OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 17, Iss. 3 — Feb. 2, 2009
  • pp: 1806–1816
« Show journal navigation

Theoretical investigation of the transverse optical force between a silicon nanowire waveguide and a substrate

W.H.P. Pernice, Mo Li, and H.X. Tang  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 17, Issue 3, pp. 1806-1816 (2009)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.001806


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2689 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present a study of transverse optical forces arising in a freestanding silicon nanowire waveguide. A theoretical framework is provided for the calculation of the optical forces existing between a waveguide and a dielectric substrate. The force is evaluated using a numerical procedure based on finite-element simulations. In addition, an analytical formalism is developed which allows for a simple approximate analysis of the problem. We find that in this configuration optical forces on the order of pN can be obtained, sufficient to actuate nano-mechanical devices.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

With recent advances in the fabrication of nano-sized devices [1

01. S. S. Verbridge, H. G. Craighead, and J. M. Parpia, “A megahertz nanomechanical resonator with room temperature quality factor over a million,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 3112–3114 (2008). [CrossRef]

], optical effects that are too small to have a measurable impact on a macroscopic scale are attracting increasing interest. Among these is the optical force exerted by photons that arises when structures are illuminated by electromagnetic radiation. So far, past research has focussed primarily on the optical force that is a result of momentum transfer from photons to matter, the so-called radiation pressure [2–8

2. T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala, “Cavity Opto-Mechanics,” Opt. Express 15, 17,172–17,205 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Radiation pressure is a force normal to the device surface and thus usually requires reflective mirrors to be significant. However, an alternative lateral force has also been recently predicted by Povinelli [9

9. M. L. Povinelli, M. Loncar, M. Ibanescu, E. J. Smythe, S. G. Johnson, F. Capasso, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Evanescent-wave bonding between optical waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 3042–3044 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 10

10. M. Povinelli, S. Johnson, M. Lonèar, M. Ibanescu, E. Smythe, F. Capasso, and J. Joannopoulos, “High-Q enhancement of attractive and repulsive optical forces between coupled whispering-gallery- mode resonators,” Opt. Express 13, 8286–8295 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] in a coupled waveguide system, by Rakich et al. for coupled ring resonators [11

11. P. T. Rakich, M. A. Popovic, M. Soljacic, and E. P. Ippen, “Trapping, corralling and spectral bonding of optical resonances through optically induced potentials,” Nature Photonics 1, 658–665 (2007). [CrossRef]

] and Taniyama et al. for coupled photonic crystal cavities [12

12. H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, T. Yamamoto, Y. Yoshikawa, Y. Torii, and T. Kuga, “Strong radiation force induced in two-dimensional photonic crystal slab cavities,” Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics) 78, 165,129 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. This force can show either attractive or repulsive behavior depending on the supermode excited in the waveguides. The physical origin of this optical force lies in the excitation of optical dipoles in dielectric media when radiation is applied. This was also confirmed experimentally by [13

13. M. Eichenfield, C. P. Michael, R. Perahia, and O. Painter, “Actuation of micro-optomechanical systems via cavity-enhanced optical dipole forces,” Nature Photonics 1, 416–422 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. As a consequence the magnitude of the force is proportional to the dipole strength and therefore to the intensity of the radiation.

Recently, we have experimentally demonstrated the transverse optical force in an integrated photonic circuit [14

14. M. Li, W. H. P. Pernice, C. Xiong, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, and H. X. Tang, “Harnessing optical forces in integrated photonic circuits,” Nature 456, 480–484 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The optical force was utilized to actuate a nano-mechanical beam clamped between two multi-mode interference couplers. This setup provides a very generic platform for the actuation of nano-mechanical devices. For optimization of future devices it is thus essential to develop an accurate model of the origin of the transverse optical force.

Here we provide a detailed analysis of optical forces arising in this general geometry. We calculate the transverse force between a silicon nano-wire and a dielectric substrate. We show that at moderate laser powers considerable optical forces are obtainable. The force values are calculated numerically using the finite element method and are also confirmed by applying an analytical approach based on the Maxwell stress tensor. A phenomenological model is presented that puts the substrate-coupled force into the context of coupled waveguides.

2. Numerical calculation of the optical force

In order to determine the magnitude of the transverse optical force we apply two separate approaches. First we deduce the force from finite element simulations. In a second approach we develop an analytical model and determine the force as a function of gap from the evaluation of the Maxwell stress tensor. The two approaches show good agreement and thus provide physical insight into this novel optical force generation mechanism.

2.1. The effective index method

In this article we consider a structure as presented in Fig. 1(a). A silicon waveguide of 500 nm width is realized on a SOI wafer. The thickness of the waveguiding silicon layer is 110 nm and the silicon layer is separated from the bulk silicon wafer by a silicon dioxide layer of 3 μm thickness. A freestanding waveguide is created by etching into the silicon oxide layer, thus removing the dielectric material under the waveguide.

Fig. 1. Illustration of the device. a) Render view of the freestanding silicon waveguide suspended over a SiO 2 substrate. Overlaid in color is the mode pattern of a propagating wave with a wavelength of 1.55 μm. The nano-mechanical resonator is released by removing the oxide under the silicon waveguide by isotropic etching. b) A cross section view of the device in the center of the groove detailing the dimensions used in the force calculations.

In order to evaluate the optical force with the finite element method we consider a cross section of the waveguide as shown in Fig.1(b). The fundamental mode of the waveguide is excited in TE polarization. Neglecting scattering losses, the fundamental mode will propagate along the beam without changing its profile. Therefore the investigation of a two-dimensional cross-section is a valid simplification. The waveguide is separated from the substrate by a gap of size g. When the waveguide is brought closer to the substrate, the waveguide mode will be coupled evanescently to the dielectric. With decreasing gap, the propagation constant of the fundamental mode decreases. This is demonstrated in the dispersion diagram obtained from the finite-element simulations as shown in Fig.2(a). Above cut-off, the dispersion curves corresponding to varying gap sizes show a local maximum before converging towards the propagation constant of the free waveguide. From the dispersion diagram we are able to derive the optical force, which acts on the waveguide. Following Povinelli [9

9. M. L. Povinelli, M. Loncar, M. Ibanescu, E. J. Smythe, S. G. Johnson, F. Capasso, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Evanescent-wave bonding between optical waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 3042–3044 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] we calculate the optical forces by considering the frequency shift of the optical mode with decreasing gap distance as

F=1ωωgU
(1)

F=1neffneffgU
(2)

Assuming that the energy on the beam is given by U = PLng/c, where P is the optical power, L is the length of the beam and ng is the group index of the mode, we get the optical force normalized to length and power as

Fig. 2. Illustration of the device. a) The dispersion relation of the device in Fig 1(a) obtained from finite-element calculations. b) The optical force calculated from the dispersion relation using Eq.(3). The force is normalized to optical power and beam length and thus given in pN/μm/mW.
Fn=ngcneffneffg
(3)

The results are presented in Fig.2(b).The force is plotted as a function of the normalized wavevector kn = k 0 w/2π, where k 0 is the free space wave vector. From the negative sign it is apparent, that the force is attractive, thus pulling the beam towards the substrate. When the gap size is zero, the force reaches its maximum value of ≈ 13 pN/μm/mW. It decreases mono-tonically towards zero, when the gap is increased towards infinity. Based on the calculations, we find a typical strength of the force on the order of pN when assuming device dimensions in the micrometer range. Therefore given the high sensitivity and small mass of the free standing waveguide [14

14. M. Li, W. H. P. Pernice, C. Xiong, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, and H. X. Tang, “Harnessing optical forces in integrated photonic circuits,” Nature 456, 480–484 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 15

15. D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. Mamin, and B. Chui, “Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy,” Nature 430, 329–332 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] this force value is significant for the actuation the nanomechanical motion of the waveguide [16

16. K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes, “Nanoelectromechanical systems,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 061,101 (2005). [CrossRef]

].

2.2. Image waveguide approximation

In addition to the numerical method outlined above, the optical force between the waveguide and the substrate can be approximated by considering the force existing between two coupled waveguides. This approach is motivated from the well-known method of mirror charges in electrostatics which is used to determine the electrical field distribution of a charged object with respect to a metal surface [17

17. J. D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics (J.Wiley and sons, New York, 1975).

]. In analogy, we therefore calculate the optical force between two identical silicon nano-wires separated by a distance 2g. Here we essentially look at the interaction between the dipoles in the waveguide and their image dipoles induced by the dielectric substrate. We restrict ourselves to the symmetric mode and thus solve for the attractive lateral force. The concept is illustrated in Fig.2.2. The calculation is carried out as described by Povinelli and as elucidated in the preceding section. The force between coupled waveguides depends on the gap size in a fashion similar to the results in Fig.2(b). It is stronger than the force to the substrate, because the waveguides are assumed to be surrounded by air. To take the effect of the substrate into account, we introduce a shielding factor α into Eq.(3) as

Fig. 3. The optical force acting on the waveguide can be understood in analogy to the concept of a mirror charge in electro-statics. An image waveguide is assumed to be present on the other side of the substrate-air interface. The symmetric mode of the coupled waveguides is the origin of the attractive optical force.
Fcoupled=αngcneffneffg
(4)

This factor is used as a fitting parameter to match the force obtained for the coupled waveguide setup to the values obtained with Eq.(3). It accounts for the fact, that the optical path in the dielectric substrate is different from the free-space solution and thus the mode pattern in the substrate differs from the mode of the free waveguide. The results are shown in Fig.2.2. For the above device we use a shielding factor of 0.65. The two methods are in good agreement, when the gap values are sufficiently large, so that the coupling between waveguide and substrate is weak. In the regime of strong mode coupling the agreement breaks down as would also be expected for coupled-mode theories. However, the shielding factor is only an empirical number, thus the analogy considered in this section is not intended as an alternative formulation. Rather, we attempt to provide the reader with an phenomenological model that elucidates the origin of the force and provides further physical insights.

Fig. 4. The optical force calculated using Eq.(4) with a shielding factor of 0.65. These results agree well when the gap values are large enough, that the coupling between the waveguide and the substrate is weak.

3. A one-dimensional analytical method for determination of the optical force

In order to calculate the force resulting from the asymmetry of the field distribution in the waveguide, we perform the following steps: i) The waveguide mode is assumed to be excited in TE-polarization and is propagating as a plane wave along the z-direction. For this configuration the modes are obtained with their corresponding propagation constant. The propagation constant is the solution of a transcendental Eq., so an explicit solution is not available. Therefore an approximate solution is obtained to express the effective index as a function of distance between the waveguide and the substrate. ii) The optical force is then calculated by integrating over the Maxwell stress tensor in the gap between waveguide and substrate.

3.1. Calculation of the electrical fields

The silicon waveguide of width h with a refractive index nc of 3.5 is embedded in a host material with na of 1.0. The waveguide is separated from the substrate with a refractive index ns of 1.5 by a distance g. The slab is assumed to extend infinitely in the x and z directions. In this configuration the electric and magnetic fields are given by

E(r,t)=E(y)ei(ωtβz)
(5)
H(r,t)=H(y)ei(ωtβz)
(6)

For TE polarization, the components Ey, Ez and Hx are 0 and therefore the field vector is given as

ψ={1,βωμiωμ}TEx
(7)

where T denotes the matrix transpose. Using the freespace wavevector k=2πλ we define the following wavevectors corresponding to the three different material regions as

ks=β2k2ns2
(8)
ka=β2k2na2
(9)
kc=k2nc2β2
(10)

Then the x component of the electric field can be expressed as

Ex=A{a1eksyy<0a2ekay+a3ekay0y<gcos(kc(yg)+ϕ)gy<g+ha4eka(ygh)yg+h
(11)

The coefficients ai in above Eq. are obtained by requiring the impedance ExHz to be continuous throughout the domain. Solving for ϕ leads to the dispersion relation for the structure as

kch=tan1(kakc)+tan1(ka2sinh(kag)+kakscosh(kag)kskcsinh(kag)+kckacosh(kag))mπ
(12)

where m is the mode number of the waveguide. Above Eq. does not have an analytical solution, so the values of β corresponding to a given wavelength have to be obtained numerically.

Solving for the field amplitudes gives the following expressions for the coefficients ai

a1=2a3kaka+ksa2=a3kakska+ks
(13)
a3=ka+ks2Ma4=kcka2+ks2
(14)

where we used the following expression for M

M=(kakc)2[kasinh(kag)+kscosh(kag)]2+[kssinh(kag)+kacosh(kag)]2

The above relations fully characterize the electromagnetic fields in the slab waveguide. In order to obtain the mode profiles for a given gap value, we thus need to solve the transcendental dispersion relation and can calculate the fields subsequently. This will still involve a numerical tool, therefore we derive an approximate solution to Eq.(12) in the following section.

3.2. Approximation of the propagation constant

Because an analytical solution to the transcendental Eq. for the propagation constant does not exist, we look instead for an approximate expression of the form

β(g)=β0+β1eσg
(15)

where β 0 is the propagation constant of the free waveguide. For small values of g we can introduce the following approximations

kaαa+β0β1αaeσg
(16)
ksαs+β0β1αseσg
(17)
kcαcβ0β1αceσg
(18)

where the wavevectors for the free waveguide are given as

αa=β02k2na2
(19)
αs=β02k2ns2
(20)
αc=k2ns2β02
(21)

We rewrite the Eq. for the dispersion relation as follows

tan(kch)=kakc1+Q1(kakc)2Q
(22)

where Q is defined as

Q=kasinh(kag)+kscosh(kag)kssinh(kag)+kacosh(kag)
(23)

First we determine the amplitude β 1 by solving the above Eq. for g = 0. Since we assume β 0 to be much larger than β1, we can use

tan(kch)tan(αc)P
(24)

and Q(g=0)=kakc. We then need to solve the following Eq.

(Phαcβ0β1)(1(kakc)2kska)kakc(1+kska)(1+Phαcβ0β1)=0
(25)

After some lengthy but straightforward algebra we arrive at the following cubic Eq. for the amplitude β 1

[Phαc2(1αs+1αa)hαc(1αc2+1αaαs)]β03β13
+[P(1αc2+1αaαs)+hαc(2+αsαa+αaαs)
+1αc+(1αs+1αa)Phαc(αcαs+αcαaαsαcαaαc)]β02β12
[P(2+αsαa+αaαs)+hαc(αc2αsαa)+Ph(αa+αs)+(αcαs+αxαaαsαcαaαc)]β0β1
+[P(αc2αsαa)αc(αs+αa)]=0

The standard formula for the roots of a cubic polynomial can be applied to obtain the correct solution for the amplitude. In order to obtain the exponential factor σ of the approximation, we first determine the value for the gap at which the propagation constant has a value of β(g)=β0+β12 which is equivalent to requiring that σg = ln(2). Then we use this value in the transcendental Eq. and find for σ the following expression:

σ=2kaIn(2)In{P(kaks)(ka2+kc2)(ka+ks)(ka2kc2)P+2kakc}
(26)

Thus the effective index is given as

neff(g)=k(β0+β1eσg)=n0+n1eσg
(27)

The results of the above approximation are shown in Fig.5. Both the approximate solution and the direct solution of the transcendental dispersion Eq. are displayed. Good agreement is found between the two for the gap values of interest. Thus approximation of neff with the simple exponential decay from Eq.(27) is a valid simplification.

Fig. 5. Comparison of the approximate solution for the effective index and the numerical solution of the dispersion Eq. for the effective index. The approximation of neff with the exponential decay from Eq.(27) is very close to the direct solution of Eq.(12).

3.3. Calculation of the optical force using the Maxwell stress tensor

Using the above Eq.s we are now able to calculate the optical force. This is achieved by evaluating the Maxwell stress tensor in the gap between waveguide and substrate. The relevant component of the stress tensor is the Tyy value. This is given for TE polarization as

Tyy=ε04{Ex2+c2μ2(Hz2Hy2)}
(28)
=ε04{Ex2(1β2k2)+1k2yEx2}
(29)

Evaluating the above Eq. in the host material with a refractive index of 1.0 we find that the stress tensor is 0 outside the waveguide because

Tyy=ε04Ex2(1na2)
(30)

Therefore we only need to consider Tyy in the gap to calculate the optical force. This leads to the following expression:

Foptical=Tyy=ε0M2A2(k2β2)(ns2na2)
(31)

Calculating the optical force therefore requires knowledge of the field amplitude. We can use the expression derived earlier in Eq.(13) and Eq.(14). However, in the derivation it was assumed that the optical power is applied over the complete slab, which is not the case. Hence we can alternatively use the standard Eq. for the field amplitude of a plane wave with optical power P. The field amplitude is then given as A=2PAwgcnε0, where Awg is the mode area of the waveguide. In order to compare the analytical solution for the slab with simulation results for the cross section of a real waveguide we need to adjust the analytical formula to take the two-dimensionality of the geometry into account. This is done by defining an effective width of the waveguide slab in the 1d model. This effective width is driven by the fact, that the 1d field amplitude will only correspond to the mode pattern in the 2d waveguide in the center. Further away from the center, the mode pattern is concentrated in a smaller area. Therefore we define the effective width of the 1d slab as

weff=hAwg(Eywg)2dxdyAwg(Eyanalytical)2dxdy
(32)

Using Eq.s to approximate the optical force. A comparison of the force calculated with the above expression and the effective index method for the 2d cross section is shown in Fig.6. When using the effective width approach, good agreement is obtained between the effective index method and the analytical model. Therefore, the one-dimensional model can be used as a good approximation to the complex two-dimensional case.

Fig. 6. The calculated force in comparison with the effective index method. When the effective width is used in the calculations (red markers), both methods are in good agreement. Strong deviations are found when the actual width of 110 nm is used in the analytical expressions.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have presented a numerical and analytical analysis of the transverse optical force in silicon nanowire waveguides. The force arising from evanescent coupling between the wire waveguide and a dielectric substrate is on the order of pN/μm/mW and thus large enough to efficiently actuate nanoscale devices. We have used a numerical approach to deduce the force from finite-element calculations and also formulated an approximate analytical formulation. Results from both calculations are in good agreement. For larger gap values, the comparison with the coupled-waveguide system shows good agreement, when an empirical correction factor is introduced.

Acknowledgement

W.H.P. Pernice gratefully acknowledges the support of the Alexander-von-Humboldt foundation through a postdoctoral fellowship. H.X. Tang acknowledges a young faculty startup grant from Yale University.

References and links

01.

S. S. Verbridge, H. G. Craighead, and J. M. Parpia, “A megahertz nanomechanical resonator with room temperature quality factor over a million,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 3112–3114 (2008). [CrossRef]

2.

T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala, “Cavity Opto-Mechanics,” Opt. Express 15, 17,172–17,205 (2007). [CrossRef]

3.

H. Rokhsari, T. Kippenberg, T. Carmon, and K. Vahala, “Radiation-pressure-driven micro-mechanical oscillator,” Opt. Express 13, 5293–5301 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

B. Kemp, T. Grzegorczyk, and J. Kong, “Ab initio study of the radiation pressure on dielectric and magnetic media,” Opt. Express 13, 9280–9291 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

M. Mansuripur, “Radiation pressure and the linear momentum of light in dispersive dielectric media,” Opt. Express 13, 2245–2250 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6.

J. P. Gordon, “Radiation Forces and Momenta in Dielectric Media,” Phys. Rev. A 8, 14–21 (1973). [CrossRef]

7.

M. Mansuripur, “Radiation pressure and the linear momentum of the electromagnetic field,” Opt. Express 12, 5375–5401 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

R. Loudon and S. M. Barnett, “Theory of the radiation pressure on dielectric slabs, prisms and single surfaces,” Opt. Express 14, 11,855–11,869 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

M. L. Povinelli, M. Loncar, M. Ibanescu, E. J. Smythe, S. G. Johnson, F. Capasso, and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Evanescent-wave bonding between optical waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30, 3042–3044 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

M. Povinelli, S. Johnson, M. Lonèar, M. Ibanescu, E. Smythe, F. Capasso, and J. Joannopoulos, “High-Q enhancement of attractive and repulsive optical forces between coupled whispering-gallery- mode resonators,” Opt. Express 13, 8286–8295 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

P. T. Rakich, M. A. Popovic, M. Soljacic, and E. P. Ippen, “Trapping, corralling and spectral bonding of optical resonances through optically induced potentials,” Nature Photonics 1, 658–665 (2007). [CrossRef]

12.

H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, T. Yamamoto, Y. Yoshikawa, Y. Torii, and T. Kuga, “Strong radiation force induced in two-dimensional photonic crystal slab cavities,” Physical Review B (Condensed Matter and Materials Physics) 78, 165,129 (2008). [CrossRef]

13.

M. Eichenfield, C. P. Michael, R. Perahia, and O. Painter, “Actuation of micro-optomechanical systems via cavity-enhanced optical dipole forces,” Nature Photonics 1, 416–422 (2007). [CrossRef]

14.

M. Li, W. H. P. Pernice, C. Xiong, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, and H. X. Tang, “Harnessing optical forces in integrated photonic circuits,” Nature 456, 480–484 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. Mamin, and B. Chui, “Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy,” Nature 430, 329–332 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16.

K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes, “Nanoelectromechanical systems,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 061,101 (2005). [CrossRef]

17.

J. D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics (J.Wiley and sons, New York, 1975).

18.

F. Riboli, A. Recati, M. Antezza, and I. Carusotto, “Radiation induced force between two planar waveguides,” European Physical Journal D 46, 157–164 (2008). [CrossRef]

19.

E. A. J. Marcatili, “Dielectric rectangular waveguide and directional coupler for integrated optics,” Bell Syst. Tech. J. 48, 2071–2102 (1969).

20.

A. Kumar, K. Thyagarajan, and A. K. Ghatak, “Analysis of rectangular-core dielectric waveguides: an accurate perturbation approach,” Opt. Lett. 8, 63–65 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

21.

P. Yeh and H. F. Taylor, “Contradirectional frequency-selective couplers for guided-wave optics,” Appl. Opt. 19, 2848–2855 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

OCIS Codes
(000.4430) General : Numerical approximation and analysis
(230.4685) Optical devices : Optical microelectromechanical devices

ToC Category:
Physical Optics

History
Original Manuscript: October 28, 2008
Revised Manuscript: January 26, 2009
Manuscript Accepted: January 27, 2009
Published: January 29, 2009

Citation
W. H. P. Pernice, Mo Li, and H. X. Tang, "Theoretical investigation of the transverse optical force between a silicon nanowire waveguide and a substrate," Opt. Express 17, 1806-1816 (2009)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-17-3-1806


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. S. S. Verbridge, H. G. Craighead, and J. M. Parpia, "A megahertz nanomechanical resonator with room temperature quality factor over a million," Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 3112-3114 (2008). [CrossRef]
  2. T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala, "Cavity Opto-Mechanics," Opt. Express 15, 17,172-17,205 (2007). [CrossRef]
  3. H. Rokhsari, T. Kippenberg, T. Carmon, and K. Vahala, "Radiation-pressure-driven micro-mechanical oscillator," Opt. Express 13, 5293-5301 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. B. Kemp, T. Grzegorczyk, and J. Kong, "Ab initio study of the radiation pressure on dielectric and magnetic media," Opt. Express 13, 9280-9291 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. M. Mansuripur, "Radiation pressure and the linear momentum of light in dispersive dielectric media," Opt. Express 13, 2245-2250 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. J. P. Gordon, "Radiation Forces and Momenta in Dielectric Media," Phys. Rev. A 8, 14-21 (1973). [CrossRef]
  7. M. Mansuripur, "Radiation pressure and the linear momentum of the electromagnetic field," Opt. Express 12, 5375-5401 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. R. Loudon and S. M. Barnett, "Theory of the radiation pressure on dielectric slabs, prisms and single surfaces," Opt. Express 14, 11,855-11,869 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. M. L. Povinelli, M. Loncar, M. Ibanescu, E. J. Smythe, S. G. Johnson, F. Capasso, and J. D. Joannopoulos, "Evanescent-wave bonding between optical waveguides," Opt. Lett. 30, 3042-3044 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. M. Povinelli, S. Johnson, M. Lonèar, M. Ibanescu, E. Smythe, F. Capasso, and J. Joannopoulos, "High-Q enhancement of attractive and repulsive optical forces between coupled whispering-gallery- mode resonators," Opt. Express 13, 8286-8295 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. P. T. Rakich, M. A. Popovic, M. Soljacic, and E. P. Ippen, "Trapping, corralling and spectral bonding of optical resonances through optically induced potentials," Nat. Photonics 1, 658 -665 (2007). [CrossRef]
  12. H. Taniyama, M. Notomi, E. Kuramochi, T. Yamamoto, Y. Yoshikawa, Y. Torii, and T. Kuga, "Strong radiation force induced in two-dimensional photonic crystal slab cavities," Phys. Rev. B 78, 165,129 (2008). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Eichenfield, C. P. Michael, R. Perahia, and O. Painter, "Actuation of micro-optomechanical systems via cavity-enhanced optical dipole forces," Nat. Photonics 1, 416-422 (2007). [CrossRef]
  14. M. Li, W. H. P. Pernice, C. Xiong, T. Baehr-Jones, M. Hochberg, and H. X. Tang, "Harnessing optical forces in integrated photonic circuits," Nature 456, 480-484 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. D. Rugar, R. Budakian, H. Mamin, and B. Chui, "Single spin detection by magnetic resonance force microscopy," Nature 430, 329-332 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. K. L. Ekinci and M. L. Roukes, "Nanoelectromechanical systems," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 061,101 (2005). [CrossRef]
  17. J. D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics, (J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975).
  18. F. Riboli, A. Recati, M. Antezza, and I. Carusotto, "Radiation induced force between two planar waveguides," Eur. Phys. J. D 46, 157-164 (2008). [CrossRef]
  19. E. A. J. Marcatili, "Dielectric rectangular waveguide and directional coupler for integrated optics," Bell Syst. Tech. J. 48, 2071-2102 (1969).
  20. A. Kumar, K. Thyagarajan, and A. K. Ghatak, "Analysis of rectangular-core dielectric waveguides: an accurate perturbation approach," Opt. Lett. 8, 63-65 (1983). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. P. Yeh and H. F. Taylor, "Contradirectional frequency-selective couplers for guided-wave optics," Appl. Opt. 19, 2848-2855 (1980). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited