OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 13 — Jun. 20, 2011
  • pp: 12418–12426
« Show journal navigation

Fiber-tip micro-cavity for temperature and transverse load sensing

Jun Ma, Jian Ju, Long Jin, Wei Jin, and Dongning Wang  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 13, pp. 12418-12426 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.012418


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1278 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

A low cost fiber-optic micro-cavity interferometric sensor is presented. The micro-cavity is fabricated at the fiber tip by splicing a silica capillary to a single mode fiber and then heating/melting the capillary to form a microsphere with an internal air cavity. Applications of the micro-cavity sensor for temperature and traverse load measurements are demonstrated. The sensor has small size and good mechanical strength, and may be used in high temperature environment.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

Optical fiber Fabry-Perot interferometers (FPIs) have been widely used for sensing temperature, strain, pressure, and etc [1

1. Y. J. Rao, “Recent progress in fiber-optic extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensors,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 12(3), 227–237 (2006). [CrossRef]

8

8. J. Villatoro, V. Finazzi, G. Coviello, and V. Pruneri, “Photonic-crystal-fiber-enabled micro-Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 34(16), 2441–2443 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. Strain sensors have been made by inserting two pieces of single mode fiber (SMF) into a tube to form an FPI by the air-gap between two air-silica interfaces [2

2. V. Bhatia, K. A. Murphy, R. O. Claus, M. E. Jones, J. L. Grace, T. A. Tran, and J. A. Greene, “Optical fiber based absolute extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensing system,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 7(1), 58–61 (1996). [CrossRef]

]. FPIs have also been fabricated by splicing a short segment of hollow-core fiber or hollow-core photonic bandgap fiber between two sections of SMFs [4

4. J. S. Sirkis, D. D. Brennan, M. A. Putman, T. A. Berkoff, A. D. Kersey, and E. J. Friebele, “In-line fiber etalon for strain measurement,” Opt. Lett. 18(22), 1973–1975 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 5

5. Y. J. Rao, M. Deng, T. Zhu, and H. Li, “In-line Fabry-Perot etalons based on hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers for high-temperature applications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(19), 4360–4365 (2009). [CrossRef]

]. Recently, FPIs were fabricated by ablating a groove in a SMF by use of a femtosecond laser, and were studied for strain [6

6. Y. J. Rao, M. Deng, D. W. Duan, X. C. Yang, T. Zhu, and G. H. Cheng, “Micro Fabry-Perot interferometers in silica fibers machined by femtosecond laser,” Opt. Express 15(21), 14123–14128 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and refractive index measurement [7

7. T. Wei, Y. Han, Y. Li, H.-L. Tsai, and H. Xiao, “Temperature-insensitive miniaturized fiber inline Fabry-Perot interferometer for highly sensitive refractive index measurement,” Opt. Express 16(8), 5764–5769 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. However, the aforementioned methods for FPI fabrication need stringent alignment between the two fibers inserting into the tube, careful cleaving, and/or the use of expensive lasers. In addition, the multiple splices or surface imperfection (i.e., ablation) would degrade the mechanical strength of the fiber, which is important for many practical applications.

In this paper, we demonstrate a low cost fiber-tip FPI-like micro-cavity sensor for high temperature and transverse-load measurement. This sensor is fabricated by splicing a silica capillary to a SMF and then fusing (heating/melting) the capillary to form a microsphere with an internal air-cavity. In the entire fabrication process, only a fusion splicer is needed. The fabrication of the sensor is reported in section 2, and the results of temperature and transverse load measurements are presented respectively in sections 3 and 4, followed by a brief summary of the findings.

2. Fabrication of micro-cavity

Figure 1
Fig. 1 Fabrication of the micro-cavity. (a) Splice a silica capillary to a SMF; (b) heat and melt the capillary to form an air cavity (L: distance from electrode to the SMF end); (c) a sketch showing the fiber-tip micro-cavity; microscope image of (d) capillary cross-section and (e) micro-cavity.
shows the fabrication process of the fiber-tip micro-cavity. Firstly, a conventional SMF (SMF28) is spliced to a capillary with an outer diameter D = 126 µm and an inner diameter d = 75 µm, by use of the normal-splice-program of an Ericsson FSU-975 fusion splicer. The splice joint is then moved horizontally by use of a translation stage so that the position of the splicer’s electrodes offsets the splice joint by L. Afterward, the splicing parameters are adjusted to increase the arc discharge current to ~20 mA and the discharge time to ~1 s, the arc discharge is then applied to the capillary section, as shown in Fig. 1(b). During the discharge, the temperature reaches the softening/melting point of silica and the capillary is separated into two parts. One part is a microsphere with an internal air-cavity and is firmly attached to the end of the SMF, as shown in Figs. 1(c) and 1(e). For the example shown in Fig. 1(e), the value of L used is ~ 400 µm; the length (d*) of the air cavity is estimated, by using an optical microscope, to be ~ 84 µm, and the thickness (t) of the outer silica wall (between surfaces 2 and 3) is ~ 30 µm. The length and the shape of the air-cavity may be adjusted by the offset distance L. In the whole process, only a fusion splicer is used and no additional alignment procedure is needed.

Considering that the reflectivity of the silica/air interface is less than 3.5%, the higher-order reflections from these surfaces may be ignored [8

8. J. Villatoro, V. Finazzi, G. Coviello, and V. Pruneri, “Photonic-crystal-fiber-enabled micro-Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 34(16), 2441–2443 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. As a result, three reflected waves may be collected and guided back along the SMF: one is from the end of the SMF (1), the other two are from the inner and outer surfaces of the silica wall (2, 3), as indicated in Fig. 1(c). These three reflected beams interfere and the return light intensity will be modulated [9

9. Y. Zhu and A. Wang, “Miniature fiber-optic pressure sensor,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(2), 447–449 (2005). [CrossRef]

].

Figure 2(a)
Fig. 2 Reflection spectrum of the micro-cavity shown in Fig. 1(e). The fiber-tip is placed (a) in air and (b) in a liquid with refractive index of 1.4. The spectrums were normalized by the source spectrum.
shows the measured reflection spectrum of the micro-cavity shown in Fig. 1(e). The spectrum was measured using the setup shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Setup for measuring the reflection spectrum of the micro-cavity sensor; (b) spectrum of the BBS; (c) setup for transverse load test.
. A broadband source (BBS) and an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) are connected to the two input ports of a 3-dB coupler. The fiber-tip micro-cavity senor is connected to the output port. The BBS consists of five individual super-luminescent light emitting diodes (LEDs) with wavelength ranging from 1200 nm to 1700 nm and the spectrum of the BBS is shown in Fig. 3(b). The spectrum of the micro-cavity shows an interference fringe visibility of ~15 dB. The fringes are the results of the coherent mixing of the three reflected waves. By immersing the fiber-tip into a refractive index liquid with n = 1.4, the reflection from the outer silica surface (3) is minimized and the reflections from the two inner surfaces of the air-cavity become dominant. The reflection spectrum is changed to Fig. 2(b). The interference fringes in Fig. 2(b) are not exactly sinusoidal, probably due to the divergence of the beam when traveling outside of the SMF fiber and the residual reflection from the outer silica surface. Nevertheless, from Fig. 2(b), we may estimate the effective length d* of the air-cavity, by using the relationshipΔλ=λ2/2naird*, to be d* = 76 µm, where Δλ denotes the fringe wavelength spacing, nair (≈1) is the refractive index of air.

By changing the offset distance L, micro-cavities with different cavity lengths can be fabricated. Figure 4(a)
Fig. 4 (a) Dependence of air-cavity length on offset distance L; (b) relationship between fringe wavelength spacing and air-cavity length.
shows the measured air-cavity lengths with an optical microscope for several micro-cavities made with different offset distances. The cavity length increases in general with the offset distance L, but the slope becomes small for L < 200 µm. Figure 4(b) shows the fringe wavelength spacing around 1525 nm for micro-cavities with different air-cavity lengths. The calculated results (the solid curve) are close to the ones estimated by using the microscope image (the dots). The discrepancy may arise from the refraction of spherical shape of the cavity as well as the inaccuracy of microscope measurement, which was found to vary considerably with the position of the focal plane.

Figure 5
Fig. 5 Micro-cavities fabricated with different offset distances L. (a) 300 µm; (b) 400µm; (c) 700µm.
shows the microscope images of the micro-cavities fabricated with L = 300, 400, and 700 µm. In addition to the air-cavity length, the thickness of the silica wall t also has an increasing trend with L. However, when the offset distance L is smaller than 200 µm, the air cavity is difficult to be reduced further. The reason might be that for smaller air cavity, the effect of inner air-pressure, which tends to increase the air cavity size during the arc discharge process, becomes dominant and prevents the further reduction of the air cavity.

3. Response to temperature

3.1 Experimental test

The temperature characteristics of a fiber-tip micro-cavity sensor were measured by using a similar system shown in Fig. 3. The fiber-tip was placed horizontally in a furnace. The heating rate of the furnace was set to be 15 °C/min, and the temperature was raised in steps of 100 °C and maintained for about 30 min at each step to make sure the temperature in the furnace have stabilized. After the temperature reached 1000 °C, the heating process was stopped and the temperature was decreased by natural cooling. The cooling process was also in steps of 100 °C, and the temperature was maintained for about 30 min. In order to test the repeatability, the heating and cooling cycle was repeated for 3 times. The fiber-tip was not immersed into the refractive index liquid and the fringes observed are due to the interference of the three reflected waves (three-wave mode) with a reflection spectrum similar to the one shown in Fig. 2(a).

Figure 7
Fig. 7 (a) Spectrum of micro-cavity sensors fabricated with different offset distances L. The spectrums are offset vertically for the purpose of easy observation. The actual spectrums are all around the level of - 30 dB; (b) Dip wavelengths as function of temperature for cavities made with different offset distances L.
shows the spectrums of micro-cavity sensors fabricated with different offset distances L = 200, 300 and 400 µm. The temperature sensitivity of the sensor was studied by monitoring the wavelengths corresponding to specific dips (i.e., dips 1 and 2 as indicated in Fig. 7(a)) in the interference spectrum. The measured sensitivities of the dip wavelengths for three different sensors are listed in the Table 1

Table 1. Temperature characteristics of micro-cavity sensors fabricated by different offset distances

table-icon
View This Table
. The cavity length d* and the silica wall thickness t in Table 1 were estimated by use of an optical microscope. The smaller value of t for L = 300 µm may be caused by the instability of the arc-discharges.

3.2 Discussion

As mentioned in sections 2 and 3.1, the fringes shown in Figs. 2(a), 6(a) and 7(a) are due to interference of three waves, which are respectively reflected from the three surfaces as shown in Fig. 1(c). For the reflected waves associated with the internal air-cavity, the thermally induced refractive index change of air may be negligible [3

3. H. Y. Choi, K. S. Park, S. J. Park, U. C. Paek, B. H. Lee, and E. S. Choi, “Miniature fiber-optic high temperature sensor based on a hybrid structured Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 33(21), 2455–2457 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

] and the thermal expansion of the cavity length would then play a main role in the temperature sensitivity. An increase of the temperature will elongate the cavity length d*, which increases Δϕ=4πd*/λ and leads to the red shift of the dip wavelength. The wavelength shift of the two-wave interference pattern to temperature is given as follows,
Δλλ=(ΔLL+Δnn)=ε+κ
(1)
where ε is the thermal expansion coefficient and κ is the thermo-optic coefficient. For pure silica, ε=5.5×10−7 and κ=1.0×10−5 [10

10. V. B. Braginsky, M. L. Gorodetsky, and S. P. Vyatchanin, “Thermo-refractive noise in gravitational wave antennae,” Phys. Lett. A 271(5-6), 303–307 (2000). [CrossRef]

]. If only the interference between the two reflected waves from the air-cavity (i.e., surfaces 1 and 2) is considered, the sensitivity of the dip wavelength (around 1513 nm) to temperature is theoretically estimated to be ~0.83 pm/°C. This is significantly different from the measured sensitivity, which is almost an order of magnitude higher than the FPI reported previously [8

8. J. Villatoro, V. Finazzi, G. Coviello, and V. Pruneri, “Photonic-crystal-fiber-enabled micro-Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 34(16), 2441–2443 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. If the fringe shift for the interference between reflected waves from surfaces 2 and 3 is considered, the temperature sensitivity is ~15.96 pm/°C. As a result, we believe the high temperature sensitivity of the micro-cavity sensor is mainly due to the thermally induced refractive index change of silica wall, which affects both the phase difference between reflected waves from surface 3 and surface 2, and the reflected waves from surface 3 and surface 1.

However, the above discussion based on the two-wave interference cannot accurately predict the significantly different temperature sensitivities of the different interference dips. To better understand the thermal behavior of the micro-cavity sensor, we consider the three waves interference model. The light intensity at the sensor output may be expressed as below [11

11. Y. Zhu, K. L. Cooper, G. R. Pickrell, and A. Wang, “High-temperature fiber-tip pressure sensor,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(2), 861–869 (2006). [CrossRef]

],
I|E|2=|E1E2exp(4πλnaird*)+E3exp[4πλ(nsilicat+naird*)]|2                                                                                       =E12+E22+E322E1E2cos(4πλnaird*)2E2E3cos(4πλnsilicat)                                                                                                         +2E1E3cos[4πλ(nsilicat+naird*)]
(2)
where, E1, E2, and E3 are respectively the amplitudes of the three reflected waves, d* is the length of the air cavity, t is the thickness of the outside silica wall, λ is light wavelength, and nair and nsilica are respectively the refractive indexes of air and silica. The negative sign before E2 is due to the π-phase shift of reflection at surface 2.

By curve fitting the interference pattern (e.g., Fig. 2a)), the value of E1, E2, E3, d* and t can be acquired. Then the temperature sensitivity of the micro-cavity sensor can be estimated theoretically. Taking the micro-cavity sensor fabricated with offset distance L = 400 µm as an example, the air-cavity length and thickness of the silica wall are found to be d* = 83 µm and t = 58 µm, very close to the results obtained from the microscope as in Table 1. The calculated sensitivities are respectively 10.6 pm/°C and 6.5 pm/°C for wavelength dips around 1503 and 1513 nm, close to the measured values in Table 1.

To ensure unambiguous and absolute temperature measurement, the values of d* and/or t need to be demodulated or recovered accurately. This in principle can be done by curve fitting the measured spectrums but may be impractical for field applications due to dependence on appropriate initial conditions and the large number of variables which results in computational ineffectiveness [11

11. Y. Zhu, K. L. Cooper, G. R. Pickrell, and A. Wang, “High-temperature fiber-tip pressure sensor,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(2), 861–869 (2006). [CrossRef]

]. The spherical reflection surface instead of standard plane surface may also induce inaccuracy and need special models which may further increase the demodulation complexity.

The sensor demodulation may be significantly simplified if only two-beams involved in the interference process. This can be achieved by reducing reflection from the outer silica surface by for example immersing or imbedding the fiber-tip into a higher index material or simply blackening or roughening the outer silica surface to reduce reflection. Then, only interference of the two beams reflected from two air-cavity surfaces remains. This also significantly reduces the temperature sensitivity of the sensor, which may be beneficial to some applications. An example of such applications is presented in section 4.

4. Response to transverse load

4.1 Experimental test

Transverse load detection has important applications in structural health monitoring. Compared with the strain sensing, the transverse load is in the direction perpendicular to the fiber axis. In the past years, transverse load sensing have been realized by using fiber Bragg grating (FBG) [12

12. M. LeBlanc, S. T. Vohra, T. E. Tsai, and E. J. Friebele, “Transverse load sensing by use of pi-phase-shifted fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Lett. 24(16), 1091–1093 (1999). [CrossRef]

15

15. T. Geernaert, G. Luyckx, E. Voet, T. Nasilowski, K. Chah, M. Becker, H. Bartelt, W. Urbanczyk, J. Wojcik, W. De Waele, J. Degrieck, H. Terryn, F. Berghmans, and H. Thienpont, “Transversal load sensing with fiber Bragg gratings in microstructured optical fibers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(1), 6–8 (2009). [CrossRef]

] or long period grating (LPG) [16

16. Y. Liu, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Fibre optic load sensors with high transverse strain sensitivity based on long-period gratings in B/Ge co-doped fibre,” Electron. Lett. 35(8), 661–663 (2002). [CrossRef]

].

Transverse load measurement was carried with a fiber-tip micro-cavity sensor with an air cavity length of ~100 µm and an outer silica wall thickness (i.e., the separation between surfaces 2 and 3) of ~ 60 µm. The measurement setup is similar to that shown in Fig. 3, and the measured reflection spectrums without transverse loading are shown in Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Reflection spectrum of a fiber-tip micro-cavity. The fiber-tip is (a) without blackening process and (b) after blackening process. No transverse load is applied.
. Figure 8(a) shows the reflection spectrum where all the three reflected waves are involved in the interference process, while Fig. 8(b) is the spectrum when the outer surface of the tip (surface 3) was blackened by applying matt black aerosol paint. The blackening is preferred over surface roughening, which might comprise the mechanical strength of the sensor.

The blackened sensor head was placed between two parallel metal plates as shown in Fig. 3(c). Different transverse loads were applied perpendicularly to the upper plate and the fringe dip wavelength is recorded. With the increase of the transverse load, the cavity elongates longitudinally, which causes the phase difference between the two beams (Δφ=4πd*/λ) to increase. This makes the reflected spectrum shift to longer wavelength. As shown in Fig. 9(a)
Fig. 9 (a) Transverse load sensitivity of the micro-cavity sensor in the range of 0 - 5 N; insert: reflection spectrum for different transverse loads; (b) temperature sensitivity of the micro-cavity sensor.
, the sensor shows a transverse load sensitivity of ~ 1.37 nm/N. In the experiment, we also find that the transverse load sensitivity of the micro-cavity sensor depends on the cavity shape and cavity center position in the fiber tip. By more careful design, the sensitivity may be further enhanced. Working is continuing along this direction.

The temperature response of the micro-cavity sensor was also tested and shown in Fig. 9(b). The temperature sensitivity is ~ 2.1 pm/°C. It should be emphasized that this is the sensitivity of the air-cavity, i.e., the interference between the reflected waves from surfaces 1 and 2, and the reflections from surface 3 is minimized by blackening the surface 3 as mentioned previously. For such an air-cavity, the thermally induced refractive index change of air may be negligible and the thermal expansion of the cavity length would play a main role in the temperature sensitivity. An increase of the temperature will elongate the cavity length d*, leading to the red shift of the dip wavelength. The low sensitivity of the micro-cavity sensor to temperature would be beneficial to temperature insensitive transverse load sensing.

4.2 Discussion

Compared with the FBG or LPG based transverse load sensors that have the highest transverse load sensitivity of ~1 nm/N [16

16. Y. Liu, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Fibre optic load sensors with high transverse strain sensitivity based on long-period gratings in B/Ge co-doped fibre,” Electron. Lett. 35(8), 661–663 (2002). [CrossRef]

], the micro-cavity transverse load sensor shows a higher sensitivity of 1.37 nm/N. If no temperature compensation is used, the error caused by temperature cross-sensitivity will be about 1.5×10−3 N/°C. This may be neglected in applications in which large transverse load is involved. The micro-cavity sensor is similar to a point-contact load sensor and the high sensitivity is believed to be caused by the large pressure created by the load on the small contacting area. Hence, appropriate package is important for the senor to maintain the high transverse load sensitivity in practical applications.

5. Conclusion

In summary, a compact fiber-tip micro-cavity sensor was fabricated by use of the electric arc discharge to melt a section of capillary which is spliced to a single mode fiber end. The micro-cavity sensor demonstrated an interference fringe visibility exceeding 15 dB. The sensor can work a three-wave interference mode or a two-wave interference mode. In the three-wave mode, a temperature sensor with good repeatability up to 1000 °C was demonstrated. In the two-wave mode, a transverse load sensor with a high sensitivity of ~ 1.37 nm/N and a low temperature sensitivity of ~ 2.1 pm/°C was demonstrated. The sensor is tiny and works in a reflection mode, and hence may be used in space-limited environment.

In addition, refractive index sensing may be implemented by filling the air-cavity with the target liquid through for example a hole dilled transversely [7

7. T. Wei, Y. Han, Y. Li, H.-L. Tsai, and H. Xiao, “Temperature-insensitive miniaturized fiber inline Fabry-Perot interferometer for highly sensitive refractive index measurement,” Opt. Express 16(8), 5764–5769 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

]. The micro-cavity sensor may also be used as a sensitive pressure detector if the outer silica wall could be made thinner using for example wet etching [17

17. J. Xu, X. Wang, K. L. Cooper, and A. Wang, “Miniature all-silica fiber optic pressure and acoustic sensors,” Opt. Lett. 30(24), 3269–3271 (2005). [CrossRef]

]. The good high temperature performance and mechanical strength means that the micro-cavity sensor may be used as gas/liquid pressure sensor in harsh (high temperature) environment. We are currently working along this direction.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Hong Kong SAR government through grant PolyU5196/09E and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University through grant J-BB9K.

References and links

1.

Y. J. Rao, “Recent progress in fiber-optic extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensors,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 12(3), 227–237 (2006). [CrossRef]

2.

V. Bhatia, K. A. Murphy, R. O. Claus, M. E. Jones, J. L. Grace, T. A. Tran, and J. A. Greene, “Optical fiber based absolute extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensing system,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 7(1), 58–61 (1996). [CrossRef]

3.

H. Y. Choi, K. S. Park, S. J. Park, U. C. Paek, B. H. Lee, and E. S. Choi, “Miniature fiber-optic high temperature sensor based on a hybrid structured Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 33(21), 2455–2457 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

J. S. Sirkis, D. D. Brennan, M. A. Putman, T. A. Berkoff, A. D. Kersey, and E. J. Friebele, “In-line fiber etalon for strain measurement,” Opt. Lett. 18(22), 1973–1975 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

5.

Y. J. Rao, M. Deng, T. Zhu, and H. Li, “In-line Fabry-Perot etalons based on hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers for high-temperature applications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(19), 4360–4365 (2009). [CrossRef]

6.

Y. J. Rao, M. Deng, D. W. Duan, X. C. Yang, T. Zhu, and G. H. Cheng, “Micro Fabry-Perot interferometers in silica fibers machined by femtosecond laser,” Opt. Express 15(21), 14123–14128 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

7.

T. Wei, Y. Han, Y. Li, H.-L. Tsai, and H. Xiao, “Temperature-insensitive miniaturized fiber inline Fabry-Perot interferometer for highly sensitive refractive index measurement,” Opt. Express 16(8), 5764–5769 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

8.

J. Villatoro, V. Finazzi, G. Coviello, and V. Pruneri, “Photonic-crystal-fiber-enabled micro-Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 34(16), 2441–2443 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9.

Y. Zhu and A. Wang, “Miniature fiber-optic pressure sensor,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(2), 447–449 (2005). [CrossRef]

10.

V. B. Braginsky, M. L. Gorodetsky, and S. P. Vyatchanin, “Thermo-refractive noise in gravitational wave antennae,” Phys. Lett. A 271(5-6), 303–307 (2000). [CrossRef]

11.

Y. Zhu, K. L. Cooper, G. R. Pickrell, and A. Wang, “High-temperature fiber-tip pressure sensor,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(2), 861–869 (2006). [CrossRef]

12.

M. LeBlanc, S. T. Vohra, T. E. Tsai, and E. J. Friebele, “Transverse load sensing by use of pi-phase-shifted fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Lett. 24(16), 1091–1093 (1999). [CrossRef]

13.

M. Silva-Lopez, C. Li, W. N. MacPherson, A. J. Moore, J. S. Barton, J. D. Jones, D. Zhao, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Differential birefringence in Bragg gratings in multicore fiber under transverse stress,” Opt. Lett. 29(19), 2225–2227 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

C. Jewart, K. P. Chen, B. McMillen, M. M. Bails, S. P. Levitan, J. Canning, and I. V. Avdeev, “Sensitivity enhancement of fiber Bragg gratings to transverse stress by using microstructural fibers,” Opt. Lett. 31(15), 2260–2262 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

T. Geernaert, G. Luyckx, E. Voet, T. Nasilowski, K. Chah, M. Becker, H. Bartelt, W. Urbanczyk, J. Wojcik, W. De Waele, J. Degrieck, H. Terryn, F. Berghmans, and H. Thienpont, “Transversal load sensing with fiber Bragg gratings in microstructured optical fibers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(1), 6–8 (2009). [CrossRef]

16.

Y. Liu, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Fibre optic load sensors with high transverse strain sensitivity based on long-period gratings in B/Ge co-doped fibre,” Electron. Lett. 35(8), 661–663 (2002). [CrossRef]

17.

J. Xu, X. Wang, K. L. Cooper, and A. Wang, “Miniature all-silica fiber optic pressure and acoustic sensors,” Opt. Lett. 30(24), 3269–3271 (2005). [CrossRef]

OCIS Codes
(060.2340) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics components
(060.2370) Fiber optics and optical communications : Fiber optics sensors

ToC Category:
Sensors

History
Original Manuscript: January 13, 2011
Revised Manuscript: March 9, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: March 21, 2011
Published: June 13, 2011

Citation
Jun Ma, Jian Ju, Long Jin, Wei Jin, and Dongning Wang, "Fiber-tip micro-cavity for temperature and transverse load sensing," Opt. Express 19, 12418-12426 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-13-12418


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. Y. J. Rao, “Recent progress in fiber-optic extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensors,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 12(3), 227–237 (2006). [CrossRef]
  2. V. Bhatia, K. A. Murphy, R. O. Claus, M. E. Jones, J. L. Grace, T. A. Tran, and J. A. Greene, “Optical fiber based absolute extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric sensing system,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 7(1), 58–61 (1996). [CrossRef]
  3. H. Y. Choi, K. S. Park, S. J. Park, U. C. Paek, B. H. Lee, and E. S. Choi, “Miniature fiber-optic high temperature sensor based on a hybrid structured Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 33(21), 2455–2457 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. S. Sirkis, D. D. Brennan, M. A. Putman, T. A. Berkoff, A. D. Kersey, and E. J. Friebele, “In-line fiber etalon for strain measurement,” Opt. Lett. 18(22), 1973–1975 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Y. J. Rao, M. Deng, T. Zhu, and H. Li, “In-line Fabry-Perot etalons based on hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers for high-temperature applications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(19), 4360–4365 (2009). [CrossRef]
  6. Y. J. Rao, M. Deng, D. W. Duan, X. C. Yang, T. Zhu, and G. H. Cheng, “Micro Fabry-Perot interferometers in silica fibers machined by femtosecond laser,” Opt. Express 15(21), 14123–14128 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. T. Wei, Y. Han, Y. Li, H.-L. Tsai, and H. Xiao, “Temperature-insensitive miniaturized fiber inline Fabry-Perot interferometer for highly sensitive refractive index measurement,” Opt. Express 16(8), 5764–5769 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. J. Villatoro, V. Finazzi, G. Coviello, and V. Pruneri, “Photonic-crystal-fiber-enabled micro-Fabry-Perot interferometer,” Opt. Lett. 34(16), 2441–2443 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Y. Zhu and A. Wang, “Miniature fiber-optic pressure sensor,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 17(2), 447–449 (2005). [CrossRef]
  10. V. B. Braginsky, M. L. Gorodetsky, and S. P. Vyatchanin, “Thermo-refractive noise in gravitational wave antennae,” Phys. Lett. A 271(5-6), 303–307 (2000). [CrossRef]
  11. Y. Zhu, K. L. Cooper, G. R. Pickrell, and A. Wang, “High-temperature fiber-tip pressure sensor,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(2), 861–869 (2006). [CrossRef]
  12. M. LeBlanc, S. T. Vohra, T. E. Tsai, and E. J. Friebele, “Transverse load sensing by use of pi-phase-shifted fiber Bragg gratings,” Opt. Lett. 24(16), 1091–1093 (1999). [CrossRef]
  13. M. Silva-Lopez, C. Li, W. N. MacPherson, A. J. Moore, J. S. Barton, J. D. Jones, D. Zhao, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Differential birefringence in Bragg gratings in multicore fiber under transverse stress,” Opt. Lett. 29(19), 2225–2227 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. C. Jewart, K. P. Chen, B. McMillen, M. M. Bails, S. P. Levitan, J. Canning, and I. V. Avdeev, “Sensitivity enhancement of fiber Bragg gratings to transverse stress by using microstructural fibers,” Opt. Lett. 31(15), 2260–2262 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. T. Geernaert, G. Luyckx, E. Voet, T. Nasilowski, K. Chah, M. Becker, H. Bartelt, W. Urbanczyk, J. Wojcik, W. De Waele, J. Degrieck, H. Terryn, F. Berghmans, and H. Thienpont, “Transversal load sensing with fiber Bragg gratings in microstructured optical fibers,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 21(1), 6–8 (2009). [CrossRef]
  16. Y. Liu, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Fibre optic load sensors with high transverse strain sensitivity based on long-period gratings in B/Ge co-doped fibre,” Electron. Lett. 35(8), 661–663 (2002). [CrossRef]
  17. J. Xu, X. Wang, K. L. Cooper, and A. Wang, “Miniature all-silica fiber optic pressure and acoustic sensors,” Opt. Lett. 30(24), 3269–3271 (2005). [CrossRef]

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.


« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited