OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 10 — May. 9, 2011
  • pp: 9102–9110
« Show journal navigation

Compact cryogenic self-aligning fiber-to-detector coupling with losses below one percent

Aaron J. Miller, Adriana E. Lita, Brice Calkins, Igor Vayshenker, Steven M. Gruber, and Sae Woo Nam  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 10, pp. 9102-9110 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.009102


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1328 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We present a compact packaging technique for coupling light from a single-mode telecommunication fiber to cryogenic single-photon sensitive devices. Our single-photon detectors are superconducting transition-edge sensors (TESs) with a collection area only a factor of a few larger than the area of the fiber core which presents significant challenges to low-loss fiber-to-detector coupling. The coupling method presented here has low loss, cryogenic compatibility, easy and reproducible assembly and low component cost. The system efficiency of the packaged single-photon counting detectors is verified by the “triplet method” of power-source calibration along with the “multiple attenuator” method that produces a calibrated single-photon flux. These calibration techniques, when used in combination with through-wafer imaging and fiber back-reflection measurements, give us confidence that we have achieved coupling losses below 1 % for all devices packaged according to the self-alignment method presented in this paper.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

In fiber-coupled optoelectronic systems, source-to-fiber and fiber-to-detector coupling of light has been traditionally important for reducing optical losses. However, recent emerging applications of quantum optical systems have placed increasingly stringent requirements on these coupling connections [1

1. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46–52 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

,2

2. M. Varnava, D. E. Browne, and T. Rudolph, “How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Theoretical and experimental progress in these fields has motivated the development of extremely high-efficiency single-photon optical systems, including sources, optics, and detectors. In this paper we present the design, fabrication, and demonstration of a fiber-to-detector coupling technique that exhibits low loss, cryogenic compatibility, easy and reproducible assembly, and results in a compact assembled package with low component cost.

Our method exploits the micrometer resolution of photolithographic processes to etch the outer edges of a device-bearing silicon substrate. The substrate is micromachined into a circular shape to a precision of approximately one micrometer in diameter. We then leverage the commercially available high-tolerance fiber-alignment components ubiquitous in the telecommunication industry to align a ferrule-terminated single-mode fiber to the center of the circular substrate. By ensuring our optical photon-counting device is centered on the circular substrate, we easily achieve alignment accuracy comparable to, or exceeding, the best attained by manual alignment under a microscope by use of micromanipulators or micrometer stages.

The impetus to develop new fiber-to-detector coupling comes from the high performance of our existing superconducting transition-edge sensors (TESs) used for number-resolved single-photon counting [3

3. A. J. Miller, S. Nam, J. M. Martinis, and A. V. Sergienko, “Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 791 – 793 (2003). [CrossRef]

]. As the device quantum efficiency (QE) of the TES devices has approached 100 % [4

4. A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Exp. 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]

], the few-percent losses from system components must be eliminated for the full benefit of the ultra-high device efficiency to be available for science applications. Additionally, because our devices require sub-Kelvin cryogenic operation, we have additional challenging engineering requirements. Our goals for this coupling method are as follows: (1) losses below 1 %, (2) sub-Kelvin operating temperatures, (3) no moving parts at low temperature, (4) fast assembly with no manual alignment, (5) compact packaging to enable many detectors in limited cryogenic volume, and (6) exploit low-cost commercial, off-the-shelf components as much as possible.

Prior to implementation of the “self-alignment” method presented in this paper, manual alignment of devices has resulted in fiber-to-detector coupling above 85 %, with some approaching 100 % [4

4. A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Exp. 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]

6

6. T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, T. S. Clement, B. Calkins, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, A. L. Migdall, S. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and E. Knill, “Generation of optical coherent state superpositions by number-resolved photon subtraction from squeezed vacuum,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 031802 (2010). [CrossRef]

]. However, this manual method of alignment had significant drawbacks: 1) alignment required manipulation of device mounts under a microscope by use of micrometer-resolution movement stages, 2) the alignment process took approximately 30 minutes per device by a skilled operator, 3) the cryogenic device package required careful material selection, mechanical design, and machining to minimize losses from thermal-contraction-induced alignment errors, 4) substrate thickness and machined component measurements were made on each device and machined package to ensure that the distance between the fiber tip and the device was sufficient to allow for the thermal contraction of the entire assembly to prevent catastrophic damage to the detectors, and 5) the manual alignment process and subsequent assembly yielded a coupling efficiency above 85 % for only about one quarter of the devices, when tested cryogenically.

2. Fiber-to-detector self-alignment

Figure 1 shows the components and completed assembly for the design presented here. The fiber coupling consists of four critical alignment components, enumerated by the labels given in Fig. 1:a standard telecommunication single-mode-fiber (SMF) terminated by a zirconia ferrule, (b) zirconia alignment sleeve, (c), (d), (e) the custom micromachined device substrate, and a custom back-side zirconia or sapphire substrate ferrule. This technique allows the detector (typically 25 μm×25 μm) to be placed in the middle of a micromachined Si disk that has a diameter slightly less than the inner diameter of a telecommunications fiber ferrule sleeve. The precise dimensions of the standard fiber ferrule sleeve makes possible the alignment of the ∼9 μm diameter core of the fiber to the high-QE detector. Self-alignment is ensured by the precise dimensions of circular chips, fiber ferrule and ceramic alignment sleeve. The use of zirconia ceramic ferrules and sleeves is standard in the telecommunications industry and results in sub-micrometer center-to-center lateral alignment between opposing ferrules.

Fig. 1 Complete fiber-to-detector assembly showing (a) single-mode fiber terminated in a stainless steel and zirconia ferrule inserted into (b) a zirconia alignment sleeve (outlined for clarity). The completed detector and substrate (c) has wiring along a silicon “tongue” (d) that extends out the zirconia sleeve (e) and is wirebonded to pins (f) that allow electrical connection to cryogenic pre-amplifiers. A fully assembled device viewed via through-wafer infrared imaging showing (g) the laser light (bright) centered on the 25 μm×25 μm square device (dark square). A complete cryogenic assembly (h) containing 16 self-aligned, fiber-coupled photon-number-resolving devices.

The circular silicon substrate is patterned by use of the standard semiconductor photolithography processes. The silicon is then micromachined with a standard Bosch dry-etch process that provides a near-vertical etch profile through the 275 μm thick Si wafer. For this thickness of substrate we observe approximately 1 μm of undercut around the circular edges of the 2.5 mm-diameter substrates. During the long-duration through-wafer etch, the photoresist gets slowly etched as well. Consequently, a photoresist of thickness 7 μm is required to protect the top-side wiring and devices from etch-induced damage. All processing steps (e.g., photoresist baking, wafer mounting on carrier wafer, and lateral etch, etching time based on silicon substrate thickness) are carefully characterized to ensure that the cumulative variability in the photoresist reflow, developing undercut, and etch undercut are designed to achieve the final substrate diameter of (2.497±0.001) mm, targeted at an outer diameter 3 μm smaller than the inner diameter of the alignment sleeve to allow for damage-free assembly.

Our circular substrates have an integrated Si beam (or “tongue”) that extends through the ceramic alignment sleeve, as seen in Fig. 1(e). The opening of the sleeve is specified to be 1 mm wide to accommodate the 800 μm wide Si beam that carries the detector wiring out through the slot to enable wirebonding to the machined metal substrate holder, as seen in Fig. 1(e). The back-side ferrule is press-fit into a machined hole to capture the ferrule and to provide thermal connection between the zirconia components and the cooled metal components. It is important for the cryogenic compatibility that the ferrule-sleeve-substrate-ferrule assembly is attached to the cryostat at only one end. As the assembly is cooled from room temperature to below 1 K the single-end connection enables the assembly to thermally contract without introducing appreciable displacement between the zirconia components and the silicon substrate. Such displacement may induce coupling losses or, at worst, physical detector damage.

3. Alignment verification

To determine the effectiveness of this coupling scheme, the backing ferrule was replaced by a glass cylinder with dimensions matching the ferrule. Laser light of 1550 nm wavelength wavelength was sent into the fiber and images of the transmission of the laser light through a device and through the substrate were acquired with an infrared camera; an example image is shown in Fig. 1(g). The location of the centroid of the laser spot was recorded relative to the device geometry. In the image, the device is a thin (20 nm thick) tungsten square of 25 μm×25 μm. Measurements from the independent assembly of 35 such aligned devices resulted in the distribution of offset errors shown in Fig. 2. Also shown is the best-fit normal distribution with a mean offset error of 3.1 μm. This non-zero offset is consistent with the designed 3 μm undersizing of the substrate diameter relative to the inner diameter of the zirconia alignment sleeve. Assuming the fiber mode is Gaussian with a mode-field diameter of 10 μm and a 25 μm×25 μm square detector, an alignment error of 3 μm is calculated to result in a decrease in coupling efficiency of less than 0.1 %.

Fig. 2 Result of the measurement of the alignment error from 35 assembled transition-edge sensor photon counters by use of the self-aligning fiber-to-detector method. The average radial displacement was ∼3 μm, consistent with the intentional 3 μm substrate undersizing.

A second indication that the alignment is sufficient to place the fiber over our devices is the measured back-reflection from the fiber-coupled device. Figure 3 shows the less than 1 % absolute reflectivity from seven independently assembled self-aligned fiber-coupled devices across the C and L telecommunication bands (1525–1630 nm). Each device was illuminated with a tunable laser source and the reflected power was measured by use of a fiber circulator. The resulting back-reflected power was calibrated relative to the known 3.6 % reflection from an unterminated flat-polished fiber. All devices came from a single fabricated wafer in which the device structure was independently measured by use of an optical reflectometer to have a reflectivity of less than 1 % at these wavelengths. The reflection is seen to be consistently very low for the assembled package, giving confidence that the fiber end is well coupled to the highly absorbing detectors.

Fig. 3 Absolute reflectance of eight fiber-coupled devices with maximum absorption at a wavelength near 1580 nm. Reflectance was measured via fiber back-reflection at room temperature.

4. Detector calibration at the single-photon level

The effectiveness of this alignment technique at cryogenic temperatures can be demonstrated by measurements of single-photon system detection efficiency of the aligned devices when they are operating at low temperature (<1 K). System detection efficiency can be given as
ηsystem=ηfiberηcouplingηabsorptionηQEηtrigger,
where η fiber accounts for losses in the optical fiber system between the (room-temperature) light input point and the (cold) detector, η coupling accounts for overlap between the optical mode in the fiber and the detector itself, η absorption is the fraction of the power incident on the device that is absorbed, η QE is the fraction of absorbed photons that result in an electrical signal (pulse) at the detector readout, and η trigger is the fraction of electrical pulses that meet the signal processing trigger criteria and are ultimately counted. For optical TES devices embedded in an optical cavity, η absorption should be near unity [4

4. A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Exp. 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]

, 7

7. A. E. Lita, B. Calkins, L. A. Pellouchoud, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Superconducting transition-edge sensors optimized for high-efficiency photon-number resolving detectors,” Proc. SPIE 7681, 76810D–1–10 (2010).

]. The factor η QE is unity because an absorbed photon must produce an increase in the temperature of the superconducting thermometer. For high signal-to-noise and pulsed operation as in this work, η trigger is near unity, however this factor could be less than unity in cases of high CW count rates or low signal-to-noise on photon events. We expect that all losses are small relative to coupling losses and a measurement of system detection efficiency is a reasonable proxy for a measurement of coupling efficiency.

Currently there does not exist a calibrated single-photon source. As a result, measurements of the detection efficiency of a single-photon detector must rely on a calibrated optical power source, combined with a series of carefully measured linear optical attenuators. One way of doing this measurement is diagrammed in Fig. 4. In order for this setup to work, the optical attenuators must be switchable, repeatable, and linear, and the power meter must be calibrated at a variety of input power levels. The total dynamic range of the power meter calibration determines the attenuation that can be applied by each attenuator, and the output power of the source then determines the number of attenuators that must be used. When all attenuators are activated, the result is an indirectly calibrated single-photon source. The dominant uncertainty in this calibration is a multiple (in this case, three) of the systematic error in the calibration of the power meter. In practice, the calibration of the optical power meter comes in two parts. First, the power meter response is compared to a transfer standard detector at the wavelength of interest, and at a given input power level [8

8. J. H. Lehman and X. Li, “A transfer standard for optical fiber power metrology,” Appl. Opt. 38, 7164–7166 (1999).

]. In our case this calibration was done by the optical fiber power metrology group at NIST, Boulder Colorado. Secondly, the linearity of the power meter response is measured relative to the calibration power level by means of a series of additive power measurements [9

9. I. Vayshenker, S. Yang, X. Li, T. R. Scott, and C. L. Cromer, “Optical fiber power meter nonlinearity calibrations at NIST,” NIST Special Publication 250–56 (2000).

]. The setup for this linearity calibration is shown in Fig. 5, and is known as a triplet measurement. By comparing the power measured from each of the two beamsplitter arms alone to the power measured when the two arms are combined, it is possible to determine the relative difference in the response of the power meter at those two power levels. By making many of these measurements over the entire dynamic range of the power meter, a dynamic calibration curve can be generated.

Fig. 4 Multiple-attenuator method for measuring the single-photon detection efficiency of a device under test (DUT).
Fig. 5 Setup for power meter nonlinearity calibration. Power measurement V 1 is taken with shutter 2 closed, V 2 is taken with shutter 1 closed, and V 3 is taken with both shutters open. The extra mandrel of optical fiber is chosen so that the path difference is much longer than the coherence length of the source. Comparing the three measurements at a given power level indicates the local nonlinearity of the power meter.

Fig. 6 Example dynamic calibration curves for a wavelength of 1550 nm. Calibrated input power levels are given by (measured power)/(correction factor).
Fig. 7 Example dynamic calibration curves for a wavelength of 860 nm. Calibrated input power levels are given by (measured power)/(correction factor).

Fig. 8 System detection efficiency results in absolute percent for self-aligned TES devices from four separate wafer fabrication runs. Devices are optimized for optimal efficiency at a wavelength of 805 nm (○), 850 nm (+), and 1550 nm (×). Points at each wavelength are arbitrarily offset horizontally for clarity. Efficiency measurements were made using pulsed diode laser sources at the design wavelength of each device.

5. Conclusion

The nearly lossless, self-aligning fiber-to-detector coupling method described in this paper has been demonstrated to be reproducible, cryogenically stable, and simple to assemble, and is now used as our primary fiber-coupling method for high-efficiency photon-number resolving devices. The single-photon-level detector calibration scheme has enabled the demonstration of a robust, self-aligning packaging technique that shows no indication of alignment drift across multiple warm-up/cool-down cycles for a packaged device. We expect this technique to gain widespread adoption for the low-loss coupling of optical fibers to cryogenic devices.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIST Quantum Information Initiative and the Albion College Faculty Development Fund. The authors are grateful to Daniel Schmidt at NIST for his assistance in photographing our assemblies, Marty Gould for machining and mechanical advice and Jeff VanLanen for aid in implementing many of the techniques presented. This work is a contribution of the US Government and is not subject to US Copyright.

References and links

1.

E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46–52 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2.

M. Varnava, D. E. Browne, and T. Rudolph, “How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

3.

A. J. Miller, S. Nam, J. M. Martinis, and A. V. Sergienko, “Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 791 – 793 (2003). [CrossRef]

4.

A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Exp. 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]

5.

D. Rosenberg, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Noise-free high-efficiency photon-number-resolving detectors,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 61803 (2005). [CrossRef]

6.

T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, T. S. Clement, B. Calkins, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, A. L. Migdall, S. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and E. Knill, “Generation of optical coherent state superpositions by number-resolved photon subtraction from squeezed vacuum,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 031802 (2010). [CrossRef]

7.

A. E. Lita, B. Calkins, L. A. Pellouchoud, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Superconducting transition-edge sensors optimized for high-efficiency photon-number resolving detectors,” Proc. SPIE 7681, 76810D–1–10 (2010).

8.

J. H. Lehman and X. Li, “A transfer standard for optical fiber power metrology,” Appl. Opt. 38, 7164–7166 (1999).

9.

I. Vayshenker, S. Yang, X. Li, T. R. Scott, and C. L. Cromer, “Optical fiber power meter nonlinearity calibrations at NIST,” NIST Special Publication 250–56 (2000).

OCIS Codes
(060.2380) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics sources and detectors
(220.1140) Optical design and fabrication : Alignment

ToC Category:
Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

History
Original Manuscript: March 8, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: March 25, 2011
Published: April 25, 2011

Citation
Aaron J. Miller, Adriana E. Lita, Brice Calkins, Igor Vayshenker, Steven M. Gruber, and Sae Woo Nam, "Compact cryogenic self-aligning fiber-to-detector coupling with losses below one percent," Opt. Express 19, 9102-9110 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-10-9102


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46–52 (2001). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. M. Varnava, D. E. Browne, and T. Rudolph, “How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. A. J. Miller, S. Nam, J. M. Martinis, and A. V. Sergienko, “Demonstration of a low-noise near-infrared photon counter with multiphoton discrimination,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 791 – 793 (2003). [CrossRef]
  4. A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Exp. 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]
  5. D. Rosenberg, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Noise-free high-efficiency photon-number-resolving detectors,” Phys. Rev. A 71, 61803 (2005). [CrossRef]
  6. T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, T. S. Clement, B. Calkins, A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, A. L. Migdall, S. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and E. Knill, “Generation of optical coherent state superpositions by number-resolved photon subtraction from squeezed vacuum,” Phys. Rev. A 82, 031802 (2010). [CrossRef]
  7. A. E. Lita, B. Calkins, L. A. Pellouchoud, A. J. Miller, and S. Nam, “Superconducting transition-edge sensors optimized for high-efficiency photon-number resolving detectors,” Proc. SPIE 7681, 76810D–1–10 (2010).
  8. J. H. Lehman and X. Li, “A transfer standard for optical fiber power metrology,” Appl. Opt. 38, 7164–7166 (1999).
  9. I. Vayshenker, S. Yang, X. Li, T. R. Scott, and C. L. Cromer, “Optical fiber power meter nonlinearity calibrations at NIST,” NIST Special Publication 250–56 (2000).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited