OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 12 — Jun. 8, 2009
  • pp: 10019–10024
« Show journal navigation

Room temperature 1.6 µm electroluminescence from Ge light emitting diode on Si substrate

Szu-Lin Cheng, Jesse Lu, Gary Shambat, Hyun-Yong Yu, Krishna Saraswat, Jelena Vuckovic, and Yoshio Nishi  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 12, pp. 10019-10024 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.010019


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (409 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We report the room temperature electroluminescence (EL) at 1.6 µm of a Ge n+/p light emitting diode on a Si substrate. Unlike normal electrically pumped devices, this device shows a superlinear luminescence enhancement at high current. By comparing different n type doping concentrations, we observe that a higher concentration is required to achieve better efficiency of the device. Thermal enhancement effects observed in temperature dependent EL spectra show the capability of this device to operate at room temperature or above. These detailed studies show that Ge can be a good candidate for a Si compatible light emitting device.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

A silicon (Si) compatible laser for applications in telecommunication and optical interconnect systems [1

1. L. C. Kimerling, “Silicon microphotonics,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 159160, 8–13 (2000). [CrossRef]

] has been an interesting topic for several years now but has yet to be practically demonstrated. The main problem rests with the issue of having a material which is compatible with conventional CMOS process and has an emission wavelength around 1550 nm for coupling to the optical fiber network [2

2. J. Liu, X. Sun, D. Pang, X. Wang, L. C. Kimerling, T. L. Koch, and J. Michel, “Tensile-strained, n-type Ge as a gain medium for monolithic laser integration on Si,” Opt. Express 15, 11272–11277 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Germanium (Ge) is compatible with silicon and has a direct band gap of 0.8 eV, corresponding to the required telecommunication wavelength of 1550 nm. The small difference of 0.134 eV between the direct and indirect band gaps of Ge suggests the possibility of a direct band gap transition. There are three main approaches that researchers are taking to fulfill this goal, including quantum confinement (quantum wells and quantum dots) [3

3. V. G. Talalaev, G. E. Cirlin, A. A. Tonkikh, N. D. Zakharov, and P. Werner, “Room temperature electroluminescence from Ge/Si quantum dots superlattice close to 1.6 µm,” Phys. Status Solidi A 198, R4–R6 (2003). [CrossRef]

5

5. M. H. Liao, C. H. Lee, T. A. Hung, and C. W. Liu, “The intermixing and strain effects on electroluminescence of SiGe dots,” J. Appl. Phys. 102, 053520 (2007). [CrossRef]

], strain [6

6. R. A. Soref and L. Friedman, “Direct-gap Ge/GeSn/Si and GeSn/Ge/Si Heterostructures,” Superlattice Microst. 14, 189–193 (1993). [CrossRef]

], and high concentration n-type doping [2

2. J. Liu, X. Sun, D. Pang, X. Wang, L. C. Kimerling, T. L. Koch, and J. Michel, “Tensile-strained, n-type Ge as a gain medium for monolithic laser integration on Si,” Opt. Express 15, 11272–11277 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, until recently [7

7. X. Sunn, J. Liu, L. C. Kimerling, and J. Michel, “Room temperature direct band gap electroluminescence from Ge-on-Si light emitting diode,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1198–1200 (2009). [CrossRef]

], room temperature electroluminescence (EL) reports at around 1550 nm have only been demonstrated in Ge/Si quantum dot p-i-n diode [3

3. V. G. Talalaev, G. E. Cirlin, A. A. Tonkikh, N. D. Zakharov, and P. Werner, “Room temperature electroluminescence from Ge/Si quantum dots superlattice close to 1.6 µm,” Phys. Status Solidi A 198, R4–R6 (2003). [CrossRef]

,4

4. Y. H. Peng, C. H. Hsu, C. H. Kuan, and C. W. Liu, “The evolution of electroluminescence in Ge quantum-dot diodes with the fold number,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6107–6109 (2004). [CrossRef]

] and tunnel diodes [8

8. M. H. Liao, C. Y. Yu, T. H. Guo, C. H. Lin, and C. W. Liu, “Electroluminescence from the Ge quantum dot MOS tunneling diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27, 252–254 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. By the quantum confinement effect between Ge and Si bands and the compressive strain applied to Ge from lattice mismatch, the indirect band gap of Ge is increased to match the required wavelength of 1550 nm. However, due to the type II junction between Ge and Si, only confinement of holes can be achieved. Without confining electrons, Ge/Si quantum dots still preserve the indirect band gap property of Ge and thus the light emitting efficiency of the dots are limited. Therefore, for higher efficiency devices, a direct band gap transition is necessary. Other methods of strain and high n-type doping have been proposed to have the potential of exhibiting a direct transition behavior. However, when the required 2% tensile strain is achieved to make Ge a direct band gap material, the corresponding emission wavelength shifts to 2500nm [2

2. J. Liu, X. Sun, D. Pang, X. Wang, L. C. Kimerling, T. L. Koch, and J. Michel, “Tensile-strained, n-type Ge as a gain medium for monolithic laser integration on Si,” Opt. Express 15, 11272–11277 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Therefore, only highly-doped n-type Ge can preserve the original direct band gap separation. Through large concentration n-type doping, the Fermi energy of Ge will be above the indirect conduction band (L valley) edge and the probability that electrons occupy the direct Γ valley will increase. This band filling effect can thus enhance the light emitting efficiency of Ge by raising the possibility of direct transitions. The higher the doping concentration, the more direct band-gap-like the material will become. From calculations, the required doping concentration is 7.6·1019 cm-3 for Ge with 0.25 % tensile strain to become a direct band gap material [2

2. J. Liu, X. Sun, D. Pang, X. Wang, L. C. Kimerling, T. L. Koch, and J. Michel, “Tensile-strained, n-type Ge as a gain medium for monolithic laser integration on Si,” Opt. Express 15, 11272–11277 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Recently, the first room temperature direct band gap EL from a Ge/Si p-i-n diode has been successfully demonstrated [7

7. X. Sunn, J. Liu, L. C. Kimerling, and J. Michel, “Room temperature direct band gap electroluminescence from Ge-on-Si light emitting diode,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1198–1200 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. In this work, we also demonstrate room temperature direct band gap EL at 1.6 µm from Ge n+/p light emitting diodes (LED) on a Si substrate with further discussions on the contribution of electron band filling effect to the device efficiency under different n-type doping concentrations and the temperature dependence of the device.

2. Experimental

Fig. 1. Design of the Ge-based light emitting diode. (a) Isometric schematic of the device structure showing the Ge mesa on top of a p-type Si substrate with Al ring contacts. (b) Cross-section schematic of the device structure.

An n+/p Ge homojunction light emitting diode on a Si substrate was fabricated using an in-situ doping method. The isometric and cross-section schematics of the diode are shown in Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 1(b), respectively. A 500 nm thick silicon thermal oxide was first grown on a p-type (100) Si substrate. A 500 µm by 500µm window was defined by optical lithography and the oxide within this window was removed by an Applied Material plasma etcher. A 2.2 µm epi-Ge mesa was then grown selectively on the Si substrate by an Applied Materials reduced pressure chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system. The P and N regions of Ge were defined in-situ by flowing B2H6 and PH3 during the deposition. The 0.8 µm p-type Ge layer was first grown at 400 °C and 8 Pa with GeH4 for 24 min, followed by annealing at 825 °C in hydrogen ambient for 30 min. The mass flow ratio of B2H6 and GeH4 for this p-layer is 10-3. The growth temperature was then increased to 600 °C for 1.4 µm n-layer deposition at 8 Pa for 10 min. The mass flow ratio of PH3 and GeH4 for this n-layer is 5·103. A Ge mesa 300 µm in diameter was defined by dry etching and 100 nm thick Al ring contacts were then deposited on top and outside of the mesa.

In-situ doping was used because it can provide a better definition of the junction profile than traditional implantation techniques. This is especially important for Ge due to the much higher diffusion coefficient of the n-type dopants under post annealing and after ion implantation, which make the junction profile difficult to define [9

9. C. O. Chui, K. Gopalakrishnan, P. G. Griffin, J. D. Plummer, and K. C. Saraswat, “Activation and diffusion studies of ion-implantated p and n dopants in germanium,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3275–3277 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. The doping concentrations of phosphorous and boron are 7.5·1018 cm-3 and 3.6·1017 cm-3, as measured by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The activation level of the n+ Ge layer grown at 600 °C was confirmed to be 100% by the combined results of spreading resistance probe (SRP) measurement and SIMS in our recent submitted work [10

10. H. Y. Yu, S. L. Cheng, P. B. Griffin, Y. Nishi, and K. C. Saraswat, “Germanium in-situ doped epitaxial growth on Si for high performance n+/p junction diode,” (submitted to IEEE Electron Device Lett.).

].

Electroluminescence and photoluminescence measurements were collected with a 20x objective lens, directed towards a monochromator and detected with a liquid nitrogen-cooled linear InGaAs detector array. Either electrical probes or wire-bonding was used to electrically contact devices with Keithley 2635 sourcemeter. A pump laser at 633 nm, with 4 mW of incident power focused to an approximately 20 um spot was used to produce PL measurements. For low-temperature measurements, samples were placed in a liquid-He flow cryostat.

3. Ge LED characteristics

Fig. 2. (a). Electroluminescence spectra of the Ge LED under different applied biases. (b) Current density-to-voltage (J-V) characteristic of the device. The J-V curve exhibits a dependence of 1.21 for voltages greater than 2 V. (c) Integrated luminescence-to-current density L-Jm characteristics of the device. The factor m is 0.94 between 36–250 A/cm2 and 1.48 for current densities greater than 300 A/cm2.

Room temperature EL spectra of the Ge LED with different applied biases are shown in Fig. 2(a). The wavelength of the EL peak is located near 1.6 µm, which suggests emission from the direct band gap of Ge. The onset of the EL is at 0.75 V, closely matching the indirect band gap (0.66 eV) of Ge. The EL intensity is significantly enhanced for voltages greater than 2 V, which corresponds to a current density of 160 A/cm2. Due to the spectrometer detection limit at 1600 nm, we cannot obtain a complete EL spectrum for this device. The actual peak position is expected at approximately 1610 nm due to the 0.2 % thermal-induced tensile strain from Ge on Si epitaxy [11

11. Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, D. D. Cannon, J. Liu, H. C. Luan, and L. C. Kimerling, “Strain-induced band gap shrinkage in Ge grown on Si substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2044–2046 (2003). [CrossRef]

].

The current density-to-voltage (J-V) curve of this device in Fig. 2(b) shows typical diode-like behavior. For applied voltages greater than 2 V, the J-V slope of 1.21 implies ohmic conduction from the series resistance of the device. The integrated EL intensity dependence on drive current is shown in Fig. 2(c). This dependence is also characterized empirically by the relation L∝Jm, where L is the integrated EL intensity and J is the current density. The exponent m is an important factor used to understand the emission behavior. For current densities between 36 and 250 A/cm2, the extracted exponent m is 0.94, indicating a linear relation. However, a superlinear L-J dependence with m of 1.48 is observed for currents greater than 300A/cm2. This implies that the device is more effective when operating under high current. This phenomenon is contrary to typical LED behavior, which exhibits lower m values at higher currents due to lower radiative efficiency, caused by effects such as Auger recombination. We believe that this superlinear effect at high injection currents is caused by an increase in device temperature by Joule heating, which we examine further in section 5, as well as a shift of the position of the quasi Fermi-level Efn, which is examined in Ref. [7

7. X. Sunn, J. Liu, L. C. Kimerling, and J. Michel, “Room temperature direct band gap electroluminescence from Ge-on-Si light emitting diode,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1198–1200 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. In the future, we plan to include both temperature as well as quasi-fermi-level shifts in a simulation model of our device.

4. Electron band filling effect on light emitting efficiency

Fig. 3. (a). PL spectra of undoped, n-type 1.5·1018 and 7.5·1018 cm-3 concentrations of Ge. Better radiative efficiency is obtained with higher n-type doping concentration. (b) EL spectra of n-type 1.5·1018 and 7.5·1018 cm-3 concentration Ge devices under the same drive current of 700 A/cm2. A similar emission trend is observed as that for the PL spectra. The evidence of similar spectra shapes suggests the same light emitting mechanism.

5. Temperature dependence of electroluminescence

Fig. 4. EL spectra measured at various temperatures. Better radiative efficiencies are observed for higher temperatures. Redshifts of the EL peaks at higher temperature are also obtained due to the band gap shrinkage of Ge.

We conclude from the results shown in Fig. 2(c) that a cause of the EL enhancement effect at high current densities is likely due to the increase in electron density in the Γ valley caused by Joule heating. It is therefore important to further understand the dependence of EL with temperature. EL spectra from 50K to 300K, taken by placing the sample in a liquid-He cooled cryostat, are shown in Fig. 4. The spectra are obtained under the same drive current of 250 A/cm2. Unlike the temperature dependence for a normal LED, EL intensity is enhanced as the temperature is increased. This effect is especially different from the temperature dependent EL reports of Ge quantum dot and SiGe quantum well devices [5

5. M. H. Liao, C. H. Lee, T. A. Hung, and C. W. Liu, “The intermixing and strain effects on electroluminescence of SiGe dots,” J. Appl. Phys. 102, 053520 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 8

8. M. H. Liao, C. Y. Yu, T. H. Guo, C. H. Lin, and C. W. Liu, “Electroluminescence from the Ge quantum dot MOS tunneling diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27, 252–254 (2006). [CrossRef]

], which show EL quenching at high temperature. For an n-type doping concentration of 7.5·1018 cm-3, the Fermi energy is only at the edge of the in-direct L valley. Therefore, the electron density in the Γ valley, which contributes to the radiative transition, is highly dependent on the Fermi-Dirac distribution. At lower temperatures, the Fermi-Dirac distribution resembles a step function and the probability that electrons occupy Γ valley is decreased. Conversely, at higher temperatures the electron distribution is smeared out and the likelihood of electron occupation in the Γ valley increases. This is the reason why our temperature dependent EL measurements show a better radiative efficiency at higher temperatures. Part of the superlinear relation with m=1.48 from the L-J curve at higher current densities can be interpreted as being caused by Joule heating which increases the population of the Γ valley and thus the radiative efficiency of the device. An expected redshift is also observed in the temperature dependence data due to the direct band gap shrinkage at higher temperature. Due to the detection limit of our system at 1600 nm, the exact peak position isn’t available and a more precise study for this redshifting effect is underway.

6. Conclusion

We demonstrate a Si-compatible Ge-based LED at 1.6 µm. This is a significant step in achieving a Si-compatible laser, which have been studied for over two decades. The direct band gap transition characteristic of this device and the simple fabrication process make it attractive for telecommunication applications. The higher light emitting efficiency at higher temperatures shows the capability of this device to operate at room temperature, which is an important necessity from a practical point of view. To demonstrate a Ge-based Si-compatible laser using the band filling method, a higher n type doping concentration of Ge needs to be achieved in order to increase the radiative efficiency and achieve gain.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Toshiba, MARCO Interconnect Focus Center, AFOSR and SNF NNIN.

References and links

1.

L. C. Kimerling, “Silicon microphotonics,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 159160, 8–13 (2000). [CrossRef]

2.

J. Liu, X. Sun, D. Pang, X. Wang, L. C. Kimerling, T. L. Koch, and J. Michel, “Tensile-strained, n-type Ge as a gain medium for monolithic laser integration on Si,” Opt. Express 15, 11272–11277 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

V. G. Talalaev, G. E. Cirlin, A. A. Tonkikh, N. D. Zakharov, and P. Werner, “Room temperature electroluminescence from Ge/Si quantum dots superlattice close to 1.6 µm,” Phys. Status Solidi A 198, R4–R6 (2003). [CrossRef]

4.

Y. H. Peng, C. H. Hsu, C. H. Kuan, and C. W. Liu, “The evolution of electroluminescence in Ge quantum-dot diodes with the fold number,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6107–6109 (2004). [CrossRef]

5.

M. H. Liao, C. H. Lee, T. A. Hung, and C. W. Liu, “The intermixing and strain effects on electroluminescence of SiGe dots,” J. Appl. Phys. 102, 053520 (2007). [CrossRef]

6.

R. A. Soref and L. Friedman, “Direct-gap Ge/GeSn/Si and GeSn/Ge/Si Heterostructures,” Superlattice Microst. 14, 189–193 (1993). [CrossRef]

7.

X. Sunn, J. Liu, L. C. Kimerling, and J. Michel, “Room temperature direct band gap electroluminescence from Ge-on-Si light emitting diode,” Opt. Lett. 34, 1198–1200 (2009). [CrossRef]

8.

M. H. Liao, C. Y. Yu, T. H. Guo, C. H. Lin, and C. W. Liu, “Electroluminescence from the Ge quantum dot MOS tunneling diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27, 252–254 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

C. O. Chui, K. Gopalakrishnan, P. G. Griffin, J. D. Plummer, and K. C. Saraswat, “Activation and diffusion studies of ion-implantated p and n dopants in germanium,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3275–3277 (2003). [CrossRef]

10.

H. Y. Yu, S. L. Cheng, P. B. Griffin, Y. Nishi, and K. C. Saraswat, “Germanium in-situ doped epitaxial growth on Si for high performance n+/p junction diode,” (submitted to IEEE Electron Device Lett.).

11.

Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, D. D. Cannon, J. Liu, H. C. Luan, and L. C. Kimerling, “Strain-induced band gap shrinkage in Ge grown on Si substrate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2044–2046 (2003). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.4760) Materials : Optical properties
(230.3670) Optical devices : Light-emitting diodes

ToC Category:
Optical Devices

History
Original Manuscript: April 8, 2009
Revised Manuscript: May 14, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: May 17, 2009
Published: May 29, 2009

Citation
Szu-Lin Cheng, Jesse Lu, Gary Shambat, Hyun-Yong Yu, Krishna Saraswat, Jelena Vuckovic, and Yoshio Nishi, "Room temperature 1.6 μm electroluminescence from Ge light emitting diode on Si substrate," Opt. Express 17, 10019-10024 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-12-10019


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. L. C. Kimerling, "Silicon microphotonics," Appl. Surf. Sci. 159-160, 8-13 (2000). [CrossRef]
  2. J. Liu, X. Sun, D. Pang, X. Wang, L. C. Kimerling, T. L. Koch, and J. Michel, "Tensile-strained, n-type Ge as a gain medium for monolithic laser integration on Si," Opt. Express 15, 11272-11277 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. V. G. Talalaev, G. E. Cirlin, A. A. Tonkikh, N. D. Zakharov, and P. Werner, "Room temperature electroluminescence from Ge/Si quantum dots superlattice close to 1.6 μm," Phys. Status Solidi A 198, R4-R6 (2003). [CrossRef]
  4. Y. H. Peng, C. H. Hsu, C. H. Kuan, and C. W. Liu, "The evolution of electroluminescence in Ge quantum-dot diodes with the fold number," Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 6107-6109 (2004). [CrossRef]
  5. M. H. Liao, C. H. Lee, T. A. Hung, and C. W. Liu, "The intermixing and strain effects on electroluminescence of SiGe dots," J. Appl. Phys. 102, 053520 (2007). [CrossRef]
  6. R. A. Soref, and L. Friedman, "Direct-gap Ge/GeSn/Si and GeSn/Ge/Si Heterostructures," Superlattice Microst. 14, 189-193 (1993). [CrossRef]
  7. X. Sunn, J. Liu, L. C. Kimerling and J. Michel, "Room temperature direct band gap electroluminescence from Ge-on-Si light emitting diode," Opt. Lett. 34, 1198-1200 (2009). [CrossRef]
  8. M. H. Liao, C. Y. Yu, T. H. Guo, C. H. Lin, and C. W. Liu, "Electroluminescence from the Ge quantum dot MOS tunneling diodes," IEEE Electron Device Lett. 27, 252-254 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. C. O. Chui, K. Gopalakrishnan, P. G. Griffin, J. D. Plummer, and K. C. Saraswat, "Activation and diffusion studies of ion-implantated p and n dopants in germanium," Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3275-3277 (2003). [CrossRef]
  10. H. Y. Yu, S. L. Cheng, P. B. Griffin, Y. Nishi, and K. C. Saraswat, "Germanium in-situ doped epitaxial growth on Si for high performance n+/p junction diode," (submitted to IEEE Electron Device Lett.).
  11. Y. Ishikawa, K. Wada, D. D. Cannon, J. Liu, H. C. Luan, and L. C. Kimerling, "Strain-induced band gap shrinkage in Ge grown on Si substrate," Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2044-2046 (2003). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 
Fig. 4.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited