Separating polarization components through the electro-optic read-out of photorefractive solitons

doi:10.1364/OE.15.014283

« Show journal navigation

Separating polarization components through the electro-optic read-out of photorefractive solitons

A. Pierangelo, E. DelRe, A. Ciattoni, G. Biagi, E. Palange, and A. Agranat »View Author Affiliations

Optics Express, Vol. 15, Issue 21, pp. 14283-14288 (2007)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.014283

View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (741 KB)

Journal Search
Article Lookup

Article Tools

Citations

Alert me when this article is cited
Export Citation/Save

Full Text
Article Info
References (20)
Cited By
Figures (4)
Metrics

Abstract

Analyzing the propagation dynamics of a light beam of arbitrary linear input polarization in an electro-activated photorefractive soliton we are able to experimentally find the conditions that separate its linear polarization components, mapping them into spatially distinct regions at the crystal output. Extending experiments to the switching scheme based on two oppositely biased solitons, we are able to transform this spatial separation into a separation of two distinct guided modes. The result is a miniaturized electro-optic polarization separator.

1. Introduction and motivation

Photorefractive solitons can be used to write semi-permanent volume space-charge patterns that passively guide and steer longer wavelength or less intense beams [1

M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, and B. Fischer, “Spatial solitons in photorefractive media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 923–926 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 2

M. Morin, G. Duree, G. Salamo, and M. Segev, “Wave-guides formed by quasi-steady-state photorefractive spatial solitons,” Opt. Lett. 20, 2066–2068 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 3

M.F. Shih, M. Segev, and G. Salamo, “Circular waveguides induced by two-dimensional bright steady-state photorefractive spatial screening solitons,” Opt. Lett. 21, 931–933 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The procedure is a typical two-step read-write scheme: a nonlinear beam forms the soliton in conditions in which absorption occurs (write), and either simultaneously or when the write beam has been turned-off a non-absorbed beam is linearly guided through the previously imprinted pattern (read). An important issue is how this pattern can be changed and rearranged. In crystals that have a linear electro-optic effect the pattern can be altered only through a successive writing phase, involving slow charge-separation and absorption, and the pattern can hence be considered functionally static. In crystals with a quadratic electro-optic effect, such as paraelectrics, unpoled ferroelectrics, and disordered glasses [4

E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, M. Segev, E. Refaeli, and A.J. Agranat, “Two-dimensional photorefractive spatial solitons in centrosymmetric paraelectric potassium-lithium-tantalate-niobate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 16–18 (1998). [CrossRef]

, 5

M. Chauvet, A.Q. Gou, G.Y. Fu, and G. Salamo, “Electrically switched photoinduced waveguide in unpoled strontium barium niobate,” J. Appl. Phys. 99, 113107 (2006). [CrossRef]

, 6

M. Asaro, M. Sheldon, Z.G. Chen, O. Ostroverkhova, and W.E. Moerner, “Soliton-induced waveguides in an organic photorefractive glass,” Opt. Lett. 30, 519–521 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the nonlinear combination of the soliton space-charge with the applied external bias allows a purely electro-optic manipulation on command without the requirement of further charge separation or rearrangement. The external electric control field is thus capable of rapidly rendering guiding or antiguiding a given soliton pattern (soliton electro-activated pattern) [7

E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, and A.J. Agranat, “Soliton electro-optic effects in paraelectrics,” Opt.Lett. 25, 963–965 (2000). [CrossRef]

, 8

E. DelRe, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E. Palange, and A.J. Agranat, “Electro-optic beam manipulation through photorefractive needles,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2188–2190 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. Both the static and electro-activated patterns form through birefringence, and this makes them intrinsically polarization sensitive. Conventional schemes aimed at guiding and steering reduce and simplify the system to an approximately scalar propagation by having both the soliton and the passively guided beam linearly polarized along the natural or induced optical axis, and hence the birefringence does not appreciably affect the polarization. From the purely nonlinear perspective, i.e., in the writing phase, effects resulting from the interaction of different polarization states have been predicted in Ref.[10

M. Segev, G. C. Valley, S.R. Singh, M.I. Carvalho, and D.N. Christodoulides, “Vector photorefractive spatial solitons,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1764–1766 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], whereas a recent effort has been dedicated to the study of effects of unconventional bias field directions [11

C. Crognale and L. Rosa, “Vector analysis of the space-charge field in nonconventionally biased photorefractive crystals ,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23, 2175–2185 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 12

P. Zhang, J. Zhao, C. Lou, X. Tan, Y. Gao, Q. Liu, D. Yang, J. Xu, and Z. Chen, “Elliptical solitons in noncon-ventionally biased photorefractive crystals,” Opt. Exp. 15, 536–544 (2007). [CrossRef]

], a geometry that can equally activate polarization change.

In this paper our focus is on how an imprinted soliton pattern can be used on read-out to electro-optically manipulate polarization, an extension of functionality that parallels that recently begun for electro-holography, where the use of a spatially resolved index of refraction ellipsoid allows electrically tunable wavelength filters [9

A. Bitman, N. Sapiens, L. Secundo, A.J. Agranat, G. Bartal, and M. Segev, “Electroholographic tunable volume grating in the (g44) configuration,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2849–2851 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We investigate light behavior in the read-out of an electro-activated soliton pattern when the light beam enters with an arbitrary linear input polarization. We are able to identify a specific geometry that allows the separation of input polarization components, providing a first demonstration of a soliton-based polarization analyzer.

Fig. 1. Left: Experimental setup. Right: Propagation dynamics in the readout of an electro-activated soliton pattern. (a) input and (b) output intensity distribution before charge separation and (c)–(l) output for various conditions of θ_in , θ_out , and bias V.

2. Experiment

The experimental set-up is illustrated in Fig.(1) .A λ/4 waveplate followed by a polarizer acting on the polarized laser beam is used to generate a read-out beam of arbitrary linear polarization, at an angle θ_in with respect to the x direction. An output polarizer selects the linear polarization at the angle θ_out . The photorefractive crystal was a zero-cut L_x = 3mm, L_y = 2.4mm, L_z = 1mm sample of potassium-lithium-tantalate-niobate (KLTN) doped with Copper and Vanadium impurities [13

A. Agranat, R. Hofmeister, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 17, 713–715 (1992) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The crystal has a ferroelectric phase-transition at T_c ≃ 14°C. The temperature is fixed to T ≃ 19°C in the paraelectric phase, where the electro-optic response is quadratic and the dielectric constant is ε_r ≃ 1.9 × 10⁴. The quadratic electro-optic tensor reflects the m3m symmetry [14

A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, New York, 2002).

], with the coefficients g ₁₁ ≃ 0.16m⁴C^-2, g ₁₂ ≃ - 0.02 m⁴C^-2, and g ₄₄ ≃ 0.08 m⁴C^-2, and a background index of refraction n ₀ ≃ 2.35. The crystal is biased along the x-direction by applying a voltage V to planar electrodes on the opposite x-facets. The transmitted beam intensity distribution is imaged through a CCD camera. The soliton is generated as a quasi-steady-state two-dimensional self-trapped beam [1

M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, and B. Fischer, “Spatial solitons in photorefractive media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 923–926 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 2

M. Morin, G. Duree, G. Salamo, and M. Segev, “Wave-guides formed by quasi-steady-state photorefractive spatial solitons,” Opt. Lett. 20, 2066–2068 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 3

] by launching a continuous-wave λ = 633 nm Gaussian beam from a He-Ne laser along the z-direction, with θ_in = 0, i.e. polarized along the x-direction parallel to the bias electric field, and focusing it onto the input x,y facet of the crystal. The input beam Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum (FWHM) was Δx ≃ Δy ≃ 8 μm (Fig.(1)a). For V = 0 the beam spreads due to linear diffraction to Δx ≃ Δy ≃15 μm at output (Fig.(1)b, for θ_out = θ_in ). Applying V = V_sol ≃ -1.2 kV the beam traps into a soliton with output Δx ≃ 7 μm and Δy ≃ 8 μm after an interval τ_w ≃ 60 s for an input power of 5 μW (Fig.(1)c, and again θ_out = θ_in ). At this point, the soliton forming beam is blocked and the space-charge pattern remains locked into the acceptor impurities of the sample.

3. Results

Readout propagation is analyzed by launching the identical beam used to generate the soliton, but with a strongly attenuated power of 100 nW. In this case the space-charge remains unaltered for the whole duration of our experiments which is much less than the characteristic pattern decay time τ_r ≃ 50τ_w . The process amounts to a passive linear propagation dependent on the values of the applied electro-activation voltage V (in general different from V_sol ). In an actual device, this guiding and manipulation would ideally be carried out on a longer wavelength, for example at λ ≃ 1.5 μm, for which photorefractive absorption is ineffective [13

A. Agranat, R. Hofmeister, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 17, 713–715 (1992) [CrossRef] [PubMed]

In particular, we analyzed the three principal conditions of electro-activation: V ₊ = V_sol , V ₀ = 0, V _- = -V_sol [8

E. DelRe, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E. Palange, and A.J. Agranat, “Electro-optic beam manipulation through photorefractive needles,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2188–2190 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. These three configurations correspond, in the standard scalar readout case where polarization is always kept parallel to the direction of the applied bias field, respectively to rendering guiding the patterns associated to the solitons formed with a writing bias V = V_sol and rendering antiguiding those formed at V = -V_sol (V ₊ case); rendering antiguiding all soliton patterns (V ₀ case); and rendering antiguiding the solitons formed with V_sol and guiding the ones formed with -V_sol (V _- case). The strongly modified picture of single-soliton electro-activated readout for different input polarization states is shown in Fig.(1). For V = V ₊, θ_in = 0, the output beam component θ_out = 0 is guided and obviously identical to the soliton case of Fig.(1c). For θ_in = θ_out = π/2, the beam diffracts to approximately 17 μm (Fig.(1)d), slightly more than the case of Fig. (1b). Next, for V ₀ and θ_in = θ_out = 0 we detected the well-know two-lobe structure [15

A.A. Zozulya and D.Z. Anderson, “Propagation of an optical beam in a photorefractive medium in the presence of a photogalvanic nonlinearity or an externally applied electric-field,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 1520–1531 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 16

E. DelRe, A. Ciattoni, and A.J. Agranat, “Anisotropic charge displacement supporting isolated photorefractive optical needles ,” Opt. Lett. 26, 908–910 (2001). [CrossRef]

], the central waveguide manifesting an antiguiding effect (Fig.(1e)). For θ_in = θ_out = π/2, the beam spreads to ≃ 14μm (Fig.(1f)). The last case of V _-, for θ_in = θ_out = 0 the waveguide is strongly antiguiding (Fig.(1)g). For θ_in = θ_out = π/2, the beam is weakly guided in the center of the pattern with an output Δx ≃ 11μm and Δy ≃ 13μm (Fig.(1h)).

We finally analyzed transmission in all previous cases for θ_in = 0,π/2 and θ_out = π/2,0 (crossed polarizers), observing only a weak output intensity distribution. Increasing the exposure of the CCD camera by a factor of ≃ 80, we were able to detect the output distribution. For example, for the case of V ₀, for θ_in = 0 θ_out = π/2 we observe the quadrifoil-like pattern of Fig.(1i), and for θ_in = π/2 and θ_out = 0 the pattern of Fig.(1l). This means that for the conditions analyzed, both the soliton and the waveguiding process is to a good approximation scalar, i.e., the polarization does not change. The weak cross-polarizer patterns are associated to the tensorial nature of the electro-optic response, in turn associated with the off-diagonal terms g ₄₄ [14

A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, New York, 2002).

4. Polarization separation

For a soliton written with V_sol , readout with an opposite bias V _- = -V_sol allows the separation of the polarization components at output (see Fig.(1g,h)). The reason behind this effect is made evident analyzing the underlying index pattern distribution in the various cases, as discussed in the next Section. In general, the process can be described by the slowly-varying envelope of the input optical field A(x,y,z = 0) = A(x,y,0)(cosθ_in ê _x + sin θ_in ê _y) that evolves to a general output field A(x,y, z = L_z ) = [B_xx (x,y) cos θ_in + B_xy (x,y) sin θ_in ]ê _x + [B_yx (x,y) cos θ_in + B_yy (x,y) sin θ_in ]ê _y where B_ij (x,y) is the output shape of the i- cartesian field components due to the input j- cartesian field component. B_xy and B_yx are responsible for the energy redistribution from input to output, associated with off-diagonal terms in the electro-optic tensor. Since we observed (see Fig(2)) that the output energy distribution follows the law W_x = ∫ dxdy|A_x (x,y,L_z )|² = W_tot cos² θ_in and W_y = ∫ dxdy|A_y (x,y,L_z )|² = W_tot sin² θ_in , where W_tot = W_X + W_y , this implies that B_xy and B_yx are negligible with respect to B_xx and B_yy . Thus the separation does not involve an energy redistribution, so that for V _- the pattern truly acts as a separator of input polarization components.

The next step is to have both the separated components propagate in a guided fashion. This is achieved using a two-soliton pattern. The first soliton S ₁ is formed with the writing bias V _{s
₁} = V_sol = - 1.2kV (Fig.(3)a). The second soliton S ₂ is formed parallel to S ₁ but shifted along the x-direction of 15 μm, with an opposite bias V _{S
₂} = -V _{S
₁} (Fig.(3)c), using a technique described in detail in Ref. [8

E. DelRe, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E. Palange, and A.J. Agranat, “Electro-optic beam manipulation through photorefractive needles,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2188–2190 (2002). [CrossRef]

]. S ₁ and S ₂ are formed in sequence. Even though laterally shifted, the writing of S ₂ is normally impaired by the fact that for V _{S
₂} the pattern of S1 becomes strongly antiguiding. However, this antiguiding has a negligible effect if S ₂ is formed exactly where the space-charge pattern underlying S ₁ has a lateral lobe [15

], because in distinction to all other regions, here its response is actually weakly guiding for an opposite read-out bias [16

E. DelRe, A. Ciattoni, and A.J. Agranat, “Anisotropic charge displacement supporting isolated photorefractive optical needles ,” Opt. Lett. 26, 908–910 (2001). [CrossRef]

] (Fig. (3b)).

The input read-out beam of arbitrary polarization, whose components at θ_in = 0 and θ_in = π/2 we wish to separate and guide, is launched where S ₂ has been written, and a readout V ₊ = V _{S
₁} is applied. The two components θ_in = 0 and θ_in = π/2 are separated and approximately guided in the patterns of S ₁ and S ₂ respectively, as shown in Fig.(3d–f) (for the case θ_in = π/4). Again the separation of the input components is confirmed by a transmission analysis analogous to Fig.(2). The mechanism can once again be understood analyzing the underlying index patterns, as described in the next Section.

Fig. 2. Observed fraction of output power of the separated polarization components along x (triangles) and y (circles) and input for various values of θ_in and V = -V_sol . The dotted line is the case in which the relative power distribution is preserved from input to output.

Fig. 3. A two-soliton polarization component separator. (a) S ₁ soliton output at V _{S
₁} = V_sol after τ_w ; (b) Output before the S ₂ writing phase at V = -V_sol , having shifted the beam laterally by 15 μm; (c) S ₂ output at V _{S
₂} = -V_sol after a second interval τ_w ; read-out phase at V = V_sol , launching light into the S ₂ core with θ_in = π/4, (d) with θ_out = 0, (e) θ_out = π/2, and (f) no output polarizer. Crosses provide the reference to the two underlying soliton positions.

5. Numerical results and physical mechanism

The physical mechanism underlying the effect can be grasped by analyzing theoretically the index of refraction pattern in all the relevant cases. The full theoretical description involves the solution of the propagation problem with a time-dependent model for quasi-steady-state soli-tons [17

A. Zozulya and D. Anderson, “Nonstationary self-focusing in photorefractive media,” Opt. Lett. 20, 837–839 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 18

C. Dari-Salisburgo, DelRe E., and E. Palange, “Molding and stretched evolution of optical solitons in cumulative nonlinearities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 263903 (2003). [CrossRef]

], an anisotropic model for the two-dimensional soliton nonlinearity [19

S. Gatz and J. Herrmann, “Anisotropy, nonlocality, and space-charge field displacement in (2+1)-dimensional self-trapping in biased photorefractive crystals,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1176–1178 (1998). [CrossRef]

], and a fully vector model for light. Here, we limit our report to the predictions in Fig.(4), which are the numerical evaluation of the tensorial electro-optic index of refraction pattern dn_pq (p,q = 1,2, and 1 = x, 2 = y) for relevant situations, i.e., in the one soliton geometry for V ₊ (first row) and V _- (second row), and for the two-soliton-separator geometry (third row), in the simplified scheme of assuming a given z-independent space-charge density ρ that corresponds to the steady-state solution for the observed soliton intensity, and calculating the electric field E. Experiments can be understood on the basis of this calculation. For V ₊, for θ_in = θ_out = 0, the pattern of Fig.(4a) applies, and the beam is guided as observed in Fig.(1c), whereas for θ_in = θ_out = π/2, it is weakly antiguided by the pattern in Fig.(4b), as observed in Fig.(1d). Coupling from one component to the other afforded by the δn ₁₂ (Fig.(4c)), generating a transmission for θ_in = 0 and θ_out = π/2 (and for θ_in = π/2, θ_out = 0), is reduced both because of the limited value of the pattern and because the effect is confined to regions external to the actual central waveguide core. For V _-, θ_in = θ_out = 0, the pattern of Fig.(4d) applies, and the beam is strongly anti-guided (as observed in Fig.(1g)), whereas for θ_in = θ_out = π/2, it weakly guided (Fig.(4e) and associated observation Fig.(1h)). Coupling from one component to the other afforded by the δn ₁₂ (Fig.(4f)), generating a transmission for θ_in = 0 and θ_out = π/2 (and for θ_in = π/2, θ_out = 0), is again reduced as observed. For the two-soliton polarization separator, for V =V _{S
₁} = V_sol , for θ_in = 0, the S ₁ is guiding and S ₂ is antiguiding (Fig.(4g)), whereas for θ_in = π/2 S ₂ is guiding and S ₁ is antiguiding (Fig.(4h)), and the weak pattern in Fig.(4i) implies a weak polarization rotation, as observed. Since S ₁ and S ₂ are in close proximity, the θ_in = 0 component of the input read-out beam is extracted from its original launch position and axis (i.e., along the S ₂ pattern) into that of S ₁ and guided by it as in Fig.(1c). In turn, the θ_in = π/2 component remains trapped in the pattern of S ₂, since it is guided by it as in Fig.(1h), explaining the results of Fig.(3d–f).

Fig. 4. Numerically evaluated components of the refractive index tensor driving light propagation through the readout stage: single channel readout for V = V_sol (a,b and c), single channel readout for V = -V_sol (d,e and f), two channels readout for V = V _{S
₁} = -V _{S
₂} (g,h and i). Transverse x and y coordinate are expressed in microns.

6. Conclusion

We have analyzed the propagation dynamics of a beam of arbitrary linear polarized light in electro-activated soliton patterns, and have identified a condition in which a two-soliton switching scheme serves to separate the input polarization components into two guided modes. This can be integrated with units already available, which are fiber-coupled waveguides, miniaturized electro-activated switches, hybrido-dimensional wavelength filters [20

E. DelRe, A. D’Ercole, E. Palange, and A.J. Agranat, “Observation of soliton ridge states for the self-imprinting of fiber-slab couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 191110 (2005). [CrossRef]

], permanent dielectric striation patterns and ion implantation structures, with the ultimate aim of demonstrating a versatile optical bench in a single solid state crystal of KLTN. Possible applications are in polarization encoding for innovative communications links such as single photon quantum cryptography schemes.

Research was funded by the Italian Ministry for Research through the FIRB initiative.

References and links

1.	M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, and B. Fischer, “Spatial solitons in photorefractive media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 923–926 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2.	M. Morin, G. Duree, G. Salamo, and M. Segev, “Wave-guides formed by quasi-steady-state photorefractive spatial solitons,” Opt. Lett. 20, 2066–2068 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3.	M.F. Shih, M. Segev, and G. Salamo, “Circular waveguides induced by two-dimensional bright steady-state photorefractive spatial screening solitons,” Opt. Lett. 21, 931–933 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4.	E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, M. Segev, E. Refaeli, and A.J. Agranat, “Two-dimensional photorefractive spatial solitons in centrosymmetric paraelectric potassium-lithium-tantalate-niobate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 16–18 (1998). [CrossRef]
5.	M. Chauvet, A.Q. Gou, G.Y. Fu, and G. Salamo, “Electrically switched photoinduced waveguide in unpoled strontium barium niobate,” J. Appl. Phys. 99, 113107 (2006). [CrossRef]
6.	M. Asaro, M. Sheldon, Z.G. Chen, O. Ostroverkhova, and W.E. Moerner, “Soliton-induced waveguides in an organic photorefractive glass,” Opt. Lett. 30, 519–521 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7.	E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, and A.J. Agranat, “Soliton electro-optic effects in paraelectrics,” Opt.Lett. 25, 963–965 (2000). [CrossRef]
8.	E. DelRe, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E. Palange, and A.J. Agranat, “Electro-optic beam manipulation through photorefractive needles,” Opt. Lett. 27, 2188–2190 (2002). [CrossRef]
9.	A. Bitman, N. Sapiens, L. Secundo, A.J. Agranat, G. Bartal, and M. Segev, “Electroholographic tunable volume grating in the (g44) configuration,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2849–2851 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10.	M. Segev, G. C. Valley, S.R. Singh, M.I. Carvalho, and D.N. Christodoulides, “Vector photorefractive spatial solitons,” Opt. Lett. 20, 1764–1766 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11.	C. Crognale and L. Rosa, “Vector analysis of the space-charge field in nonconventionally biased photorefractive crystals ,” J. Lightwave Technol. 23, 2175–2185 (2005). [CrossRef]
12.	P. Zhang, J. Zhao, C. Lou, X. Tan, Y. Gao, Q. Liu, D. Yang, J. Xu, and Z. Chen, “Elliptical solitons in noncon-ventionally biased photorefractive crystals,” Opt. Exp. 15, 536–544 (2007). [CrossRef]
13.	A. Agranat, R. Hofmeister, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 17, 713–715 (1992) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14.	A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, New York, 2002).
15.	A.A. Zozulya and D.Z. Anderson, “Propagation of an optical beam in a photorefractive medium in the presence of a photogalvanic nonlinearity or an externally applied electric-field,” Phys. Rev. A 51, 1520–1531 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16.	E. DelRe, A. Ciattoni, and A.J. Agranat, “Anisotropic charge displacement supporting isolated photorefractive optical needles ,” Opt. Lett. 26, 908–910 (2001). [CrossRef]
17.	A. Zozulya and D. Anderson, “Nonstationary self-focusing in photorefractive media,” Opt. Lett. 20, 837–839 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18.	C. Dari-Salisburgo, DelRe E., and E. Palange, “Molding and stretched evolution of optical solitons in cumulative nonlinearities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 263903 (2003). [CrossRef]
19.	S. Gatz and J. Herrmann, “Anisotropy, nonlocality, and space-charge field displacement in (2+1)-dimensional self-trapping in biased photorefractive crystals,” Opt. Lett. 23, 1176–1178 (1998). [CrossRef]
20.	E. DelRe, A. D’Ercole, E. Palange, and A.J. Agranat, “Observation of soliton ridge states for the self-imprinting of fiber-slab couplers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 191110 (2005). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.2100) Materials : Electro-optical materials
(190.5330) Nonlinear optics : Photorefractive optics
(230.5440) Optical devices : Polarization-selective devices

ToC Category:
Optical Devices

History
Original Manuscript: June 28, 2007
Revised Manuscript: August 31, 2007
Manuscript Accepted: September 2, 2007
Published: October 12, 2007

Citation
A. Pierangelo, E. DelRe, A. Ciattoni, G. Biagi, E. Palange, and A. Agranat, "Separating polarization components through the electro-optic read-out of photorefractive solitons," Opt. Express 15, 14283-14288 (2007)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-21-14283

Sort: Author | Year | Journal | Reset

References

M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, and B. Fischer, "Spatial solitons in photorefractive media," Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 923-926 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. Morin, G. Duree, G. Salamo, and M. Segev, "Wave-guides formed by quasi-steady-state photorefractive spatial solitons," Opt. Lett. 20, 2066-2068 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. F. Shih, M. Segev, and G. Salamo, "Circular waveguides induced by two-dimensional bright steady-state photorefractive spatial screening solitons," Opt. Lett. 21, 931-933 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, M. Segev, E. Refaeli, and A. J. Agranat, "Two-dimensional photorefractive spatial solitons in centrosymmetric paraelectric potassium-lithium-tantalate-niobate," Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 16-18 (1998). [CrossRef]
M. Chauvet, A. Q. Gou, G. Y. Fu, and G. Salamo, "Electrically switched photoinduced waveguide in unpoled strontium barium niobate," J. Appl. Phys. 99, 113107 (2006). [CrossRef]
M. Asaro, M. Sheldon, Z. G. Chen, O. Ostroverkhova, and W. E. Moerner, "Soliton-induced waveguides in an organic photorefractive glass," Opt. Lett. 30, 519-521 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
E. DelRe, M. Tamburrini, and A. J. Agranat, "Soliton electro-optic effects in paraelectrics," Opt.Lett. 25, 963-965 (2000). [CrossRef]
E. DelRe, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, E. Palange, and A. J. Agranat, "Electro-optic beam manipulation through photorefractive needles," Opt. Lett. 27, 2188-2190 (2002). [CrossRef]
A. Bitman, N. Sapiens, L. Secundo, A. J. Agranat, G. Bartal, and M. Segev, "Electroholographic tunable volume grating in the (g44) configuration," Opt. Lett. 31, 2849-2851 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
M. Segev, G. C. Valley, S. R. Singh, M. I. Carvalho, and D. N. Christodoulides, "Vector photorefractive spatial solitons," Opt. Lett. 20, 1764-1766 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Crognale and L. Rosa, "Vector analysis of the space-charge field in nonconventionally biased photorefractive crystals," J. Lightwave Technol. 23, 2175-2185 (2005). [CrossRef]
P. Zhang, J. Zhao, C. Lou, X. Tan, Y. Gao, Q. Liu, D. Yang, J. Xu, and Z. Chen, "Elliptical solitons in nonconventionally biased photorefractive crystals," Opt. Express 15, 536-544 (2007). [CrossRef]
A. Agranat, R. Hofmeister, and A. Yariv, Opt. Lett. 17, 713-715 (1992) [CrossRef] [PubMed]
A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, New York, 2002).
A. A. Zozulya and D. Z. Anderson, "Propagation of an optical beam in a photorefractive medium in the presence of a photogalvanic nonlinearity or an externally applied electric-field," Phys. Rev. A 51, 1520-1531 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
E. DelRe, A. Ciattoni, and A. J. Agranat, "Anisotropic charge displacement supporting isolated photorefractive optical needles," Opt. Lett. 26, 908-910 (2001). [CrossRef]
A. Zozulya and D. Anderson, "Nonstationary self-focusing in photorefractive media," Opt. Lett. 20, 837-839 (1995). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
C. Dari-Salisburgo, E. DelRe, and E. Palange, "Molding and stretched evolution of optical solitons in cumulative nonlinearities," Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 263903 (2003). [CrossRef]
S. Gatz and J. Herrmann, "Anisotropy, nonlocality, and space-charge field displacement in (2+1)-dimensional selftrapping in biased photorefractive crystals," Opt. Lett. 23, 1176-1178 (1998). [CrossRef]
E. DelRe, A. D’Ercole, E. Palange, and A. J. Agranat, "Observation of soliton ridge states for the self-imprinting of fiber-slab couplers," Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 191110 (2005). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper