OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 18, Iss. 19 — Sep. 13, 2010
  • pp: 20072–20085
« Show journal navigation

Ultrawideband doublet pulse generation based on nonlinear polarization rotation of an elliptically polarized beam and its distribution over a fiber/wireless link

You Min Chang, Junsu Lee, and Ju Han Lee  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 18, Issue 19, pp. 20072-20085 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.020072


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (2543 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

Proposed herein is an alternative photonic scheme for the generation of a doublet UWB pulse, which is based on the nonlinear polarization rotation of an elliptically polarized probe beam. The proposed scheme is a modified optical-fiber Kerr shutter that uses an elliptically polarized probe beam together with a linearly polarized control beam. Through theoretical analysis, it was shown that the optical-fiber-based Kerr shutter is capable of producing an ideal transfer function for the successful conversion of input Gaussian pulses into doublet pulses under special elliptical polarization states of the probe beam. An experimental verification was subsequently carried out to verify the working principle. Finally, the system performance of the generated UWB doublet pulses was assessed by propagating them over a 25-km-long standard single-mode fiber link, followed by wireless transmission. Error-free transmission was successfully achieved.

© 2010 OSA

1. Introduction

Ultrawideband (UWB) radio technology has been receiving much attention of late as a highly promising solution for future high-capacity wireless personal-area networks (PANs) due to its various benefits, such as low power consumption, high data capacity, and multipath fading immunity [1

1. D. Porcino and W. Hirt, “Ultra-wideband radio technology: Potential and challenges ahead,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(7), 66–74 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. The UWB signal transmission is realized by spreading a small amount of radiated radio frequency power across a very wide frequency band relative to its center frequency. The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Report and Order issued in 2002 defines the UWB signal as any signal that possesses a spectral bandwidth of more than 500 MHz in the 3.1~10.6 GHz band, with a spectral power density lower than −41.3 dBm/MHz [2

2. Fed. Commun. Commission, Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems, Tech. Rep. ET-Docket 98–153, FCC02–48, Apr. (2002).

]. The commonly used UWB transmission systems are implemented based on the impulse radio UWB (IR-UWB) or orthogonal-frequency-division-multiplexing UWB (OFDM-UWB) schemes. The IR-UWB technology, which transmits data via ultrashort temporal pulses, is an attractive technique due to its carrier-free modulation and low power consumption, and because it does not require the use of frequency mixers [3

3. M. Z. Win and R. A. Scholtz, “Ultra-wide bandwidth time-hopping spread-spectrum impulse radio for wireless multiple-access communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. 48(4), 679–689 (2000). [CrossRef]

].

Although the IR-UWB technology can provide a variety of technical advantages, such as reduced multipath fading, broad bandwidth, and increased operational security, it has the fundamental limitation of low spectral-power density, which allows it to cover only a short signal transmission distance of less than tens of meters. As a potential solution, the use of UWB-over-fiber technology, with which the generation, modulation, and distribution of UWB signals are implemented in the optical domain, was proposed, and its feasibility has been successfully demonstrated [4

4. R. Llorente, T. Alves, M. Morant, M. Beltran, J. Perez, A. Cartaxo, and J. Marti, “Ultra-Wideband Radio Signals Distribution in FTTH Networks,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(11), 945–947 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. Although UWB signals can have step and Gaussian waveforms, the commonly employed waveforms are monocycle- and doublet-shaped as these waveforms possess reduced low-frequency components.

A number of optical schemes have been proposed for the generation of monocycle or doublet UWB pulses, such as waveform transformation from a Gaussian pulse to a doublet pulse using a nonlinearly biased electro-optic modulator [5

5. Q. Wang and J. Yao, “UWB doublet generation using a nonlinearly-biased electro-optic intensity modulator,” Electron. Lett. 42(22), 1304–1305 (2006). [CrossRef]

], monocycle pulse generation through the direct-current modulation of semiconductor lasers followed by chirp-to-intensity conversion [6

6. V. Torres-Company, K. Prince, and I. T. Monroy, “Fiber transmission and generation of ultrawideband pulses by direct current modulation of semiconductor lasers and chirp-to-intensity conversion,” Opt. Lett. 33(3), 222–224 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], Sagnac-interferometer-based intensity modulation for both monocycle and doublet pulse generation [7

7. J. Li, K. Xu, S. Fu, J. Wu, J. Lin, M. Tang, and P. Shum, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation with flexible pulse shape and polarity control using a Sagnac-interferometer-based intensity modulator,” Opt. Express 15(26), 18156–18161 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

], electro-optic phase modulation (PM) followed by PM-to-intensity conversion with the use of a frequency discriminator or a chromatic dispersive element [8

8. F. Zeng and J. Yao, “Ultrawideband impulse radio signal generation using a high-speed electrooptic phase modulator and a fiber-Bragg-grating-based frequency discriminator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(19), 2062–2064 (2006). [CrossRef]

], polarization modulation and subsequent different time delays [9

9. Q. Wang and J. Yao, “An electrically switchable optical ultrawideband pulse generator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(11), 3626–3633 (2007). [CrossRef]

], the use of the cross-absorption modulation effect in an electroabsorption modulator [10

10. T.-H. Wu, J. P. Wu, and Y.-J. Chiu, “Novel ultra-wideband (UWB) photonic generation through photodetection and cross-absorption modulation in a single electroabsorption modulator,” Opt. Express 18(4), 3379–3384 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and the cross-gain modulation effect in a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) [11

11. Q. Wang, F. Zeng, S. Blais, and J. Yao, “Optical ultrawideband monocycle pulse generation based on cross-gain modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(21), 3083–3085 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] for the generation of monocycle pulses, and the use of the cross-gain modulation (XGM) effect in a fiber optic parametric amplifier [12

12. J. Li, B. P.-P. Kuo, and K. K.-Y. Wong, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation and based on cross-gain modulation in fiber optical parametric amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(4), 212–214 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. A nonlinear optical-loop mirror based on optical fiber has also been used for the generation of monocycle or doublet pulses [13

13. H. Huang, K. Xu, J. Li, J. Wu, X. Hong, and J. Lin, “UWB pulse generation and distribution using a NOLM based optical switch,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(15), 2635–2640 (2008). [CrossRef]

].

These techniques can be roughly classified as electro-optic conversion-based and all-optical schemes. The electro-optic conversion-based schemes use an electrical Gaussian pulse as an input seed signal, and electro-optic converters are used as signal-processing units [5

5. Q. Wang and J. Yao, “UWB doublet generation using a nonlinearly-biased electro-optic intensity modulator,” Electron. Lett. 42(22), 1304–1305 (2006). [CrossRef]

,6

6. V. Torres-Company, K. Prince, and I. T. Monroy, “Fiber transmission and generation of ultrawideband pulses by direct current modulation of semiconductor lasers and chirp-to-intensity conversion,” Opt. Lett. 33(3), 222–224 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,8

8. F. Zeng and J. Yao, “Ultrawideband impulse radio signal generation using a high-speed electrooptic phase modulator and a fiber-Bragg-grating-based frequency discriminator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(19), 2062–2064 (2006). [CrossRef]

10

10. T.-H. Wu, J. P. Wu, and Y.-J. Chiu, “Novel ultra-wideband (UWB) photonic generation through photodetection and cross-absorption modulation in a single electroabsorption modulator,” Opt. Express 18(4), 3379–3384 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. On the other hand, the all-optical schemes use a short optical pulse as an input seed, and nonlinear optical media, such as semiconductor optical amplifiers and nonlinear optical fibers, as signal-processing units [7

7. J. Li, K. Xu, S. Fu, J. Wu, J. Lin, M. Tang, and P. Shum, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation with flexible pulse shape and polarity control using a Sagnac-interferometer-based intensity modulator,” Opt. Express 15(26), 18156–18161 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,11

11. Q. Wang, F. Zeng, S. Blais, and J. Yao, “Optical ultrawideband monocycle pulse generation based on cross-gain modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(21), 3083–3085 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13

13. H. Huang, K. Xu, J. Li, J. Wu, X. Hong, and J. Lin, “UWB pulse generation and distribution using a NOLM based optical switch,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(15), 2635–2640 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. One benefit of all-optical schemes is no need for extra electro-optic conversion that makes the whole system complicated. In other words, they not require high speed electrical pulse generators and high speed electro-optic modulators, since the UWB pulse generation is performed in the optical domain [14

14. F. Zeng, Q. Wang, and J. Yao, “All-optical UWB impulse generation based on cross-phase modulation and frequency discriminator,” Electron. Lett. 43(2), 119–122 (2007). [CrossRef]

].

High-quality IR-UWB signals have been successfully achieved through the foregoing schemes, but there is still a huge demand for the expansion of the technological bases for alternative UWB signal generation and distribution schemes.

In this study, an alternative photonic scheme for the generation of doublet UWB pulses was proposed, and its operating principle was experimentally verified. The proposed scheme, which is an all-optical one with an all-fiber-integrated structure, is based on the optical-fiber-based Kerr shutter configuration using the nonlinear-polarization-rotation (NPR) principle [15

15. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2007).

]. The conventional optical-fiber-based Kerr shutters, which use both linearly polarized control and probe beams, have been widely used for nonlinear signal processing, such as data demultiplexing in high-speed optical-time-domain-multiplexing (OTDM) systems [16

16. J. Suzuki, K. Taira, Y. Fukuchi, Y. Ozeki, T. Tanemura, and K. Kikuchi, “All-optical time-division add-drop multiplexer using optical fibre Kerr shutter,” Electron. Lett. 40(7), 445–446 (2004). [CrossRef]

], wavelength conversion [17

17. J. H. Lee, T. Nagashima, T. Hasegawa, S. Ohara, N. Sugimoto, and K. Kikuchi, “Wide-band tunable wavelength conversion of 10-Gb/s nonreturn-to-zero signal using cross-phase-Modulation-induced polarization rotation in 1-m bismuth oxide-based nonlinear optical fiber,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(1), 298–300 (2006). [CrossRef]

], and logic gates [18

18. K. Kitayama, Y. Kimura, and S. Seikai, “Fiber-optic logic gate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 46(4), 317–319 (1985). [CrossRef]

].

Unlike the commonly used Kerr shutter configurations, the proposed scheme uses an elliptically polarized probe beam together with a linearly polarized control beam. Through theoretical analysis, the optical-fiber-based Kerr shutter was shown to be capable of producing an ideal transfer function for the successful conversion of input Gaussian pulses into doublet pulses under special polarization conditions of the input beams. Note that the use of elliptically polarized probe beams rather than linearly polarized ones in implementing optical-fiber Kerr shutters has not been reported so far. An experimental demonstration was subsequently carried out to verify the working principle of the proposed scheme. Finally, the system performance of the generated UWB doublet pulses was evaluated by propagating them over a 25-km-long standard single-mode fiber (SMF) link, followed by wireless transmission. Error-free transmission was successfully achieved.

Compared to other all-optical UWB pulse generation schemes our proposed scheme has a noticeable advantage that the produced doublet pulse has a single operating wavelength. It should be noted that most of the all-optical UWB pulse generation schemes were based on the simultaneous generation of multiple Gaussian pulses with opposite polarities followed by the time-delayed temporal overlap [7

7. J. Li, K. Xu, S. Fu, J. Wu, J. Lin, M. Tang, and P. Shum, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation with flexible pulse shape and polarity control using a Sagnac-interferometer-based intensity modulator,” Opt. Express 15(26), 18156–18161 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,11

11. Q. Wang, F. Zeng, S. Blais, and J. Yao, “Optical ultrawideband monocycle pulse generation based on cross-gain modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(21), 3083–3085 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13

13. H. Huang, K. Xu, J. Li, J. Wu, X. Hong, and J. Lin, “UWB pulse generation and distribution using a NOLM based optical switch,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(15), 2635–2640 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. In these schemes the multiple Gaussian pulses must have different operating wavelengths; otherwise, the temporal overlap induces significant coherent noise at the output signal. Such UWB optical pulses thus suffer from optical fiber dispersion-induced transmission distance limitation. However, the optical doublet pulses produced from our proposed scheme does not suffer from the fiber dispersion-induced limitation, since it is a single wavelength signal.

2. Operating principle

To produce doublet optical pulses from input Gaussian-shaped optical pulses, an all-optical pulse-shaping device that has transfer functions, as shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b)
Fig. 1 (a) Ideal transfer function for the waveform conversion from Gaussian input pulses to doublet pulses. (b) Ideal transfer function for inverted doublet pulse generation.
, is essentially required. These kinds of transfer function are different from the sin2()- or cos2()-shaped ones shown in Fig. 2(b)
Fig. 2 (a) Commonly used Kerr shutter configuration and (b) its transfer functions depending on the SOPs of the probe beam and the polarizer.
, which can be obtained from the conventional linear-polarization-based Kerr shutter configurations [15

15. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2007).

] shown in Fig. 2(a). It should be noted that the required transfer functions of Fig. 1 are phase-shifted versions of the ones in Fig. 2. In this section, simple mathematical analysis is performed to show that the transfer functions of Fig. 1 can be readily obtained from the Kerr shutter configuration if a control beam has a linear state of polarization (SOP) and a probe beam with a special elliptical SOP.

For a better understanding of the working principle, let an analytical formula of the Kerr shutter transfer function be derived for the arbitrary SOPs of the probe beam. When NPR occurs in an optical fiber, the fiber acts as a birefringent-phase plate. The optical-fiber-based Kerr shutter system can thus be modeled by using the Jones matrix method. The Jones vectors of the probe beams with arbitrary SOPs can be expressed using a righthand elliptical (RHE) SOP or a lefthand elliptical (LHE) SOP [19

19. A. Yariv, and P. Yeh, Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2007).

].
Eprobe=[acosφ+ibsinφasinφibcosφ] for RHE [acosφibsinφasinφ+ibcosφ] for LHE
(1)
where φ is the angle between the longer axis of the polarization ellipsoid and the x-axis, and a and b are coefficients that determine the degree of ellipticity and that have the relation of a2+b2=1. Here, a/b=0or a/b= pertains to linear polarization, and a/b=1 to circular polarization. The birefringent plate of the optical fiber can be expressed as follows [15

15. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2007).

].
M=[eiΓ/2cos2ψ+eiΓ/2sin2ψ          isin(Γ/2)sin(2ψ)isin(Γ/2)sin(2ψ)               eiΓ/2sin2ψ+eiΓ/2cos2ψ]
(2)
where ψ is the angle between the slow axis of the birefringent plate and the x-axis, and Γ is the phase retardation between the slow and fast axes, which is given by the following relation.
Γ=2πλ(nsnf)Leff
(3)
where ns and nf are refractive indices for the slow and fast axes, respectively; λ is the beam wavelength; and Leff is the effective length of the nonlinear fiber. The SOP of a linearly polarized control beam decides the slow axis of the nonlinear fiber if the self-phase modulation (SPM) is neglected [14

14. F. Zeng, Q. Wang, and J. Yao, “All-optical UWB impulse generation based on cross-phase modulation and frequency discriminator,” Electron. Lett. 43(2), 119–122 (2007). [CrossRef]

].
ns=ns,linear+2n2|EC2|
(4)
nf=nf,linear+2n2B|EC2|
(5)
where ns,linear and nf,linear are the linear parts of the refractive indices for the slow and fast axes, respectively; n2 is the nonlinear index coefficient; and ECis the peak power of the control beam. If χ(3) is originated from a purely electronic response, then B=1/3 [14

14. F. Zeng, Q. Wang, and J. Yao, “All-optical UWB impulse generation based on cross-phase modulation and frequency discriminator,” Electron. Lett. 43(2), 119–122 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. Assuming ns,linear=nf,linear for isotropic fiber, the phase retardation Γ can be expressed as

Γ=83πLeffλn2|ΕC|2
(6)

The polarizer has the following vector expression.
P=[1    00    0] aligned to x-axis, [0001] aligned to y-axis
(7)
Then, the output beam has the following form.
EOut=PMEprobe
(8)
The transfer function is given by
T=|Eout|2/|Eprobe|2
(9)
Using Eqs. (8) and (9), four different combinations of the SOPs of the probe beam and polarizer were analyzed in terms of the transfer function. It was shown that the ideal transfer functions of Fig. 1 for UWB doublet pulse generation can be obtained by using elliptically polarized probe beams.

2.1 Probe beam: RHE SOP; Polarizer: x-axis

Consider a case where the probe has an RHE SOP and where the polarizer is aligned to the x-axis, as shown in Fig. 3(a)
Fig. 3 (a) Polarization arrangement: probe beam, RHE SOP; polarizer, x-axis. (b) Calculated transmittance as a function of the ellipticity ratio a/b of the probe beam.
. For the sake of easy calculation, let it be assumed that φ=0o and ψ=45o. Using Eqs. (8) and (9), the transmittance T can be calculated as follows:

T=a2cos2(Γ/2)+b2sin2(Γ/2)2abcos(Γ/2)sin(Γ/2)
(10)

Figure 3(b) shows the calculated transmittance as a function of the ellipticity ratio a/b. It is evident from the graph that the minimum transmission point moves to the righthand side as the a/b ratio increases. From Fig. 2 it can be easily inferred that the ideal transfer function, like Fig. 1(a), which is suitable for doublet pulse generation, can be readily produced by controlling the ellipticity ratio a/b of the probe beam. a/b=0.66 was found to lead to the ideal transfer function of Fig. 1(a).

2.2 Probe beam: RHE SOP; Polarizer: y-axis

In the case where a probe beam with an RHE SOP is used together with a polarizer aligned to the y-axis, as shown in Fig. 4(a)
Fig. 4 (a) Polarization arrangement: probe beam, RHE SOP; polarizer: y-axis. (b) Calculated transmittance as a function of the ellipticity ratio a/b of the probe beam.
, the transmittance T can be calculated as follows.

T=a2sin2(Γ/2)+b2cos2(Γ/2)+2abcos(Γ/2)sin(Γ/2)
(11)

Figure 4(b) shows the calculated transmittance as a function of the ellipticity ratio a/b. Interestingly, it can be seen that the transfer function of Fig. 1(b), which is suitable for the generation of inverted doublet pulses, can be obtained by controlling the ellipticity ratio a/b. a/b=0.66 was found to lead to the ideal transfer function of Fig. 1(b).

2.3 Probe beam: LHE SOP; Polarizer: x-axis

In the case where a probe beam with an LHE SOP is used together with a polarizer aligned to the x-axis, as shown in Fig. 5(a)
Fig. 5 (a) Polarization arrangement: probe beam, LHE SOP; polarizer, x-axis. (b) Calculated transmittance as a function of the ellipticity ratio a/b of the probe beam.
, the transmittance T can be given by

T=a2cos2(Γ/2)+b2sin2(Γ/2)+2abcos(Γ/2)sin(Γ/2)
(12)

From Fig. 5(b), a/b=1.5 was found to result in the ideal transfer function of Fig. 1(b) for inverted doublet pulse generation.

2.4 Probe beam: LHE SOP; Polarizer: y-axis

In the case where a probe beam with an LHE SOP is used together with a polarizer aligned to the y-axis, the transmittance T can be given by

T=a2sin2(Γ/2)+b2cos2(Γ/2)2abcos(Γ/2)sin(Γ/2)
(13)

From Fig. 6(b)
Fig. 6 (a) Polarization arrangement: probe beam, LHE SOP; polarizer, y-axis. (b) Calculated transmittance as a function of the ellipticity ratio a/b of the probe beam.
, a/b=1.5 was found to result in the ideal transfer function of Fig. 1(a) for doublet pulse generation.

3. Experimental verification of the proposed doublet pulse generation principle

To verify the proposed doublet pulse generation principle, an experimental setup was constructed, as shown in Fig. 7(a)
Fig. 7 (a) Experimental configuration to verify the proposed doublet pulse generation principle. (b) Measured autocorrelation trace of the actively-mode-locked fiber laser output pulse, which was used as an input pulse.
. First, an actively-mode-locked fiber laser [20

20. C. Wu and N. K. Dutta, “High-repetition-rate optical pulse generation using a rational harmonic mode-locked fiber laser,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 36(2), 145–150 (2000). [CrossRef]

] that can generate ~50-ps-wide soliton pulses, as shown in the measured autocorrelation trace in Fig. 2(b), was built. Note that all the experiments in this work were performed with the soliton pulses since the mode-locked fiber laser generated soliton pulses rather than Gaussian pulses. The mode-locked fiber laser was composed of a 3.5-m-long erbium-doped fiber (EDF), a 980-nm pump laser diode, a 980/1550-nm-wavelength division multiplexer, a LiNbO3 modulator, a 50:50 coupler, a 100-m-long dispersion-compensating fiber, and a polarization controller (PC). By changing the RF frequency of the sinusoidal electrical signal coupled to the modulator, the repetition rate of the output optical pulses could be changed from ~300 MHz to ~3 GHz. For this particular experiment, the mode-locked laser was operated at 623 MHz. The generated soliton pulses were used as a control beam for a Kerr shutter. The soliton control beam and a continuous-wave (CW) probe beam from an external-cavity tunable laser were amplified using erbium-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) and were then combined using a 50:50 coupler. The SOP of each beam was adjusted by using a PC in front of the 50:50 coupler. They were subsequently launched into a 500-m-long highly nonlinear dispersion-shifted fiber (HNL-DSF). The power levels of the control and probe beams that were coupled into the HNL-DSF were measured to be ~14 dBm and 3.6 dBm, respectively, and their operating wavelengths were 1538.1 nm and 1542.1 nm, each. The nonlinear parameter and zero dispersion wavelength of the HNL-DSF were ~28 W/km and ~1552 nm, respectively. A polarization beam splitter rather than a polarizer was connected to the output end of the HNL-DSF to monitor the outputs of the x- and y-axes at the same time. A 1-nm band pass filter was used after the PBS to filter out the residual control beam components.

One key issue in successfully carrying out this proof-of-principle experiment was how to precisely control the SOPs of the control and probe beams. In particular, the most difficult task was to ensure that the elliptical SOPs of the probe beams would have specific ellipticity ratios of a/b. For this purpose, a novel procedure was devised involving the real-time measurement of the output pulse from the Kerr shutter, as follows:

  • Step 1: Select one of the two output ports from the PBS and denote it as the x-axis. Then the other automatically becomes the y-axis.
  • Step 2: Launch the CW probe beam into the Kerr shutter and adjust its SOP with the use of a PC to ensure the maximum output power at the x-axis output. The SOP of the probe beam is now parallel to the x-axis of the PBS.
  • Step 3: Launch the control beam with medium-level optical power into the Kerr shutter and adjust its SOP with the use of a PC to ensure the largest negative pulse appearing at the probe beam, as shown in Fig. 8
    Fig. 8 Procedure for the adjustment of the SOPs of the control and probe beams.
    . This step ensures that the control beam has linear polarization with a 45° angle relative to the x-axis of the PBS. Note that the control beam cannot otherwise induce the largest negative pulse.
    Fig. 8Procedure for the adjustment of the SOPs of the control and probe beams.
  • Step 4: Adjust the SOP of the probe beam with the use of a PC to produce a doublet-like pulse, as shown in Fig. 8. The relative level of the background CW component must be adjusted to 30% of the original CW probe level. This step ensures that the probe beam has an RHE SOP with a/b=0.66.
  • Step 5: Increase the power of the control pulse to make the doublet-like pulse evolve into a perfect doublet pulse.
  • Step 6: Check the output pulse at the y-axis output from the PBS to ensure that the pulse has an inverted doublet pulse shape.

A few iterative PC adjustments were made to obtain the desired doublet or inverted-doublet pulses as the non-polarization-maintaining (PM) HNL-DSF that was used had a degree of polarization instability.

Figure 9
Fig. 9 Experimentally measured and theoretically calculated transfer functions.
shows the experimentally measured transfer functions at the x- and y-axis outputs of the PBS together with the theoretically calculated ones. Even if the experimental transfer functions were in good agreement with the theoretical ones at low control power regimes, there was some degree of discrepancy at the higher control power regimes. This phenomenon is believed to be due to the NPR efficiency reduction caused by the SPM-induced NPR of the control beam itself [21

21. R. H. Stolen, J. Botineau, and A. Ashkin, “Intensity discrimination of optical pulses with birefringent fibers,” Opt. Lett. 7(10), 512–514 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] or by the random distribution of the birefringence of the non-PM HNL-DSF that was used [22

22. T. Tanemura and K. Kikuchi, “Circular-birefringence fiber for nonlinear optical signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(11), 4108–4119 (2006). [CrossRef]

].

Figure 10
Fig. 10 (a) Measured oscilloscope trace and (b) measured RF spectrum of the generated doublet pulse. The FCC mask is plotted by a dotted line.
shows the measured oscilloscope trace of the UWB doublet pulse produced from the x-axis output of the PBS, together with its corresponding measured RF spectrum. It is evident from the graph that the desired UWB doublet pulse was readily achieved. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the generated pulse was ~47 ps, and the interval of the two negative peaks at both sides was ~90 ps. The center frequency and 10 dB bandwidth of the generated UWB doublet pulse were estimated to be ~9 and ~10 GHz, respectively. Accordingly, the fractional bandwidth was ~111%. To make the RF spectrum of the UWB signal meet the FCC requirement we have properly adjusted the optical power levels of the control and probe beams [23

23. M. Abtahi, J. Magné, M. Mirshafiei, L. A. Rusch, and S. LaRochelle, “Generation of power-efficient FCC-compliant UWB waveforms using FBGs: analysis and experiment,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(5), 628–635 (2008). [CrossRef]

].

On the other hand, the oscilloscope trace and RF spectrum of the inverted-UWB-doublet pulse produced from the y-axis output of the PBS are shown in Fig. 11
Fig. 11 (a) Measured oscilloscope trace and (b) measured RF spectrum of the generated inverted-doublet pulse.
. The FWHM of the generated pulse and the interval of the two negative peaks at both sides were ~51 and ~100 ps, respectively. The center frequency and 10 dB bandwidth of the generated UWB doublet pulse were estimated to be ~8.1 and ~8.95 GHz, respectively. Accordingly, the fractional bandwidth was ~111%. A noticeable performance difference between the produced UWB doublet and inverted-doublet pulses was observed despite the fact that the same Kerr shutter was used. This is believed to be due to the polarization uncertainty of the probe beam. In other words, it was slightly difficult to ensure in practice that the probe beam has a perfect RHE SOP with an ellipticity ratio of a/b=0.66.

4. System performance assessment of the UWB doublet pulse generated over fiber/wireless transmission link

4.1 System Setup

To assess the system performance of the generated UWB pulses, a signal transmission experiment with a data rate of 1.25 Gbit/s was subsequently performed over a 25-km-long standard SMF link, followed by a 5 ~50-cm wireless link, using the setup in Fig. 12(a)
Fig. 12 (a) Experimental configuration for 1.25Gbit/s UWB doublet pulse transmission over a fiber/wireless link. (b) A real photo and a schematic diagram of the design of the antenna that was used in the experiment.
. For this experiment, soliton optical pulses were first produced at a repetition rate of 1.25 GHz. They were then on- and off-keying-modulated to provide a 27-1 pseudorandom bit sequence (PRBS) using a LiNbO3 modulator. The modulated soliton pulses were amplified and used as a control beam for the Kerr shutter, whereas a CW beam from an external-cavity tunable laser was used as a probe. The PRBS-modulated doublet optical pulses generated from the Kerr shutter were then propagated over a 25-km-long standard SMF link. After 25-km fiber transmission, the 1.25 Gbit/s PRBS doublet pulse stream was optically amplified through an EDFA and then coupled into a 15GHz photodetector to convert the optical doublet pulse into an electrical one. The electrical UWB doublet pulse was amplified using an inverting RF amplifier, and was fed into a transmitter antenna. A receiver antenna was set to be 5 ~50 cm away from the transmitter antenna. The output signal from the receiver antenna was amplified by a low-noise amplifier (LNA) and detected by a digital-communication analyzer or an error detector.

An omnidirectional antenna, which was designed based on the coplanar-waveguide (CPW) UWB antenna principle, was used. The peak gain varied from 5 to 10 dBi within the 3~10GHz UWB spectrum. Further details on the antennas that were used are fully described in Ref [24

24. Y. M. Chang, J. S. Lee, D. Koh, H. Chung, and J. H. Lee, ““Ultra-wideband doublet pulse generation based on semiconductor electroabsorption modulator and its distribution over a fiber/wireless link”, To be published in J,” Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(8), 600–608 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. The wireless-transmission experiment was carried out under open-air conditions, without electromagnetic-interference-noise shielding.

4.2 Transmission over a 25-km SMF link

4.3 Wireless Transmission after 25-km fiber transmission

After transmission, the RF spectral components located at the frequency band higher than ~10 GHz substantially disappeared due to the antenna response, but sufficient RF spectral components were still quite well maintained over a broad frequency range. Figure 16(a)
Fig. 16 , (a) Measured BER v.s. wireless transmission distance. (b) Eye diagram at BER = ~10−5 after 30-cm wireless transmission. The wireless signal transmission of the UWB doublet signal was carried out after 25-km transmission over a SMF link.
shows the measured BER as a function of wireless transmission distance. Considering forward error correction (FEC) limit (2 x 10−3) the maximum wireless transmission distance of the PRBS doublet data stream after 25-km fiber transmission was found to be ~45 cm. Figure 16(b) shows the measured eye diagram of the wireless-transmitted pulses at BER = ~10−5 after 30-cm wireless transmission. A clean and open eye was evidently observed, and this means that the proposed fiber/wireless-transmission system works well at a 1.25 Gbit/s data rate. The wireless-transmission distance was limited to ~45 cm due to the various wireless noise components and low antenna gain. A significant improvement in the receiver design is required to increase the wireless-transmission distance.

5. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

This research work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST), Republic of Korea (No.2010-0009799).

References and links

1.

D. Porcino and W. Hirt, “Ultra-wideband radio technology: Potential and challenges ahead,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(7), 66–74 (2003). [CrossRef]

2.

Fed. Commun. Commission, Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems, Tech. Rep. ET-Docket 98–153, FCC02–48, Apr. (2002).

3.

M. Z. Win and R. A. Scholtz, “Ultra-wide bandwidth time-hopping spread-spectrum impulse radio for wireless multiple-access communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. 48(4), 679–689 (2000). [CrossRef]

4.

R. Llorente, T. Alves, M. Morant, M. Beltran, J. Perez, A. Cartaxo, and J. Marti, “Ultra-Wideband Radio Signals Distribution in FTTH Networks,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(11), 945–947 (2008). [CrossRef]

5.

Q. Wang and J. Yao, “UWB doublet generation using a nonlinearly-biased electro-optic intensity modulator,” Electron. Lett. 42(22), 1304–1305 (2006). [CrossRef]

6.

V. Torres-Company, K. Prince, and I. T. Monroy, “Fiber transmission and generation of ultrawideband pulses by direct current modulation of semiconductor lasers and chirp-to-intensity conversion,” Opt. Lett. 33(3), 222–224 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

J. Li, K. Xu, S. Fu, J. Wu, J. Lin, M. Tang, and P. Shum, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation with flexible pulse shape and polarity control using a Sagnac-interferometer-based intensity modulator,” Opt. Express 15(26), 18156–18161 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

F. Zeng and J. Yao, “Ultrawideband impulse radio signal generation using a high-speed electrooptic phase modulator and a fiber-Bragg-grating-based frequency discriminator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(19), 2062–2064 (2006). [CrossRef]

9.

Q. Wang and J. Yao, “An electrically switchable optical ultrawideband pulse generator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(11), 3626–3633 (2007). [CrossRef]

10.

T.-H. Wu, J. P. Wu, and Y.-J. Chiu, “Novel ultra-wideband (UWB) photonic generation through photodetection and cross-absorption modulation in a single electroabsorption modulator,” Opt. Express 18(4), 3379–3384 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

11.

Q. Wang, F. Zeng, S. Blais, and J. Yao, “Optical ultrawideband monocycle pulse generation based on cross-gain modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(21), 3083–3085 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12.

J. Li, B. P.-P. Kuo, and K. K.-Y. Wong, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation and based on cross-gain modulation in fiber optical parametric amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(4), 212–214 (2009). [CrossRef]

13.

H. Huang, K. Xu, J. Li, J. Wu, X. Hong, and J. Lin, “UWB pulse generation and distribution using a NOLM based optical switch,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(15), 2635–2640 (2008). [CrossRef]

14.

F. Zeng, Q. Wang, and J. Yao, “All-optical UWB impulse generation based on cross-phase modulation and frequency discriminator,” Electron. Lett. 43(2), 119–122 (2007). [CrossRef]

15.

G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2007).

16.

J. Suzuki, K. Taira, Y. Fukuchi, Y. Ozeki, T. Tanemura, and K. Kikuchi, “All-optical time-division add-drop multiplexer using optical fibre Kerr shutter,” Electron. Lett. 40(7), 445–446 (2004). [CrossRef]

17.

J. H. Lee, T. Nagashima, T. Hasegawa, S. Ohara, N. Sugimoto, and K. Kikuchi, “Wide-band tunable wavelength conversion of 10-Gb/s nonreturn-to-zero signal using cross-phase-Modulation-induced polarization rotation in 1-m bismuth oxide-based nonlinear optical fiber,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(1), 298–300 (2006). [CrossRef]

18.

K. Kitayama, Y. Kimura, and S. Seikai, “Fiber-optic logic gate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 46(4), 317–319 (1985). [CrossRef]

19.

A. Yariv, and P. Yeh, Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2007).

20.

C. Wu and N. K. Dutta, “High-repetition-rate optical pulse generation using a rational harmonic mode-locked fiber laser,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 36(2), 145–150 (2000). [CrossRef]

21.

R. H. Stolen, J. Botineau, and A. Ashkin, “Intensity discrimination of optical pulses with birefringent fibers,” Opt. Lett. 7(10), 512–514 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

22.

T. Tanemura and K. Kikuchi, “Circular-birefringence fiber for nonlinear optical signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(11), 4108–4119 (2006). [CrossRef]

23.

M. Abtahi, J. Magné, M. Mirshafiei, L. A. Rusch, and S. LaRochelle, “Generation of power-efficient FCC-compliant UWB waveforms using FBGs: analysis and experiment,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(5), 628–635 (2008). [CrossRef]

24.

Y. M. Chang, J. S. Lee, D. Koh, H. Chung, and J. H. Lee, ““Ultra-wideband doublet pulse generation based on semiconductor electroabsorption modulator and its distribution over a fiber/wireless link”, To be published in J,” Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(8), 600–608 (2010). [CrossRef]

25.

T. B. Gibbon, X. Yu, and I. T. Monroy, “Photonic ultra-wideband 781.25-Mb/s signal generation and transmission incorporating digital signal processing detection,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(15), 1060–1062 (2009). [CrossRef]

26.

H. Shams, A. Kaszubowska-Anandarajah, P. Perry, P. Anandarajah, and L. P. Barry, “Electro-optical generation and distribution of ultrawideband signals based on the gain switching technique,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(3), 122–130 (2010). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(060.4080) Fiber optics and optical communications : Modulation
(060.4370) Fiber optics and optical communications : Nonlinear optics, fibers
(350.4010) Other areas of optics : Microwaves
(060.5625) Fiber optics and optical communications : Radio frequency photonics

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: May 20, 2010
Revised Manuscript: July 22, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: August 9, 2010
Published: September 3, 2010

Citation
You Min Chang, Junsu Lee, and Ju Han Lee, "Ultrawideband doublet pulse generation based on nonlinear polarization rotation of an elliptically polarized beam and its distribution over a fiber/wireless link," Opt. Express 18, 20072-20085 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-19-20072


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. D. Porcino and W. Hirt, “Ultra-wideband radio technology: Potential and challenges ahead,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 41(7), 66–74 (2003). [CrossRef]
  2. Fed. Commun. Commission, Revision of Part 15 of the Commission’s Rules Regarding Ultra-Wideband Transmission Systems, Tech. Rep. ET-Docket 98–153, FCC02–48, Apr. (2002).
  3. M. Z. Win and R. A. Scholtz, “Ultra-wide bandwidth time-hopping spread-spectrum impulse radio for wireless multiple-access communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. 48(4), 679–689 (2000). [CrossRef]
  4. R. Llorente, T. Alves, M. Morant, M. Beltran, J. Perez, A. Cartaxo, and J. Marti, “Ultra-Wideband Radio Signals Distribution in FTTH Networks,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 20(11), 945–947 (2008). [CrossRef]
  5. Q. Wang and J. Yao, “UWB doublet generation using a nonlinearly-biased electro-optic intensity modulator,” Electron. Lett. 42(22), 1304–1305 (2006). [CrossRef]
  6. V. Torres-Company, K. Prince, and I. T. Monroy, “Fiber transmission and generation of ultrawideband pulses by direct current modulation of semiconductor lasers and chirp-to-intensity conversion,” Opt. Lett. 33(3), 222–224 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. J. Li, K. Xu, S. Fu, J. Wu, J. Lin, M. Tang, and P. Shum, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation with flexible pulse shape and polarity control using a Sagnac-interferometer-based intensity modulator,” Opt. Express 15(26), 18156–18161 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. F. Zeng and J. Yao, “Ultrawideband impulse radio signal generation using a high-speed electrooptic phase modulator and a fiber-Bragg-grating-based frequency discriminator,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(19), 2062–2064 (2006). [CrossRef]
  9. Q. Wang and J. Yao, “An electrically switchable optical ultrawideband pulse generator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(11), 3626–3633 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. T.-H. Wu, J. P. Wu, and Y.-J. Chiu, “Novel ultra-wideband (UWB) photonic generation through photodetection and cross-absorption modulation in a single electroabsorption modulator,” Opt. Express 18(4), 3379–3384 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Q. Wang, F. Zeng, S. Blais, and J. Yao, “Optical ultrawideband monocycle pulse generation based on cross-gain modulation in a semiconductor optical amplifier,” Opt. Lett. 31(21), 3083–3085 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. J. Li, B. P.-P. Kuo, and K. K.-Y. Wong, “Ultra-wideband pulse generation and based on cross-gain modulation in fiber optical parametric amplifier,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(4), 212–214 (2009). [CrossRef]
  13. H. Huang, K. Xu, J. Li, J. Wu, X. Hong, and J. Lin, “UWB pulse generation and distribution using a NOLM based optical switch,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(15), 2635–2640 (2008). [CrossRef]
  14. F. Zeng, Q. Wang, and J. Yao, “All-optical UWB impulse generation based on cross-phase modulation and frequency discriminator,” Electron. Lett. 43(2), 119–122 (2007). [CrossRef]
  15. G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 4th ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 2007).
  16. J. Suzuki, K. Taira, Y. Fukuchi, Y. Ozeki, T. Tanemura, and K. Kikuchi, “All-optical time-division add-drop multiplexer using optical fibre Kerr shutter,” Electron. Lett. 40(7), 445–446 (2004). [CrossRef]
  17. J. H. Lee, T. Nagashima, T. Hasegawa, S. Ohara, N. Sugimoto, and K. Kikuchi, “Wide-band tunable wavelength conversion of 10-Gb/s nonreturn-to-zero signal using cross-phase-Modulation-induced polarization rotation in 1-m bismuth oxide-based nonlinear optical fiber,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(1), 298–300 (2006). [CrossRef]
  18. K. Kitayama, Y. Kimura, and S. Seikai, “Fiber-optic logic gate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 46(4), 317–319 (1985). [CrossRef]
  19. A. Yariv, and P. Yeh, Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2007).
  20. C. Wu and N. K. Dutta, “High-repetition-rate optical pulse generation using a rational harmonic mode-locked fiber laser,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 36(2), 145–150 (2000). [CrossRef]
  21. R. H. Stolen, J. Botineau, and A. Ashkin, “Intensity discrimination of optical pulses with birefringent fibers,” Opt. Lett. 7(10), 512–514 (1982). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. T. Tanemura and K. Kikuchi, “Circular-birefringence fiber for nonlinear optical signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(11), 4108–4119 (2006). [CrossRef]
  23. M. Abtahi, J. Magné, M. Mirshafiei, L. A. Rusch, and S. LaRochelle, “Generation of power-efficient FCC-compliant UWB waveforms using FBGs: analysis and experiment,” J. Lightwave Technol. 26(5), 628–635 (2008). [CrossRef]
  24. Y. M. Chang, J. S. Lee, D. Koh, H. Chung, and J. H. Lee, ““Ultra-wideband doublet pulse generation based on semiconductor electroabsorption modulator and its distribution over a fiber/wireless link”, To be published in J,” Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(8), 600–608 (2010). [CrossRef]
  25. T. B. Gibbon, X. Yu, and I. T. Monroy, “Photonic ultra-wideband 781.25-Mb/s signal generation and transmission incorporating digital signal processing detection,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(15), 1060–1062 (2009). [CrossRef]
  26. H. Shams, A. Kaszubowska-Anandarajah, P. Perry, P. Anandarajah, and L. P. Barry, “Electro-optical generation and distribution of ultrawideband signals based on the gain switching technique,” J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(3), 122–130 (2010). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited