OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 26 — Dec. 21, 2009
  • pp: 24130–24136

Optics InfoBase > Optics Express > Volume 17 > Issue 26 > Page 24130

« Show journal navigation

Compact fiber amplifier pumped OPCPA system delivering Gigawatt peak power 35 fs pulses

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, T. Gottschall, T. Clausnitzer, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 26, pp. 24130-24136 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.024130


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (187 KB)


Advanced Search

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We report on a compact Gigawatt peak power OPCPA system which is pumped by the second harmonic of an Yb-doped fiber amplifier and seeded by a cavity dumped Ti:Sapphire oscillator. Picosecond pump pulses for the OPCPA are generated by spectral filtering and directly amplified to 1 mJ pulse energy in several fiber amplifiers, without the need of chirped pulse amplification. Since no stretcher and compressor is required, the pump laser is very compact and easy to operate. The two stage optical parametric amplifier delivers 35 fs pulses with 53 µJ pulse energy and 1.1 GW peak power at 40 kHz repetition rate. Additionally, the scaling potential of this approach is discussed.

© 2009 OSA

1. Introduction

Today, ultra-short laser pulses have found widespread applications. The process of high order harmonic generation (HHG) in noble gases is one impressive example where intense ultra-short laser pulses are required [1

M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, “Multiple harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases,” J. Phys. B 21(3), L31 (1988). [CrossRef]

]. The emitted radiation provides laser like brilliance and coherence in the XUV wavelength range. Furthermore, attosecond pulse generation became feasible by using driving laser pulses as short as a few optical cycles [2

T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: Frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 (2000).

]. However, the photon flux in the XUV range is low, since the conversion efficiency of the HHG process is typically below 10−6. Hence, a high laser output power and repetition rate is desirable for many applications, improving signal to noise ratio and minimizing necessary detector integration times.

Another interesting application for XUV radiation, generated via HHG of a high repetition rate laser source, is seeding of a free electron laser (FEL) [3

A. Azima, J. Boedewadt, M. Drescher, H. Delsim-Hashemi, S. Khan, T. Maltezopoulos, V. Miltchev, M. Mittenzwey, J. Roßbach, R. Tarkeshian, M. Wieland, H. Schlarb, S. Duesterer, J. Feldhaus, and T. Laarmann, Experimental Layout of 30 nm High Harmonic Laser Seeding at FLASH,” Proceedings of 11th European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC'08) (2008).

]. By seeding the FEL with high order harmonics of an external infrared laser it is possible to achieve higher shot-to-shot stability and shorter pulse duration and improved coherence. Additionally, the output of the FEL is precisely synchronized with the external seed laser, thus enabling pump-probe experiments with femtosecond resolution.

The infrared laser pulses for HHG are typically delivered by Ti:Sapphire (Ti:Sa) lasers, which nowadays deliver up to 100 Gigawatt peak power pulses at repetition rates up to several kHz [4

S. Backus, J. Peatross, C. P. Huang, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “Ti:sapphire amplifier producing millijoule-level, 21-fs pulses at 1 kHz,” Opt. Lett. 20(19), 2000–2002 (1995), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-20-19-2000. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Additional post- compression, based on hollow core fibers, enabled the generation of pulses as short as 3.8 fs [5

G. Steinmeyer and G. Stibenz, “Generation of sub-4-fs pulses via compression of a white-light continuum using only chirped mirrors,” Appl. Phys. B 82(2), 175–181 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. However, due to thermo-optical effects, e.g. thermal lensing, the output power of these laser systems is limited to the Watt level. Cryogenically cooling of the Ti:Sapphire crystal helped to increase the average output powers up to 40 W [6

I. Matsushima, H. Yashiro, and T. Tomie, “10 kHz 40 W Ti:sapphire regenerative ring amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(13), 2066–2068 (2006), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-31-13-2066. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], but the cooling technique is complex and expensive. Additionally, further power scaling is limited by the required high power pump lasers with excellent beam quality.

An alternative approach to generate intense few cycle pulses is optical parametric amplification (OPA). In noncollinear geometry, which offers enormous gain bandwidth, pulses as short as 3.9 fs have been generated [7

A. Baltuška, T. Fuji, and T. Kobayashi, “Visible pulse compression to 4 fs by optical parametric amplification and programmable dispersion control,” Opt. Lett. 27(5), 306–308 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and the generation of sub-10 fs pulses at up to 1 MHz repetition rate has been reported [8

A. Steinmann, A. Killi, G. Palmer, T. Binhammer, and U. Morgner, “Generation of few-cycle pulses directly from a MHz-NOPA,” Opt. Express 14(22), 10627–10630 (2006), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-22-10627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. By combination of noncollinear optical parametric amplifier (NOPA) and the chirped pulse amplification principle (CPA) extremely powerful optical parametric chirped pulse amplification (OPCPA) few cycle laser sources have been developed [9

N. Ishii, L. Turi, V. S. Yakovlev, T. Fuji, F. Krausz, A. Baltuska, R. Butkus, G. Veitas, V. Smilgevicius, R. Danielius, and A. Piskarskas, “Multimillijoule chirped parametric amplification of few-cycle pulses,” Opt. Lett. 30(5), 567–569 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-18-8168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,10

S. Witte, R. Zinkstok, W. Hogervorst, and K. Eikema, “Generation of few-cycle terawatt light pulses using optical parametric chirped pulse amplification,” Opt. Express 13(13), 4903–4908 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-13-4903. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Due to low absorption and lack of energy storage in the nonlinear crystals, thermal lensing is negligible in these amplifiers.

Today, high power pump lasers for OPCPA are based on rare earth ions such as Nd3+ or Yb3+, which offer a very low quantum defect compared to Ti:Sa and can be pumped directly by high power laser diodes. Especially the fiber geometry, which offers a large surface to active volume ratio, provides excellent thermal properties. State of the art femtosecond fiber amplifiers are based on chirped pulse amplification and deliver pulse energies up to 1 mJ [11

F. Röser, T. Eidam, J. Rothhardt, O. Schmidt, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Millijoule pulse energy high repetition rate femtosecond fiber chirped-pulse amplification system,” Opt. Lett. 32(24), 3495–3497 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-24-3495. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and average powers up to 325 W [12

T. Eidam, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, E. Seise, T. Gottschall, J. Rothhardt, T. Schreiber, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “325W Average Power Fiber CPA System delivering sub-400fs pulses,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 187–190 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. They have been used successfully as pump for OPA and pulses as short as 29 fs [13

S. Hädrich, J. Rothhardt, F. Röser, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Degenerate optical parametric amplifier delivering sub 30 fs pulses with 2GW peak power,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19812–19820 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-24-19812. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], with a pulse peak power as high as 2 GW have been generated. Additionally an average output power as high as 4 W [14

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “500 MW peak power degenerated optical parametric amplifier delivering 52 fs pulses at 97 kHz repetition rate,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8981–8988 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-12-8981. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] has been achieved for 50 fs pulses at 100 kHz repetition rate. However, these systems are rather complex, and in particular, to achieve the high pulse energies of 1 mJ [11

F. Röser, T. Eidam, J. Rothhardt, O. Schmidt, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Millijoule pulse energy high repetition rate femtosecond fiber chirped-pulse amplification system,” Opt. Lett. 32(24), 3495–3497 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-24-3495. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], a large stretcher and compressor is needed in the pump laser to keep the accumulated nonlinear phase (measure: B-Integral) low, and therefore, to prevent pulses from nonlinear distortion. In addition, to match the broadband signal pulse duration to those of the pump pulses, a second stretcher and compressor is needed for the signal pulses.

An alternative approach is direct (unchirped) amplification of picosecond pulses without the need of large and complex CPA in the pump laser. Recently, this concept has been implemented in an OPCPA system delivering 50 fs, 16 µJ pulses, with 180 MW peak power at 80 kHz repetition rate [15

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

In this contribution we present a significantly improved, table-top OPCPA system. A schematic of the experimental setup is shown in Fig. 1 . Both the OPA and the fiber amplifier chain are seeded by a cavity dumped Ti:Sa oscillator. A two stage birefringent pulse shaper generates 460 ps long flat-top pulses, which allows us to extract 1 mJ pulses from the power amplifier. Additionally, the efficiency of second harmonic generation (SHG) and optical parametric amplification is improved, due to the uniform temporal profile. The broadband signal pulses are stretched by a Martinez type grating stretcher and parametrically amplified up to 72 µJ pulse energy in two BBO crystals. The pulse compressor consists of two dielectric transmission gratings, which provide high diffraction efficiency and high power capability. We measured a compressor throughput as high as 74% resulting in 53 µJ energy for the compressed pulses. The compressed pulse duration is 35 fs.

Fig. 1 Schematic overview of the experimental setup including the Ti:Sapphire oscillator, the pre- amplifier and spectral filter, the pulse shaper, the power amplifier, second harmonic generation (SHG), the optical parametric amplifier (OPA) and the grating stretcher and compressor.

Overall, the improved system provides a pulse peak power of 1.1 GW, which is a factor of 6 higher, than the previously reported [15

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The pulse duration is significantly reduced and the pulse energy is increased more than 3 times.

2. The pump laser

For parametric amplification, due to lack of energy storage in the nonlinear medium, synchronized pump pulses are required. They are generated by soliton formation and self frequency shift in a small-core photonic crystal fiber with enhanced nonlinearity and tailored dispersion [16

C. Teisset, N. Ishii, T. Fuji, T. Metzger, S. Köhler, R. Holzwarth, A. Baltuška, A. Zheltikov, and F. Krausz, “Soliton-based pump-seed synchronization for few-cycle OPCPA,” Opt. Express 13(17), 6550–6557 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-17-6550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 17

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “High repetition rate fiber amplifier pumped sub-20 fs optical parametric amplifier,” Opt. Express 15(25), 16729–16736 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-25-16729. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The frequency shifted pulses are directly amplified in two step-index single mode fiber pre-amplifiers, which are both operated in double pass configuration. The spectral bandwidth is reduced by fiber Bragg gratings to 15 pm resulting in transform limited 100 ps Gaussian-like pulses. The pre-amplifiers offer turn-key, stable and alignment-free operation, since all fiber components are polarization-maintaining and spliced together [15

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

To lower gain narrowing effects in the OPA, which occur for non-uniform pump pulse profiles [18

G. Arisholm, R. Paschotta, and T. Südmeyer, “Limits to the power scalability of high-gain optical parametric amplifiers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 578–590 (2004), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-21-3-578. [CrossRef]

], and to increase the efficiency of SHG and OPA, we implemented a two stage birefringent pulse shaper [19

I. Will, “Generation of flattop picosecond pulses by means of a two-stage birefringent filter,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 594(2), 119–125 (2008). [CrossRef]

], to generate a flat-top temporal pulse profile. The schematic setup of the pulse shaper is shown in Fig. 2 .

Fig. 2 Schematic setup of the two stage birefringent pulse shaper

The device is based on birefringent Yttrium Orthovanadate (YVO4) crystals. In each stage, the polarisation of the optical pulses is set 45 degrees with respect to the optical axis of the crystal. Therefore, the same part of optical power is polarized ordinary and extraordinary. At the end of each crystal the two pulse replicas experience a temporal delay and interfere at a polarizer, which is orientated 45 degrees to the optical axis and is located at the crystals output. The two stages provide 133 ps / 266 ps delay with a crystal length of 180 mm / 360 mm. Temperature control of the crystals allows for fine tuning of the relative phases of the interfering sub-pulses. The relative amplitudes of the sub-pulses are controlled by half-wave-plates, which are placed in front of each crystal set. The generated pulses consist of four sub-pulses, have a flat-top like pulse shape and 460 ps pulse duration.

These pulses are further amplified in a 1.5 m long double-clad Yb-doped photonic crystal fiber which has a mode field diameter of 33 µm. The amplifier is used in a double pass configuration while a Tellurium Dioxide (TeO2) acousto-optical modulator is used to reduce the repetition rate to 40 kHz after the first pass of the amplifier fiber. The AOM provides a modulation contrast better than 10−5, when operated in double pass. However due to the rise- and fall-time of the modulator the neighbouring pulses are suppressed by 10−2. In the second amplification pass the pulse energy is increased to 5 µJ which corresponds to an average power of 200 mW.

The power amplifier consists of a 1.2 m long Yb-doped rod type photonic crystal fiber with a mode field diameter of 71 µm, delivering up to 41.5 W of average power. It is pumped by a 976 nm fiber coupled laser diode, imaged into the 200 µm diameter pump core of the rod type fiber. The amount of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) is measured to be below 2% and unwanted pre- and post-pulses amount to 2%, hence the pulse energy of the amplified pulses is as large as 1 mJ. It is worth mentioning that even at the highest output power we could not observe significant degradation of the polarization contrast and that the amplifier is operated at a B-Integral as high as 25 rad. It has to be stressed that such a high accumulated nonlinear phase leads to severe degradation of the pulse quality in fiber CPA systems [20

J. Limpert, F. Röser, D. N. Schimpf, E. Seise, T. Eidam, S. Hadrich, J. Rothhardt, C. J. Misas, and A. Tünnermann, “High Repetition Rate Gigawatt Peak Power Fiber Laser Systems: Challenges, Design, and Experiment,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 159–169 (2009). [CrossRef]

].

In contrast, self-phase modulation only results in moderate spectral broadening in the herein presented approach. Most important, the amplified picosecond pulses are not disturbed by the nonlinear phase in the temporal domain. The measured spectral bandwidth of the amplified pulses is below 0.2 nm (FWHM), which is acceptable for efficient SHG. When focusing into a 6 mm long LBO crystal, efficient second harmonic generation is observed, resulting in up to 660 µJ pulses at 515 nm wavelength. The corresponding conversion efficiency is as high as 66%, owing to the uniform temporal pulse profile and the excellent beam quality of the fiber amplifier. The output characteristics of the fiber amplifier and the generated second harmonic are shown in Fig. 3 (a). The temporal pulse profile at 1 mJ pulse energy, measured with a fast photodiode (rise time: 18.5 ps) and a 50 GHz sampling scope, is shown in Fig. 3(b).

Fig. 3 a) Infrared output power of the fiber amplifier (red, squares), generated second harmonic power (green, triangles) and second harmonic conversion efficiency (black, circles) versus pump power of the fiber amplifier. b) Temporal pulse profile of the amplified pulses at 1mJ pulse energy.

3. Optical parametric chirped pulse amplifier

3.1 Grating stretcher

The signal pulses, delivered by the cavity dumped output of the Ti:Sa oscillator (95 nm FWHM), are stretched to match the pump pulse duration. For this purpose a Martinez-type grating stretcher is applied which is based on a dielectric transmission grating with 700 nm period used under Littrow angle. It is worth mentioning, that the material dispersion of the 5 mm thick fused silica substrate can be compensated easily at least in the 2nd and 3rd order by the compressor, and is therefore negligible even for 15 fs pulses. The stretcher provides low aberrations, e.g. no measurable spatial chirp, and a stretched pulse duration of 400 ps for 90 nm transmitted bandwidth (FWHM).

3.2 Parametric amplifiers

Suitable candidates for the nonlinear material are several crystals belonging to the borate group (BBO, LBO, BIBO). They offer a high effective nonlinear coefficient, large transparency range and high damage thresholds as well as proper phase matching conditions for broadband amplification around 800 nm central wavelength.

In [15

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] the properties of these borate crystals are discussed in detail. Especially for relatively low peak power (~MW) pump lasers BIBO is superior due to its higher nonlinear coefficient and angular acceptance. However, when pumped at 515 nm, BIBO shows two photon absorption and photo-induced damages which make these crystals unsuitable for high power operation [21

J. H. Jang, I. H. Yoon, and C. S. Yoon, “Cause and repair of optical damage in nonlinear optical crystals of BiB3O6,” Opt. Mater. 31(6), 781–783 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. For this reason we choose BBO as nonlinear material for the presented OPCPA system, even though, the single pass gain is low due to the relatively low angular acceptance of BBO. Experimentally, a single pass gain of 50 is measured for a pump pulse peak power of 1.4 MW. Hence, the first parametric amplifier (20 mm long BBO) is used in double pass configuration to achieve sufficient gain. The experimental setup of the two stage parametric amplifier is shown in Fig. 4 . When a pump intensity of 1.3 GW/cm2 is applied, the 4.4 nJ stretched signal pulses are amplified to 11 µJ in the first stage, corresponding to a gain factor of 2500.

Fig. 4 Schematic of the optical parametric amplifier

The second amplifier is an 8 mm long BBO crystal operated at 2.1 GW/cm2 pump intensity (pump beam diameter 275 µm). A single amplification pass boosts the pulse energy to 72 µJ, which corresponds to an overall pump to signal conversion efficiency of 11%. Note that the signal beam diameters in the nonlinear crystals have been chosen to be slightly larger than the pump diameters, in order to compensate for spatial gain narrowing effects during each amplification pass.

The angle between the wave vectors of signal and pump is chosen to be 2.6 ° inside the crystal to provide broadband phase matching over a large spectral range around 800 nm. The calculated gain curve for a 20 mm long BBO used in this configuration is shown in Fig. 5 a ) (grey dashed) together with the measured seed spectrum (blue dashed) and the amplified spectra for only the first OPA pumped (red) and both OPAs pumped (black). The amplified spectral bandwidth is 63 nm (FWHM), which corresponds to a Fourier limited pulse duration of 22 fs.

Fig. 5 a) Measured amplified spectra with one (red) and both (black) OPAs pumped. Blue dashed: Seed spectrum, grey dashed: calculated OPA gain curve for 20 mm BBO crystal. b) Measured Autocorrelation trace (black), and 4th order Dispersion corrected Fourier transform of the measured spectrum (grey).

3.3. Grating compressor

For recompression, the amplified pulses are sent through a grating compressor, which consists of the same type of dielectric transmission gratings used in the stretcher. These gratings provide more than 94% diffraction efficiency for a wavelength range of 760 nm to 820 nm. Experimentally a compressor throughput as large as 74% is measured, including reflection losses at a silver coated roof mirror, resulting in 53 µJ energy of the compressed pulses. The grating angles and their distance are optimized for compensation of 2nd and 3rd order dispersion to achieve the minimum compressed pulse duration. The measured autocorrelation trace is shown in Fig. 5(b) (black). For comparison a Fourier transform of the measured spectrum is shown (grey). It is corrected by 4th order dispersion to the same autocorrelation width. Both curves agree well, despite a small pre- or post- pulse which is present in the measured trace and caused by higher order phase distortions in stretcher and compressor. The assumption of 90% peak power of the corresponding numerical result (grey), leads to a pulse peak power as high as 1.1 GW for the recompressed pulses.

4. Conclusion and outlook

In this paper, we presented an OPCPA system delivering 35 fs pulses with 53 µJ pulse energy and 1.1 GW pulse peak power. The system is pumped by a fiber amplifier, operated at 40 kHz repetition rate and seeded by a cavity dumped broadband Ti:Sa oscillator.

The implementation of a two stage birefringent pulse shaper, with accurate temperature control, enables the generation of 460 ps long flat-top pulses. These pulses allow for extraction of 1 mJ pulse energy out of a rod type amplifier fiber. Additionally, the uniform temporal profile results in improved SHG and OPA efficiency.

Emphasis is also placed on average power scalability of the setup. Highly efficient dielectric transmission gratings are used in the compressor and provide significantly improved high average power capability and efficiency. The use of BBO crystals as nonlinear material avoids thermo optical distortion as well as crystal damage. The presented system currently delivers 2.1 W average power, which is among the highest for high repetition rate OPCPA systems [13

S. Hädrich, J. Rothhardt, F. Röser, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Degenerate optical parametric amplifier delivering sub 30 fs pulses with 2GW peak power,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19812–19820 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-24-19812. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 14

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “500 MW peak power degenerated optical parametric amplifier delivering 52 fs pulses at 97 kHz repetition rate,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8981–8988 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-12-8981. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In future, an increase of the average output power by up to one order of magnitude seems feasible by incorporating a several 100 W fiber amplifier [12

T. Eidam, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, E. Seise, T. Gottschall, J. Rothhardt, T. Schreiber, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “325W Average Power Fiber CPA System delivering sub-400fs pulses,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 187–190 (2009). [CrossRef]

] as pump laser and optimization of the OPCPA efficiency.

Due to a revised stretcher, which provides very low aberrations, the compressed pulse duration is reduced to 35 fs and the pulse quality is significantly improved compared to the previously reported results [15

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

Overall, the presented system provides a pulse peak power as high as 1.1 GW, which is a factor of 6 higher, than the previously reported result [15

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The pulse peak power and the pulse duration are comparable to the current record of 2 GW and 29 fs [13

S. Hädrich, J. Rothhardt, F. Röser, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Degenerate optical parametric amplifier delivering sub 30 fs pulses with 2GW peak power,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19812–19820 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-24-19812. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], which has been achieved by a fiber CPA system pumped OPCPA.

Please note that the herein presented system is less complex and easier to operate, since no stretcher and compressor is needed for the pump laser. Furthermore short free space beam paths and looser timing requirements, due to the longer pump pulse duration, lead to superior stability. In the future we plan to implement a fiber based pump pulse shaper [22

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann, M. Rothhardt, M. Becker, S. Brückner, and H. Bartelt, “Generation of flattop pump pulses for OPCPA by coherent pulse stacking with fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Express 17(18), 16332–16341 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-18-16332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] as well as a fiber coupled AOM to have a fully monolithic and alignment-free fiber preamplifier and pump pulse shaper.

The pulse energy of the presented system can be further increased by incorporating longer pump pulses, which allow for extraction of higher pump pulse energies from the fiber amplifier. The limiting nonlinear effect is self focusing, which is observed at ~4.3 MW pulse peak power for linear polarized light [23

A. V. Smith, B. T. Do, G. R. Hadley, and R. L. Farrow, “Optical Damage Limits to Pulse Energy From Fibers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 153–158 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. For example a 1 ns pulse could therefore extract more than 4 mJ pulse energy from the amplifier fiber. Additionally, the simplicity of the pump laser allows for the use of multiple amplifier fibers as pump for the OPA, which could increase the pulse energy of the amplified ultrashort pulses to several hundred microjoule. Additionally, the use of an active phase shaper for the broadband signal could reduce the compressed pulse duration of the system below 20 fs.

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) with project 03ZIK455 ’onCOOPtics’ and the Helmholtz Institute Jena. S.H. acknowledges financial support of the Carl Zeiss Stiftung Germany.

References and links

1.

M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, “Multiple harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases,” J. Phys. B 21(3), L31 (1988). [CrossRef]

2.

T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: Frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 (2000).

3.

A. Azima, J. Boedewadt, M. Drescher, H. Delsim-Hashemi, S. Khan, T. Maltezopoulos, V. Miltchev, M. Mittenzwey, J. Roßbach, R. Tarkeshian, M. Wieland, H. Schlarb, S. Duesterer, J. Feldhaus, and T. Laarmann, Experimental Layout of 30 nm High Harmonic Laser Seeding at FLASH,” Proceedings of 11th European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC'08) (2008).

4.

S. Backus, J. Peatross, C. P. Huang, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “Ti:sapphire amplifier producing millijoule-level, 21-fs pulses at 1 kHz,” Opt. Lett. 20(19), 2000–2002 (1995), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-20-19-2000. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

G. Steinmeyer and G. Stibenz, “Generation of sub-4-fs pulses via compression of a white-light continuum using only chirped mirrors,” Appl. Phys. B 82(2), 175–181 (2006). [CrossRef]

6.

I. Matsushima, H. Yashiro, and T. Tomie, “10 kHz 40 W Ti:sapphire regenerative ring amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(13), 2066–2068 (2006), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-31-13-2066. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

A. Baltuška, T. Fuji, and T. Kobayashi, “Visible pulse compression to 4 fs by optical parametric amplification and programmable dispersion control,” Opt. Lett. 27(5), 306–308 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

A. Steinmann, A. Killi, G. Palmer, T. Binhammer, and U. Morgner, “Generation of few-cycle pulses directly from a MHz-NOPA,” Opt. Express 14(22), 10627–10630 (2006), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-22-10627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

N. Ishii, L. Turi, V. S. Yakovlev, T. Fuji, F. Krausz, A. Baltuska, R. Butkus, G. Veitas, V. Smilgevicius, R. Danielius, and A. Piskarskas, “Multimillijoule chirped parametric amplification of few-cycle pulses,” Opt. Lett. 30(5), 567–569 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-18-8168. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

S. Witte, R. Zinkstok, W. Hogervorst, and K. Eikema, “Generation of few-cycle terawatt light pulses using optical parametric chirped pulse amplification,” Opt. Express 13(13), 4903–4908 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-13-4903. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

F. Röser, T. Eidam, J. Rothhardt, O. Schmidt, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Millijoule pulse energy high repetition rate femtosecond fiber chirped-pulse amplification system,” Opt. Lett. 32(24), 3495–3497 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-24-3495. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

T. Eidam, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, E. Seise, T. Gottschall, J. Rothhardt, T. Schreiber, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “325W Average Power Fiber CPA System delivering sub-400fs pulses,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 187–190 (2009). [CrossRef]

13.

S. Hädrich, J. Rothhardt, F. Röser, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Degenerate optical parametric amplifier delivering sub 30 fs pulses with 2GW peak power,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19812–19820 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-24-19812. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “500 MW peak power degenerated optical parametric amplifier delivering 52 fs pulses at 97 kHz repetition rate,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8981–8988 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-12-8981. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

C. Teisset, N. Ishii, T. Fuji, T. Metzger, S. Köhler, R. Holzwarth, A. Baltuška, A. Zheltikov, and F. Krausz, “Soliton-based pump-seed synchronization for few-cycle OPCPA,” Opt. Express 13(17), 6550–6557 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-17-6550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

17.

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “High repetition rate fiber amplifier pumped sub-20 fs optical parametric amplifier,” Opt. Express 15(25), 16729–16736 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-25-16729. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

18.

G. Arisholm, R. Paschotta, and T. Südmeyer, “Limits to the power scalability of high-gain optical parametric amplifiers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 578–590 (2004), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-21-3-578. [CrossRef]

19.

I. Will, “Generation of flattop picosecond pulses by means of a two-stage birefringent filter,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 594(2), 119–125 (2008). [CrossRef]

20.

J. Limpert, F. Röser, D. N. Schimpf, E. Seise, T. Eidam, S. Hadrich, J. Rothhardt, C. J. Misas, and A. Tünnermann, “High Repetition Rate Gigawatt Peak Power Fiber Laser Systems: Challenges, Design, and Experiment,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 159–169 (2009). [CrossRef]

21.

J. H. Jang, I. H. Yoon, and C. S. Yoon, “Cause and repair of optical damage in nonlinear optical crystals of BiB3O6,” Opt. Mater. 31(6), 781–783 (2009). [CrossRef]

22.

J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann, M. Rothhardt, M. Becker, S. Brückner, and H. Bartelt, “Generation of flattop pump pulses for OPCPA by coherent pulse stacking with fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Express 17(18), 16332–16341 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-18-16332. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

23.

A. V. Smith, B. T. Do, G. R. Hadley, and R. L. Farrow, “Optical Damage Limits to Pulse Energy From Fibers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 153–158 (2009). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(140.3510) Lasers and laser optics : Lasers, fiber
(140.7090) Lasers and laser optics : Ultrafast lasers
(190.4970) Nonlinear optics : Parametric oscillators and amplifiers

ToC Category:
Lasers and Laser Optics

History
Original Manuscript: October 21, 2009
Revised Manuscript: November 24, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: November 24, 2009
Published: December 17, 2009

Citation
J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, T. Gottschall, T. Clausnitzer, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, "Compact fiber amplifier pumped OPCPA system delivering Gigawatt peak power 35 fs pulses," Opt. Express 17, 24130-24136 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-26-24130


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, “Multiple harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases,” J. Phys. B 21(3), L31 (1988). [CrossRef]
  2. T. Brabec and F. Krausz, “Intense few-cycle laser fields: Frontiers of nonlinear optics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72 (2000).
  3. A. Azima, J. Boedewadt, M. Drescher, H. Delsim-Hashemi, S. Khan, T. Maltezopoulos, V. Miltchev, M. Mittenzwey, J. Roßbach, R. Tarkeshian, M. Wieland, H. Schlarb, S. Duesterer, J. Feldhaus, and T. Laarmann, Experimental Layout of 30 nm High Harmonic Laser Seeding at FLASH,” Proceedings of 11th European Particle Accelerator Conference (EPAC'08) (2008).
  4. S. Backus, J. Peatross, C. P. Huang, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “Ti:sapphire amplifier producing millijoule-level, 21-fs pulses at 1 kHz,” Opt. Lett. 20(19), 2000–2002 (1995), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-20-19-2000 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. G. Steinmeyer and G. Stibenz, “Generation of sub-4-fs pulses via compression of a white-light continuum using only chirped mirrors,” Appl. Phys. B 82(2), 175–181 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. I. Matsushima, H. Yashiro, and T. Tomie, “10 kHz 40 W Ti:sapphire regenerative ring amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(13), 2066–2068 (2006), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-31-13-2066 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. A. Baltuška, T. Fuji, and T. Kobayashi, “Visible pulse compression to 4 fs by optical parametric amplification and programmable dispersion control,” Opt. Lett. 27(5), 306–308 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. A. Steinmann, A. Killi, G. Palmer, T. Binhammer, and U. Morgner, “Generation of few-cycle pulses directly from a MHz-NOPA,” Opt. Express 14(22), 10627–10630 (2006), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-22-10627 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. N. Ishii, L. Turi, V. S. Yakovlev, T. Fuji, F. Krausz, A. Baltuska, R. Butkus, G. Veitas, V. Smilgevicius, R. Danielius, and A. Piskarskas, “Multimillijoule chirped parametric amplification of few-cycle pulses,” Opt. Lett. 30(5), 567–569 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-18-8168 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. S. Witte, R. Zinkstok, W. Hogervorst, and K. Eikema, “Generation of few-cycle terawatt light pulses using optical parametric chirped pulse amplification,” Opt. Express 13(13), 4903–4908 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-13-4903 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. F. Röser, T. Eidam, J. Rothhardt, O. Schmidt, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Millijoule pulse energy high repetition rate femtosecond fiber chirped-pulse amplification system,” Opt. Lett. 32(24), 3495–3497 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-24-3495 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. T. Eidam, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, E. Seise, T. Gottschall, J. Rothhardt, T. Schreiber, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “325W Average Power Fiber CPA System delivering sub-400fs pulses,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 187–190 (2009). [CrossRef]
  13. S. Hädrich, J. Rothhardt, F. Röser, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Degenerate optical parametric amplifier delivering sub 30 fs pulses with 2GW peak power,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19812–19820 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-24-19812 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, F. Röser, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “500 MW peak power degenerated optical parametric amplifier delivering 52 fs pulses at 97 kHz repetition rate,” Opt. Express 16(12), 8981–8988 (2008), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-16-12-8981 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “80 kHz repetition rate high power fiber amplifier flat-top pulse pumped OPCPA based on BIB3O6,” Opt. Express 17(4), 2508–2517 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-4-2508 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. C. Teisset, N. Ishii, T. Fuji, T. Metzger, S. Köhler, R. Holzwarth, A. Baltuška, A. Zheltikov, and F. Krausz, “Soliton-based pump-seed synchronization for few-cycle OPCPA,” Opt. Express 13(17), 6550–6557 (2005), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-17-6550 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, D. N. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “High repetition rate fiber amplifier pumped sub-20 fs optical parametric amplifier,” Opt. Express 15(25), 16729–16736 (2007), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-15-25-16729 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. G. Arisholm, R. Paschotta, and T. Südmeyer, “Limits to the power scalability of high-gain optical parametric amplifiers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 578–590 (2004), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-21-3-578 . [CrossRef]
  19. I. Will, “Generation of flattop picosecond pulses by means of a two-stage birefringent filter,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. A 594(2), 119–125 (2008). [CrossRef]
  20. J. Limpert, F. Röser, D. N. Schimpf, E. Seise, T. Eidam, S. Hadrich, J. Rothhardt, C. J. Misas, and A. Tünnermann, “High Repetition Rate Gigawatt Peak Power Fiber Laser Systems: Challenges, Design, and Experiment,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 159–169 (2009). [CrossRef]
  21. J. H. Jang, I. H. Yoon, and C. S. Yoon, “Cause and repair of optical damage in nonlinear optical crystals of BiB3O6,” Opt. Mater. 31(6), 781–783 (2009). [CrossRef]
  22. J. Rothhardt, S. Hädrich, T. Gottschall, J. Limpert, A. Tünnermann, M. Rothhardt, M. Becker, S. Brückner, and H. Bartelt, “Generation of flattop pump pulses for OPCPA by coherent pulse stacking with fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Express 17(18), 16332–16341 (2009), http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-18-16332 . [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. A. V. Smith, B. T. Do, G. R. Hadley, and R. L. Farrow, “Optical Damage Limits to Pulse Energy From Fibers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 15(1), 153–158 (2009). [CrossRef]

Cited By

 Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited