OSA's Digital Library

Energy Express

Energy Express

  • Editor: Bernard Kippelen
  • Vol. 18, Iss. S2 — Jun. 21, 2010
  • pp: A167–A173
« Show journal navigation

UV-ozone-treated ultra-thin NaF film as anode buffer layer on organic light emitting devices

Yu-Cheng Chen, Po-Ching Kao, and Sheng-Yuan Chu  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 18, Issue S2, pp. A167-A173 (2010)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.00A167


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1422 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

An ultra-thin NaF film was thermally deposited between ITO and NPB as the buffer layer and then treated with the ultraviolet (UV) ozone, in the fabrication of organic light emitting diodes (ITO/NaF/NPB/Alq3/LiF/Al) to study its effect on hole-injection properties. The treatment drastically transforms the role of NaF film from hole-blocking to hole-injecting. This transformation is elucidated using hole-only devices, energy band measurement, surface energy, surface polarity, and X-ray photoelectron spectra. With the optimal thickness (3 nm) of the UV-ozone-treated NaF layer, the device performance is significantly improved, with a turn-on voltage, maximum luminance, and maximum current efficiency of 2.5 V, 15700 cd/m2, and 4.9 cd/A, respectively. Results show that NaF film is not only a hole-blocking layer, but also a promising hole-injecting layer after UV-ozone treatment.

© 2010 OSA

1. Introduction

Multilayer organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) have been considered as promising candidates for light-weight, fast-response, full-color displays ever since Tang and Van Slyke reported the first efficient OLED [1

1. C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, “Organic electroluminescent diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51(12), 913–915 (1987). [CrossRef]

3

3. S. A. Van Slyke, C. H. Chen, and C. W. Tang, “Organic electroluminescent devices with improved stability,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(15), 2160–2162 (1996). [CrossRef]

]. A lot of effort had been put into improving the performance of OLEDs and understanding their underlying mechanisms. Many studies have demonstrated that the interface between electrode and organic layer plays a crucial role in the efficiency of an OLED [4

4. L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, and M. G. Mason, “Enhanced electron injection in organic electroluminescence devices using an Al/LiF electrode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70(2), 152–154 (1997). [CrossRef]

,5

5. M. G. Mason, L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, S. T. Lee, K. W. Wong, and M. Wang, “Characterization of treated indium–tin–oxide surfaces used in electroluminescent devices,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(3), 1688–1692 (1999). [CrossRef]

]. For example, various treatments, such as O2 plasma and UV-ozone, have been applied to indium tin oxide (ITO) to improve device performance [6

6. S. T. Lee, Z. Q. Gao, and L. S. Hung, “Metal diffusion from electrodes in organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(10), 1404–1406 (1999). [CrossRef]

8

8. H. Y. Yu, X. D. Feng, D. Grozea, Z. H. Lu, R. N. S. Sodhi, A. M. Hor, and H. Aziz, “Surface electronic structure of plasma-treated indium tin oxides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 78(17), 2595–2597 (2001). [CrossRef]

]. So the an ultra-thin buffer layer has been inserted between ITO and the organic layer to enhance the efficiency of hole-injection or reduce it to balance the concentration between holes and electrons. The insertion of a metal-oxide such as MoOx, ZnO, or Fe3O4 has attracted a lot of attention due to its capability to lower the hole-injection barrier to increase efficiency [9

9. H. You, Y. Dai, Z. Zhang, and D. Ma, “Improved performances of organic light-emitting diodes with metal oxide as anode buffer,” J. Appl. Phys. 101(2), 026105 (2007). [CrossRef]

11

11. D.-D. Zhang, J. Feng, Y.-F. Liu, Y.-Q. Zhong, Y. Bai, Y. Jin, G.-H. Xie, Q. Xue, Y. Zhao, S.-Y. Liu, and H.-B. Sun, “Enhanced hole injection in organic light-emitting devices by using Fe[sub 3]O[sub 4] as an anodic buffer layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(22), 223306 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Metal fluorides such as NaF have been adopted as the hole-blocking layer to achieve a good balance between holes and electrons [12

12. S. Zhan, X. Ying-Ge, L. Xia, and Y. Tao, “A novel hole-blocking layer NaF between the α-naphthylphenyliphenyl diamine and ITO,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(9), 4374–4376 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. However, each attempted buffer material reported plays just one role in effecting the charges injection, i.e. increasing or decreasing the hole-injection. In this study, a hole-blocking NaF buffer layer that can be drastically transformed into an efficient hole-injecting layer using UV-ozone treatment is demonstrated. With the optimal thickness of the UV-ozone treated NaF thin layer, the performance of OLEDs can be greatly enhanced. The mechanisms of performance enhancement are discussed using the results of work function, surface energy, surface polarity, X-ray photoelectron spectra, and hole-only devices. The treatment of NaF thin layer using UV-ozone increases work function, surface energy and, surface polarity, which lead to the improved hole-injection.

2. Experimental details

Prior to film deposition, the ITO glass substrate was cleaned sequentially with a neutraler reiniger/deionized water (1:3 volume) mixture, deionized water, isopropanol and ethanol, followed by UV-ozone treatment (Jetlight UVO-42) for 20 min. The substrate was then covered with a NaF layer using the conventional vacuum thermal evaporation and treated with additional UV-ozone for 20 min. The hole-transporting α-naphthylphenylbiphenyl diamine (NPB) layer, green-emitting tris-8-quinolinolato-aluminum (Alq3) layers, LiF, and an aluminum cathode were deposited to obtain organic light emitting devices with a structure of ITO/NaF(0~3 nm)/NPB(40 nm)/Alq3(40 nm)/LiF(1 nm)/Al(100 nm). The thickness of each layer was controlled by a calibrated quartz crystal oscillator. The deposition rate was 0.1 Å/s for inorganic layers, about 1 Å/s for the organic layer and 4 Å/s for the Al metal cathode. The active area of the devices was 2 mm × 2 mm. The current density-voltage (J-V) and luminance-voltage (L-V) characteristics were measured with a source meter (Keithely-2400) and a luminance meter (LS-100). The UPS (ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy) and high resolution XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) measurements were performed in air with Riken Keiki AC-2 and Kratos Axis Ultra DLD with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) source, respectively. The contact angle of NaF thin films was measured using the Sessile drop technique with a Contact Angle Goniometer (MagicDrop, USA) under ambient conditions. De-ionized water (H2O) and methylene iodide (CH2I2) were used as the test liquids. The surface energy was estimated from the measured contact angles using the following geometric-mean expression13-15:
γL.(1+cosθ)=2(γSp.γLp)1/2+2(γSd.γLd)1/2,
(1)
where γL ( = γLp + γLd) and γS ( = γSp + γSd) are the surface tension of the test liquid and the surface energy of the solid, respectively. These values can be obtained from contact angles of different test liquids by solving two simultaneous equations. Table 1

Table 1. Surface Tension Components of Test Liquidsa

table-icon
View This Table
| View All Tables
shows the surface tension components of water and CH2I2, which represent polar and nonpolar solvents, respectively [14

14. Z. Z. You, “Combined AFM, XPS, and contact angle studies on treated indium-tin-oxide films for organic light-emitting devices,” Mater. Lett. 61(18), 3809–3814 (2007). [CrossRef]

].

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1
Fig. 1 (a) Current density-voltage (b) luminance-voltage characteristics for OLEDs with a NaF ultra-thin buffer layer of various thicknesses (c) current density-voltage characteristics of the hole-only devices.
shows the current density-voltage and luminance-voltage characteristics of the OLEDs with a pristine or a UV-ozone treated NaF layer deposited between the ITO substrate and hole-transporting NPB layer. The deposition of a pristine NaF layer on ITO resulted in an increased threshold voltage, which can be attributed to its hole-blocking effect [12

12. S. Zhan, X. Ying-Ge, L. Xia, and Y. Tao, “A novel hole-blocking layer NaF between the α-naphthylphenyliphenyl diamine and ITO,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(9), 4374–4376 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. The threshold voltage is significantly decreased when the NaF layer was treated with UV-ozone for 20 min. As shown in Fig. 1(a) the current density increased significantly when NaF film thickness was increased (from 1 nm to 3 nm) under a constant operating voltage, indicating highly efficient hole-injection of the UV-ozone-treated NaF thin film. Figure 1(b) shows the luminance-voltage relationship of the devices. Similarly, the turn-on voltage (the bias required to produce a measurable luminance of 1 cd/m2) increased from 3.3 V for the device without a NaF layer to higher than 4.8 V for devices with a 1 nm UV-ozone-treated NaF layer or a pristine NaF layer. The turn-on voltage decreased drastically to 2.5 V and 2.8 V when the thickness of the treated NaF layer was increased to 2 nm and 3 nm, respectively, and returned to about 3.5 V at 4 nm (not shown). To make the J-V and L-V plots understood clearly, we show thickness up to optimal values of 3 nm. The optimal thickness for UV-ozone treated NaF layer is about 3 nm for hole-injecting applications. The operation voltage corresponding to 100 cd/m2 was about 6 V for the OLED device without a NaF layer, whereas it is higher than 7.5 V for those with a pristine NaF layer (2 nm and 3 nm). However, the operation voltage significantly decreased to about 4 V for the device with a 3-nm-thick UV-ozone-treated NaF layer. Moreover, its brightness reached 15700 cd/m2 at 8.5 V, which is superior to 5290 cd/m2 for the device without a NaF layer and a few hundred for those with a pristine NaF layer. Current efficiency increased to maximum 4.9cd/A, as compared to 3.5cd/A for standard device. This is attributable to the enhanced hole-injection efficiency due to the UV-ozone-treated NaF layer. The performance of the device with a standard structure (ITO/NPB/Alq3/LiF/Al) was comparable to that obtained by other groups [16

16. K. Okumoto, H. Kanno, Y. Hamada, H. Takahashi, and K. Shibata, “High efficiency red organic light-emitting devices using tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene-doped rubrene as an emitting layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(1), 013502–013503 (2006). [CrossRef]

,17

17. S. T. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, J. M. Zhao, Y. Q. Zhan, Y. Wu, Y. C. Zhou, X. M. Ding, and X. Y. Hou, “Electron blocking and hole injection: the role of N, N'-bis(naphthalen-1-y)-N, N'-bis(phenyl)benzidine in organic light-emitting devices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(15), 2916–2918 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. Table 2

Table 2. Some selected properties of buffer layers coated onto ITO and the opto–electronic performances of OLEDs.

table-icon
View This Table
| View All Tables
compares optoelectronic performance of our NaF-based OLED device with ZnO- and Li-doped ZnO (LZO)-based devices reported previously [10

10. H.-H. Huang, S.-Y. Chu, P.-C. Kao, Y.-C. Chen, M.-R. Yang, and Z.-L. Tseng, “Enhancement of hole-injection and power efficiency of organic light emitting devices using an ultra-thin ZnO buffer layer,” J. Alloy. Comp. 479(1–2), 520–524 (2009). [CrossRef]

,20

20. H.-H. Huang, S.-Y. Chu, P.-C. Kao, Y.-C. Chen, and R.-C. Chang, “Improved hole-injection and power efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes using an ultrathin Li-doped ZnO buffer layer,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 154(3), J105–J108 (2007). [CrossRef]

]. The performance of NaF-based OLED device is better than the other two devices, i.e., with lower turn-on voltage and higher current efficiency. The Fig. 1(c) show the current density-voltage characteristics of the hole-only devices with a structure of ITO/with or without NaF/NPB(80 nm)/Au(5 nm)/Au(100 nm). No electroluminescence (EL) was detected for this device due to the negligibly small number of electrons injected from the cathode. This confirms the nature of hole-injection in the OLEDs mentioned above. Under a given operating voltage, the UV-ozone-treated NaF layer (3 nm) obviously increased the current density when compared with that of an untreated one. The device without a NaF layer had the smallest current density. The results indicate that UV-ozone treatment can transform the effect of the NaF layer from hole-blocking to hole-injecting. This dual property of NaF thin layer makes it a versatile material for the fabrication of organic light emitting devices.

The effect of surface UV-ozone or O2 plasma treatment and their mechanism have been mentioned in several studies [13

13. S. K. So, W. K. Choi, C. H. Cheng, L. M. Leung, and C. F. Kwong, “Surface preparation and characterization of indium tin oxide substrates for organic electroluminescent devices,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 68(4), 447–450 (1999). [CrossRef]

15

15. J. S. Kim, R. H. Friend, and F. Cacialli, “Surface energy and polarity of treated indium–tin–oxide anodes for polymer light-emitting diodes studied by contact-angle measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(5), 2774–2778 (1999). [CrossRef]

,18

18. J. S. Kim, P. K. H. Ho, D. S. Thomas, R. H. Friend, F. Cacialli, G. W. Bao, and S. F. Y. Li, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of surface-treated indium-tin oxide thin films,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 315(5–6), 307–312 (1999). [CrossRef]

,19

19. C. H. Yi, C. H. Jeong, Y. H. Lee, Y. W. Ko, and G. Y. Yeom, “Oxide surface cleaning by an atmospheric pressure plasma,” Surf. Coat. Tech. 177–178, 711–715 (2004). [CrossRef]

]. UV-ozone treatment is a photo cleaning technique to remove trace organic contaminants on surface. The treatment can refill the oxygen vacancy of oxide to increase its work function and to change its surface energy. For non-oxide materials such as silver and copper the treatment can oxidize them to form as metal oxides. However, the studies focused mainly on surface property of neat ITO after surface treatment, barely on those of buffer layer deposited on ITO. In this study, ITO substrates deposited with NaF film were treated with UV-Ozone to investigate their surface property changes. The changes in surface energy and composition of NaF deposited ITO will be discussed in the following sections.

Table 3

Table 3. Contact angles of H2O and CH2I2 on ITO, NaF/ITO and UV-ozone treated NaF/ITO

table-icon
View This Table
| View All Tables
summarizes the contact angles of bare ITO substrate, and pristine NaF (3 nm) and UV-ozone treated NaF layers (3 nm) deposited on an ITO substrate, measured using the Sessile drop technique with water and methylene iodide as test liquids. The UV-ozone treatment of NaF layer clearly reduced the contact angles of both test liquids from 55.3° and 36.8° to 14.6° and 21.5°, respectively. In contrast, the pristine NaF layer increased the contact angles to 68.8° and 42° for water and methylene iodide, respectively. This indicates that the deposition of the NaF layer lowers the polarity of the ITO substrate; its polarity, however, can be greatly increased to higher than that of a bare ITO substrate by treating with UV-ozone. Surface energy γS and surface polarity (χp=γSp/γS) can be readily calculated using Eq. (1) and the measured contact angles. These two parameters depend strongly on the physical properties of the surface. As shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Surface energy and (b) surface polarity of ITO substrate and NaF-covered ITO substrate.
, the surface energy and polarity of bare ITO substrate are 51.14 mJ/m2 and 0.35, respectively; they decrease to 42.51 mJ/m2 and 0.25 after the substrate is covered with a NaF layer. However, they significantly increase to the highest surface energy of 72.22 mJ/m2 and polarity of 0.56 by after UV-ozone treatment. These results demonstrate that covering an ITO surface with UV-ozone-treated NaF thin layer increases surface energy, surface polarity, and the work function, which in turn improves the device performance. Without UV-ozone treatment, only the work function of the ITO is increased, which leads to inferior device performance. The increase in surface energy and polarity of the NaF layer after UV-ozone treatment may have resulted from its oxidation during the treatment. Thus the treated NaF layer contacts intimately with the hole-transporting NPB layer to facilitate hole-injection. Our results demonstrate that the work function is not the exclusive factor in determining the hole-injection efficiency. Surface energy and polarity play dominating role as well. All three parameters (work function, surface energy, and surface polarity) should be increased simultaneously to enhance device performance.

The enhanced mechanism of the work function and surface energy of NaF film after UV-ozone treatment can be investigated using high resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 4
Fig. 4 Na 1s X-ray photoelectron spectra for NaF film deposited on ITO substrate before and after UV-ozone treatment.
shows the Na 1s X-ray photoelectron spectra of NaF films before and after UV-ozone treatment. The pristine NaF film shows two peaks which correspond to the binding energies of Na 1s core electrons in Na-F and Na-O bonds, respectively. After the UV-ozone treatment, the maximum peak shifts. This shift of binding energy indicates that most of the Na-F bond transforms to Na-O bond after the UV-ozone treatment. Accordingly, the surface becomes enriched in Na2O due to oxidation during treatment. Furthermore, the change of surface composition caused by oxidization from UV-ozone treatment explains why the work function and surface energy change after UV-zone treatment.

4. Conclusion

Two absolutely different properties of ultra-thin NaF film as the anode buffer layer in OLEDs (ITO/NaF/NPB/Alq3/LiF/Al) were demonstrated. Depositing a NaF layer on an ITO anode decreased the hole-injection efficiency and made it a hole-blocking layer. However, treating the NaF layer with UV-ozone transformed it to a hole-injecting layer that enhanced the hole-injection efficiency significantly. With the optimal thickness of the UV-ozone-treated NaF layer (3 nm), the turn-on voltage and operating voltage of the devices at 100 cd/m2 decreased to 2.5 V and 4 V, respectively, compared to those of the device without NaF layer (3.3 V, 6 V) . The maximum luminance and maximum current efficiency reached 15700 cd/m2 and 4.9cd/A at 8.5 V, respectively. On the contrary, the devices with a pristine NaF layer had increased turn-on and operating voltages at 100 cd/m2 of 4.8 V and 7.5 V, respectively. To explain this interesting transformation, the changes in work function, surface energy, and surface polarity after the UV-ozone treatment were measured. The treatment led to an increased work function (5.09 eV), surface energy (72.22 mJ/m2) and surface polarity (0.56) relative to those of bare ITO (4.78 eV, 51.14 mJ/m2, and 0.35). Although depositing untreated NaF film slightly increased the work function, it greatly decreased the surface energy and polarity, degrading the device performance. The XPS spectra results suggest that the UV-ozone treatment greatly increased the composition of Na-O bond due to oxidation. The results demonstrate that the UV-ozone treatment of NaF film effectively improves device performance, making it applicable for the fabrication of efficient OLEDs.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan under grants NSC 97-ET-7-006-005-ET and NSC-98-2112-M-415-001-MY3. The authors thank the Center for Micro/Nano Technology Research, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, for providing a Single-Slide Mask Aligner.

References and links

1.

C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, “Organic electroluminescent diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51(12), 913–915 (1987). [CrossRef]

2.

C. W. Tang, S. A. VanSlyke, and C. H. Chen, “Electroluminescence of doped organic thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 65(9), 3610–3616 (1989). [CrossRef]

3.

S. A. Van Slyke, C. H. Chen, and C. W. Tang, “Organic electroluminescent devices with improved stability,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(15), 2160–2162 (1996). [CrossRef]

4.

L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, and M. G. Mason, “Enhanced electron injection in organic electroluminescence devices using an Al/LiF electrode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70(2), 152–154 (1997). [CrossRef]

5.

M. G. Mason, L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, S. T. Lee, K. W. Wong, and M. Wang, “Characterization of treated indium–tin–oxide surfaces used in electroluminescent devices,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(3), 1688–1692 (1999). [CrossRef]

6.

S. T. Lee, Z. Q. Gao, and L. S. Hung, “Metal diffusion from electrodes in organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(10), 1404–1406 (1999). [CrossRef]

7.

F. Li, H. Tang, J. Shinar, O. Resto, and S. Z. Weisz, “Effects of aquaregia treatment of indium–tin–oxide substrates on the behavior of double layered organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70(20), 2741–2743 (1997). [CrossRef]

8.

H. Y. Yu, X. D. Feng, D. Grozea, Z. H. Lu, R. N. S. Sodhi, A. M. Hor, and H. Aziz, “Surface electronic structure of plasma-treated indium tin oxides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 78(17), 2595–2597 (2001). [CrossRef]

9.

H. You, Y. Dai, Z. Zhang, and D. Ma, “Improved performances of organic light-emitting diodes with metal oxide as anode buffer,” J. Appl. Phys. 101(2), 026105 (2007). [CrossRef]

10.

H.-H. Huang, S.-Y. Chu, P.-C. Kao, Y.-C. Chen, M.-R. Yang, and Z.-L. Tseng, “Enhancement of hole-injection and power efficiency of organic light emitting devices using an ultra-thin ZnO buffer layer,” J. Alloy. Comp. 479(1–2), 520–524 (2009). [CrossRef]

11.

D.-D. Zhang, J. Feng, Y.-F. Liu, Y.-Q. Zhong, Y. Bai, Y. Jin, G.-H. Xie, Q. Xue, Y. Zhao, S.-Y. Liu, and H.-B. Sun, “Enhanced hole injection in organic light-emitting devices by using Fe[sub 3]O[sub 4] as an anodic buffer layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(22), 223306 (2009). [CrossRef]

12.

S. Zhan, X. Ying-Ge, L. Xia, and Y. Tao, “A novel hole-blocking layer NaF between the α-naphthylphenyliphenyl diamine and ITO,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(9), 4374–4376 (2007). [CrossRef]

13.

S. K. So, W. K. Choi, C. H. Cheng, L. M. Leung, and C. F. Kwong, “Surface preparation and characterization of indium tin oxide substrates for organic electroluminescent devices,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 68(4), 447–450 (1999). [CrossRef]

14.

Z. Z. You, “Combined AFM, XPS, and contact angle studies on treated indium-tin-oxide films for organic light-emitting devices,” Mater. Lett. 61(18), 3809–3814 (2007). [CrossRef]

15.

J. S. Kim, R. H. Friend, and F. Cacialli, “Surface energy and polarity of treated indium–tin–oxide anodes for polymer light-emitting diodes studied by contact-angle measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(5), 2774–2778 (1999). [CrossRef]

16.

K. Okumoto, H. Kanno, Y. Hamada, H. Takahashi, and K. Shibata, “High efficiency red organic light-emitting devices using tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene-doped rubrene as an emitting layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(1), 013502–013503 (2006). [CrossRef]

17.

S. T. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, J. M. Zhao, Y. Q. Zhan, Y. Wu, Y. C. Zhou, X. M. Ding, and X. Y. Hou, “Electron blocking and hole injection: the role of N, N'-bis(naphthalen-1-y)-N, N'-bis(phenyl)benzidine in organic light-emitting devices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(15), 2916–2918 (2004). [CrossRef]

18.

J. S. Kim, P. K. H. Ho, D. S. Thomas, R. H. Friend, F. Cacialli, G. W. Bao, and S. F. Y. Li, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of surface-treated indium-tin oxide thin films,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 315(5–6), 307–312 (1999). [CrossRef]

19.

C. H. Yi, C. H. Jeong, Y. H. Lee, Y. W. Ko, and G. Y. Yeom, “Oxide surface cleaning by an atmospheric pressure plasma,” Surf. Coat. Tech. 177–178, 711–715 (2004). [CrossRef]

20.

H.-H. Huang, S.-Y. Chu, P.-C. Kao, Y.-C. Chen, and R.-C. Chang, “Improved hole-injection and power efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes using an ultrathin Li-doped ZnO buffer layer,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 154(3), J105–J108 (2007). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(160.4890) Materials : Organic materials
(230.3670) Optical devices : Light-emitting diodes
(230.4170) Optical devices : Multilayers

ToC Category:
Light-Emitting Diodes

History
Original Manuscript: February 10, 2010
Revised Manuscript: May 7, 2010
Manuscript Accepted: May 7, 2010
Published: May 26, 2010

Citation
Yu-Cheng Chen, Po-Ching Kao, and Sheng-Yuan Chu, "UV-ozone-treated ultra-thin NaF film as anode buffer layer on organic light emitting devices," Opt. Express 18, A167-A173 (2010)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-18-S2-A167


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, “Organic electroluminescent diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 51(12), 913–915 (1987). [CrossRef]
  2. C. W. Tang, S. A. VanSlyke, and C. H. Chen, “Electroluminescence of doped organic thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 65(9), 3610–3616 (1989). [CrossRef]
  3. S. A. Van Slyke, C. H. Chen, and C. W. Tang, “Organic electroluminescent devices with improved stability,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(15), 2160–2162 (1996). [CrossRef]
  4. L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, and M. G. Mason, “Enhanced electron injection in organic electroluminescence devices using an Al/LiF electrode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70(2), 152–154 (1997). [CrossRef]
  5. M. G. Mason, L. S. Hung, C. W. Tang, S. T. Lee, K. W. Wong, and M. Wang, “Characterization of treated indium–tin–oxide surfaces used in electroluminescent devices,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(3), 1688–1692 (1999). [CrossRef]
  6. S. T. Lee, Z. Q. Gao, and L. S. Hung, “Metal diffusion from electrodes in organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(10), 1404–1406 (1999). [CrossRef]
  7. F. Li, H. Tang, J. Shinar, O. Resto, and S. Z. Weisz, “Effects of aquaregia treatment of indium–tin–oxide substrates on the behavior of double layered organic light-emitting diodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70(20), 2741–2743 (1997). [CrossRef]
  8. H. Y. Yu, X. D. Feng, D. Grozea, Z. H. Lu, R. N. S. Sodhi, A. M. Hor, and H. Aziz, “Surface electronic structure of plasma-treated indium tin oxides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 78(17), 2595–2597 (2001). [CrossRef]
  9. H. You, Y. Dai, Z. Zhang, and D. Ma, “Improved performances of organic light-emitting diodes with metal oxide as anode buffer,” J. Appl. Phys. 101(2), 026105 (2007). [CrossRef]
  10. H.-H. Huang, S.-Y. Chu, P.-C. Kao, Y.-C. Chen, M.-R. Yang, and Z.-L. Tseng, “Enhancement of hole-injection and power efficiency of organic light emitting devices using an ultra-thin ZnO buffer layer,” J. Alloy. Comp. 479(1–2), 520–524 (2009). [CrossRef]
  11. D.-D. Zhang, J. Feng, Y.-F. Liu, Y.-Q. Zhong, Y. Bai, Y. Jin, G.-H. Xie, Q. Xue, Y. Zhao, S.-Y. Liu, and H.-B. Sun, “Enhanced hole injection in organic light-emitting devices by using Fe[sub 3]O[sub 4] as an anodic buffer layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(22), 223306 (2009). [CrossRef]
  12. S. Zhan, X. Ying-Ge, L. Xia, and Y. Tao, “A novel hole-blocking layer NaF between the α-naphthylphenyliphenyl diamine and ITO,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(9), 4374–4376 (2007). [CrossRef]
  13. S. K. So, W. K. Choi, C. H. Cheng, L. M. Leung, and C. F. Kwong, “Surface preparation and characterization of indium tin oxide substrates for organic electroluminescent devices,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 68(4), 447–450 (1999). [CrossRef]
  14. Z. Z. You, “Combined AFM, XPS, and contact angle studies on treated indium-tin-oxide films for organic light-emitting devices,” Mater. Lett. 61(18), 3809–3814 (2007). [CrossRef]
  15. J. S. Kim, R. H. Friend, and F. Cacialli, “Surface energy and polarity of treated indium–tin–oxide anodes for polymer light-emitting diodes studied by contact-angle measurements,” J. Appl. Phys. 86(5), 2774–2778 (1999). [CrossRef]
  16. K. Okumoto, H. Kanno, Y. Hamada, H. Takahashi, and K. Shibata, “High efficiency red organic light-emitting devices using tetraphenyldibenzoperiflanthene-doped rubrene as an emitting layer,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(1), 013502–013503 (2006). [CrossRef]
  17. S. T. Zhang, Z. J. Wang, J. M. Zhao, Y. Q. Zhan, Y. Wu, Y. C. Zhou, X. M. Ding, and X. Y. Hou, “Electron blocking and hole injection: the role of N, N'-bis(naphthalen-1-y)-N, N'-bis(phenyl)benzidine in organic light-emitting devices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(15), 2916–2918 (2004). [CrossRef]
  18. J. S. Kim, P. K. H. Ho, D. S. Thomas, R. H. Friend, F. Cacialli, G. W. Bao, and S. F. Y. Li, “X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of surface-treated indium-tin oxide thin films,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 315(5–6), 307–312 (1999). [CrossRef]
  19. C. H. Yi, C. H. Jeong, Y. H. Lee, Y. W. Ko, and G. Y. Yeom, “Oxide surface cleaning by an atmospheric pressure plasma,” Surf. Coat. Tech. 177–178, 711–715 (2004). [CrossRef]
  20. H.-H. Huang, S.-Y. Chu, P.-C. Kao, Y.-C. Chen, and R.-C. Chang, “Improved hole-injection and power efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes using an ultrathin Li-doped ZnO buffer layer,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 154(3), J105–J108 (2007). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited