OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 26 — Dec. 21, 2009
  • pp: 23582–23588
« Show journal navigation

Third-harmonic generation from arrays of sub-wavelength metal apertures

Tingjun Xu, Xiaojin Jiao, and Steve Blair  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 26, pp. 23582-23588 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.023582


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2518 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We measure third-harmonic generation (THG) from arrays of sub-wavelength metal apertures in transmission using fundamental input at 800 nm. Samples with different aperture spacings, sizes, and shapes are used. Strong angular dependence of THG is observed, with maxima located at incidence angles corresponding to extraordinary optical transmission (EOT) for the fundamental. We demonstrate an anomalous scaling of TH intensity with aperture size, where at different EOT peaks, the TH may either increase or decrease with aperture size. The aperture shape is also shown to have a strong effect on TH output.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Extraordinary optical transmission (EOT) through metal films modulated with a 2-D array of sub-wavelength apertures [1

1. T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff “Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays,” Nature (London) 391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]

] was reported in 1998. It is now well established that upon the condition of EOT, intensity buildup within the apertures can occur [2

2. L. Salomon, F. Grillot, A. V. Zayats, and F. Fornel “Near-field distribution of optical transmission of periodic subwavelength holes in a metal film,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1110–1113 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 3

3. Y. Liu and S. Blair “Fluorescence enhancement from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” Opt. Lett. 28, 507–509 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], motivating the study of nonlinear processes. Indeed, resonant enhancement of second-harmonic generation (SHG) by a factor of 104 has been demonstrated for a single sub-wavelength aperture surrounded by periodic annular corrugation [4

4. A. Nahata, R. A. Linke, T. Ishi, and K. Ohashi “Enhanced nonlinear optical conversion using periodically nanostructured metal films,” Opt. Lett. 28, 423–425 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. SHG has also been studied in arrays of sub-wavelength apertures of various shapes, using disordered [5

5. N. Rakov, F. E. Ramos, and M. Xiao “Strong second-harmonic generation from a thin silver film with randomly distributed small holes,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, L349–L352 (2003). [CrossRef]

, 6

6. M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” J. Opt. A 7, S118–S123 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and periodic [6

6. M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” J. Opt. A 7, S118–S123 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 8

8. W. Fan, S. Zhang, N. C. Panoiu, A. Abdenour, S. Krishna, R. M. Osgood Jr., K. J. Malloy, and S. R. J. Brueck “Second-harmonic generation from a nanopatterned isotropic nonlinear material,” Nano Lett. 6, 1027–1030 (2006). [CrossRef]

, 10

10. J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandtke, R. H. Harmsen, F. B. Segerink, J. C. Prangsma, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 11

11. A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon “Apex-enhanced second harmonic generation by using double-hole arrays in a gold film,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 045423 (2007). [CrossRef]

] arrangements. The effect of the symmetry of the aperture has been shown [6

6. M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” J. Opt. A 7, S118–S123 (2005). [CrossRef]

], in that, at normal incidence, apertures with inversion symmetry produce much weaker SH than non-centrosymmetric apertures, while at off-normal incidence, SH can be produced with centrosymmetric apertures [6

6. M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” J. Opt. A 7, S118–S123 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 11

11. A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon “Apex-enhanced second harmonic generation by using double-hole arrays in a gold film,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 045423 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

2. Experimental methods

Arrangements of sub-wavelength apertures were produced in 100 nm thick gold films using electron beam lithography (EBL). Briefly, a 5 nm chromium or TiO2 adhesion layer was sputter deposited onto the quartz substrate, followed by 100 nm of gold and 20 nm of chromium. ZEP520A e-beam resist of about 300 nm thickness was spin coated. Following e-beam exposure, the upper chromium layer was dry etched with chlorine, and the e-beam resist removed. The chromium layer served as a hard mask for argon ion milling of the gold. A wet etch removed the upper chromium layer (and likely resulted in some undercut in the underlying chromium adhesion layer). For samples with TiO2 as the adhesion layer, we used reactive sputtering to produce the ~5 nm TiO2 layer by introducing O2 during the sputtering process; pure O2 was flowed through the chamber to fully oxidize the thin film before the chamber was pumped down to sputter the gold film.

The experimental setup is similar to that used previously [7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], as shown in Fig. 1. A Ti:Sapphire laser is used at 800 nm wavelength and ~30 fs pulse duration. The setup allows the rotation of the sample with respect to the incident fundamental beam as well as rotation of the detector around the sample so that the radiation pattern can be measured in transmission. The detector is a blue-sensitized PMT (H5784-03) and two spectral filters are used to block the transmitted fundamental at 800 nm and minimize the influence of broadband background luminescence [10

10. J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandtke, R. H. Harmsen, F. B. Segerink, J. C. Prangsma, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The angular acceptance of light collection is roughly 1° through a slit of about 2 mm width. Lock-in detection is performed by modulating the 86 MHz pulse train at 2 kHz, and average incident power is 75 mW(measured after the chopper), except where noted.

Fig. 1. Experimental setup for THG measurements. The output of the p-polarized Ti:Sapphire laser passes through a neutral density filter and a spectral longpass filter (690 nm) before being focused onto the sample with a 20 µm spot size by a 10 cm focal length lens; all patterned areas were larger than the spot size (EBL samples are 80 µm by 80 µm). Emission from the sample passes through a collection lens of 5 cm focal length made from fused silica, a spectral UG5 glass filter (Thorlabs) with passband around 225 nm to 400 nm to suppress the fundamental, an Hg line interference filter (CVI, 265 nm center, 25 nm passband) to isolate the TH, and a 2 mm slit, and is detected with the PMT.

3. Results

One significant difference between SHG and THG is that THG does not have the symmetry limitations of SHG. This is observed in Fig. 2 which plots the fundamental transmission, second-harmonic (SH) output, and third-harmonic (TH) output versus incidence angle for a sample with Cr adhesion layer, and 885 nm spacing of round holes. Because of centro-symmetry of the sample at normal incidence, there can be no SH output [6

6. M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” J. Opt. A 7, S118–S123 (2005). [CrossRef]

, 7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, the χ (3) response always exists. As shown in Fig. 2, the TH output peaks with maxima in fundamental transmission, indicating that the greatest intensity enhancement within the aperture occurs near the transmission maxima, as expected.

Power scaling of the SH and TH signals are also shown in Fig. 2. The measured data points are plotted on a log-log scale and fit to a linear equation with slopes of 2.0 and 2.8, respectively, for SH and TH. From the measurements, it is clear that the samples can withstand average incident power levels where the TH signal is about the same as the maximum SH (under strong symmetry-breaking conditions), not correcting for differences in collection efficiency and PMT responsivity (taking these factors into account, SH is detected with about 4x greater efficiency than TH). Whether this holds for even higher harmonics is not known yet.

Double-angle scans for SHG and THG using the sample with Cr adhesion layer are shown in Fig. 3, where both the incidence and detection angles are varied. Again, the difference between the SHG and THG mechanisms is observed in that there is minimal SH under conditions of inversion symmetry (normal incidence and normal detection), other than a small two-photon luminescence background. The peaks in the detection scan correspond to coherent emissions from the apertures that satisfy the following momentum matching condition [7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]:

ktnω=nktω+mK,
(1)

where n is the harmonic order, K is a reciprocal lattice vector with |K|=2π/Λ, Λ is the aperture spacing, m is the diffraction order, and k t represents a transverse light wave-vector. For a square lattice, and assuming that the optical wavevectors have only the x̂ transverse component (since the scans are performed along only one axis), Eq. (1) can be written

sinγ=sinθ+mλnΛ,
(2)

where γ is the detection angle and θ is the incidence angle. Therefore, the angular spacing between peaks in the TH measurements are narrower due to the shorter wavelength of emission (n=3). At detection angles that lie in-between these peaks, luminescence background can be observed. Since two- and three-photon luminescence are incoherent emissions, they produce broad angular spectra, which is clearly evident. Evidence that the luminescence emits from the apertures is given by the fact that the luminescence is strongest at the same incidence angles that the SH and TH peaks occur.

Fig. 2. Fundamental transmission, SH output, and TH output versus incidence angle for a sample of 200 nm holes with 885 nm spacing in a square lattice (left). The adhesion layer is 5 nm of Cr. Power scaling of SH and TH outputs (right). For THG measurement, the sample was set for a 12° incidence angle, while for SHG measurement, the sample was set for 46° incidence (indicated by arrows).

A practical issue not always addressed for plasmonic structures is the adhesion layer. Often-times, a thin layer of Cr is used to promote the adhesion of Au to a glass substrate. However, Cr is a highly lossy material, and can cause significant attenuation of SPP propagation at the metal/substrate interface [14

14. X. Jiao, J. Goeckeritz, S. Blair, and M. Oldham “Localization of near-field resonances in bow-tie antennae: influence of adhesion layers,” Plasmonics 4, 37–50 (2009). [CrossRef]

, 15

15. H. Aouani, J. Wenger, D. Gerard, H. Rigneault, E. Devaux, T.W. Ebbesen, F. Mahdavi, T. Xu, and S. Blair “Crucial role of the adhesion layer on the plasmonic fluorescence enhancement,” ACS Nano 3, 2043–2048 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. We performed subsequent TH measurements on samples with TiO2 adhesion layers, except where noted.

3.1. Effects of aperture spacing

Keeping the aperture size fixed at 250 nm, we investigated the effects of varying the spacing. The results are shown in Fig. 4 for both the transmission of the fundamental beam and emission at the TH wavelength. In these measurements, the sample was rotated with respect to the incident beam (varying θ) and detection was performed at the zeroth order transmission (γ=-θ).

Two effects of changing the aperture spacing are readily observable. First, there is a shift to higher incidence angles at which the transmission/TH output peak. Second, there is a clear increase in TH output for spacings of 885 nm and longer; note that this is repeatable across multiple measurements of these patterns. Even though the fundamental transmission peaks also increase with aperture spacing, the effect is not as dramatic.

Fig. 3. SH (left) and TH (right) outputs for a sample with Cr adhesion layer, 885 nm pitch, and 200 nm aperture diameter. The SH and TH signal intensities are normalized to the same value. Trajectories of the diffraction peaks closely follow Eq. (2), as indicated by the dashed lines on the contour plots.
Fig. 4. Fundamental transmission (left) and TH output (right) for samples of 250 nm apertures with variable spacing in a square lattice. The adhesion layer is TiO2.

3.2. Effects of aperture size

Keeping the aperture spacing fixed at about 885 nm, we investigated the effects of varying the aperture size. The results are shown in Fig. 5. Again, there are two effects which are immediately noticed. The first is that the transmission of the fundamental increases with increasing aperture size, which is expected; however, the second effect is unexpected. At the first two peaks in TH output (near 0° and 10°), TH decreases with aperture size, while at the third peak (near 30°), TH increases with aperture size; at the fourth peak, it decreases again. Individual apertures have cutoff frequencies, below which group velocity is minimized, resulting in increase in intra-aperture intensity [16

16. E. Popov, M. Nevière, J. Wenger, P.-F. Lenne, H. Rigneault, P. Chaumet, N. Bonod, J. Dintinger, and T. Ebbesen “Field enhancement in single subwavelength apertures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2342–2348 (2006). [CrossRef]

, 10

10. J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandtke, R. H. Harmsen, F. B. Segerink, J. C. Prangsma, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. This simplification (neglecting effects due to periodicity) suggests an explanation for the behavior seen at 0°, 10°, and 50°, where the decreasing aperture size should result in increasing TH. However, this doesn’t explain the results at 30°, which is the subject of further investigation.

Fig. 5. Fundamental transmission (left) and TH output (right) for samples of variable hole size with 885 nm spacing in a square lattice. The adhesion layer is TiO2.

3.3. Effects of aperture shape

It is known that aperture shape can have a strong influence on SHG [10

10. J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandtke, R. H. Harmsen, F. B. Segerink, J. C. Prangsma, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 11

11. A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon “Apex-enhanced second harmonic generation by using double-hole arrays in a gold film,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 045423 (2007). [CrossRef]

, 7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], due, in part, to symmetry breaking. Aperture shape also affects the conversion efficiency of THG, as shown in Fig. 6 for a sample with asymmetric aperture shape and Cr adhesion layer, where field enhancement is expected to be localized along the long edge of the apertures [7

7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In comparison to the results of a round aperture, an 8 times increase in TH is obtained. Optimization of the aperture shape may allow for even greater TH conversion to be obtained.

Fig. 6. TH (left) output for a sample with Cr adhesion layer, 885 nm pitch, and asymmetric aperture shape. TH is normalized to the maximum TH produced from the sample in Fig. 3. An SEM scan of the asymmetric aperture array is shown on the right figure.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have observed TH from arrays of sub-wavelength apertures. TH maxima are obtained at incidence angles corresponding to EOT of the fundamental, with signal strengths comparable to SH under symmetry-breaking conditions. There is a clear effect of lattice spacing and aperture size and shape on the TH signal, where an anomaly is observed in the scaling of TH with aperture size at different incidence angles corresponding to EOT.

Acknowledgement

References and links

1.

T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff “Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays,” Nature (London) 391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]

2.

L. Salomon, F. Grillot, A. V. Zayats, and F. Fornel “Near-field distribution of optical transmission of periodic subwavelength holes in a metal film,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1110–1113 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

Y. Liu and S. Blair “Fluorescence enhancement from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” Opt. Lett. 28, 507–509 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

A. Nahata, R. A. Linke, T. Ishi, and K. Ohashi “Enhanced nonlinear optical conversion using periodically nanostructured metal films,” Opt. Lett. 28, 423–425 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

N. Rakov, F. E. Ramos, and M. Xiao “Strong second-harmonic generation from a thin silver film with randomly distributed small holes,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, L349–L352 (2003). [CrossRef]

6.

M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures,” J. Opt. A 7, S118–S123 (2005). [CrossRef]

7.

T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair “Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement,” Opt. Express 15, 13894–13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

W. Fan, S. Zhang, N. C. Panoiu, A. Abdenour, S. Krishna, R. M. Osgood Jr., K. J. Malloy, and S. R. J. Brueck “Second-harmonic generation from a nanopatterned isotropic nonlinear material,” Nano Lett. 6, 1027–1030 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon “Enhanced second harmonic generation from nanoscale double-hole arrays in a gold film,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 261104 (2006). [CrossRef]

10.

J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandtke, R. H. Harmsen, F. B. Segerink, J. C. Prangsma, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers “Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon “Apex-enhanced second harmonic generation by using double-hole arrays in a gold film,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 045423 (2007). [CrossRef]

12.

P. Mühlschlegel, H.-J. Eisler, O. J. F. Martin, B. Hecht, and D. W. Pohl “Resonant optical antennas,” Science 308, 1607–1609 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

S. Kim, J. Jin, Y.-J. Kim, I.-Y. Park, Y. Kim, and S.-W. Kim “High-harmonic generation by resonant plasmon field enhancement,” Nature (London) 453, 757–760 (2008). [CrossRef]

14.

X. Jiao, J. Goeckeritz, S. Blair, and M. Oldham “Localization of near-field resonances in bow-tie antennae: influence of adhesion layers,” Plasmonics 4, 37–50 (2009). [CrossRef]

15.

H. Aouani, J. Wenger, D. Gerard, H. Rigneault, E. Devaux, T.W. Ebbesen, F. Mahdavi, T. Xu, and S. Blair “Crucial role of the adhesion layer on the plasmonic fluorescence enhancement,” ACS Nano 3, 2043–2048 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

E. Popov, M. Nevière, J. Wenger, P.-F. Lenne, H. Rigneault, P. Chaumet, N. Bonod, J. Dintinger, and T. Ebbesen “Field enhancement in single subwavelength apertures,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2342–2348 (2006). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(190.2620) Nonlinear optics : Harmonic generation and mixing
(190.4350) Nonlinear optics : Nonlinear optics at surfaces
(240.6680) Optics at surfaces : Surface plasmons
(350.4238) Other areas of optics : Nanophotonics and photonic crystals

ToC Category:
Nonlinear Optics

History
Original Manuscript: October 27, 2009
Revised Manuscript: December 7, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: December 7, 2009
Published: December 9, 2009

Citation
Tingjun Xu, Xiaojin Jiao, and Steve Blair, "Third-harmonic generation from arrays of sub-wavelength metal apertures," Opt. Express 17, 23582-23588 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-26-23582


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff "Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays," Nature (London) 391, 667-669 (1998). [CrossRef]
  2. L. Salomon, F. Grillot, A. V. Zayats, and F. Fornel "Near-field distribution of optical transmission of periodic subwavelength holes in a metal film," Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1110-1113 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Y. Liu and S. Blair "Fluorescence enhancement from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures," Opt. Lett. 28, 507-509 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. A. Nahata, R. A. Linke, T. Ishi, and K. Ohashi "Enhanced nonlinear optical conversion using periodically nanostructured metal films," Opt. Lett. 28, 423-425 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. N. Rakov, F. E. Ramos, and M. Xiao "Strong second-harmonic generation from a thin silver film with randomly distributed small holes," J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, L349-L352 (2003). [CrossRef]
  6. M. Airola, Y. Liu, and S. Blair "Second-harmonic generation from an array of sub-wavelength metal apertures," J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 7, S118-S123 (2005). [CrossRef]
  7. T. Xu, X. Jiao, G. P. Zhang, and S. Blair "Second-harmonic emission from sub-wavelength apertures: Effects of aperture symmetry and lattice arrangement," Opt. Express 15, 13894-13906 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. W. Fan, S. Zhang, N. C. Panoiu, A. Abdenour, S. Krishna, R. M. Osgood, Jr., K. J. Malloy, and S. R. J. Brueck "Second-harmonic generation from a nanopatterned isotropic nonlinear material," Nano Lett. 6, 1027-1030 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon "Enhanced second harmonic generation from nanoscale doublehole arrays in a gold film," Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 261104 (2006). [CrossRef]
  10. J. A. H. van Nieuwstadt, M. Sandtke, R. H. Harmsen, F. B. Segerink, J. C. Prangsma, S. Enoch, and L. Kuipers "Strong modification of the nonlinear optical response of metallic subwavelength hole arrays," Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 146102 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. A. Lesuffleur, L. K. S. Kumar, and R. Gordon, "Apex-enhanced second harmonic generation by using double-hole arrays in a gold film," Phys. Rev. B 75, 045423 (2007). [CrossRef]
  12. P. Muhlschlegel, H.-J. Eisler, O. J. F. Martin, B. Hecht, and D. W. Pohl "Resonant optical antennas," Science 308, 1607-1609 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. S. Kim, J. Jin, Y.-J. Kim, I.-Y. Park, Y. Kim, and S.-W. Kim "High-harmonic generation by resonant plasmon field enhancement," Nature (London) 453, 757-760 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. X. Jiao, J. Goeckeritz, S. Blair, and M. Oldham "Localization of near-field resonances in bow-tie antennae: influence of adhesion layers," Plasmonics 4, 37-50 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. H. Aouani, J. Wenger, D. Gerard, H. Rigneault, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, F. Mahdavi, T. Xu, and S. Blair "Crucial role of the adhesion layer on the plasmonic fluorescence enhancement," ACS Nano 3, 2043-2048 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. E. Popov, M. Neviere, J. Wenger, P.-F. Lenne, H. Rigneault, P. Chaumet, N. Bonod, J. Dintinger, and T. Ebbesen "Field enhancement in single subwavelength apertures," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 2342-2348 (2006). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited