OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 18 — Aug. 31, 2009
  • pp: 16300–16305
« Show journal navigation

Measurement of field-free molecular alignment by cross-defocusing assisted polarization spectroscopy

Jian Wu, Hua Cai, Yuqi Tong, and Heping Zeng  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 18, pp. 16300-16305 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.016300


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (147 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We demonstrate the measurement of field-free molecular alignment of nitrogen by a cross-(de)focusing assisted polarization spectroscopy technique, allowing us to distinguish the transient orientation of prealigned molecules on the basis of the relative ratio of the adjacent revival peaks of the measured signal. For impulsive excitation with high pump intensities, the involved orientation-dependent ionization of the neutral molecules contributes to the signal.

© 2009 OSA

1. Introduction

In this paper, we demonstrate that the field-free transient orientation of nitrogen molecules can be distinguished by combining the cross-(de)focusing and polarization spectroscopy techniques. The cross-(de)focusing effect is extracted by detecting a small part of the probe beam, which alters the polarization spectroscopy measurement in a different way for various transient orientations.

2. Experimental setup

Experimentally, an output from the amplified Ti:Sapphire laser system (pulse duration Tp: 60 fs, central wavelength λ 0: 800 nm, repetition rate: 1 kHz, beam diameter: 7 mm at 1/e 2) was split in two parts: the transmitted pump pulse for molecular alignment and the reflected probe pulse for signal analysis. The field polarization of the probe was rotated by 45° with respect to the pump. Both the pump and probe pulses were focused by a lens of f = 100 cm into a 10-cm long gas cell at a noncollinear crossing angle of ~2°, which was filled with pure N2 at a gas pressure of 1 atm. The interaction distance between the pump and probe beams was estimated to be d = 4~5 mm for a beam waist w 0 = 70~80 μm around the focus. The f number of the beam was then calculated to be 0.5(πZ 0/λ 0)1/2~143, where Z 0~2 cm is the Rayleigh length [12

12. H. Cai, J. Wu, Y. Peng, and H. Zeng, “Comparison study of supercontinuum generation by molecular alignment of N2 and O2.,” Opt. Express 17(7), 5822–5828 (2009). [PubMed]

]. Only the field component with polarization perpendicular to the incident one of the probe pulse was selected by an α-BBO polarizer (extinction ratio ~1:10−6), which was then diffracted freely onto a photodiode with a sensitive area of ~0.4 mm2 (locating at a distance of L~30 cm away from the interaction zone). Therefore, only a small part at the beam center of the probe pulse with modulated polarization was measured, which composed of our hybrid technique with respect to the conventional weak field polarization technique [3

3. V. Renard, M. Renard, S. Guérin, Y. T. Pashayan, B. Lavorel, O. Faucher, and H. R. Jauslin, “Postpulse molecular alignment measured by a weak field polarization technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 153601 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The output signal from the photodiode was analyzed with a Lock-in amplifier (SR830). By using a variable attenuator, the pump pulse energy could be adjusted from 0.05 to 1.2 mJ, while the probe one was fixed to be 20 μJ to avoid any undesired self-acted nonlinear effects.

3. Theoretical model

The principle of polarization spectroscopy for molecular alignment measurement [3

3. V. Renard, M. Renard, S. Guérin, Y. T. Pashayan, B. Lavorel, O. Faucher, and H. R. Jauslin, “Postpulse molecular alignment measured by a weak field polarization technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 153601 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] is based on polarization modulation of the linearly polarized probe pulse due to the orientation-dependent refractive index of the prealigned molecules. Since the Gaussian-shaped transverse profile of the pump pulse induces a larger molecular alignment in the beam center than in its periphery, the probe pulse meanwhile experiences an additional cross-(de)focusing effect from the prealigned molecules [10

10. J. Wu, H. Cai, H. Zeng, and A. Couairon, “Femtosecond filamentation and pulse compression in the wake of molecular alignment,” Opt. Lett. 33(22), 2593–2595 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18

18. V. Loriot, E. Hertz, A. Rouzée, B. Sinardet, B. Lavorel, and O. Faucher, “Strong-field molecular ionization: determination of ionization probabilities calibrated with field-free alignment,” Opt. Lett. 31(19), 2897–2899 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The prealigned molecular gas with an effective thickness of d is equivalent to a lens of a nonlinear focal length [17

17. V. Renard, O. Faucher, and B. Lavorel, “Measurement of laser-induced alignment of molecules by cross defocusing,” Opt. Lett. 30(1), 70–72 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]:
fm(t)=n0w02/[4dΔn0(t)],
(1)
where n 0 is the linear refractive index, Δn 0(t) = (2πN0Δα/n0)[<<cos 2 θ(t)>>r = 0 -1/3] is the refractive index change at the beam center induced by molecular alignment, N 0 is the number density of the molecular gas, and ∆α = α is the polarizability difference between the components parallel (α) and perpendicular (α) to the field polarization [2

2. H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, “Colloquium: Aligning molecules with strong laser pulses,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(2), 543–557 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. Therefore, when the molecules are oriented parallel or perpendicular to the field polarization with <<cos 2 θ>> greater or smaller than 1/3, the prealigned molecules act as a positive or negative lens, respectively. For N2 at 1 atm with a polarizability difference of Δα = 1.0 Å3 excited by a pump intensity of Ip = 4.0 × 1013 W/cm2 with |<<cos 2 θ>>-1/3|~0.06, the nonlinear focal length fm and molecular number (8Δn 0)-1/2 are respectively estimated to be ~3 cm and 115, characterizing the importance of the molecular alignment induced cross-(de)focusing effect [12

12. H. Cai, J. Wu, Y. Peng, and H. Zeng, “Comparison study of supercontinuum generation by molecular alignment of N2 and O2.,” Opt. Express 17(7), 5822–5828 (2009). [PubMed]

].

In order to have a more intuitive picture on the energy modulation of the probe beam induced by the additional cross-(de)focusing effect, we calculated the waist of the probe beam on the surface of the detector at a distance of L from the crossing point by assuming its propagation obeys the basic Gaussian law, which is valid for the fairly low probe pulse energy as considered here. When the pump pulse was turned off (i.e. without molecular alignment), the probe beam waist reads wL = w 0[1 + L 2/Z02]1/2. However, when the molecular alignment induced cross-(de)focusing effect with an equivalent focal length of fm is included, the probe beam waist becomes to be
wLm=w0β{1+[L/(Z0β)Z0/fm]2}1/2,
(2)
where β = (1 + Z 0 2/fm 2)−1. By assuming the focal length fm of the equivalent lens induced by the molecular alignment is much greater than the Rayleigh length Z 0 (i.e. β~1 and Z 0 2/fm 2~1), as compared to the case without molecular alignment of wL, the beam waist of the probe pulse is modulated to be wLm(t) = [wL 2-2w 0 2 L/fm(t)]1/2. For a Gaussian beam with a transverse intensity distribution of I(r,L)~[w 0/wL (m)(L)]2exp{-2[r/wL(m)(L)]2}~[w 0/wL(m)(L)]2{1-2[r/wL(m)(L)]2}, the energy contained at the beam center within a diameter of D can be expressed as

SD(t)~20D/2I(r,t)dr~[w0/wL(m)]2{1D3/[12wL(m)]2}.
(3)

For high pump intensities, the molecular ionization during the pump excitation is unavoidable. Since a diatomic molecule is much easier to be ionized as its molecular axis is parallel to the field polarization than the perpendicular case [19

19. I. V. Litvinyuk, K. F. Lee, P. W. Dooley, D. M. Rayner, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Alignment-dependent strong field ionization of molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(23), 233003 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,22

22. J. Wu, H. Zeng, and C. Guo, “Polarization effects on nonsequential double ionization of molecular fragments in strong laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 75(4), 043402 (2007). [CrossRef]

] for its double-well potential structure, an orientation-dependent depletion of the neutral molecules is resulted as Nk(θ) = N 0 Wk(θ), where
Wk(θ)=σK0IpKTp(a+b<<cos2θ>>)=W0(a+b<<cos2θ>>)
(5)
is the orientation-dependent ionization rate [6

6. T. Kanai, S. Minemoto, and H. Sakai, “Quantum interference during high-order harmonic generation from aligned molecules,” Nature 435(7041), 470–474 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], σK 0 = 6.31 × 10−140 s−1cm22/W11 is the ionization cross-section of the randomly oriented N2 at 800 nm, K = 11 is the number of photons needed to liberate an electron from N2, and the molecular alignment metrics are considered up to the second order.

The refractive index proportional to the neutral molecular number density N 0[1-WK(θ)] is thus modulated. The refractive index parallel to the field polarization of the pump pulse can be written as [23

23. R. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2003).

]

n//=1+2πN0[1WK(θ)](α+Δα<<cos2θ>>)~1+2πN0{α(1aW0)+[Δα(1aW0)bW0α]<<cos2θ>>}.
(6)

Similarly, the modulated refractive index perpendicular to the pump polarization can be written as
n=1+2πN0[1WK(θ)](α+Δα<<sin2θsin2ϕ>>)~1+πN0{(α+α//)(1aW0)+[Δα(aW01)bW0(α+α//)]<<cos2θ>>},
(7)
where the relationship of <<sin2 θsin2 ϕ>> = (1-<<cos 2 θ>>)/2 was used. It therefore leads to a corrected refractive index difference as:

Δn=n//n~N0Δαπ[bW0/3+(33aW0+bW0)(<<cos2θ>>1/3)].
(8)

For the case without ionization W 0 = 0.0, it reduces to the conventional one and leads to molecular alignment signal proportional to (Δn)2~(<<cos 2 θ>>-1/3)2 [3

3. V. Renard, M. Renard, S. Guérin, Y. T. Pashayan, B. Lavorel, O. Faucher, and H. R. Jauslin, “Postpulse molecular alignment measured by a weak field polarization technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 153601 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Since the measured molecular alignment signal by the weak field polarization spectroscopy is directly proportional to the square of the refractive index difference (Δn)2 [3

3. V. Renard, M. Renard, S. Guérin, Y. T. Pashayan, B. Lavorel, O. Faucher, and H. R. Jauslin, “Postpulse molecular alignment measured by a weak field polarization technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 153601 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the anisotropic depletion of the neutral molecules induced by the orientation-dependent ionization rate of the diatomic molecules during the pump excitation also contributes the measured molecular alignment signal.

When both the cross-(de)focusing and anisotropic molecular ionization are considered, the measured signal is therefore corrected to be

SD~(Δnπd/λ0)2[1η(<<cos2θ>>1/3)]1.
(9)

Figures 1(c) and 1(d) show the calculated molecular alignment signal from the detector at different pump intensities by including both the cross-(de)focusing and anisotropic multiphoton ionization contributions. Here, we normalized the signal peaks around zero delay to unity. For a pump intensity of 1.0 × 1013 W/cm2 with negligible ionization rate as shown in Fig. 1(c), the measured signal is nearly proportional to (<<cos 2 θ>>-1/3)2 with a small correction owing to the weak cross-(de)focusing effect. As shown in Fig. 1(d), for a pump intensity of 5.0 × 1013 W/cm2 with an expected ionization rate of W 0 = 1.8%, a dip for the central peak around the quarter-revival time is resulted as compared to the side ones, and the second peak is relatively decreased as compared to the first one around the half-revival time.

4. Experimental results

Our experimentally measured molecular alignment signals under different pump intensities are presented in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Experimentally measured molecular alignment signal of N2 under various pump intensities. The dashed curves represent the numerically fitted ones (shifted by 0.1 as compared with the measured ones).
. When the pump intensity is lower than 1013 W/cm2 as shown in Fig. 2(a), a homodyne signal as the conventional weak field polarization measurement was typically observed. For a pump intensity of 1.5 × 1013 W/cm2, as shown in Fig. 2(b), the central peak around the quarter-revival time is relatively decreased as compared with the side ones. Around the half-revival time, the second peak is decreased in comparison with the first one. As shown in Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), such relative evolutions of the adjacent peaks become more and more pronounced with increasing pump intensities. This is consistent with our above discussion on the influence of the cross-(de)focusing effect by considering the Gaussian-shaped transverse distribution of the pump beam and the consequent intensity-dependent molecular alignment degree, which acts as additional positive or negative lens.

For a pump intensity of 5.0 × 1013 W/cm2 [Fig. 2(e)], not only the cross-defocusing but also the anisotropic multiphoton ionization contributes the finally measured signal. The profile of the measured signal is almost unchanged when the pump intensity is further increased to higher than 5.0 × 1013 W/cm2 as shown in Fig. 2(f). This corresponds to the formation of optical filament [24

24. A. Couairon and A. Mysyrowicz, “Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media,” Phys. Rep. 441(2-4), 47–189 (2007). [CrossRef]

], which limits the pump intensity on the order of 5.0 × 1013 W/cm2 and consequently restricts the molecular alignment as well as the ionization. To estimate the involved ionization rate W 0, we firstly obtained a factor η~10 by fitting the measured molecular alignment signals around the quarter-revival time at low pump intensities [Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), dashed curves], where only the spatial cross-(de)focusing contributions were considered due to the negligible ionizations at these intensities. Then, the measured molecular alignment signal at high pump intensity was fitted by including both the ionization and cross-(de)focusing contributions with the predetermined correction factor η. For example, at 5.0 × 1013 W/cm2 as shown in Fig. 2(d), we estimated that about 3% N2 were ionized in our experiments. This confirms the influence of the ionization on the measured molecular alignment signal with our cross-(de)focusing assisted polarization spectroscopy technique.

5. Conclusion

In summary, by using a cross-(de)focusing assisted polarization spectroscopy technique, the measured molecular alignment signals are relatively increased or decreased for the parallel or perpendicular orientation revivals with increasing pump intensities. For high pump intensities, the orientation-dependent ionization of the neutral molecules during the impulsive excitation is demonstrated in the measured signal, which can be used to study the weak ionization during the molecular alignment and may be extended for filamentation in molecular gas [24

24. A. Couairon and A. Mysyrowicz, “Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media,” Phys. Rep. 441(2-4), 47–189 (2007). [CrossRef]

] to characterize the involved ionization and clamping intensity inside the core.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded in part by National Natural Science Fund (10525416 & 10804032), National Key Project for Basic Research (2006CB806005), Projects from Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (08ZR1407100 & 09QA1402000), and Shanghai Educational Development Foundation (2008CG29).

References and links

1.

F. Rosca-Pruna and M. J. J. Vrakking, “Experimental observation of revival structures in picosecond laser-induced alignment of I2.,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(15), 153902 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, “Colloquium: Aligning molecules with strong laser pulses,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(2), 543–557 (2003). [CrossRef]

3.

V. Renard, M. Renard, S. Guérin, Y. T. Pashayan, B. Lavorel, O. Faucher, and H. R. Jauslin, “Postpulse molecular alignment measured by a weak field polarization technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 153601 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

E. Hertz, D. Daems, S. Guérin, H. R. Jauslin, B. Lavorel, and O. Faucher, “Field-free molecular alignment induced by elliptically polarized laser pulses: Noninvasive three-dimensional characterization,” Phys. Rev. A 76(4), 043423 (2007). [CrossRef]

5.

R. A. Bartels, T. C. Weinacht, N. Wagner, M. Baertschy, C. H. Greene, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “Phase modulation of ultrashort light pulses using molecular rotational wave packets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1), 013903 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

T. Kanai, S. Minemoto, and H. Sakai, “Quantum interference during high-order harmonic generation from aligned molecules,” Nature 435(7041), 470–474 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

C. Vozzi, F. Calegari, E. Benedetti, J.-P. Caumes, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, M. Nisoli, R. Torres, E. Heesel, N. Kajumba, J. P. Marangos, C. Altucci, and R. Velotta, “Controlling two-center interference in molecular high harmonic generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(15), 153902 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

J. Wu, H. Qi, and H. Zeng, “Extreme-ultraviolet frequency combs by surface-enhanced optical fields with diatomic molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 77(5), 053412 (2008). [CrossRef]

9.

G. H. Lee, I. J. Kim, S. B. Park, T. K. Kim, and C. H. Nam, “Measurement of the polarization of high-order harmonics from aligned N(2) molecules by spatial interferometry,” Opt. Lett. 33(18), 2083–2085 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

J. Wu, H. Cai, H. Zeng, and A. Couairon, “Femtosecond filamentation and pulse compression in the wake of molecular alignment,” Opt. Lett. 33(22), 2593–2595 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

Y. Chen, C. Marceau, F. Théberge, M. Châteauneuf, J. Dubois, and S. L. Chin, “Polarization separator created by a filament in air,” Opt. Lett. 33(23), 2731–2733 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

H. Cai, J. Wu, Y. Peng, and H. Zeng, “Comparison study of supercontinuum generation by molecular alignment of N2 and O2.,” Opt. Express 17(7), 5822–5828 (2009). [PubMed]

13.

J. Wu, H. Cai, Y. Peng, and H. Zeng, “Controllable supercontinuum generation by the quantum wake of molecular alignment,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 041404(R) (2009).

14.

H. Cai, J. Wu, A. Couairon, and H. Zeng, “Spectral modulation of femtosecond laser pulse induced by molecular alignment revivals,” Opt. Lett. 34(6), 827–829 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

J. Wu‚ H. Cai‚ A. Couarion‚ and H. Zeng, “Wavelength tuning of a few-cycle laser pulse by molecular alignment in femtosecond filamentation wake,” Phys. Rev. A 79‚ 063812 (2009).

16.

J. Wu, H. Cai, A. Couarion, and H. Zeng, “Few-cycle shock X-wave generation by filamentation in pre-aligned molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 80(1), 013828 (2009). [CrossRef]

17.

V. Renard, O. Faucher, and B. Lavorel, “Measurement of laser-induced alignment of molecules by cross defocusing,” Opt. Lett. 30(1), 70–72 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

V. Loriot, E. Hertz, A. Rouzée, B. Sinardet, B. Lavorel, and O. Faucher, “Strong-field molecular ionization: determination of ionization probabilities calibrated with field-free alignment,” Opt. Lett. 31(19), 2897–2899 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

I. V. Litvinyuk, K. F. Lee, P. W. Dooley, D. M. Rayner, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Alignment-dependent strong field ionization of molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(23), 233003 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

20.

N. Xu, C. Wu, Y. Gao, H. Jiang, H. Yang, and Q. Gong, “Measurement of the field-free alignment of diatomic molecules,” J. Phys. Chem. A 112(4), 612–617 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21.

Y. H. Chen, S. Varma, A. York, and H. M. Milchberg, “Single-shot, space- and time-resolved measurement of rotational wavepacket revivals in H(2), D(2), N(2), O(2), and N(2)O,” Opt. Express 15(18), 11341–11357 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

J. Wu, H. Zeng, and C. Guo, “Polarization effects on nonsequential double ionization of molecular fragments in strong laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 75(4), 043402 (2007). [CrossRef]

23.

R. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2003).

24.

A. Couairon and A. Mysyrowicz, “Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media,” Phys. Rep. 441(2-4), 47–189 (2007). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(260.5950) Physical optics : Self-focusing
(320.7110) Ultrafast optics : Ultrafast nonlinear optics

ToC Category:
Ultrafast Optics

History
Original Manuscript: June 4, 2009
Revised Manuscript: August 11, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: August 26, 2009
Published: August 28, 2009

Citation
Jian Wu, Hua Cai, Yuqi Tong, and Heping Zeng, "Measurement of field-free molecular alignment by cross-defocusing assisted polarization spectroscopy," Opt. Express 17, 16300-16305 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-18-16300


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. F. Rosca-Pruna and M. J. J. Vrakking, “Experimental observation of revival structures in picosecond laser-induced alignment of I2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(15), 153902 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, “Colloquium: Aligning molecules with strong laser pulses,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(2), 543–557 (2003). [CrossRef]
  3. V. Renard, M. Renard, S. Guérin, Y. T. Pashayan, B. Lavorel, O. Faucher, and H. R. Jauslin, “Postpulse molecular alignment measured by a weak field polarization technique,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 153601 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. E. Hertz, D. Daems, S. Guérin, H. R. Jauslin, B. Lavorel, and O. Faucher, “Field-free molecular alignment induced by elliptically polarized laser pulses: Noninvasive three-dimensional characterization,” Phys. Rev. A 76(4), 043423 (2007). [CrossRef]
  5. R. A. Bartels, T. C. Weinacht, N. Wagner, M. Baertschy, C. H. Greene, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “Phase modulation of ultrashort light pulses using molecular rotational wave packets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1), 013903 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. T. Kanai, S. Minemoto, and H. Sakai, “Quantum interference during high-order harmonic generation from aligned molecules,” Nature 435(7041), 470–474 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. C. Vozzi, F. Calegari, E. Benedetti, J.-P. Caumes, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, M. Nisoli, R. Torres, E. Heesel, N. Kajumba, J. P. Marangos, C. Altucci, and R. Velotta, “Controlling two-center interference in molecular high harmonic generation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(15), 153902 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. Wu, H. Qi, and H. Zeng, “Extreme-ultraviolet frequency combs by surface-enhanced optical fields with diatomic molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 77(5), 053412 (2008). [CrossRef]
  9. G. H. Lee, I. J. Kim, S. B. Park, T. K. Kim, and C. H. Nam, “Measurement of the polarization of high-order harmonics from aligned N(2) molecules by spatial interferometry,” Opt. Lett. 33(18), 2083–2085 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. J. Wu, H. Cai, H. Zeng, and A. Couairon, “Femtosecond filamentation and pulse compression in the wake of molecular alignment,” Opt. Lett. 33(22), 2593–2595 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Y. Chen, C. Marceau, F. Théberge, M. Châteauneuf, J. Dubois, and S. L. Chin, “Polarization separator created by a filament in air,” Opt. Lett. 33(23), 2731–2733 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. H. Cai, J. Wu, Y. Peng, and H. Zeng, “Comparison study of supercontinuum generation by molecular alignment of N2 and O2.,” Opt. Express 17(7), 5822–5828 (2009). [PubMed]
  13. J. Wu, H. Cai, Y. Peng, and H. Zeng, “Controllable supercontinuum generation by the quantum wake of molecular alignment,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 041404(R) (2009).
  14. H. Cai, J. Wu, A. Couairon, and H. Zeng, “Spectral modulation of femtosecond laser pulse induced by molecular alignment revivals,” Opt. Lett. 34(6), 827–829 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J. Wu‚ H. Cai‚ A. Couarion‚ and H. Zeng, “Wavelength tuning of a few-cycle laser pulse by molecular alignment in femtosecond filamentation wake,” Phys. Rev. A 79‚ 063812 (2009).
  16. J. Wu, H. Cai, A. Couarion, and H. Zeng, “Few-cycle shock X-wave generation by filamentation in pre-aligned molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 80(1), 013828 (2009). [CrossRef]
  17. V. Renard, O. Faucher, and B. Lavorel, “Measurement of laser-induced alignment of molecules by cross defocusing,” Opt. Lett. 30(1), 70–72 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. V. Loriot, E. Hertz, A. Rouzée, B. Sinardet, B. Lavorel, and O. Faucher, “Strong-field molecular ionization: determination of ionization probabilities calibrated with field-free alignment,” Opt. Lett. 31(19), 2897–2899 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. I. V. Litvinyuk, K. F. Lee, P. W. Dooley, D. M. Rayner, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, “Alignment-dependent strong field ionization of molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(23), 233003 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. N. Xu, C. Wu, Y. Gao, H. Jiang, H. Yang, and Q. Gong, “Measurement of the field-free alignment of diatomic molecules,” J. Phys. Chem. A 112(4), 612–617 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Y. H. Chen, S. Varma, A. York, and H. M. Milchberg, “Single-shot, space- and time-resolved measurement of rotational wavepacket revivals in H(2), D(2), N(2), O(2), and N(2)O,” Opt. Express 15(18), 11341–11357 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. J. Wu, H. Zeng, and C. Guo, “Polarization effects on nonsequential double ionization of molecular fragments in strong laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 75(4), 043402 (2007). [CrossRef]
  23. R. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, New York, 2003).
  24. A. Couairon and A. Mysyrowicz, “Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media,” Phys. Rep. 441(2-4), 47–189 (2007). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited