OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 18, Iss. 4 — Feb. 15, 2010
  • pp: 3404–3414

Optics InfoBase > Optics Express > Volume 18 > Issue 4 > Page 3404

« Show journal navigation

Multilayer transparent electrode for organic light-emitting diodes: tuning its optical characteristics

Hyunsu Cho, Changhun Yun, and Seunghyup Yoo  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 18, Issue 4, pp. 3404-3414 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003404


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (718 KB)


Advanced Search

Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

The optical properties of dielectric-metal-dielectric (DMD) transparent electrodes are investigated from the perspectives of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). A joint experimental and theoretical study showed that the optical characteristics of OLEDs based on DMD electrodes can be widely tuned to fulfill the requirements of a target application through careful control of the microcavity effect, transmittance of DMD electrodes, and a correlation of these two factors with the emission spectra of the emitted materials. Upon variation of the DMD structure, near-Lambertian emission and a 100% improvement in the luminous efficiency are demonstrated, respectively. Optimization strategies are also discussed that are relevant to forward luminous efficiency, total optical power, and angular/ spectral characteristics.

© 2010 OSA

1. Introduction

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) are making rapid progress as a next-generation light source for displays and lighting applications [1

P. E. Burrows, G. Gu, V. Bulovic, Z. Shen, S. R. Forrest, and M. E. Thompson, “Achieving Full-Color Organic Light-Emitting Devices for Lightweight, Flat-Panel Displays,” IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 44(8), 1188–1203 (1997). [CrossRef]

,2

B. W. D’Andrade and S. R. Forrest, “White Organic Light-Emitting Devices for Solid-State Lighting,” Adv. Mater. 16(18), 1585–1595 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. In most solid-state light sources, transparent electrodes (TEs) are an essential element which can impact both optical and electrical performance. In OLEDs, indium tin oxide (ITO) has been dominantly used as transparent electrodes for decades due to its excellent transparency and relatively high conductivity. While ITO films fulfill the requirements of most current flat-panel displays (FPDs), concerns over the poor mechanical flexibility of ITO films [3

G. F. Wang, X. M. Tao, and R. X. Wang, “Flexible organic light-emitting diodes with a polymeric nanocomposite anode,” Nanotech. 19(14), 145201 (2008). [CrossRef]

] as well as those related to a potential price hike owing to a limited supply of indium demand the development of an alternative TE technology in futuristic applications such as roll-type displays and/or in cost-sensitive applications. Hence, the potential importance of ITO-free dielectric-metal-dielectric (DMD) multilayer electrodes was noted, as previously proposed for OLEDs by Pang et al. [4

H. Pang, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhou, J. Lian, L. Cao, J. Zhang, and X. Zhou, “ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS coating as transparent anode for organic light emitting diodes,” J. Lumin. 122–123, 587–589 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. These DMD electrodes have optical transparency and sheet conductance properties that are comparable to or better than those of ITO films. In addition, their injection property can be tuned by varying their inner dielectric layers, which are defined as the layer which interfaces with the organic semiconductors. Recently, it was shown that DMD electrodes based on ZnS-Ag-WO3 (ZAW) layers, in which WO3 functions as a hole-injecting layer, can work not only as an effective bottom anode in conventional geometry but also as a damage-free top anode in inverted top-emission geometry [5

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

,6

C. Yun, H. Cho, H. Kang, Y. Lee, Y. Park, and S. Yoo, “Electron injection via pentacene thin films for efficient inverted organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(5), 053301 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Performance comparable to or better than that observed with conventional ITO-based OLEDs was demonstrated in both cases. Moreover, those OLEDs with ZAW electrodes exhibited mechanical flexibility far superior to that of ITO-based devices due to the ductile nature of the thin metal layers [5

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

,7

J. Lewis, S. Grego, B. Chalamala, E. Vick, and D. Temple, “Highly flexible transparent electrodes for organic light-emitting diode-based displays,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(16), 3450 (2004). [CrossRef]

], which mainly account for the sheet conductance in DMD electrodes. Despite the various benefits and potential significance of DMD electrodes, however, no systematic study has been done to understand their optical properties from an OLED standpoint.

The present study explores the optical characteristics of OLEDs based on a DMD electrode using the framework of thin-film optics with an optical microcavity. In particular, we focus on its impact on luminous efficiency as well as on the spectral and angular emission characteristics so that an efficient light source with ideal characteristics suitable for applications of interest may be realized. Optimization strategies are also discussed and compared with the experimental results from the perspectives of both display and lighting applications.

2. Experiment

Dielectric-metal-dielectric (DMD) transparent electrodes consisting of ZnS, Ag, and WO3 were prepared by thermal evaporation on a pre-cleaned glass substrate planarized with polymeric film (SU-8, Microchem), which was prepared by spin-coating (3000 rpm, 30 s) followed by drying at 120°C for 1 hr. The root-mean-square (RMS) surface roughness of the SU-8 film was measured to be as low as 0.42nm. The planarization process was previously shown to be the key step in ensuring the uniform, continuous growth of ultrathin Ag layers with low sheet resistance [5

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. The thickness of the Ag film was fixed at 15 nm, and its sheet conductance was measured to be 15 Ω/sq. As shown in Fig. 1 , OLED devices were in normal bottom-emission geometry and were based on N,N'-Bis(naphthalen-1-yl)-N,N'-bis(phenyl)-benzidine (NPB) as a hole transporting layer (HTL), tris(8-hydroxy-quinolinato) aluminium (Alq3) as an emitting and electron transporting layer (EML/ETL), and LiF/Al as a cathode. ITO-based conventional cells were also fabricated as a reference.

Fig. 1 (a) Schematic device structure of the OLED under study and (b) its simplified microcavity structure used for an optical analysis based on thin-film optics (right). z 0 is the distance of the emission zone measured from the aluminum / Alq3 interface. (c) The optical constants (n,k) of each material used for optical analysis. For those of Ag, please refer to Ref. 8 (the values given for 12-nm-thick Ag film therein)

The OLED devices were not exposed to an ambient atmosphere during the fabrication process. In addition, they were characterized in an N2-filled glove box. Electroluminescent (EL) spectra were measured with a fiber optic spectrometer (EPP2000, StellarNet), and current-voltage (J-V) and luminance-voltage (L-V) characteristics were recorded with a source-measure unit (Keithley 2400) and a calibrated photodiode (FDS100, Thorlab). Commercial software (The Essential Macleod, Thin Film Center, Inc.) based on what is known as the characteristic matrix method was employed for optical analysis involving a multilayer structure. The optical constants of WO3 and ZnS were measured by spectroscopic ellipsometry [See Fig. 1(c)], those of Ag were borrowed from the literature [8

X. Liu, X. Cai, J. Qiao, J. Mao, and N. Jiang, “The design of ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS transparent conductive multilayer films,” Thin Solid Films 441(1-2), 200–206 (2003). [CrossRef]

], and those of Alq3 and NPB were borrowed from the software.

3. Optical Properties of DMD-Based OLEDs: Framework for Optical Analysis

3.1 Optical transmission of DMD electrodes in OLEDs

The dielectric-metal-dielectric (DMD) coating was initially developed for transparent heat reflection films because the DMD structure can be designed so that it has high transmission in the visible region and high reflection in the infrared region [9

J. C. C. Fan and F. J. Bachner, “Transparent heat mirrors for solar-energy applications,” Appl. Opt. 15(4), 1012–1017 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. In these types of applications, what matters is the transmission of light from the air through the DMD films and the substrate to the air. With OLEDs, where the internal emission from the organic layer has to be outcoupled to air, it is organic-to-air transmission that is of interest. However, most previous works using DMD electrodes in OLEDs concern only the simple air-to-air transmittance of DMD films without considering the optical effect of organic media [4

H. Pang, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhou, J. Lian, L. Cao, J. Zhang, and X. Zhou, “ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS coating as transparent anode for organic light emitting diodes,” J. Lumin. 122–123, 587–589 (2007). [CrossRef]

,10

S. Y. Ryu, J. H. Noh, B. H. Hwang, C. S. Kim, S. J. Jo, J. T. Kim, H. S. Hwang, H. K. Baik, H. S. Jeong, C. H. Lee, S. Y. Song, S. H. Choi, and S. Y. Park, “Transparent organic light-emitting diodes consisting of a metal oxide multilayer cathode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(2), 023306 (2008). [CrossRef]

]. Calculation results comparing the air-to-glass transmittance T air-to-glass and the organic-to-glass transmittance T organic-to-glass values show a different trend. (i) First, the maximum T organic-to-glass value that can be achieved upon optimization is lower than the maximum T air-to-glass value achievable with the same DMD layers; (ii) secondly, variation in the thickness of the inner dielectric layer Di ( = WO3 in the present case) result in little change in the transmittance in the organic-to-glass case [See Fig. 2 ]. These findings mainly ensue because the index contrast between Di and organic medium is much smaller than that between Di and air, making the optical effect of Di less significant in terms of transmission/ reflection when the light is incident from an organic medium. Nevertheless, Fig. 2 shows that it is nonetheless possible to maximize T organic-to-glass, upon optimization, to 83.9% in ZAW electrodes with a 15-nm-thick Ag layer. In fact, what may be more important is the potential that the transmittance as well as other optical properties can be tuned in a relatively wide range to suit the different needs of various applications.

Fig. 2 Transmittance of a DMD structure upon variation of the thickness of the inner (WO3) and outer (ZnS) dielectric layers for a 15-nm-thick Ag layer: (a) air-to-glass vs. (b) organic-to-glass transmittance

3.2 Consideration of the microcavity / interference effect in DMD-based OLEDs

The presence of finite reflectance at DMD-organic interfaces and strong reflectance at organic-metal interfaces can result in a microcavity effect that is typically found in top-emitting OLEDs with a semitransparent thin metal electrode. By adopting the so-called Smith method, in which a DMD multilayer stack is effectively regarded as one single medium, as shown in Fig. 1(b) [11

H. A. Macleod, Thin-film optical Filters (Taylor & Francis, 2001).

], the overall light output from a DMD-based OLED at a given wavelength λ will be proportional to I 0(λ) × G cav(λ), in which I 0(λ) is the intensity of the light generated inside the active layer by the emitter under no cavity effect, and G cav(λ), the cavity enhancement factor, is given by [12

D. G. Deppe, C. Lei, C. C. Lin, and D. L. Huffaker, “Spontaneous emission from planar microstructures,” J. Mod. Opt. 41(2), 325–344 (1994). [CrossRef]

,13

M. Thomschke, R. Nitsche, M. Furno, and K. Leo, “Optimized efficiency and angular emission characteristics of white top-emitting organic electroluminescent diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(8), 083303 (2009). [CrossRef]

]:
G cav(λ)= f FP(λ)  ×  f TI(λ; z0)
(1)
with
f FP= T DMD ( 1− R Al R DMD)2+4 R Al R DMD sin2 ( Δϕ2)
(2)
f TI=1+ R Al+ 2 R Alcos ( − ϕ Al+ 4π n org zocos ( θ org,EML)λ)
(3)
in which f FP(λ) and f TI(λ) are the Fabry-Perot factor and the two-beam interference factor, respectively, z 0 is the location of the emission zone measured from the organic/Al interface, T DMD is the transmittance through DMD films from the organic material (NPB in this work) to the glass (or to air if DMD is used as the top electrode in a top-emission OLED), R Al and R DMD are the reflectance values at the organic-Al ( = A) and DMD-organic interfaces ( = B), respectively. Additionally, Δϕ is the round-trip phase term given by
Δϕ=− ϕ Al− ϕ DMD+ ∑ i=NPB,Alq3 4π ni dicos( θi)λ
(4)
in which ϕ Al and ϕ DMD are phase changes occurring upon reflections at interfaces A and B, respectively, and ni and di are the refractive index and the thickness of the i-th layer, with i being NPB or Alq3. Reflection that can occur at the NPB/ Alq3 interface is ignored in the above equations because the refractive index difference is small between NPB and Alq3. f TI(λ) considers the effect of the interference between the two beams shown in Fig. 1(b); this value is common for all of the devices under study when one assumes that the emission zone is nearly identical among those devices.

4. Results and discussions

4.1 Optical effect of an inner dielectric layer

Figure 3 shows the current density-voltage (J-V) and luminance-current density (L-J) characteristics of OLED devices in a structure of glass/ X/ NPB (50nm)/ Alq3 (50nm)/ LiF (1nm)/ Al with X being ITO or ZnS (30nm)/ Ag (15nm)/ WO3 (x nm) for x values of 5, 20, and 30 nm. In Fig. 3(a), one can first note that the current density values of the ZAW-based devices do not show much variation in the range of WO3 thickness studied. The conductivity of WO3 films prepared in the same way was found to be on the order of 10−6 S/cm, similar to that of p-doped organic semiconductors [14

S. Han, W. Shin, M. Seo, D. Gupta, S. Moon, and S. Yoo, “Improving performance of organic solar cells using amorphous tungsten oxides as an interfacial buffer layer on transparent anodes,” Org. Electron. 10(5), 791–797 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. This range of conductivity is large enough to make the voltage drop over the thickness of WO3 virtually negligible in the range of thickness under study. The relatively high conductivity and large work function (4.7-6.4eV) of WO3 makes hole injection from Ag to WO3 and to NPB layer efficient, yielding a net current that is comparable to that of ITO-based reference cells [15

J. Meyer, S. Hamwi, T. Bulow, H.-H. Johannes, T. Riedl, and W. Kowalsky, “Highly efficient simplified organic light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(11), 113506 (2007). [CrossRef]

,16

C. Tao, S. Ruan, G. Xie, X. Kong, L. Shen, F. Meng, C. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Dong, and W. Chen, “Role of tungsten oxide in inverted polymer solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(4), 043311 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. The important role of WO3 in a ZAW structure as a hole injection layer was previously recognized by the authors in an experiment comparing the turn-on voltages of ZAW-based devices with those of devices based on ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS anodes [4

H. Pang, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhou, J. Lian, L. Cao, J. Zhang, and X. Zhou, “ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS coating as transparent anode for organic light emitting diodes,” J. Lumin. 122–123, 587–589 (2007). [CrossRef]

,5

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

].

Fig. 3 (a) Current density-voltage (J-V) and (b) luminance-current density (L-J) characteristics of OLED devices in a structure of glass/ X/ NPB (50nm)/ Alq3 (50nm)/ LiF (1nm)/Al, with X being ITO or ZnS (30nm) / Ag (15nm) / WO3 (x nm) for x values of 5, 20, and 30 nm. L was measured at a direction normal to the substrate.

In contrast to the case of the current density, the thickness of WO3 makes a clear difference in the forward luminous efficiency (η L) [See Fig. 3(b)]. Considering the equivalence of the current density at a given voltage for all of the ZAW-based devices, it becomes clear that the observed difference in luminous efficiency comes mainly from an optical effect. Additionally, the device with the 5-nm-thick WO3 layer has a higher η L value compared to devices with a 20 or 30-nm-thick WO3 layer (See Table 1 for a summary). On the other hand, the T organic-to-glass value of the ZAW electrode with 5-nm-thick WO3 is lower than those of ZAW electrodes with 20 or 30-nm-thick WO3 layers, as shown in Fig. 4(a) and Table 1. It is important to note that previous works based on DMD electrodes were mostly concerned with achieving a high transmittance to obtain high-performance OLEDs. The results shown here, however, suggest that high transmittance may not always guarantee high efficiency in DMD-based OLEDs. This is similar to what was observed in top-emitting OLEDs with a thin metal and an optical capping layer [17

H. Riel, S. Karg, T. Beierlein, W. Rieß, and K. Neyts, “Tuning the emission characteristics of top-emitting organic light-emitting devices by means of a dielectric capping layer: An experimental and theoretical study,” J. Appl. Phys. 94(8), 5290 (2003). [CrossRef]

].

Table 1  Device Characteristics of ZAW-based OLEDs vs. the Thickness of the WO3 Layer
ITO
ZnS/Ag/WO3 (30/15/x nm)
WO3 thickness, d WO3 (x nm)52030
Turn-on voltage (V) a 2.502.452.452.50
η L (cd/A) b at 5,000 cd/m2 4.48.06.85.2
Peak wavelength for G cav(λ) (nm)-527546546
Peak wavelength for f FP(λ) (nm)-524612662
Cavity resonant wavelength (nm) c -524604657
FWHM (nm)-79102110
T organic-to-glass at λ of 520nm (%)-69.972.674.7

a Voltage corresponding to L of 1 cd/m2. b measured at a direction normal to the substrate. c Δϕ = 2πm, m: integer.

Fig. 4 (a) Reflectance and transmittance, (b) f TI(λ), I 0(λ), and f FP(λ), and (c) Δϕ of DMD-based OLEDs for WO3 thicknesses(x) of 5, 20, and 30 nm. (d) Comparison of the measured emission spectra I(λ) and the simulation result using G cav(λ) × I 0(λ) for DMD-based OLEDs. During the fitting procedure, the thickness of each layer was allowed to vary only within 10% from the nominal thickness.

Figures 4(b) presents the f TI(λ), I 0(λ), and f FP(λ) values of ZAW-based OLEDs for x values of 5, 20, and 30 nm. This figure shows that the peak values for the Fabry-Perot resonance term f FP(λ) are quite different from device to device. What makes a difference depending on the thickness of the WO3 is in fact the degree of matching between the peak of f FP(λ) and that of I 0(λ). As shown in Fig. 4(b), the peak wavelength for f FP(λ) shifts toward a longer wavelength as WO3 becomes thicker; This is because the major reflection in ZAW electrodes occurs at the Ag/ WO3 interface. That is, an increase in the WO3 thickness by Δd will increase the optical path length by 2n WO3 Δd per round-trip, shifting ϕ ZAW and Δϕ accordingly [See Fig. 4(c)]. For the case of a device with 30-nm-thick WO3 layer, the Fabry-Perot resonance peak is too far from that of the emission spectrum of Alq3, which makes its luminous efficiency smaller than other ZAW-based devices. In case of the device with a 5-nm-thick WO3 layer, however, the resonant wavelength matches well with the peak wavelength of the emission spectrum of Alq3 ; thus, it exhibits higher luminous efficiency compared to the other devices. It is also noted that the mismatch between I 0(λ) and f FP(λ) causes not only the emission intensity to be reduced but also the emission spectrum to have a larger full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) [See Fig. 4(d) and Table 1].

It should also be noted that the peak location of f FP(λ) is not determined solely by the cavity resonance condition; it is of course the major factor but the spectral dependence of R ZAW and T ZAW can have some influence. For example, when x = 20 nm, the cavity resonant condition, where the round-trip phase term is 2πm (m is integer), will be met at λ of 604 nm. However, for λ > 604 nm, R ZAW increases with λ, enhancing the value of f FP(λ) in an off-resonance condition, slightly shifting the peak location of f FP(λ) to 612 nm. Regarding the net emission spectra, the location of the peak can be varied further because the overall line shape will be determined by all of the three factors: f TI(λ), I 0(λ), and f FP(λ). In order to check the validity of our descriptions, the experimental emission spectra of each case were fitted using G cav(λ) × I 0(λ). During the fitting procedure, the thickness of each layer was allowed to vary only within 10% from the nominal thickness. As for the overall magnitude, G cav(λ) × I 0(λ) was scaled to match the peak value of I(λ) in each case. Figure 4(d) shows that G cav(λ) × I 0(λ) is in good agreement with the actual emission spectra I(λ). In fact, scaling factors differed at most within 13% from case to case, indicating that the present optical analysis is also valid in terms of the relative magnitudes among different cases.

4.2 Optical effect of the outer dielectric layer

Figure 5 shows the J-V and L-J characteristics of OLED devices in a structure of glass/ Y/ NPB (50nm)/ Alq3 (50nm)/ LiF (1 nm)/Al, with Y being ITO or ZnS (y nm) / Ag (15nm) / WO3 (5 nm) for y values of 30, 45, and 60 nm. As summarized in Table 2 , all of the ZAW-based OLEDs exhibit much higher η L values compared to the ITO-based devices. For a y value of 60 nm, the improvement ratio of η L with respect to that of ITO-based devices was as large as 2.

Fig. 5 (a) Current density-voltage (J-V) and (b) luminance-current density (L-J) characteristics of OLED devices in a structure of glass/ Y/ NPB (50nm)/ Alq3 (50nm)/ LiF (1 nm)/Al, with Y being ITO or ZnS (y nm) / Ag (15nm) / WO3 (5 nm) for y values of 30, 45, and 60 nm.
Table 2  Device Characteristics of ZAW-based OLEDs vs. the Thickness of the ZnS Layer
ITO
ZnS/Ag/WO3 (y/15/5 nm)
ZnS thickness, d ZnS (y nm)304560
Turn-on voltage (V)2.502.452.452.45
η L (cd/A) at 5,000 cd/m2 4.17.37.58.3
Peak wavelength for G cav(λ) (nm)-521511518
Peak wavelength for f FP(λ) (nm)-512500513
Cavity resonant wavelength (nm)-513500513
FWHM (nm)-766447
T organic-to-glass at λ of 520nm (%)-69.960.650.3

The optical analysis presented in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) reveals that the improvement in this case is a combined effect of an enhanced cavity effect and its good spectral overlap with the emission spectrum of Alq3. Recall that T ZAW and R ZAW tend to vary more sensitively depending on the thickness of ZnS ( = d ZnS) than on the WO3 thickness ( = d WO3) due to a relatively high index contrast at the ZnS/ glass interface [See Fig. 2(b)]. While R ZAW may increase or decrease with d ZnS, the results presented in Fig. 6(b) indicate that R ZAW increases with d ZnS for the range of thickness studied in this work. On the other hand, the net round-trip phase change Δϕ remains nearly identical as d ZnS varies [Fig. 6(c)], showing a good contrast with the previous case of d WO3 variation. The thickness of WO3 being fixed at 5 nm, which was previously shown to be near the phase resonance condition at λ ≈520 nm, all three types of devices meet the resonant condition near the peak wavelength of I 0(λ). Thus, f FP(λ) shows a good spectral overlap with I 0(λ) in each case. Together with the high degree of spectral overlap, the increase in R ZAW with d ZnS results in an enhancement in f FP(λ). This combined effect leads to the overall improvement in η L in the OLED devices under study.

Fig. 6 (a) Reflectance and transmittance, (b) f TI(λ), I 0(λ), and f FP(λ), and (c) Δϕ of DMD-based OLEDs for ZnS thicknesses(y) of 30, 45, and 60 nm. (d) Comparison of the measured emission spectra I(λ) and the simulated emission spectra G cav(λ) × I 0(λ) of DMD-based OLEDs. The fitting procedures for (d) are identical to those used in Fig. 4(d).

The emission spectra of these ZAW-based OLEDs, which exhibit a good fit to the calculated G cav(λ) × I 0(λ) values [Fig. 6(d)], indeed exhibit much less variation in the peak emission wavelength, which is consistent with the explanation given above. In addition, there is a decrease in their FWHM values with the increase in d ZnS. This is mainly because the increase in R ZAW with d ZnS results in an increase in finesse F of the cavity structure.

4.3 Effect on angular emission characteristics

Devices with a thicker inner dielectric layers d Di, within the range of thickness tried in this study, turned out to have characteristics that are closer to those of Lambertian light source as shown in Figs. 7(a) and 7(b). It was noted that in devices where the cavity resonance wavelength λ RES of f FP(λ) matches the peak wavelength λ Alq3 of the Alq3 emission spectrum forθ of 0°, the emission will in fact be more intense in a forward (normal) direction than in an off-normal direction because the resonance enhancement will be subdued in the off-normal direction. This is the case presented in Fig. 7(b). For devices with thicker WO3 layers, however, λ RES is larger than λ Alq3 when θ = 0°. As θ increases, their λ RES values will become smaller, as they scales with cos θ, and will become matched better to λ Alq3, enhancing the emission from a side-viewing angle. This enhancement in the off-normal direction, together with the relatively weak cavity effect due to small R ZAW values of the devices with the thicker d WO3, is likely to make the overall emission of DMD-based OLEDs closer to that of the Lambertian source.

Fig. 7 Angular emission characteristics of OLED devices in a structure of glass/ ZAW/ NPB (50nm)/ Alq3 (50nm)/ LiF (1nm)/Al, with ZAW being (a) ZnS (30nm) / Ag (15nm) / WO3 (x nm) for x values of 5, 20, and 30 nm and (b) ZnS (y nm)/ Ag (15nm)/ WO3 (5 nm) for y values of 30, 45, and 60 nm

4.4 Summary: application-specific optimization of the DMD structure

As shown in the previous section, the optical effect of each layer in a DMD structure is different and its optimization should consider not only transmission but also the overall cavity structure and its correlation with the emission spectrum of emitter molecules. Furthermore, the optimization process should consider the balance between luminous efficiency and the angular and/or spectral characteristics according to the needs of the target application. While higher luminous efficiency will always be desired, the preference for a specific pattern of angular or spectral dependency over others varies depending on the application of interest. In display applications, for example, light sources are desired to have a narrow spectral width to allow for a large color gamut; in lighting applications, on the other hand, color rendering close to natural sunlight will generally prefer a broad spectral distribution. In some applications such as a small display in a personal portable electronic device, a narrow viewing angle is often tolerated or even preferred, whereas a large display such as TV will generally prefer a wide viewing angle.

For applications in which high luminous efficiency in a forward direction is preferred, the thickness of the inner dielectric layer d Di should be determined first to match the cavity resonance wavelength λ RES (θ = 0°) to the peak emission wavelength λ EML of the emitter. The thickness of the outer dielectric layer d Do should then be chosen depending on the target requirements: a stronger forward luminance and narrower spectral width will require a d Do value that can lead to a high R DMD; if stronger forward luminance is preferred but a narrow spectral width is not, d Do leading to a high T DMD value may be chosen.

For applications that require Lambertian-like emission with a less spectral dependence and/or a broad spectral width, the value of d Di may be chosen such that λ RES (θ = 0°) mismatches λ EML on purpose. Additionally, d Do may be chosen such that a high T DMD value is achieved to reduce the cavity effect. It is important to note, however, that even a configuration leading to a high T DMD value at a certain wavelength may have a relatively large R DMD value in other wavelengths due to the spectral dependence of the DMD structure. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor the overall distribution of G cav(λ;θ) × I 0(λ) carefully to predict the net emission spectra. By changing λ RES (θ = 0°) so that it is larger or smaller than λ EML, the overall color temperature of the emission spectrum may be tuned as well.

For applications in which the total optical power output is a main concern, d Di and d Do should be chosen so that the integration of G cav(λ;θ) × I 0(λ) over the wavelength and emission angle is maximized. In all of the cases noted here, d Di should be within a certain limit so that the desired injection properties may not be compromised. One may also need to be reminded that the photons propagating with large emission angle (with respect to the vertical direction) will also be subject to the waveguiding effect that is found in ITO-based OLEDs. Eventual improvement may then need to include the strategies overcoming those effects. See the work by Lim et al. for example [18

J. Lim, S. S. Oh, D. Y. Kim, S. H. Cho, I. T. Kim, S. H. Han, H. Takezoe, E. H. Choi, G. S. Cho, Y. H. Seo, S. O. Kang, and B. Park, “Enhanced out-coupling factor of microcavity organic light-emitting devices with irregular microlens array,” Opt. Express 14(14), 6564–6571 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

It has to be noted throughout the article that the validity of optical analysis in this study relies on the assumption that participating layers are optically flat; this is a good approximation in most cases, but attention must be paid to the very thin layers. For example, 5-nm-thick WO3 films may be too thin to be regarded continuous. WO3 having the optical constants that are very similar to those of organic layers, however, its optical effect in terms of reflection/transmission at associated interfaces would be small. Although it can have some influence through the optical cavity effect as discussed in 4.1, the continuity of the 5-nm-thick thin WO3 film would not be that critical in optical analysis because it takes up only ~5% of the total cavity length. In case of an Ag film, however, its film morphology was shown to get influenced by the roughness or the adhesion compatibility of an underlying layer [5

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Note that the film morphology of Ag films can be critical because formation of an island-like morphology instead of continuous one can result in a high sheet resistance. Furthermore, an Ag film with such “disconnected” morphology can absorb more photons in the visible spectral range and thus can become a loss mechanism for photons that need to be outcoupled. This is regarded due to the surface Plasmon effect typical of Ag-nanoparticles which results in an enhancement in absorption in the visible spectral range [19

B. P. Rand, P. Peumans, and S. R. Forrest, “Long-range absorption enhancement in organic tandem thin-film solar cells containing silver nanoclusters,” J. Appl. Phys. 96(12), 7519 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. For the same reason, the transmittance of a single- or multilayer stack containing an Ag film with the “disconnected” morphology cannot be fitted to the modeling results based on the optical constants known for Ag thin films [8

X. Liu, X. Cai, J. Qiao, J. Mao, and N. Jiang, “The design of ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS transparent conductive multilayer films,” Thin Solid Films 441(1-2), 200–206 (2003). [CrossRef]

] [See Fig. 8(a) ]. In contrast, Ag films used in this study had a relatively continuous morphology [5

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

], and so the transmittance of multilayer stacks containing them were modeled very well with the reported optical constants for thin-film Ag [8

X. Liu, X. Cai, J. Qiao, J. Mao, and N. Jiang, “The design of ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS transparent conductive multilayer films,” Thin Solid Films 441(1-2), 200–206 (2003). [CrossRef]

] [Fig. 8(b)], supporting the validity of the present work.

Fig. 8 Measured (solid) and simulated (dashed) transmittance (T) spectra of (a) glass/ Ag (15nm) and (b) glass/SU-8/ ZnS (30nm)/Ag (15nm) samples. Inset: the photographs of the respective samples. The Ag film grown on a bare glass shown in (a) has an island-like morphology.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the optical properties of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) based on dielectric-metal-dielectric (DMD) transparent electrodes, which have advantages over conventional transparent conductive oxides (TCOs) particularly in terms of their high mechanical flexibility, low sheet resistance, and applicability as a damage-free top electrode. This study indicates that the optical characteristics of DMD-based OLEDs can be widely tuned through careful control of the interplay between the microcavity effect and the transmittance of DMD electrodes and their correlation with the emission spectrum of the emitting molecule. Different optical effects of inner and outer dielectric layers were identified in a joint experimental and theoretical study, and optimization strategies suitable for various applications were discussed. Upon variation of the DMD structure, efficient OLEDs with forward luminous efficiency twice as large as that of ITO-based reference cells were demonstrated along with OLEDs having near-Lambertian emission with luminous efficiency comparable to that of ITO-based reference cells. While the Ag-based DMD electrodes may have a material cost similar to that of ITO electrodes, those based on Cu are expected to have a significantly lower material cost; Although Cu-based DMDs may have a slightly lower performance due to absorption in the visible range, such cost benefit would be critical in applications such as lighting or low-end displays, which typically have stringent cost requirements. The work presented here will likely lay the foundation for the full utilization of the benefits that DMD electrodes can offer to OLEDs in both displays and lighting applications

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. R11-2007-045-01001-0), and by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) and Korea Institute for Advancement in Technology (KIAT) through the Workforce Development Program in Strategic Technology.

References and links

1.

P. E. Burrows, G. Gu, V. Bulovic, Z. Shen, S. R. Forrest, and M. E. Thompson, “Achieving Full-Color Organic Light-Emitting Devices for Lightweight, Flat-Panel Displays,” IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 44(8), 1188–1203 (1997). [CrossRef]

2.

B. W. D’Andrade and S. R. Forrest, “White Organic Light-Emitting Devices for Solid-State Lighting,” Adv. Mater. 16(18), 1585–1595 (2004). [CrossRef]

3.

G. F. Wang, X. M. Tao, and R. X. Wang, “Flexible organic light-emitting diodes with a polymeric nanocomposite anode,” Nanotech. 19(14), 145201 (2008). [CrossRef]

4.

H. Pang, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhou, J. Lian, L. Cao, J. Zhang, and X. Zhou, “ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS coating as transparent anode for organic light emitting diodes,” J. Lumin. 122–123, 587–589 (2007). [CrossRef]

5.

H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]

6.

C. Yun, H. Cho, H. Kang, Y. Lee, Y. Park, and S. Yoo, “Electron injection via pentacene thin films for efficient inverted organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(5), 053301 (2009). [CrossRef]

7.

J. Lewis, S. Grego, B. Chalamala, E. Vick, and D. Temple, “Highly flexible transparent electrodes for organic light-emitting diode-based displays,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(16), 3450 (2004). [CrossRef]

8.

X. Liu, X. Cai, J. Qiao, J. Mao, and N. Jiang, “The design of ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS transparent conductive multilayer films,” Thin Solid Films 441(1-2), 200–206 (2003). [CrossRef]

9.

J. C. C. Fan and F. J. Bachner, “Transparent heat mirrors for solar-energy applications,” Appl. Opt. 15(4), 1012–1017 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

S. Y. Ryu, J. H. Noh, B. H. Hwang, C. S. Kim, S. J. Jo, J. T. Kim, H. S. Hwang, H. K. Baik, H. S. Jeong, C. H. Lee, S. Y. Song, S. H. Choi, and S. Y. Park, “Transparent organic light-emitting diodes consisting of a metal oxide multilayer cathode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(2), 023306 (2008). [CrossRef]

11.

H. A. Macleod, Thin-film optical Filters (Taylor & Francis, 2001).

12.

D. G. Deppe, C. Lei, C. C. Lin, and D. L. Huffaker, “Spontaneous emission from planar microstructures,” J. Mod. Opt. 41(2), 325–344 (1994). [CrossRef]

13.

M. Thomschke, R. Nitsche, M. Furno, and K. Leo, “Optimized efficiency and angular emission characteristics of white top-emitting organic electroluminescent diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(8), 083303 (2009). [CrossRef]

14.

S. Han, W. Shin, M. Seo, D. Gupta, S. Moon, and S. Yoo, “Improving performance of organic solar cells using amorphous tungsten oxides as an interfacial buffer layer on transparent anodes,” Org. Electron. 10(5), 791–797 (2009). [CrossRef]

15.

J. Meyer, S. Hamwi, T. Bulow, H.-H. Johannes, T. Riedl, and W. Kowalsky, “Highly efficient simplified organic light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(11), 113506 (2007). [CrossRef]

16.

C. Tao, S. Ruan, G. Xie, X. Kong, L. Shen, F. Meng, C. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Dong, and W. Chen, “Role of tungsten oxide in inverted polymer solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(4), 043311 (2009). [CrossRef]

17.

H. Riel, S. Karg, T. Beierlein, W. Rieß, and K. Neyts, “Tuning the emission characteristics of top-emitting organic light-emitting devices by means of a dielectric capping layer: An experimental and theoretical study,” J. Appl. Phys. 94(8), 5290 (2003). [CrossRef]

18.

J. Lim, S. S. Oh, D. Y. Kim, S. H. Cho, I. T. Kim, S. H. Han, H. Takezoe, E. H. Choi, G. S. Cho, Y. H. Seo, S. O. Kang, and B. Park, “Enhanced out-coupling factor of microcavity organic light-emitting devices with irregular microlens array,” Opt. Express 14(14), 6564–6571 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

19.

B. P. Rand, P. Peumans, and S. R. Forrest, “Long-range absorption enhancement in organic tandem thin-film solar cells containing silver nanoclusters,” J. Appl. Phys. 96(12), 7519 (2004). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(230.3670) Optical devices : Light-emitting diodes
(230.4170) Optical devices : Multilayers
(310.6860) Thin films : Thin films, optical properties
(310.4165) Thin films : Multilayer design

ToC Category:
Optical Devices

History
Original Manuscript: December 16, 2009
Revised Manuscript: January 28, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: January 29, 2010
Published: February 2, 2010

Virtual Issues
Focus Issue: Solar Concentrators (2010) Optics Express

Citation
Hyunsu Cho, Changhun Yun, and Seunghyup Yoo, "Multilayer transparent electrode for organic light-emitting diodes: tuning its optical characteristics," Opt. Express 18, 3404-3414 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-4-3404


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. E. Burrows, G. Gu, V. Bulovic, Z. Shen, S. R. Forrest, and M. E. Thompson, “Achieving Full-Color Organic Light-Emitting Devices for Lightweight, Flat-Panel Displays,” IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 44(8), 1188–1203 (1997). [CrossRef]
  2. B. W. D’Andrade and S. R. Forrest, “White Organic Light-Emitting Devices for Solid-State Lighting,” Adv. Mater. 16(18), 1585–1595 (2004). [CrossRef]
  3. G. F. Wang, X. M. Tao, and R. X. Wang, “Flexible organic light-emitting diodes with a polymeric nanocomposite anode,” Nanotech. 19(14), 145201 (2008). [CrossRef]
  4. H. Pang, Y. Yuan, Y. Zhou, J. Lian, L. Cao, J. Zhang, and X. Zhou, “ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS coating as transparent anode for organic light emitting diodes,” J. Lumin. 122–123, 587–589 (2007). [CrossRef]
  5. H. Cho, C. Yun, J.-W. Park, and S. Yoo, “Highly flexible organic light-emitting diodes based on ZnS/Ag/WO3 multilayer transparent electrodes,” Org. Electron. 10(6), 1163–1169 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. C. Yun, H. Cho, H. Kang, Y. Lee, Y. Park, and S. Yoo, “Electron injection via pentacene thin films for efficient inverted organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(5), 053301 (2009). [CrossRef]
  7. J. Lewis, S. Grego, B. Chalamala, E. Vick, and D. Temple, “Highly flexible transparent electrodes for organic light-emitting diode-based displays,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(16), 3450 (2004). [CrossRef]
  8. X. Liu, X. Cai, J. Qiao, J. Mao, and N. Jiang, “The design of ZnS/ Ag/ ZnS transparent conductive multilayer films,” Thin Solid Films 441(1-2), 200–206 (2003). [CrossRef]
  9. J. C. C. Fan and F. J. Bachner, “Transparent heat mirrors for solar-energy applications,” Appl. Opt. 15(4), 1012–1017 (1976). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. S. Y. Ryu, J. H. Noh, B. H. Hwang, C. S. Kim, S. J. Jo, J. T. Kim, H. S. Hwang, H. K. Baik, H. S. Jeong, C. H. Lee, S. Y. Song, S. H. Choi, and S. Y. Park, “Transparent organic light-emitting diodes consisting of a metal oxide multilayer cathode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(2), 023306 (2008). [CrossRef]
  11. H. A. Macleod, Thin-film optical Filters (Taylor & Francis, 2001).
  12. D. G. Deppe, C. Lei, C. C. Lin, and D. L. Huffaker, “Spontaneous emission from planar microstructures,” J. Mod. Opt. 41(2), 325–344 (1994). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Thomschke, R. Nitsche, M. Furno, and K. Leo, “Optimized efficiency and angular emission characteristics of white top-emitting organic electroluminescent diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(8), 083303 (2009). [CrossRef]
  14. S. Han, W. Shin, M. Seo, D. Gupta, S. Moon, and S. Yoo, “Improving performance of organic solar cells using amorphous tungsten oxides as an interfacial buffer layer on transparent anodes,” Org. Electron. 10(5), 791–797 (2009). [CrossRef]
  15. J. Meyer, S. Hamwi, T. Bulow, H.-H. Johannes, T. Riedl, and W. Kowalsky, “Highly efficient simplified organic light emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(11), 113506 (2007). [CrossRef]
  16. C. Tao, S. Ruan, G. Xie, X. Kong, L. Shen, F. Meng, C. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Dong, and W. Chen, “Role of tungsten oxide in inverted polymer solar cells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(4), 043311 (2009). [CrossRef]
  17. H. Riel, S. Karg, T. Beierlein, W. Rieß, and K. Neyts, “Tuning the emission characteristics of top-emitting organic light-emitting devices by means of a dielectric capping layer: An experimental and theoretical study,” J. Appl. Phys. 94(8), 5290 (2003). [CrossRef]
  18. J. Lim, S. S. Oh, D. Y. Kim, S. H. Cho, I. T. Kim, S. H. Han, H. Takezoe, E. H. Choi, G. S. Cho, Y. H. Seo, S. O. Kang, and B. Park, “Enhanced out-coupling factor of microcavity organic light-emitting devices with irregular microlens array,” Opt. Express 14(14), 6564–6571 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. B. P. Rand, P. Peumans, and S. R. Forrest, “Long-range absorption enhancement in organic tandem thin-film solar cells containing silver nanoclusters,” J. Appl. Phys. 96(12), 7519 (2004). [CrossRef]

Cited By

 Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited