OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 15, Iss. 21 — Oct. 17, 2007
  • pp: 13682–13688
« Show journal navigation

Near-field excitation of nanoantenna resonance

Reuben M. Bakker, Alexandra Boltasseva, Zhengtong Liu, Rasmus H. Pedersen, Samuel Gresillon, Alexander V. Kildishev, Vladimir P. Drachev, and Vladimir M. Shalaev  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 15, Issue 21, pp. 13682-13688 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.013682


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (456 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

An array of paired elliptic nanoparticles designed to enhance local fields around the particle pair is fabricated with gold embedded in quartz. Light excites a coupled plasmon resonance in the particle pair and the system acts like a plasmonic nanoantenna providing an enhanced electromagnetic field. Near-field scanning optical microscopy and finite element modeling are used to study the local field effects of the nanoantenna system. Local illumination shows similar resonant properties as plane wave illumination: a strong, localized optical resonance for light polarized parallel to the main, center-to-center axis.

© 2007 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Optical properties of highly ordered, interacting metal nanoparticles have recently come to the forefront in the merging of nanotechnology and photonics [1–16

1. W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau, A. Keitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R. Aussenegg, “Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles,” Opt. Commun. 220, 137–141 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. The rudimentary system of two interacting metal nanoparticles is described as two interacting dipoles [1

1. W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau, A. Keitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R. Aussenegg, “Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles,” Opt. Commun. 220, 137–141 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. As the gap between the two interacting particles is decreased, the coupling strength will increase and give rise to an enhanced electric field in the vicinity of the gap. The coupling effect has been studied between two interacting circles [1

1. W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau, A. Keitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R. Aussenegg, “Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles,” Opt. Commun. 220, 137–141 (2003). [CrossRef]

, 4

4. T. Atay, J-H. Song, and A. V. Nurmikko, “Strong interacting plasmon nanoparticle pairs: from dipole-dipole interaction to conductively coupled regime,” Nano Lett. 4, 1627–1631 (2004). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. L. Gunnarsson, T. Rindzevicius, J. Prikulis, B. Kasemo, M. Kall, S. Zou, and G. C. Shatz, “Confined plasmons in nanofabricated single silver particle pairs: experimental observations of strong interparticle interactions,” J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 1079–1087 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 15

15. P. K. Jain, W. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, “On the universal scaling behavior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation,” Nano Lett. 7, 2080–2088 (2007). [CrossRef]

], ellipses [2

2. K. H. Su, Q. H. Wei, X. Zheng, J. J. Mock, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, “Interparticle coupling effects on plasmon resonances of nanogold particles,” Nano Lett. 3, 1087–1090 (2003). [CrossRef]

, 11–14

11. E. Cubukcu, E. A. Kort, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, “Plasmonic laser antenna,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 093120 (2006). [CrossRef]

], triangles [3

3. D. P. Fromm, A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, G. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, “Gap-dependent optical coupling of single bowtie nanoantennas resonant in the visible,” Nano Lett. 4, 957–961 (2004). [CrossRef]

, 7–10

7. A. Sundaramurthy, K. B. Crozier, G. S. Kino, D. P. Fromm, P. J. Schuck, and W. E. Moerner, “Field enhancement and gap-dependent resonance in a system of two opposing tip-to-tip Au nanotriangles,” Phys. Rev. B 72, 165409 (2005). [CrossRef]

], and rectangles [5

5. P. Muhlschlegel, H. J. Eisler, O. J. F. Martin, B. Hecht, and D. W. Pohl, “Resonant Optical Antennas,” Science 308, 1607–1609 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 16

16. T. Sondergaard and S. Bozhevolnyi, “Slow-plasmon resonant nanostructures: scattering and field enhancements,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 073402 (2007). [CrossRef]

] using far-field, polarization specific light. The coupling effect is strongly dependent upon wavelength and polarization of incident light: for pair separation on the order of the particle size the resonance wavelength red-shifts from the single particle resonance with decreasing gap distance due to coupling that occurs for light polarized parallel to the center-to-center axis [1–4

1. W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau, A. Keitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R. Aussenegg, “Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles,” Opt. Commun. 220, 137–141 (2003). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. L. Gunnarsson, T. Rindzevicius, J. Prikulis, B. Kasemo, M. Kall, S. Zou, and G. C. Shatz, “Confined plasmons in nanofabricated single silver particle pairs: experimental observations of strong interparticle interactions,” J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 1079–1087 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 12

12. O. L. Muskens, J. G. Rivas, V. Giannini, and J. A. Sanchez-Gil, “Optical scattering resonances of single plasmonic nanoantennas,” arXiv:cond-mat/0612689v3 (2006).

, 15

15. P. K. Jain, W. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, “On the universal scaling behavior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation,” Nano Lett. 7, 2080–2088 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Far-field measurements have demonstrated enhanced fields corresponding to proper resonant wavelengths and polarization of incident light [5

5. P. Muhlschlegel, H. J. Eisler, O. J. F. Martin, B. Hecht, and D. W. Pohl, “Resonant Optical Antennas,” Science 308, 1607–1609 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 7

7. A. Sundaramurthy, K. B. Crozier, G. S. Kino, D. P. Fromm, P. J. Schuck, and W. E. Moerner, “Field enhancement and gap-dependent resonance in a system of two opposing tip-to-tip Au nanotriangles,” Phys. Rev. B 72, 165409 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 12

12. O. L. Muskens, J. G. Rivas, V. Giannini, and J. A. Sanchez-Gil, “Optical scattering resonances of single plasmonic nanoantennas,” arXiv:cond-mat/0612689v3 (2006).

]. Antennae have been fabricated on NSOM tips [9

9. A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, N. R. Conley, D. P. Fromm, G. S. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, “Toward nanometer-scale optical photolithography: utilizing the near-field of bowtie optical nanoantennas,” Nano Lett. 6, 355–360 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 10

10. J. N. Farahani, H. J. Eisler, D. W. Pohl, M. Pavius, P. Fluckiger, P. Gasser, and B. Hecht, “Bow-tie optical antenna probes for single-emitter scanning near-field optical microscopy,” Nanotechnology , 18, 125506 (2007). [CrossRef]

] and laser diodes [11

11. E. Cubukcu, E. A. Kort, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, “Plasmonic laser antenna,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 093120 (2006). [CrossRef]

] with demonstrated uses of photolithography [9

9. A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, N. R. Conley, D. P. Fromm, G. S. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, “Toward nanometer-scale optical photolithography: utilizing the near-field of bowtie optical nanoantennas,” Nano Lett. 6, 355–360 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], improved near-field imaging [10

10. J. N. Farahani, H. J. Eisler, D. W. Pohl, M. Pavius, P. Fluckiger, P. Gasser, and B. Hecht, “Bow-tie optical antenna probes for single-emitter scanning near-field optical microscopy,” Nanotechnology , 18, 125506 (2007). [CrossRef]

] and ideas for high density data storage [11

11. E. Cubukcu, E. A. Kort, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, “Plasmonic laser antenna,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 093120 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. Nanoantennae also hold applications for increased light extraction from localized emitters [13

13. L. Rogobete, F. Kaminski, M. Agio, and V. Sandoghdar, “Design of plasmonic nanoantennae for enhancing spontaneous emission,” Opt. Lett. 32, 1623–1625 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 15

15. P. K. Jain, W. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, “On the universal scaling behavior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation,” Nano Lett. 7, 2080–2088 (2007). [CrossRef]

] such as fluorescent dyes, quantum dots and carbon nanotubes as well as the concept of a true subwavelength sized laser like device [17–19

17. D. J. Bergman and M. I. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Our design for nanoantennae consists of two gold nanoparticles: elliptic right cylinders separated by a small gap along their long axis. Large (100 μm by 100 μm) two dimensional arrays, embedded in a quartz substrate exhibit a strong resonance that is experimentally characterized using far-field spectroscopy and near-field scanning optical microscopy (NSOM) [20

20. D. Courjon, Near-field Microscopy and Near Field Optics (Imperial College Press, London, 2003).

] with the support of finite element modeling. These techniques allow a comprehensive study on the local field response of the arrayed nanoantenna system. Illumination mode NSOM excites the sample at different positions and the response is detected in the far-field. This gives a mapping of antenna efficiency to local excitation for high resolution observation of the plasmon mode in the nanoantenna. The resolution is high enough to excite the nanoantenna via only one particle or its part but does not allow mapping of the efficiency distribution in the gap. Such an efficiency distribution to local illumination has been compared with the intensity distribution under the plane wave illumination simulated with finite element method (FEM). It is shown that the nanoantennae respond in a similar manner to both local and plane wave illumination. This is an important result for the use of antennae in light emitting devices or with point-like light emitters. Additionally, this is one of the first demonstrations of patterned antenna arrays embedded inside the substrate. The embedding dielectric layer is important for continued development as future devices will require a host dielectric for structural support and to host light emitters.

2. Experimental technique and results

Electron beam lithography (100 kV, JEOL JBX-9300FS) is used to define the antenna pattern in a resist (ZEP520A) on a quartz substrate. Reactive ion etching is used to create 25 nm deep holes in the quartz. With the sample placed in a vacuum deposition chamber, 25 nm thickness of gold is deposited; a lift off technique leaves gold ellipses embedded in the quartz. The result is pairs of coupled elliptic cylinders with a typical dimension of 155 nm for the long axis, 65 nm for the short axis, a height of 25 nm and a gap of 65 nm. The particle pairs are patterned using a 600 nm period in the X direction and 300 nm in the Y direction.

A field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) image of the sample (XY plane) is presented in Fig. 1(a) and representation of the XZ cross section is shown in Fig. 1(b). The shape of the voids defined by the electron beam writing is a consistently smooth elliptic cylinder. However, FESEM imaging shows that the gold does not completely fill the holes in the quartz substrate. Each particle has a unique roughness around its perimeter due to limitations in electron beam evaporation uniformly filling the holes.

Far-field spectroscopy is used to characterize the resonance of the nanoantenna sample. The sample is set in the path of linearly polarized light from a lamp source; transmitted or reflected light is collected and delivered (with a SpectraCode device) to a CCD based spectrometer. Spectroscopy for light polarized across the nanoantenna gap along with the orthogonal polarization is presented in the broken lines of Fig. 1(c). Light polarized across the gap shows a large resonance centered at 810 nm; the orthogonal polarization shows a smaller resonance centered at 550 nm. The large resonance is a plasmon resonance of the two coupled particles, which is enhanced and red-shifted relative to the long axis resonance of the single particle. The weak resonance, at the shorter wavelength, of the orthogonal polarization is characteristic of the short axis plasmon resonance.

Fig. 1. The nanoantenna sample. (a) FESEM image; (b) XZ cross section; (c) Experimental (broken) far-field transmission and reflection spectra compared to far-field simulation (circled) data, INSET Absorption for the double and single particle (X polarized light).

Illumination mode NSOM provides the ability to locally excite different positions on the nanoantenna geometry and observe the field response. A commercial NSOM [Nanonics] is used with a single mode fiber tip drawn into a conical shape, terminated with a 100 nm diameter aperture. The fiber is cantilevered close to the aperture to allow for tuning fork based tapping mode operation and the sides are coated with chromium and gold. Light exiting the fiber is linearly polarized (measured to have a 14:1 extinction ratio) due to the tapering and bending of the fiber tip.

Given the strong electric field resonance of the sample in the near-infrared region, a wavelength of 785 nm is chosen for near-field investigation of the resonance. With the fiber probe illuminating the sample in the near-field, the resultant signal was collected using a 50x magnification, 0.45 NA objective lens in both reflection and transmission configurations. As the polarization of the light exiting the aperture is fixed, two orthogonal sample orientations are used to obtain images with light polarized in the X direction, parallel with the long particle and center-to-center axis, and for light polarized in the Y direction, parallel to the short particle axis. Four resulting near-field images are shown in Fig. 2. These four images are taken from the same corner of the array sample for proper comparison between the four imaging configurations as well as to compare each NSOM signal for both on and off the array. The corresponding atomic force microscope images were used to determine the position of the array edge; lines are drawn on the NSOM images to illustrate this position.

Fig. 2. Illumination mode NSOM images taken with a 785 nm light source of the same corner of the sample array: (a) Reflection image with polarization across the gap (X direction), INSET the orthogonal polarization (Y direction); color bar taken with 1 being the reflection value away from the sample; (b) Transmission image with polarization across the gap, INSET the orthogonal polarization; color bar taken with 100 being the transmission away from the sample. Inset images are shown with a size reduction of 50%.

The four NSOM images clearly show several effects occurring on the sample. As expected from the far-field spectroscopy result, NSOM images taken with a wavelength near the resonance wavelength show a strong dependence upon polarization. With the incident light polarized across the gap a very strong contrast is seen in both the reflection and transmission NSOM images while the orthogonal polarization shows non-resonant light scattering for both reflection and transmission images.

For light polarized across the gap, reflection mode [Fig. 2(a)] shows the best visualization of paired particles as the topography allows visualization of individual particles that make up the nanoantenna pair. The highly reflective nature of the nanoantennas is indicative of what is expected at the resonance condition. For individual particles, this signal is confined in the X direction but spreads out in the Y direction between adjacent pairs of particles. The transmission image [Fig 2(b)] for polarization across the gap shows a strong extinction of the near-field signal at the position of the paired particles. In Fig. 2(b), features in the X direction are well defined, while the columns of nanoantenna pairs in the Y direction do not provide a good visualization of individual pairs. The strong vertical lines with high transmission are the spaces between adjacent antenna columns while a close examination inside the high extinction regions reveals several small areas where light is leaking through the paired particles.

It needs to be noted that FESEM imaging of this corner revealed that ∼ 10 percent of the individual elliptic voids were empty. Some of these were just a single particle missing, but in some areas, several adjacent particles were missing. For device operation, such voids would be unwelcome, but for initial characterization, such defects help significantly. In overlaying the FESEM image with the NSOM images, the voids helped to directly match particle positions with the NSOM signals. For resonant reflection NSOM, most voids match up with points inside of the array with a very low NSOM signal. In resonant transmission NSOM, most of the void positions match up with the large areas of higher transmission. Additionally, when the reflection and transmission images are superimposed, the low signal regions of the reflection image match with high signal regions in transmission.

3. Finite element simulations

Three dimensional finite element modeling of the sample geometry is performed using a commercial software package [COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS]. Due to the symmetry of the sample, a unit cell containing one quarter of the particle pair is set up with a Z range of 3000 nm. A single wavelength plane wave is introduced at the top of the simulation space. With a wavelength spacing of 10 nm, the spectral response is obtained for polarizations parallel to the gap and the orthogonal case. These results match well with the experimental results and are shown using the circled data points in Fig. 1(c) for a direct comparison. Simulation with the same particle geometry, but for the case of an equal X period between each particle (Fig. 1(c) inset) shows that the coupled resonance results in a 20 nm red-shift in wavelength, a broadening of the resonance and an increase in absorption from the single particle case.

The local nature of the resonance for the paired particles is demonstrated in Fig. 3. Figure 3(a) shows an electric field intensity mapping produced from the simulation. This image shows the reflection signal in the near-field of six nanoantenna pairs illuminated with a wavelength of 790 nm; the finite element data is averaged from 25 to 35 nm above the sample plane and a running average is performed in the XY plane to give one pixel for every 10×10 nm2 for a more realistic comparison with the volume averaging that occurs with experimental NSOM imaging. This image is to be compared with Fig. 3(b) which shows a reflection NSOM image taken at 785 nm. A FESEM image taken at the exact location of the NSOM measurement, showing both particle and void positions is presented in Fig. 3(c). Figure 3(d) shows an XY vector plot of the simulated electric field. The vector plot, produced at the resonance wavelength, is taken half way between the top and bottom of the ellipses. With the incident electric field polarized across the gap, electric field vectors couple from the left particle to the right one. This allows placement of charges on the gold particles with the electric field coupling from a positively charged region on the left particle to a negatively charged region on the right one. As the incident electric field oscillates, the generated surface plasmons forces the charge regions on each particle to oscillate too.

Fig. 3. Finite element visualization of the nanoantenna effect in paired particles compared with reflection NSOM. (a) The electric field intensity above the paired particles taken at 790 nm with light polarized parallel to the gap (X axis); (b) Illumination NSOM in reflection of the paired particles; (c) FESEM image at the exact location of the NSOM measurement; (d) XY electric field vector plot half way between the top and bottom surfaces; taken at 810 nm.

Further simulations show that the coupling effect between the two particles increases with decreasing gap; this is becomes significant for gaps below 50 nm. The strong coupling increases the electric field intensity between the particles and continues to shift the system resonance to the red. Modeling also shows that embedding the particles inside the dielectric results in a slight red-shift of the resonance wavelength.

4. Discussion

The far-field spectroscopy result shows good comparison between the real sample and the finite element simulations. For polarization parallel to the center-to-center axis, simulations show a stronger and narrower resonance than experiments. This is explained by considering geometrical differences: the simulation space contains a perfect elliptic cylinder in a perfectly matching hole while there is a distribution of shapes in the gold structures on the real sample. This shape disparity leads to a distribution of resonance wavelengths and a reduction in the collective resonance strength seen from the array. Weak resonance coupling in the sample is verified by comparison with simulations for the case of equal spacing on both sides of the long ellipse axis. The coupled particle case shows an increase in absorption and a 20 nm red shift from the single particle case which indicates plasmon coupling between particles.

Local excitation at a wavelength of 785 nm shows a strong spectral resonance with high reflectance and extinction contoured around the elliptical sample. The resolution, illumination spot area is comparable to the particle area. The experimental and simulated field mappings indicate a mostly single particle resonance (which is expected) as the gap between the paired particles is just beyond the threshold for observing strong enhancement centered in the gap.

The comparison of the efficiency of the local excitation [Fig. 3(b)] to a simulated intensity distribution on the sample surface under the plane wave illumination [Fig. 3(a)] suggests an interesting conclusion. The highest efficiency of the local excitation is observed at the position of the highest local field intensity under plane wave illumination. We note similar features of these two images shown in Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b), a high reflection mapping that is well confined along the direction of the resonant polarization, but spreads out beyond the elliptic boundary in the short axis direction. The same antenna resonances excited by a plane wave can be excited by illuminating part of a particle, one particle or part of the particle pair.

There are differences seen in comparing the experimental field enhancement surrounding each particle to the simulation mapping. Counting for the two missing ellipses in Fig. 3(c), some particle positions show higher enhancement than others. This further demonstrates the resonance dependence on the geometry of the individual particles. Small deviations in the particle geometry can lead to significant differences in field enhancement from the structures.

The engineered, predictable nature of the localized field enhancement in response to both local and far-field sources is important for future applications. These include improved sensing and tagging applications involving Raman scattering and other molecular fingerprinting, increasing light emission from dyes, quantum dots and carbon nanotubes as well as the basis for a subwavelength sized nanolaser.

5. Summary

Highly ordered arrays of paired gold ellipses have been fabricated. Experimental far-field spectroscopy and near-field imaging show a strong resonance in the NIR for polarization across the gap. Finite element modeling supports these results by showing similar field effects and provides verification of weak coupling between the two particles though the single particle resonance dominates the field mappings. Peak efficiency of the local excitation is observed at the position of the highest local field intensity under plane wave illumination. High field confinement is observed for each ellipse in the long axis direction while the field spreads beyond the short axis ellipse boundary. Despite the large gap, this work provides concrete evidence of field enhancement surrounding a nanoantenna sample (which will increase with a smaller coupling distance) and shows that the antenna response is similar to both local and far-field illumination.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge partial support from ARO-STTR award W911NF-07-C-0008 and Chercheurs Associes 2006 from CNRS as well as insightful suggestions from the article referee.

References and links

1.

W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau, A. Keitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R. Aussenegg, “Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles,” Opt. Commun. 220, 137–141 (2003). [CrossRef]

2.

K. H. Su, Q. H. Wei, X. Zheng, J. J. Mock, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, “Interparticle coupling effects on plasmon resonances of nanogold particles,” Nano Lett. 3, 1087–1090 (2003). [CrossRef]

3.

D. P. Fromm, A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, G. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, “Gap-dependent optical coupling of single bowtie nanoantennas resonant in the visible,” Nano Lett. 4, 957–961 (2004). [CrossRef]

4.

T. Atay, J-H. Song, and A. V. Nurmikko, “Strong interacting plasmon nanoparticle pairs: from dipole-dipole interaction to conductively coupled regime,” Nano Lett. 4, 1627–1631 (2004). [CrossRef]

5.

P. Muhlschlegel, H. J. Eisler, O. J. F. Martin, B. Hecht, and D. W. Pohl, “Resonant Optical Antennas,” Science 308, 1607–1609 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

L. Gunnarsson, T. Rindzevicius, J. Prikulis, B. Kasemo, M. Kall, S. Zou, and G. C. Shatz, “Confined plasmons in nanofabricated single silver particle pairs: experimental observations of strong interparticle interactions,” J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 1079–1087 (2005). [CrossRef]

7.

A. Sundaramurthy, K. B. Crozier, G. S. Kino, D. P. Fromm, P. J. Schuck, and W. E. Moerner, “Field enhancement and gap-dependent resonance in a system of two opposing tip-to-tip Au nanotriangles,” Phys. Rev. B 72, 165409 (2005). [CrossRef]

8.

P. J. Schuck, D. P. Fromm, A. Sundaramurthy, G. S. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, “Improving the mismatch between light and nanoscale objects with gold bowtie nanoantennas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 017402 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, N. R. Conley, D. P. Fromm, G. S. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, “Toward nanometer-scale optical photolithography: utilizing the near-field of bowtie optical nanoantennas,” Nano Lett. 6, 355–360 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

J. N. Farahani, H. J. Eisler, D. W. Pohl, M. Pavius, P. Fluckiger, P. Gasser, and B. Hecht, “Bow-tie optical antenna probes for single-emitter scanning near-field optical microscopy,” Nanotechnology , 18, 125506 (2007). [CrossRef]

11.

E. Cubukcu, E. A. Kort, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, “Plasmonic laser antenna,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 093120 (2006). [CrossRef]

12.

O. L. Muskens, J. G. Rivas, V. Giannini, and J. A. Sanchez-Gil, “Optical scattering resonances of single plasmonic nanoantennas,” arXiv:cond-mat/0612689v3 (2006).

13.

L. Rogobete, F. Kaminski, M. Agio, and V. Sandoghdar, “Design of plasmonic nanoantennae for enhancing spontaneous emission,” Opt. Lett. 32, 1623–1625 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

O. L. Muskens, V. Giannini, J. A. Sanchez-Gil, and J. G. Rivas, “Strong enhancement of the radiative decay rate of emitters by single plasmonic nanoantennas,” Nano Lett. 7, 2871–2875 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

P. K. Jain, W. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, “On the universal scaling behavior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation,” Nano Lett. 7, 2080–2088 (2007). [CrossRef]

16.

T. Sondergaard and S. Bozhevolnyi, “Slow-plasmon resonant nanostructures: scattering and field enhancements,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 073402 (2007). [CrossRef]

17.

D. J. Bergman and M. I. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

I. E. Protsenko, A. V. Uskov, O. A. Zaimidoroga, V. N. Samoilov, and E. P. O’Reilly, “Dipole nanolaser,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 063812 (2005). [CrossRef]

19.

A. K. Sarychev and G. Tartakovsky, “Magnetic plasmonic metamaterials in actively pumped host medium and plasmonic nanolaser,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 085436 (2007). [CrossRef]

20.

D. Courjon, Near-field Microscopy and Near Field Optics (Imperial College Press, London, 2003).

OCIS Codes
(170.5810) Medical optics and biotechnology : Scanning microscopy
(240.6680) Optics at surfaces : Surface plasmons
(260.5740) Physical optics : Resonance

ToC Category:
Optics at Surfaces

History
Original Manuscript: August 9, 2007
Revised Manuscript: September 28, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: October 1, 2007
Published: October 4, 2007

Virtual Issues
Vol. 2, Iss. 11 Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics

Citation
Reuben M. Bakker, Alexandra Boltasseva, Zhengtong Liu, Rasmus H. Pedersen, Samuel Gresillon, Alexander V. Kildishev, Vladimir P. Drachev, and Vladimir M. Shalaev, "Near-field excitation of nanoantenna resonance," Opt. Express 15, 13682-13688 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-21-13682


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. W. Rechberger, A. Hohenau, A. Keitner, J. R. Krenn, B. Lamprecht, and F. R Aussenegg, "Optical properties of two interacting gold nanoparticles," Opt. Commun. 220, 137-141 (2003). [CrossRef]
  2. K. H. Su, Q. H. Wei, X. Zheng, J. J. Mock, D. R. Smith, and S. Schultz, "Interparticle coupling effects on plasmon resonances of nanogold particles," Nano Lett. 3, 1087-1090 (2003). [CrossRef]
  3. D. P. Fromm, A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, G. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, "Gap-dependent optical coupling of single bowtie nanoantennas resonant in the visible," Nano Lett. 4, 957-961 (2004). [CrossRef]
  4. T. Atay, J-H. Song, and A. V. Nurmikko, "Strong interacting plasmon nanoparticle pairs: from dipole-dipole interaction to conductively coupled regime," Nano Lett. 4, 1627-1631 (2004). [CrossRef]
  5. P. Muhlschlegel, H. J. Eisler, O. J. F. Martin, B. Hecht and D. W. Pohl, "Resonant Optical Antennas," Science 308, 1607-1609 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. L. Gunnarsson, T. Rindzevicius, J. Prikulis, B. Kasemo, M. Kall, S. Zou and G. C. Shatz, "Confined plasmons in nanofabricated single silver particle pairs: experimental observations of strong interparticle interactions," J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 1079-1087 (2005). [CrossRef]
  7. A. Sundaramurthy, K. B. Crozier, G. S. Kino, D. P. Fromm, P. J. Schuck and W. E. Moerner, "Field enhancement and gap-dependent resonance in a system of two opposing tip-to-tip Au nanotriangles," Phys. Rev. B 72, 165409 (2005). [CrossRef]
  8. P. J. Schuck, D. P. Fromm, A. Sundaramurthy, G. S. Kino, and W. E. Moerner, "Improving the mismatch between light and nanoscale objects with gold bowtie nanoantennas," Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 017402 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. A. Sundaramurthy, P. J. Schuck, N. R. Conley, D. P. Fromm, G. S. Kino, and W. E Moerner, "Toward nanometer-scale optical photolithography: utilizing the near-field of bowtie optical nanoantennas," Nano Lett. 6, 355-360 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. J. N. Farahani, H. J. Eisler, D. W. Pohl, M. Pavius, P. Fluckiger, P. Gasser, and B. Hecht, "Bow-tie optical antenna probes for single-emitter scanning near-field optical microscopy," Nanotechnology,  18, 125506 (2007). [CrossRef]
  11. E. Cubukcu, E. A. Kort, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, "Plasmonic laser antenna," Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 093120 (2006). [CrossRef]
  12. O. L. Muskens, J. G. Rivas, V. Giannini, and J. A. Sanchez-Gil, "Optical scattering resonances of single plasmonic nanoantennas," arXiv:cond-mat/0612689v3 (2006).
  13. L. Rogobete, F. Kaminski, M. Agio, and V. Sandoghdar, "Design of plasmonic nanoantennae for enhancing spontaneous emission," Opt. Lett. 32, 1623-1625 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. O. L. Muskens, V. Giannini, J. A. Sanchez-Gil, and J. G. Rivas, "Strong enhancement of the radiative decay rate of emitters by single plasmonic nanoantennas," Nano Lett. 7, 2871-2875 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. P. K. Jain, W. Huang, and M. A. El-Sayed, "On the universal scaling behavior of the distance decay of plasmon coupling in metal nanoparticle pairs: a plasmon ruler equation," Nano Lett. 7, 2080-2088 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. T. Sondergaard and S. Bozhevolnyi, "Slow-plasmon resonant nanostructures: scattering and field enhancements," Phys. Rev. B 75, 073402 (2007). [CrossRef]
  17. D. J. Bergman and M. I. Stockman, "Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems," Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. I. E. Protsenko, A. V. Uskov, O. A. Zaimidoroga, V. N. Samoilov, and E. P. O'Reilly, "Dipole nanolaser," Phys. Rev. A 71, 063812 (2005). [CrossRef]
  19. A. K. Sarychev and G. Tartakovsky, "Magnetic plasmonic metamaterials in actively pumped host medium and plasmonic nanolaser," Phys. Rev. B 75, 085436 (2007). [CrossRef]
  20. D. Courjon, Near-field Microscopy and Near Field Optics (Imperial College Press, London, 2003).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited