introduction of artifacts.

The present examples used a Manhattan geometry structure with the major spectral components along orthogonal axes. For more general objects, additional partial images covering all of frequency space can be added. Phase measurements are readily available since the zero-order beam is independently accessible and can be advanced/retarded independently of the diffracted beams. For example, this will allow detailed microscopy of phase-shift lithography masks, which is difficult with traditional techniques. In comparison to strategies that use the nonlinear response of fluorescence transitions to enhance the resolution, IIM is broadly appliable to all microscopy measurements including transmission and reflection.

Finally, the ultimate resolution can be further extended with immersion techniques. Immersion microscopy is certainly well known. Recently, lithography applications of immersion have attracted much interest for future IC generations. Table I gives the rough limits to resolution corresponding to HeNe laser sources (633 nm) and ArF laser sources (193 nm, near the transmission limits of quartz). The refractive index of the immersion fluid is taken to match that of a silica substrate to minimize Fresnel reflection coefficients; somewhat higher index fluids and substrates are available with corresponding increases in optical resolution.

Fig. 13. Reconstructed image, 180- and 170-nm structures illustrating the restoration of the field of view achieved by transforming the laboratory frame spatial frequencies to the image frame.

Table I:. Scalability of resolution including immersion microscopy

View This Table


We are thankful to Felix Jaeckel for making the mask with small features. Support for this work was provided by DARPA as part of the University Photonics Research Program.

References and links


G..Donnert J. Keller, R. Medda, M. A. Andrei, S. O. Rizzoli, R. Lührmann, R. Jahn, C. Eggeling, and S. W. Hell “Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11440–11445 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


V. Westphal and S. W. Hell, “Nanoscale resolution in the focal plane of an optical microscope,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 143903 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13081–13086 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


W. Lukosz and M. Marchant, “Optischen Abbildung Unter Ueberschreitung der Beugungsbedingten Aufloesungsgrenze,” Opt. Acta 10, 241–255 (1963). [CrossRef]


W. Lucosz, “Optical systems with resolving powers exceeding the classical limit,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 932–941 (1967). [CrossRef]


X. Chen and S. R. J. Brueck, “Imaging interferometric lithography - approaching the resolution limits of optics,” Opt. Lett. 24, 124–126 (1999). [CrossRef]


C. J. Schwarz, Y. Kuznetsova, and S. R. J. Brueck, “Imaging interferometric microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 28, 1424–1426 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


S. A. Alexandrov, T. R. Hillman, T. Gutzler, and D. D. Sampson, “Synthetic aperture Fourier holographic optical microscopy,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 168102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


S. A. Alexandrov, T. R. Hillman, and D. D. Sampson, “Spatially resolved Fourier holographic light scattering angular spectroscopy,” Opt. Lett. 30, 3305–3307 (2005). [CrossRef]


V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia, “Single-step superresolution by interferometric imaging,” Opt. Express 12, 2589–2596 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia “Superresolved imaging in digital holography by superposition of tilted wavefronts,” Appl. Opt. 45, 822–828 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, and J. Garcia, “Superresolution optical system by common-path interferometry,” Opt. Express 14, 5168–5177 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]


V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia, “Synthetic aperture superresolution with multiple off-axis holograms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 3162–3170 (2006). [CrossRef]


J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd Ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 1998).

OCIS Codes
(180.0180) Microscopy : Microscopy

ToC Category:

Original Manuscript: March 14, 2007
Revised Manuscript: May 5, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: May 5, 2007
Published: May 15, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 2, Iss. 6 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Yuliya Kuznetsova, Alexander Neumann, and S. R. Brueck, "Imaging interferometric microscopy–approaching the linear systems limits of optical resolution.," Opt. Express 15, 6651-6663 (2007)

Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  


  1. G. Donnert, J. Keller, R. Medda, M. A. Andrei, S. O. Rizzoli, R. Lührmann, R. Jahn, C. Eggeling, and S. W. Hell, "Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11440-11445 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. V. Westphal and S. W. Hell, "Nanoscale resolution in the focal plane of an optical microscope," Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 143903 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. M. G. L. Gustafsson, "Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102,13081-13086 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. W. Lukosz and M. Marchant, "Optischen Abbildung Unter Ueberschreitung der Beugungsbedingten Aufloesungsgrenze," Optica Acta  10, 241-255 (1963). [CrossRef]
  5. W. Lucosz, "Optical Sustems with Resolving Powers Exceeding the Classical Limit," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 932-941 (1967). [CrossRef]
  6. X. Chen and S. R. J. Brueck, "Imaging interferometric lithography - approaching the resolution limits of optics," Opt. Lett. 24, 124-126 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. C. J. Schwarz, Y. Kuznetsova, and S. R. J. Brueck, "Imaging interferometric microscopy," Opt. Lett. 28, 1424-1426 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. S. A. Alexandrov T. R. Hillman, T. Gutzler and D. D. Sampson, "Synthetic aperture Fourier holographic optical microscopy," Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 168102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. S. A. Alexandrov, T. R. Hillman, and D. D. Sampson, "Spatially resolved Fourier holographic light scattering angular spectroscopy," Opt. Lett. 30, 3305-3307 (2005). [CrossRef]
  10. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia, "Single-step superresolution by interferometric imaging," Opt. Express. 12, 2589-2596 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez and J. Garcia "Superresolved imaging in digital holography by superposition of tilted wavefronts," Appl. Opt. 45, 822-828 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky and J. Garcia, "Superresolution optical system by common-path interferometry," Opt. Express. 14, 5168-5177 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. V. Mico, Z. Zalevsky, P. Garcia-Martinez, and J. Garcia "Synthetic aperture superresolution with multiple off-axis holograms," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 3162-3170 (2006). [CrossRef]
  14. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, 2nd Ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 1998).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited