OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 24 — Nov. 23, 2009
  • pp: 21704–21711
« Show journal navigation

Ultra-sensitive fluorescence spectroscopy of isolated surface-adsorbed molecules using an optical nanofiber

A. Stiebeiner, O. Rehband, R. Garcia-Fernandez, and A. Rauschenbeutel  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 24, pp. 21704-21711 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.021704


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (356 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The strong radial confinement and the pronounced evanescent field of the guided light in optical nanofibers yield favorable conditions for ultra-sensitive surface spectroscopy of molecules deposited on the fiber. Using the guided mode of the nanofiber for both excitation and fluorescence collection, we present spectroscopic measurements on 3,4,9,10-perylene-tetracarboxylic dianhydride molecules (PTCDA) at ambient conditions. Surface coverages as small as 1 ‰ of a compact monolayer still give rise to fluorescence spectra with a good signal to noise ratio. Moreover, we analyze and quantify the self-absorption effects due to reabsorption of the emitted fluorescence light by circumjacent surface-adsorbed molecules distributed along the fiber waist.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Evanescent wave spectroscopy is a powerful method for the study of the optical properties of liquid and solid samples at interfaces [1

1. V. Bordo and H.-G. Rubahn, Optics and spectroscopy at surfaces and interfaces (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim2006).

]. The technique relies upon the absorption or dispersive shift of an evanescent wave created through total internal reflection at the interface between two dielectric media. In fiber-based methods, one of the media is an unclad optical fiber and the second the analyte [2

2. Ph. H. Paul and G. Kychakoff, “Fiber-optic evanescent field absorption sensor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 12–14 ( 1987). [CrossRef]

, 3

3. A. Messica, A. Greenstein, and A. Katzir, “Theory of fiber-optic, evanescent-wave spectroscopy and sensors,” Appl. Opt. 35, 2274–2284 ( 1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The main advantages of this approach are stability, fast response and the possibility to perform in situ measurements which make it specially suited for sensing applications [4

4. R. A. Potyrailo, S. E. Hobbs, and G. M. Hieftje, “Optical waveguide sensors in analytical chemistry: today’s instrumentation, applications and trends for future development,” Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 362, 349–373 ( 1998). [CrossRef]

]. Information about the structure and configuration of the particles at the interface can be obtained via absorption [2

2. Ph. H. Paul and G. Kychakoff, “Fiber-optic evanescent field absorption sensor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 12–14 ( 1987). [CrossRef]

, 5

5. S. Simhony, I. Schnitzer, A. Katzir, and E. M. Kosower, “Evanescent wave infrared spectroscopy of liquids using silver halide optical fibers,” J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3732–3734 ( 1988). [CrossRef]

] as well as fluorescence [6

6. Xh. Fang and W. Tan, “Imaging single fluorescent molecules at the interface of an optical fiber probe by evanescent wave excitation,” Anal. Chem. 71, 3101–3105 ( 1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] spectroscopy.

In this context, optical nanofibers with diameters smaller than the wavelength of the guided light exhibit a strong radial confinement of the light and a pronounced evanescent field surrounding the fiber [7

7. F. Le Kien, J. Q. Liang, K. Hakuta, and V. I. Balykin, “Field intensity distributions and polarization orientations in a vacuum-clad subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,” Opt. Commun. 242, 445–455 ( 2004). [CrossRef]

]. This makes them well suited for the controlled interaction of the guided light with particles near or on the fiber surface and opens the route towards applications in fields like optical sensing [8

8. J. Lou, L. Tong, and Z. Ye, “Modeling of silica nanowires for optical sensing,” Opt. Express 13, 2135–2140 ( 2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], nonlinear optics [9

9. V. Grubsky and A. Savchenko “Glass micro-fibers for efficient third harmonic generation,” Opt. Express 13, 6798–6806 ( 2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or cold atoms physics [10

10. F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 063403 ( 2004). [CrossRef]

, 11

11. G. Sagué, E. Vetsch, W. Alt, D. Meschede, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Cold-Atom Physics Using Ultrathin Optical Fibres: Light-Induced Dipole Forces and Surface Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 163602 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. It has been demonstrated that surface absorption spectroscopy using nanofibers is several orders of magnitude more sensitive than conventional methods based on free beam absorption [12

12. F. Warken, E. Vetsch, D. Meschede, M. Sokolowski, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Ultra-sensitive surface absorption spectroscopy using sub-wavelength diameter optical fibers,” Opt. Express 15, 11952–11958 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The resulting short integration time allows us to study and characterize dynamical processes of the molecules on the surface. Furthermore, the fluorescence from a very small number of resonantly irradiated atoms around a nanofiber has been coupled into the guided fiber mode and spectrally analyzed [13

13. K. P. Nayak, P. N. Melentiev, M. Morinaga, F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Optical nanofiber as an efficient tool for manipulating and probing atomic fluorescence,” Opt. Express 15, 5431–5438 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. For thin molecular films the measurement of both, absorption and fluorescence, could provide complementary information about the molecules on the surface.

Here, we show that the fluorescence light emitted by 3,4,9,10-perylene-tetracarboxylic dianhydride molecules (PTCDA) adsorbed on the surface of a nanofiber is efficiently coupled into the guided mode of the fiber yielding a high degree of sensitivity for spectroscopic studies. Moreover, our method is very stable and reproducible. To our knowledge this is the first time that a nanofiber is used to collect the fluorescence of surface-adsorbed particles. We measure fluorescence spectra for surface coverages as low as 1 ‰ of a compact monolayer (ML). Interlaced measurements of absorption and fluorescence spectra are performed in order to determine the respective surface coverage. Furthermore, we observe self-absorption in our system, i.e., a partial reabsorption of the emitted fluorescence by circumjacent molecules along the nanofiber. While the high sensitivity of our method allows us to perform measurements in a regime of low surface coverages where self-absorption is negligible, it has to be taken into account for higher surface coverages. Therefore, we present detailed theoretical considerations in order to quantify this effect.

2. Experimental setup

For our experiments, we use the nanofiber waist of a tapered optical fiber (TOF). We fabricate the TOFs by stretching a standard single mode optical fiber while heating it with a travelling hydrogen/oxygen flame [14

14. T. A. Birks and Y. W. Li, “The shape of fiber tapers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 10, 432–438 ( 1992). [CrossRef]

]. Our computer controlled fiber pulling rig allows us to produce TOFs with a homogeneous waist diameter down to 100 nm and a typical extension of 1-10mm [15

15. F. Warken, A. Rauschenbeutel, and T. Bartholomäus, “Fiber pulling profits from precise positioning,” Photon. Spectra 42, 3, 73 ( 2008).

]. We have carried out a series of test measurements using electron microscopy showing that the fabrication of tapered fibers is highly reproducible and has an a priori accuracy of ±5% of reaching the target diameter. In the taper sections, the mode of the unstretched fiber is adiabatically transformed into the strongly guided mode of the ultrathin section and back, resulting in a highly efficient coupling of light into and out of the nanofiber. Beyond that, the surface of the nanofiber waist exhibits a very high degree of smoothness and cleanliness. This property which usually demands special sample preparation techniques [16

16. U. Gómez, M. Leonhardt, H. Port, and H. C. Wolf, “Optical properties of amorphous ultrathin films of perylene derivatives,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 268, 1–6 ( 1997). [CrossRef]

] is crucial for spectroscopy of thin molecular films. For the presented measurements we used a 320 nm diameter nanofiber with a length of 1mm fabricated from a Nufern 460-HP fiber. This diameter ensures that only the fundamental mode is guided in the fiber waist for wavelengths longer than 450 nm, thereby matching the single mode cutoff wavelength of the unprocessed fiber. Moreover, this diameter yields the maximum sensitivity for absorption spectroscopy in the visible domain, as discussed in [12

12. F. Warken, E. Vetsch, D. Meschede, M. Sokolowski, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Ultra-sensitive surface absorption spectroscopy using sub-wavelength diameter optical fibers,” Opt. Express 15, 11952–11958 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We obtain a typical transmission of up to 70% in the wavelength range between 450 and 650 nm. The measurements were performed on PTCDA molecules, taking advantage of their stability under evaporation at ambient conditions, their high quantum yield and the experimental and theoretical knowledge concerning their spectral characteristics [17

17. S. R. Forrest, “Ultrathin organic films grown by organic molecular beam deposition and related techniques,” Chem. Rev. 97, 1793–1896 ( 1997). [CrossRef]

]. Moreover, PTCDA molecules significantly change their spectral properties depending on their arrangement on the surface [18

18. H. Proehl, Th. Dienel, R. Nitsche, and T. Fritz, “Formation of solid-state excitons in ultrathin crystalline films of PTCDA: from single molecules to molecular stacks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 097403 ( 2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Therefore, these organic molecules are well suited as a model system for sensitivity studies.

Figure 1 shows the schematic experimental setup for fiber-based absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. The molecules are deposited on the fiber waist by placing a crucible with PTCDA crystals below the fiber and by heating it to 325°C. By convection, sublimated molecules are carried to the fiber waist where they are adsorbed. The absorption of the deposited molecules is measured using a conventional absorption spectrometer configuration with a tungsten white light source (Avantes AvaLight-HAL) and a thermoelectrically cooled spectrograph (Andor SR 303i with DU920N-BR-DD detector). Fluorescence spectra are obtained upon excitation by a freely running diode laser at 406 nm (Sharp GH04020B2A). The laser light is coupled into the fiber upon reflection from a glass plate. The counterpropagating fluorescence is collected in transmission through the glass plate by the same spectrograph as for the transmitted white light. This configuration, in combination with a razor edge filter (Semrock BLP01-405R-25) placed directly in front of the spectrograph’s entrance slit, reduces the background signal due to the excitation light. To subsequently record absorption and fluorescence spectra, two shutters alternately open the path of the white light and the laser light. The shutter signal also triggers the spectrograph, thus synchronising the data aquisition. For timing reasons, the spectra are taken with an integration time of 420 ms.

Fig. 1. Scheme of the experimental setup. Molecules are deposited on the 320 nm diameter nanofiber waist of a tapered fiber from a heated crucible. Controlled by alternating shutters, either absorption is probed via transmission of white light from a tungsten lamp or fluorescence is excited by laser radiation. Both signals are detected by a CCD spectrograph.

3. Theoretical considerations

In the following, we will derive an expression for the fluorescence signal at the fiber output. For this purpose, we have to take into account multiple processes of absorption from and emission into the guided fiber mode.

We consider a nanofiber with radius R and length L covered with n molecules, yielding a surface coverage, i.e., number of molecules per surface area, of θ=n/2πRL. The absorbance of light at a wavelength λ exc propagating in the fundamental mode of this nanofiber is given by η(λ exc)=-lg(P sig(λ exc)/P ref(λ exc)), where P sig(λ exc) and P ref(λ exc) are the transmitted powers at the excitation wavelength λ exc in the presence and absence of molecules, respectively. According to [12

12. F. Warken, E. Vetsch, D. Meschede, M. Sokolowski, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Ultra-sensitive surface absorption spectroscopy using sub-wavelength diameter optical fibers,” Opt. Express 15, 11952–11958 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the absorbance η(λ exc) can be approximated to

η(λexc)nσ(λexc)ln(10)Aeff(λexc)=θσ(λexc)ln(10)·2πRLAeff(λexc),
(1)

if the molecular absorption cross section σ(λ exc) is much smaller than the effective area of the guided fiber mode Aeff(λ exc) which is defined by

Aeff(λexc)=Pref(λexc)Isurf(λexc).
(2)

I surf(λ exc) denotes the fraction of the evanescent field intensity at the fiber surface exciting the molecules. Since the molecules lie flat on the surface [19

19. T. Ogawa, K. Kuwamoto, S. Isoda, T. Kobayashi, and N. Karl “3,4:9,10-Perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) by electron crystallography,” Acta Crystallogr. B 55, 123–130 ( 1999). [CrossRef]

], their transition dipole moment is oriented perpendicular to the radial electric field component of the guided fiber mode. Therefore, only the axial and azimuthal components of the electric field, calculated according to [7

7. F. Le Kien, J. Q. Liang, K. Hakuta, and V. I. Balykin, “Field intensity distributions and polarization orientations in a vacuum-clad subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,” Opt. Commun. 242, 445–455 ( 2004). [CrossRef]

], contribute to I surf(λ exc).

A molecule at position z along the fiber waist absorbs the fraction σ(λ exc)/Aeff(λ exc) of the power P sig(λ exc,z):

Pabs(λexc,z)=σ(λexc)Aeff(λexc)Psig(λexc,z)=σ(λexc)Aeff(λexc)Pref(λexc)10η(λexc)zL.
(3)

For the fiber diameter and the wavelengths considered here, about 20%of the fluorescence of a single dipole emitter on the fiber surface is expected to be coupled back into the fundamental guided mode of the fiber, 10 % in each direction of the fiber [20

20. F. Le Kien, S. D. Gupta, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Spontaneous emission of a cesium atom near a nanofiber: Efficient coupling of light to guided modes,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 032509 ( 2005). [CrossRef]

]. As a result, the fluorescence emitted into the fiber mode by a molecule at a position z along the fiber waist is proportional to the absorbed power:

Pfl(λ,z)=C(λ)·Pabs(λexc,z),
(4)

where the proportionality factor C(λ) ∝ q(λ)/A eff(λ) includes the wavelength dependent fluorescence quantum yield of the PTCDA molecule q(λ) and the average fractional emission of the molecule into the guided fiber mode. The latter is an average over all possible orientations of the molecule on the fiber surface. Furthermore, it is determined by the intensity of the evanescent field at the fiber surface which is proportional to 1/A eff(λ), see Eq. (2).

The spectral overlap between the absorption and emission spectra in our system results in a partial reabsorption of the emitted fluorescence by circumjacent molecules before it reaches the output of the fiber. In order to quantify this effect and to determine the fluorescence signal exiting the fiber at one end, we need to multiply Eq. (4) by a factor that takes into account all molecules covering the fiber waist between the origin z of the emitted signal and the end of the fiber (z=0). The total fluorescence detected at the fiber output can be calculated by integrating over all n molecules adsorbed on the fiber waist:

Pout0(λ)=0nPfl(λ,z)10η(λ)zLdn=0L2πRθPfl(λ,z)10η(λ)zLdz
=C(λ)η(λexc)η(λ)+η(λexc)(110(η(λ)+η(λexc)))Pref(λ).
(5)

For small surface coverages, i. e. η(λ)+η(λ exc)≪1, this equation can be approximated by

Pout0(λ)C(λ)·η(λexc)·ln(10)·Pref(λexc).
(6)

Hence, if the reabsorption is small enough to be neglected, we can infer the wavelength dependence of the fluorescence quantum yield of the PTCDA molecule directly from the measured signal. We only need to correct for the known wavelength dependent coupling to the fiber mode characterized by 1/A eff(λ). For higher surface coverages however, reabsorption will become important and the detected signal has to be corrected according to Eq. (5).

For even higher surface coverages, multiple processes of emission and reabsorption may occur and can, in principle, also be corrected for. However, for the surface coverages below 1.5 % considered here, it will in general be enough to account for one more emission process, i. e., the reemission of the reabsorbed fluorescence, leading to an additional signal P 1 out(λ) at the end of the fiber. Therefore, the measured fluorescence signal at the fiber output P tot out(λ) can be approximated by:

Pouttot(λ)Pout0(λ)+Pout1(λ).
(7)

To calculate the reemission P 1 out(λ), we first have to consider the power P reabs(z,z̄) that a molecule at position z̄ will reabsorb from the fluorescence emitted by a molecule at position z. For each wavelength λ̄, it will reabsorb the fraction σ(λ̄)/A eff(λ̄) of the power of the fluorescence emitted by a molecule at position z. This power is given by Eq. (4), but taking into

account that part of the light has already been reabsorbed by other molecules on the fiber waist between the positions z and z̄. Integration over all wavelengths λ̄ yields:

Preabs(z,z̄)=0σ(λ̄)Aeff(λ)Pfl(λ̄,z)10η(λ̄)zz̄Ldλ̄.
(8)

The reemission of this molecule can be calculated in analogy to Eq. (4):

Preem(λ,z,z̄)=C(λ)·Preabs(z,z̄).
(9)
Fig. 2. Absorption (right) and corresponding fluorescence (left) spectra of surface-adsorbed PTCDA molecules during deposition. Five representative spectra within a range of surface coverages between 0.10 and 1.28% ML are shown.

Taking into account reabsorption of the reemitted fluorescence light on the way to the fiber output and integrating over all molecules emitting and reemitting, we can obtain an expression for the total reemission measured at the fiber output (z=0):

Pout1(λ)=0L0L(2π)2C(λ)Preabs(z,z̄)10η(λ)z̄Ldz̄dz.
(10)

4. Results and discussion

Figure 2 displays a series of fluorescence and absorption spectra, recorded in situ during the deposition of molecules on the fiber waist. We show representative spectra for five different surface coverages, ranging from 0.10% to 1.28% (see below) of a compact monolayer (ML) of flat lying PTCDA molecules, arranged in the herringbone structure of the (102) plane of the PTCDA bulk crystal [21

21. S. R. Forrest and Y. Zhang, “Ultrahigh-vacuum quasiepitaxial growth of model van der Waals thin-films. I. Theory,” Phys. Rev. B 49, 11297–11308 ( 1994). [CrossRef]

].

The absorption spectra with 6 nm effective spectral resolution are taken with an optical power of about 3 nW of white light within the spectral interval between 400 and 600 nm, corresponding to an intensity of less than 1W/cm2. Since the typical saturation intensities for single dye molecules are on the order of a few kW/cm2 [22

22. W. E. Moerner and D. P. Fromm, “Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 3597 ( 2003). [CrossRef]

], we are far from saturating the molecules. All spectra show the typical effective vibronic progression for excitation between the ground and first excited electronic states of PTCDA. In order to determine the absorbance of molecules on the fiber surface, a reference spectrum is recorded before deposition. The absorption spectra have been corrected for the wavelength dependent coupling to the fiber mode characterized by 1/A eff(λ exc), so that the obtained spectra are directly proportional to the molecular absorption cross section σ(λ exc). The shown spectra are the mean of two consecutive absorption spectra, one recorded 420 ms before and the other 420 ms after the corresponding fluorescence spectrum. Within this time interval, the deposition rate remains roughly constant, thus enabling us to determine the surface coverages underlying the measured fluorescence spectra by this averaging process. Using σ=4.1×10-16 cm2 [23

23. The absorption cross section of PTCDA was calculated from the molar extinction coefficient ε of PTCDA in solution [ M. Hoffmann, “Frenkel and Charge-Transfer Excitons in Quasi-One-Dimensional Molecular Crystals with Strong Intermolecular Orbital Overlap,” Dissertation (Institute of Applied Photophysics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany), p. 12 (2000)] according to σ=3/2×2.303/NA×ε. The factor 3/2 accounts for the different dimensionality on the fiber surface compared to solution. We note that the exact value of σ may differ from the one calculated by a factor of the order of one due to differences in the refractive indices.

] in Eq. (1), we infer from the absorbance of 0.04–0.51 at the absorption maximum at 2.47 eV that 0.8–10.6×106 molecules cover the fiber waist. This corresponds to a surface coverage of 0.8–10.6×1011 cm-2 or 0.10–1.28% ML.

The fluorescence spectra are recorded upon excitation with a power of about 8 µW of laser light transmitted through the nanofiber at 406 nm, corresponding to the high energy edge of the absorption spectrum. They present maxima at about 2.44 and 2.26 eV, thus showing a vibronic progression as reported for PTCDA in solution [24

24. V. Bulović, P. E. Burrows, S. R. Forrest, J. A. Cronin, and M. E. Thompson “Study of localized and extended excitons in 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA): I. Spectroscopic properties of thin films and solutions,” Chem. Phys. 210, 1–12 ( 1996). [CrossRef]

]. The absolute peak positions are shifted with respect to the solution spectra, and the fluorescence exhibits a smaller Stokes shift. We attribute this fact to the interaction of the adsorbed molecules with the fiber surface. With respect to the luminescence spectra of perylene derivatives at room temperature reported in [25

25. K. Puech, H. Fröb, M. Hoffmann, and K. Leo, “Luminescence of ultrathin organic films: transition from monomer to excimer emission,” Opt. Lett. 21, 1606–1608 ( 1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], the smallest coverages for which spectra can be measured are about two orders of magnitude smaller in our case. The shown fluorescence signal has been corrected for the wavelength dependent coupling to the fiber mode according to Eq. (6). The spectral response of our setup has been measured with a calibrated white light source (Avantes AvaLight-HALCAL).

The influence of self-absorption on the recorded spectra is shown in Fig. 3 for about 0.75% and 0.20% ML. It displays the same spectra as in Fig. 2, the spectra corrected for reabsorption (using Eq. (5)) and the ones corrected for reabsorption and reemission (according to Eq. (7) and Eq. (10)). For higher surface coverages like 0.75% ML, the reabsorption of fluorescence light significantly changes the spectrum. Only after correction for this effect, we retrieve the mirror symmetry between the fluorescence and absorption spectra which is characteristic for numerous molecular systems. For lower surface coverages like 0.20% ML, the effect of reabsorption and reemission is negligible. Hence, we conclude that for surface coverages below 0.2% ML, the spectral quantum yield of the molecule can directly be deduced from the measured fluorescence signal according to Eq. (6). The sensitivity of our method is therefore high enough to perform self-absorption-free fluorescence spectroscopy on isolated surface-adsorbed molecules. Finally, Fig. 3 shows that, due to the reduced efficiency of multiple coupling of the fluorescence back into the fiber, reemission has only a minor effect for both surface coverages considered.

5. Conclusions

Fig. 3. Influence of self-absorption and reemission on the measured fluorescence signal for 0.75% and 0.20% ML. For 0.75%ML, the signal corrected for reabsorption (magenta) differs significantly from the measured spectrum (blue). For 0.10%ML (red and black, respectively), the difference is only marginal. The correction for reemission does not have a significant influence on the spectral shape, as can be seen in the cyan/green curves. The absorbance for both surface coverages is shown for comparison of the spectral shape.

Our approach could, e. g., prove useful for bio-sensing, extending the possible applications from label-free detection using absorption measurements [26

26. X. Fan, I. M. White, S. I. Shopoua, H. Zhu, J. D. Suter, and Y. Sun, “Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review,” Anal. Chim. Acta 620, 8–26 ( 2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] to label-based detection using fluorescence measurements [27

27. M. D. Marazuela and M. C. Moreno-Bondi, “Fiber-optic biosensors - an overview,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 372, 664–682 ( 2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The interaction of the molecules with the nanofiber mode could possibly be enhanced further by using nanofiber-loop resonators [28

28. M. Sumetsky, “Optical Micro/Nanofibers for Sensing Applications,” in X. Fan, ed., Advanced Photonic Structures for Biological and Chemical Detection, (Springer, New York2009), pp. 337–376.

], which might also allow us to implement a nanofiber-based dye laser [29

29. G. J. Pendock, H. S. MacKenzie, and F. P. Payne “Dye lasers using tapered optical fibers,” Appl. Opt. 32, 5236–5242 ( 1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Moreover, our setup enables us to measure both, absorption and fluorescence spectra for a given surface coverage of molecules. This property, in conjunction with the stable and reproducible fluorescence collection efficiency, makes our method ideally suited for analyzing and quantifying dynamic processes at surfaces. As an example, it should allow us to characterize the dynamics of the agglomeration of a constant number of molecules in situ at ambient conditions.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank M. Kreiter and M. Sokolowski for valuable discussions and T. Best and M. Boeßenecker for their help with electronics. This work was supported by the Volkswagen Foundation (Lichtenberg Professorship), the ESF (European Young Investigator Award), and the EC (STREP “CHIMONO”).

References and links

1.

V. Bordo and H.-G. Rubahn, Optics and spectroscopy at surfaces and interfaces (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim2006).

2.

Ph. H. Paul and G. Kychakoff, “Fiber-optic evanescent field absorption sensor,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 12–14 ( 1987). [CrossRef]

3.

A. Messica, A. Greenstein, and A. Katzir, “Theory of fiber-optic, evanescent-wave spectroscopy and sensors,” Appl. Opt. 35, 2274–2284 ( 1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

R. A. Potyrailo, S. E. Hobbs, and G. M. Hieftje, “Optical waveguide sensors in analytical chemistry: today’s instrumentation, applications and trends for future development,” Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 362, 349–373 ( 1998). [CrossRef]

5.

S. Simhony, I. Schnitzer, A. Katzir, and E. M. Kosower, “Evanescent wave infrared spectroscopy of liquids using silver halide optical fibers,” J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3732–3734 ( 1988). [CrossRef]

6.

Xh. Fang and W. Tan, “Imaging single fluorescent molecules at the interface of an optical fiber probe by evanescent wave excitation,” Anal. Chem. 71, 3101–3105 ( 1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

F. Le Kien, J. Q. Liang, K. Hakuta, and V. I. Balykin, “Field intensity distributions and polarization orientations in a vacuum-clad subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,” Opt. Commun. 242, 445–455 ( 2004). [CrossRef]

8.

J. Lou, L. Tong, and Z. Ye, “Modeling of silica nanowires for optical sensing,” Opt. Express 13, 2135–2140 ( 2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

V. Grubsky and A. Savchenko “Glass micro-fibers for efficient third harmonic generation,” Opt. Express 13, 6798–6806 ( 2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 063403 ( 2004). [CrossRef]

11.

G. Sagué, E. Vetsch, W. Alt, D. Meschede, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Cold-Atom Physics Using Ultrathin Optical Fibres: Light-Induced Dipole Forces and Surface Interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 163602 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

F. Warken, E. Vetsch, D. Meschede, M. Sokolowski, and A. Rauschenbeutel, “Ultra-sensitive surface absorption spectroscopy using sub-wavelength diameter optical fibers,” Opt. Express 15, 11952–11958 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

K. P. Nayak, P. N. Melentiev, M. Morinaga, F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Optical nanofiber as an efficient tool for manipulating and probing atomic fluorescence,” Opt. Express 15, 5431–5438 ( 2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

T. A. Birks and Y. W. Li, “The shape of fiber tapers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 10, 432–438 ( 1992). [CrossRef]

15.

F. Warken, A. Rauschenbeutel, and T. Bartholomäus, “Fiber pulling profits from precise positioning,” Photon. Spectra 42, 3, 73 ( 2008).

16.

U. Gómez, M. Leonhardt, H. Port, and H. C. Wolf, “Optical properties of amorphous ultrathin films of perylene derivatives,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 268, 1–6 ( 1997). [CrossRef]

17.

S. R. Forrest, “Ultrathin organic films grown by organic molecular beam deposition and related techniques,” Chem. Rev. 97, 1793–1896 ( 1997). [CrossRef]

18.

H. Proehl, Th. Dienel, R. Nitsche, and T. Fritz, “Formation of solid-state excitons in ultrathin crystalline films of PTCDA: from single molecules to molecular stacks,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 097403 ( 2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

T. Ogawa, K. Kuwamoto, S. Isoda, T. Kobayashi, and N. Karl “3,4:9,10-Perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) by electron crystallography,” Acta Crystallogr. B 55, 123–130 ( 1999). [CrossRef]

20.

F. Le Kien, S. D. Gupta, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, “Spontaneous emission of a cesium atom near a nanofiber: Efficient coupling of light to guided modes,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 032509 ( 2005). [CrossRef]

21.

S. R. Forrest and Y. Zhang, “Ultrahigh-vacuum quasiepitaxial growth of model van der Waals thin-films. I. Theory,” Phys. Rev. B 49, 11297–11308 ( 1994). [CrossRef]

22.

W. E. Moerner and D. P. Fromm, “Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 3597 ( 2003). [CrossRef]

23.

The absorption cross section of PTCDA was calculated from the molar extinction coefficient ε of PTCDA in solution [ M. Hoffmann, “Frenkel and Charge-Transfer Excitons in Quasi-One-Dimensional Molecular Crystals with Strong Intermolecular Orbital Overlap,” Dissertation (Institute of Applied Photophysics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany), p. 12 (2000)] according to σ=3/2×2.303/NA×ε. The factor 3/2 accounts for the different dimensionality on the fiber surface compared to solution. We note that the exact value of σ may differ from the one calculated by a factor of the order of one due to differences in the refractive indices.

24.

V. Bulović, P. E. Burrows, S. R. Forrest, J. A. Cronin, and M. E. Thompson “Study of localized and extended excitons in 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA): I. Spectroscopic properties of thin films and solutions,” Chem. Phys. 210, 1–12 ( 1996). [CrossRef]

25.

K. Puech, H. Fröb, M. Hoffmann, and K. Leo, “Luminescence of ultrathin organic films: transition from monomer to excimer emission,” Opt. Lett. 21, 1606–1608 ( 1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

26.

X. Fan, I. M. White, S. I. Shopoua, H. Zhu, J. D. Suter, and Y. Sun, “Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review,” Anal. Chim. Acta 620, 8–26 ( 2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

27.

M. D. Marazuela and M. C. Moreno-Bondi, “Fiber-optic biosensors - an overview,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 372, 664–682 ( 2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

28.

M. Sumetsky, “Optical Micro/Nanofibers for Sensing Applications,” in X. Fan, ed., Advanced Photonic Structures for Biological and Chemical Detection, (Springer, New York2009), pp. 337–376.

29.

G. J. Pendock, H. S. MacKenzie, and F. P. Payne “Dye lasers using tapered optical fibers,” Appl. Opt. 32, 5236–5242 ( 1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(060.2370) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics sensors
(170.6280) Medical optics and biotechnology : Spectroscopy, fluorescence and luminescence
(240.6490) Optics at surfaces : Spectroscopy, surface
(300.2530) Spectroscopy : Fluorescence, laser-induced
(310.6860) Thin films : Thin films, optical properties

ToC Category:
Spectroscopy

History
Original Manuscript: October 12, 2009
Revised Manuscript: November 5, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: November 5, 2009
Published: November 11, 2009

Citation
A. Stiebeiner, O. Rehband, R. Garcia-Fernandez, and A. Rauschenbeutel, "Ultra-sensitive fluorescence spectroscopy of isolated surface-adsorbed molecules using an optical nanofiber," Opt. Express 17, 21704-21711 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-24-21704


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. V. Bordo and H.-G. Rubahn, Optics and spectroscopy at surfaces and interfaces (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006).
  2. Ph. H. Paul and G. Kychakoff, "Fiber-optic evanescent field absorption sensor," Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 12-14 (1987). [CrossRef]
  3. A. Messica, A. Greenstein, and A. Katzir, "Theory of fiber-optic, evanescent-wave spectroscopy and sensors," Appl. Opt. 35, 2274-2284 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. R. A. Potyrailo, S. E. Hobbs, and G. M. Hieftje, "Optical waveguide sensors in analytical chemistry: today’s instrumentation, applications and trends for future development," Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 362, 349-373 (1998). [CrossRef]
  5. S. Simhony, I. Schnitzer, A. Katzir, and E. M. Kosower, "Evanescent wave infrared spectroscopy of liquids using silver halide optical fibers," J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3732-3734 (1988). [CrossRef]
  6. Xh. Fang and W. Tan, "Imaging single fluorescent molecules at the interface of an optical fiber probe by evanescent wave excitation," Anal. Chem. 71, 3101-3105 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. F. Le Kien, J. Q. Liang, K. Hakuta, and V. I. Balykin, "Field intensity distributions and polarization orientations in a vacuum-clad subwavelength-diameter optical fiber," Opt. Commun. 242, 445-455 (2004). [CrossRef]
  8. J. Lou, L. Tong, and Z. Ye, "Modeling of silica nanowires for optical sensing," Opt. Express 13, 2135-2140 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. V. Grubsky and A. Savchenko "Glass micro-fibers for efficient third harmonic generation," Opt. Express 13, 6798-6806 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, "Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber," Phys. Rev. A 70, 063403 (2004). [CrossRef]
  11. G. Sagu’e, E. Vetsch,W. Alt, D. Meschede, and A. Rauschenbeutel, "Cold-Atom Physics Using Ultrathin Optical Fibres: Light-Induced Dipole Forces and Surface Interactions," Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 163602 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. F. Warken, E. Vetsch, D. Meschede, M. Sokolowski, and A. Rauschenbeutel, "Ultra-sensitive surface absorption spectroscopy using sub-wavelength diameter optical fibers," Opt. Express 15, 11952-11958 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. K. P. Nayak, P. N. Melentiev, M. Morinaga, F. Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, "Optical nanofiber as an efficient tool for manipulating and probing atomic fluorescence," Opt. Express 15, 5431-5438 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. T. A. Birks and Y. W. Li, "The shape of fiber tapers," J. Lightwave Technol. 10, 432-438 (1992). [CrossRef]
  15. F. Warken, A. Rauschenbeutel, and T. Bartholomäus, "Fiber pulling profits from precise positioning," Photon. Spectra 42(3), 73 (2008).
  16. U. Gómez, M. Leonhardt, H. Port, and H. C. Wolf, "Optical properties of amorphous ultrathin films of perylene derivatives," Chem. Phys. Lett. 268, 1-6 (1997). [CrossRef]
  17. S. R. Forrest, "Ultrathin organic films grown by organic molecular beam deposition and related techniques," Chem. Rev. 97, 1793-1896 (1997). [CrossRef]
  18. H. Proehl, Th. Dienel, R. Nitsche, and T. Fritz, "Formation of solid-state excitons in ultrathin crystalline films of PTCDA: from single molecules to molecular stacks," Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 097403 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. T. Ogawa, K. Kuwamoto, S. Isoda, T. Kobayashi, and N. Karl "3,4:9,10-Perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA) by electron crystallography," Acta Crystallogr. B 55, 123-130 (1999). [CrossRef]
  20. F. Le Kien, S. D. Gupta, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta, "Spontaneous emission of a cesium atom near a nanofiber: Efficient coupling of light to guided modes," Phys. Rev. A 72, 032509 (2005). [CrossRef]
  21. S. R. Forrest and Y. Zhang, "Ultrahigh-vacuum quasiepitaxial growth of model van der Waals thin-films. I. Theory," Phys. Rev. B 49, 11297-11308 (1994). [CrossRef]
  22. W. E. Moerner and D. P. Fromm, "Methods of single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 3597 (2003). [CrossRef]
  23. The absorption cross section of PTCDA was calculated from the molar extinction coefficient ∑ of PTCDA in solution [M. Hoffmann, "Frenkel and Charge-Transfer Excitons in Quasi-One-Dimensional Molecular Crystals with Strong Intermolecular Orbital Overlap," Dissertation (Institute of Applied Photophysics, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany), p. 12 (2000)] according to ⌠ = 3/2×2.303/NA ×∑. The factor 3/2 accounts for the different dimensionality on the fiber surface compared to solution. We note that the exact value of ⌠ may differ from the one calculated by a factor of the order of one due to differences in the refractive indices.
  24. V. Bulović, P. E. Burrows, S. R. Forrest, J. A. Cronin, and M. E. Thompson, "Study of localized and extended excitons in 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA): I. Spectroscopic properties of thin films and solutions," Chem. Phys. 210, 1-12 (1996). [CrossRef]
  25. K. Puech, H. Fröb, M. Hoffmann, and K. Leo, "Luminescence of ultrathin organic films: transition from monomer to excimer emission," Opt. Lett. 21, 1606-1608 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. X. Fan, I. M. White, S. I. Shopoua, H. Zhu, J. D. Suter, and Y. Sun, " Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review," Anal. Chim. Acta 620, 8-26 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. M. D. Marazuela and M. C. Moreno-Bondi, "Fiber-optic biosensors - an overview," Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 372, 664-682 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. M. Sumetsky, "Optical Micro/Nanofibers for Sensing Applications," in X. Fan, ed., Advanced Photonic Structures for Biological and Chemical Detection, (Springer, New York 2009), pp. 337-376.
  29. G. J. Pendock, H. S. MacKenzie, and F. P. Payne "Dye lasers using tapered optical fibers," Appl. Opt. 32, 5236-5242 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3.
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited