1. Introduction
The power scaling of diode-end-pumped solid-state lasers is a very active area of
research. The main problem that limits the power scaling of these lasers is the
generation of heat inside the laser gain medium; the generated heat causes steep
temperature gradients inside the crystal, which in turn produce stress, leading to
fracture. Fracture of the laser material occurs when the thermally induced stress
exceeds the ultimate strength of the material [
1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996).
]. When the continuous wave (cw) pump power exceeds the power
at which crystal fracture occurs, the pump source is often modulated in time,
creating a so called quasi-continuous wave (qcw) pump, with the effect of reducing
the average pump power to below the fracture limit, while maintaining a high output
power during the on-time of the pump pulse.
In order to investigate the thermally induced stresses and the power limitations due
to fracture, a thermal model of the laser gain medium is required. Existing
analytical thermal models that describe the temperature and stresses in laser
crystals are restricted to special cases and approximations, such as cw pump sources
and steady-state conditions [
1–5
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996).
]. In this paper an analytical thermal model that
determines the transient behaviour of the temperature and the corresponding induced
stresses on the pump face of an isotropic laser rod is derived from first
principles. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that such a
time-dependent analytical model has been reported. We validate the model through
finite element analysis, and apply the model to qcw pumped Tm:YLF laser rods, and
find favourable agreement between the calculated fracture limits and the
experimentally determined values reported in the literature.
We have particularly chosen to apply the model to a YLF rod because power scaling
with this material is limited by the relatively low fracture limit of 40 MPa, which
is ∼5 times lower than that of YAG [
6
X. Peng, L. Xu, and A. Asundi, “High-power efficient continous-wave
TEM00 intracavity frequencydoubled diode-pumped Nd:YLF
laser,” Appl. Opt.
44, 800–807
(2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
]. Despite being derived for isotropic rods, we show that the
model may be applied to anisotropic rods on condition that the highest linear
expansion and the lowest thermal conductivity of the respective a- and c-axis of the
crystal are used in the calculation. Finally, we illustrate how the model may be
used to estimate the peak pump power that can safely be used to qcw pump a laser rod
at a given duty cycle, opening the way to fracture-free power scaling with qcw pump
sources.
2. Theory
In this section the transient temperature and stress profiles on the pump face of a
longitudinally pumped isotropic laser rod are derived. We assume that the Rayleigh
range of the pump beam is much longer than the length of the rod so that the pump
beam is treated as perfectly collimated inside the rod. This implies that only the
pump face need be considered since the pump light in the gain medium follows an
exponential decay, with the steepest temperature gradient (and thus stress) on the
pump face [
2
C. Pfistner, R. Weber, H. P. Weber, S Merazzi, and R. Gruber, “Thermal Beam Distortions in
End-Pumped Nd:YAG, Nd:GSGG and Nd:YLF,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
30, 1605–1615
(1994). [CrossRef]
,
4
L. Yan and C. H. Lee, “Thermal Effects in End-Pumped
Nd:phosphate Glasses,” J. Appl. Phys.
75, 1286–1292
(1994). [CrossRef]
]. A closed form solution for the time dependent temperature
profile on the surface of the crystal rod,
u(
r,
t), may be found by
solving the non-homogeneous heat diffusion equation [
7
G. Barton, Elements of Green’s Functions and
Propagation , (Oxford University Press,
Oxford,1995).
,
8
H. S. Carslaw and J. C. Jaeger, Conduction of Heats in Solids ,
(Oxford University Press, Oxford,
1959).
]:
for a generalized source term
Q(
r,
t). Here
D=
k/
ρCp
is the diffusivity,
k is the thermal conductivity,
ρ is the density and
Cp
is the heat capacity of the laser material respectively,while all other terms have
their usual meaning. We will assume that the rod has a length
l and
a radius
R, and is homogenous and isotropic. Furthermore, we will
assume that the boundary of the rod is at a constant temperature,
u(
R,
t)=0, with no initial
temperature profile on its pump face:
u(
r,0)=0.
With these boundary conditions, Eq. (
1) may be solved directly by use of an appropriate
Green’s function, with the solution given in integral form as:
with the Green’s function
G(
r,ξ,t) given by [
7
G. Barton, Elements of Green’s Functions and
Propagation , (Oxford University Press,
Oxford,1995).
]:
The summation is over the positive roots (
μm
)
of the zeroth order Bessel function,
J
0. For the common
experimental configuration where the pump beam is imaged onto the rod face from a
multimode fibre, the pump intensity may be approximated as having a top-hat spatial
intensity profile.
Figure 1 shows an example of a measured top-hat transverse
intensity profile as produced by a fibre-coupled diode pump. If in addition the pump
is not assumed to be cw but rather the more general qcw, consisting of a pulse train
of on-off pulses with on-time τ
on (with
τon
usually longer than the
upper-state lifetime of the laser gain medium) and period
T,we may
write the source term as:
where
n is the number of pulses,
E is the energy in
each pulse and
w is the radius of the top-hat beam.
α is the absorption coefficient in units of inverse
length of the crystal, while
η is a parameter to account
for the fact that not all the absorbed pump light is converted into heat.This model
can be applied under lasing or non-lasing conditions by choosing an appropriate
value for
η. Typical values for the heat load efficiency
are
η=0.32 (lasing) and
η=0.4 (non-lasing) [
9
T. Y. Fan, “Heat Generation in Nd:YAG and
Yb:YAG,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
29, 1457–1459
(1993). [CrossRef]
].
Fig. 1. An example of a measured top-hat transverse intensity profile produced by a
fibre coupled diode laser pump (own experimental results).
Substituting Eqs. (
3) and (
4) into Eq. (
2
C. Pfistner, R. Weber, H. P. Weber, S Merazzi, and R. Gruber, “Thermal Beam Distortions in
End-Pumped Nd:YAG, Nd:GSGG and Nd:YLF,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
30, 1605–1615
(1994). [CrossRef]
) and solving both the time and spatial integrals separately
yields the following analytical expression for the temperature on the pump face of
the rod:
with the time dependence given by
f(p,t,μm
) as:
with
τ=min[
t,
τon
].
Here we have introduced a new variable,
τD
=
R
2/
D,
which we refer to as the diffusion relaxation time of the system, and for
convenience the temperature is calculated after
p complete pulses
plus some time
t into the
p+1 pulse, so
that the total elapsed time from the start of the pumping process is
pT+
t. While the summation in Eq. (
5) is carried to infinity, in practice one finds that 30 terms
or above leads to very good convergence of the series. Equation (
5) may easily be rewritten in terms of peak pump power
(
Pp
) or average pump power
(
Pav
) rather than pump energy (
E)
by noting that for the source term in this study
Pp
=
E/
τon
and
Pav
=
E/
T (note:
here we have assumed that the time pulse envelope is a square pulse; for other cases
the peak pump power expression may have to be modified in an appropriate manner). In
the special case of a cw pump source,
T=
τon
so that the peak
and average pump powers are identical.
By making use of a plane-strain approximation and assuming that the stress in the
axial direction is zero, we may calculate the radial and tangential stresses from
the temperature profile from [
10
S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity 3rd ed.,
(McGraw-Hill, New York,
1970).
,
11
B. A. Boley and J. H. Weiner, Theory of Thermal Stresses ,
(Courier Dover Publications, New York,
1997).
]:
where
C=
γY/(1-
V
), with
γ the linear coefficient of expansion,
Y is Young’s modulus and
V is
Poisson’s ratio. The plain-strain approximation is valid for
l/
R ≫ 1 (a long rod) [
11
B. A. Boley and J. H. Weiner, Theory of Thermal Stresses ,
(Courier Dover Publications, New York,
1997).
]. For the case where
l/
R≪1 (a thin disk), the plane-stress
approximation is used where Eqs. (
7) and (
8) also hold with
C=
γY [
11
B. A. Boley and J. H. Weiner, Theory of Thermal Stresses ,
(Courier Dover Publications, New York,
1997).
]. One can readily show that Eqs. (
7) and (
8) can be solved analytically to yield:
Due to the fact that the stress tensor alone does not provide enough information
regarding crystal fracture, we use the maximum shear stress to predict fracture [
12]. This is also known as the stress intensity or the Tresca
failure criterion, which in the plain-strain approximation reduces to:
where we have made use of the well known relation
J
2(
x)=2
J
1(
x)/
x-
J
0(
x).
Equations (
5), (
8)and (
9) allow the temperature, stresses and fracture limit to be
calculated for any qcw pulse train, as a function of both time and position in the
crystal rod.
3. Model validation
As a verification of the analytical thermal model, a time-dependent three dimensional
coupled thermal-stress finite element analysis was implemented in a commercial
software package,ABAQUS [
13,
14
E. H. Bernhardi, C. Bollig, L. Harris, M. J. D. Esser, and A. Forbes, “Investigating thermal stresses in quasicw pumped
Tm:YLF laser crystals,” in Proceedings of Advanced
Solid-State Photonics , (Nara,
Japan,2008), Poster WB11.
]. The average computation time of each finite element
simulation (5560 discretization) was approximately 5.5 hours on a dual-core 2.4 GHz
processor (the analytical model takes ∼1-2 s). In analogy with convective
heat transfer, we have specified a Neumann boundary condition with a heat transfer
coefficient at the interface between the crystal and the copper heat sink. We have
used a heat transfer coefficient of 0.9 Wcm
-2K
-1,which
corresponds to a layer of indium foil between the crystal and the heat sink [
5
S. Chénais, S. Forget, F. Druon, F. Balembois, and P. Georges, “Direct and Absolute Temperature
Mapping and Heat Transfer Measurements in Diode-End-Pumped
Yb:YAG,” Appl. Phys. B
79, 221–224
(2004). [CrossRef]
]. In the remaining text the finite element analysis will be
referred to as the
numerical model [
14
E. H. Bernhardi, C. Bollig, L. Harris, M. J. D. Esser, and A. Forbes, “Investigating thermal stresses in quasicw pumped
Tm:YLF laser crystals,” in Proceedings of Advanced
Solid-State Photonics , (Nara,
Japan,2008), Poster WB11.
].
The analytical and numerical models have been applied to reported results [
15
S. So, J. I. Mackenzie, D. P. Shepherd, W. A. Clarkson, J. G. Betterson, and E. K. Gorton, “A power-scaling strategy for
longitudinally diode-pumped Tm:YLF lasers,”
Appl. Phys. B 84,
389–393
(2006). [CrossRef]
] of a cw pumped, 4% doped, Tm:YLF laser rod with
l=12 mm and
R=1.5 mm
(
l/
R=8 so that we make use the plain-strain
approximation as discussed in section (2)). The pump beam was a near top-hat profile
with
M
2∼100 and a pump radius of
w=470 μm in the middle of the crystal. The onset of
fracture was reported at an incident power of 47.2 W
(
α=1.43
cm
-1;
η=0.33). While the actual stress values
at fracture are not reported, it is known that the fracture limit of YLF crystals is
in the 33-40 MPa range [
1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996).
,
6
X. Peng, L. Xu, and A. Asundi, “High-power efficient continous-wave
TEM00 intracavity frequencydoubled diode-pumped Nd:YLF
laser,” Appl. Opt.
44, 800–807
(2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
]. The parameters that were used in the numerical and
analytical thermal models are shown in
Table 1.
The analytical model predicts a maximum Tresca stress of 42 MPa which agrees very
well with the reported 33-40 MPa fracture limit range [
1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996).
,
6
X. Peng, L. Xu, and A. Asundi, “High-power efficient continous-wave
TEM00 intracavity frequencydoubled diode-pumped Nd:YLF
laser,” Appl. Opt.
44, 800–807
(2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
]. The numerical model results in a maximum Tresca stress of
41 MPa. This shows that for a cw pump, the analytical thermal model is consistent
with both the experimental fracture data and with the numerical solutions of a
three-dimensional finite element analysis. Since the analytical thermal model proved
to be accurate for a cw pump beam, the transient behaviour of the temperature and
the induced stresses were determined for various qcw pump duty cycles, defined as
τon
/
T.
Figure 2(a) and
2(b) show the predicted time-dependence of the temperature in
the centre of the pump face of the Tm:YLF rod for a 10% and a 50% pump duty cycle
respectively (
τon
=10 ms). The upper and lower
boundaries of the shaded red region in
Fig. 2 indicate the analytical model’s predictions
of the temperature when the thermal conductivity of the c- and the a-axis of Tm:YLF
were used respectively. It is clear from the graphs that there is very good
agreement between the analytical and numerical models when the lowest thermal
conductivity is used in the calculations.
Figure 3 illustrates that the thermally induced stresses as
calculated by the two models show very good agreement when the highest linear
expansion coefficient is used in the analytical model. The upper and lower
boundaries of the shaded red region in
Fig. 3 indicate the analytical model’s predictions
of the maximum stress on the pump face when the two respective linear expansion
coefficients of Tm:YLF were used along with the lowest thermal conductivity.
By considering the transient stress distribution on the entire pump face with a qcw
pump source, it is evident that the maximum stress does not always occur on the
edge-surface (
r=
R) of the rod; this is contrary to
the case of a cw pump beam [
4
L. Yan and C. H. Lee, “Thermal Effects in End-Pumped
Nd:phosphate Glasses,” J. Appl. Phys.
75, 1286–1292
(1994). [CrossRef]
]. The position of the maximum stress changes during a single
qcw pump pulse as well as between qcw pulses.
Figure 4(a) shows an animation of the analytically predicted
σT
on the pump face of the Tm:YLF rod
when subjected to a 90 W peak power pump beam at 50 Hz (
T=20 ms;
τon
=10 ms), while
Fig. 4(b) shows an animation of the numerically predicted
σT
throughout the bulk of the Tm:YLF
rod. A cross-section of the stress is overlaid on the analytical animation, and
clearly shows the “peak” where the stress is maximum and its
movement in time as the pulses accumulate. Note that the numerical solution does not
exhibit the same symmetrical stress distribution on the pump face as the analytical
solution since the anisotropic characteristics of Tm:YLF were accounted for in the
numerical model and not in the analytical model.
Table 1. Parameter values of the pumped Tm:YLF rod that were implemented in the
simulations.
|
Parameter
|
Thermal Model
|
Reference
|
|---|
| Pump beam radius (w) [mm] | 0.47 | [15
S. So, J. I. Mackenzie, D. P. Shepherd, W. A. Clarkson, J. G. Betterson, and E. K. Gorton, “A power-scaling strategy for
longitudinally diode-pumped Tm:YLF lasers,”
Appl. Phys. B 84,
389–393
(2006). [CrossRef] ] |
| Rod radius (R) [mm] | 1.5 | [15
S. So, J. I. Mackenzie, D. P. Shepherd, W. A. Clarkson, J. G. Betterson, and E. K. Gorton, “A power-scaling strategy for
longitudinally diode-pumped Tm:YLF lasers,”
Appl. Phys. B 84,
389–393
(2006). [CrossRef] ] |
| Absorption coefficient
(α) [cm-1] | 1.43 | [15
S. So, J. I. Mackenzie, D. P. Shepherd, W. A. Clarkson, J. G. Betterson, and E. K. Gorton, “A power-scaling strategy for
longitudinally diode-pumped Tm:YLF lasers,”
Appl. Phys. B 84,
389–393
(2006). [CrossRef] ] |
| Thermal conductivity (k)
[W.m-1.K-1] | 7.2 (a-axis), 5.8 (c-axis) | [1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996). ,16
M. Pollnau, P. J. Hardman, M. A. Kern, W. A. Clarkson, and D. C. Hanna, “Upconversion-induced heat generation
and thermal lensing in Nd:YLF and Nd:YAG,”
Phys. Rev. B 58,
16076–16092
(1998). [CrossRef] ] |
| Linear expansion coefficient
(γ) [10-6 K-1] | 13 (a-axis), 8.0 (c-axis) | [1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996). ,17
B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, M. Petros, J. Yu, and U. N. Singh, “Spectroscopy and modeling of solid
state lanthanide lasers: Application to trivalent Tm3+
and Ho3+ in YLiF4 and
LuLiF4
,” J. Appl. Phys.
95, 3255–3271
(2004). [CrossRef] ] |
| Fractional heat load (η) | 0.33 | estimated |
| Poisson’s ratio (
V
) | 0.33 | [1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996). ,16
M. Pollnau, P. J. Hardman, M. A. Kern, W. A. Clarkson, and D. C. Hanna, “Upconversion-induced heat generation
and thermal lensing in Nd:YLF and Nd:YAG,”
Phys. Rev. B 58,
16076–16092
(1998). [CrossRef] ] |
| Young’s modulus (Y)
[GPa] | 75 | [1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996). ,2
C. Pfistner, R. Weber, H. P. Weber, S Merazzi, and R. Gruber, “Thermal Beam Distortions in
End-Pumped Nd:YAG, Nd:GSGG and Nd:YLF,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
30, 1605–1615
(1994). [CrossRef] ] |
| Density (ρ)
[g.cm-3] | 3.9 | [1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996). ,17
B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, M. Petros, J. Yu, and U. N. Singh, “Spectroscopy and modeling of solid
state lanthanide lasers: Application to trivalent Tm3+
and Ho3+ in YLiF4 and
LuLiF4
,” J. Appl. Phys.
95, 3255–3271
(2004). [CrossRef] ] |
| Specific heat capacity
(Cp
) [J.g-1.K-1] | 0.79 | [1
W. Koechner
Solid-State Laser Engineering 4th ed.,
(Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany,
1996). ,17
B. M. Walsh, N. P. Barnes, M. Petros, J. Yu, and U. N. Singh, “Spectroscopy and modeling of solid
state lanthanide lasers: Application to trivalent Tm3+
and Ho3+ in YLiF4 and
LuLiF4
,” J. Appl. Phys.
95, 3255–3271
(2004). [CrossRef] ] |
Fig. 2. The analytically (red) and numerically (black) predicted temperature in the
centre of the Tm:YLF rod as a function of time while the rod is subjected to
a qcw pump with a peak power of (a) 200 W at 10 Hz
(τon
=10 ms) and, (b) 90 W at
50 Hz (τon
=10 ms).
Fig. 3. The maximum stress on the pump face of the Tm:YLF rod as a function of time
while the rod is subjected to a qcw pump with a peak power of (a) 200 W at
10 Hz (τon
= 10 ms), and (b) 90 W at
50 Hz (τon
= 10 ms). The analytical
(red) and numerical (black) solutions are shown.
Fig. 4. (0.75 MB and 0.33 MB respectively) Animations of (a) the analytical stress
distribution on the pump face [
Media 1] and (b) the numerical stress distribution in
volume of the Tm:YLF rod while it is subjected to a 90 W peak power qcw pump
beam at 50 Hz (
τon
= 10 ms) [
Media 2].
4. Power scaling of Tm:YLF rods by qcw pumping
To achieve ever higher output powers from a diode-end-pumped solid state laser, the
pump power itself must be increased in a concomitant manner. When the pump is a cw
source, the high average powers required in some applications leads to high thermal
loads, and the onset of fracture. A standard solution to this problem is to employ a
qcw pump source, with the advantages that: (i) the average thermal load is reduced
through a reduced duty cycle, and (ii) the qcw pulsing leads to higher peak pump
power, resulting in much higher laser output power during the qcw pump pulses.
During the qcw operation of a solid-state laser, the generally accepted criteria to
avoid thermal fracture is to pump the crystal with an average power
(Pav
) that is below the cw fracture pump power
(Pcw
):
The thermal model developed in section (2) provides a more comprehensive criterion
for safe qcw operation, through direct application of Eq. (
9), and the results are shown in
Fig. 5. The green shaded area in
Fig. 5(a) shows the analytically predicted average power with
which the Tm:YLF crystal can be pumped without causing thermal fracture, while the
red region indicate the predicted onset of fracture using Eq. (
10). The yellow region then indicates the region of
disagreement between the two models. It is clear that for qcw pump duty cycles of
40% and higher, fracture of the Tm:YLF rod will indeed occur at average pump powers
which are equal or greater to the cw fracture pump power, so that Eqs. (
9) and (
10) are in agreement.At pump duty cycles that are lower than
40%, the analytical model predicts that crystal fracture will occur at average
powers that are significantly lower than the cw fracture pump power. By way of
example, consider a qcw pump duty cycle of 10% (
T=100 ms;
τon
=10 ms) where the fracture limit
of Tm:YLF is at
Pcw
=47 W. For this qcw duty cycle,
fracture would occur at
Pav
>26 W, with the
region 47 W >
Pav
>26 W indicating the error of
using Eq. (
10). This error is indicated for all duty cycles as the yellow
shaded area in
Fig. 5(a). The implication is that Eq. (
10) is a necessary but not sufficient condition for
fracture-free qcw operation in Tm:YLF lasers.
An alternative approach to illustrate the results of the analytical thermal model is
to consider the peak power during a qcw pump pulse and to note the peak power at
which fracture occurs. The green shaded area in
Fig. 5(b) indicates the qcw peak power that can be used to
pump the Tm:YLF rod without fracturing it as predicted by the analytical model,while
the red region indicates the fracture limit using Eq. (
10); the yellow region is once again the region of discrepancy.
Fig. 5. (a). The average pump power (as a fraction of the cw fracture power
Pcw
) at which fracture of the Tm:YLF rod
occurs as a function of qcw pump duty cycle
(τon
=10 ms). The green shaded
region indicates the average pump power at which the Tm:YLF rod can be
pumped without fracturing according to the analytical model. The yellow
shaded region indicates the difference between the analytical model and
Pcw
. (b) The same notation as in (a) but
for the peak pump power (in units of Pcw
) at
which fracture of the Tm:YLF rod occurs as a function of qcw pump duty
cycle.
Considering the qcw pump duty cycle of 10%, we note that the Tm:YLF rod can be pumped
with a peak pump power of 5.5× higher (270 W) than the cw fracture power
before fracture will occur, while Eq. (
10) would predict a 10× higher value (470 W).
The model predictions can thus be summarised as follows: the rule of thumb given by
Eq. (
10) is a necessary but not sufficient condition for
fracture-free power scaling of Tm:YLF through the use of qcw pump sources. This is
not surprising given that this criteria is not derived from an analysis of the onset
of fracture, but is based rather on intuition. Equation (
9) is derived from a full thermal analysis, and we suggest
that this provides the necessary criterion for any laser rod to be pumped without
fracture. In the limit that the duty cycle approaches the cw case, Eq. (
9) correctly converges to Eq. (
10) as expected.
5. Conclusion
A time-dependent analytical thermal model was developed to investigate the transient
behaviour of thermally induced stresses in qcw end-pumped laser rods. The
versatility of such a model is that all the material and pump laser parameters may
be varied analytically, thereby aiding physical insight. For example, the model
confirms exactly that the temperature increases linearly with pump power, as
expected. Similarly, one can ‘instantaneously’ determine how
the rod temperature varies with any of the key parameters, enabling one to easily
probe the underlying physics with questions such as: how does the temperature
profile vary with pump size w? Determining this numerically would
be extremely time consuming. Furthermore, the resulting analytical expression for
the temperature of the rod may be used to determine other quantities, such as the
optical aberrations likely to be imparted to a propagating wave through the crystal
rod. The key advantages of the analytical model are ease of computation, as
highlighted above, and time of computation. We reported that the average computation
time of each finite element simulation was approximately 5.5 hours on a dual-core
2.4 GHz processor; this is in stark contrast to the analytical model in which the
computational time is less than a couple of seconds on a standard PC, i.e., for all
practical purposes it is ‘instantaneous’ in comparison.
The analytical model was used to investigate the thermal stress in a Tm:YLF rod at
various qcw pump duty cycles, and was found to be in very good agreement with that
of a time-dependent coupled thermal-stress finite element analysis, and with
published experimental data. We have applied the analytical model to determine the
maximum peak power at which a Tm:YLF rod can be pumped before it will fracture. We
show that at all qcw duty cycles the crystal will fracture at average power levels
that are lower than predicted by using the corresponding cw fracture limit. The
discrepancy is largest at low duty cycles,converging to a perfect agreement in the
limiting case of a 100% duty cycle (cw). Thus we suggest a new criteria to be
applied for safe power scaling of Tm:YLF rods. While the implementation of the
analytical model has concentrated on YLF due to its low fracture limit,the model
presented here may be applied to any end-pumped laser rod pumped using qcw or cw
sources as the assumptions used to develop the analytical model are not material
specific.It needs to be verified for other gain materials and other pumping
conditions that the same discrepancy (between the predicted average power level at
which fracture will occur and the cw fracture limit) exists at low duty cycles.