OSA's Digital Library

Optics Express

Optics Express

  • Editor: C. Martijn de Sterke
  • Vol. 19, Iss. 18 — Aug. 29, 2011
  • pp: 17372–17377
« Show journal navigation

High dynamic range electric field sensor for electromagnetic pulse detection

Che-Yun Lin, Alan X. Wang, Beom Suk Lee, Xingyu Zhang, and Ray T. Chen  »View Author Affiliations


Optics Express, Vol. 19, Issue 18, pp. 17372-17377 (2011)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.017372


View Full Text Article

Acrobat PDF (1087 KB)





Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Browse by Journal and Year


   


Lookup Conference Papers

Close Browse Journals / Lookup Meetings

Article Tools

Share
Citations

Abstract

We design a high dynamic range electric field sensor based on domain inverted electro-optic (E-O) polymer Y-fed directional coupler for electromagnetic wave detection. This electrode-less, all optical, wideband electrical field sensor is fabricated using standard processing for E-O polymer photonic devices. Experimental results demonstrate effective detection of electric field from 16.7V/m to 750KV/m at a frequency of 1GHz, and spurious free measurement range of 70dB.

© 2011 OSA

1. Introduction

There has been rapidly increasing interest in electric field (E-field) sensors during last decades [1

1. P. Drexler and P. Fiala, “Methods for High-Power EM Pulse Measurement,” IEEE Sens. J. 7(7), 1006–1011 (2007). [CrossRef]

4

4. J. Kanwisher and K. Lawson, “Electromagnetic flow sensors,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 20(2), 174–182 (1975). [CrossRef]

]. Electro-magnetic (EM) wave measurement has played a crucial role in various scientific and technical areas, including process control, E-field monitoring in medical apparatuses, ballistic control, electromagnetic compatibility measurements, microwave-integrated circuit testing, and detection of directional energy weapon attack. Conventional EM wave measurement systems use active metallic probes, which can disturb the EM waves to be measured and make the sensor very sensitive to electromagnetic noises. Photonic E-field sensors exhibit significant advantages with respect to the electronic ones due to their smaller size, lighter weight, higher sensitivity, and extremely broad bandwidth. Because of these exclusive merits, photonic E-field sensors based on integrated optical devices and optical fibers have emerged in the last ten years [2

2. N. Kuwabara, K. Tajima, R. Kobayashi, and F. Amemiya, “Development and analysis of electric field sensor using LiNbO3 optical modulator,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 34(4), 391–396 (1992). [CrossRef]

, 3

3. S. C. Rashleigh, “Magnetic-field sensing with a single-mode fiber,” Opt. Lett. 6(1), 19–21 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 5

5. S. S. Sriram and S. A. Kingsley, “Sensitivity enhancements to photonic electric field sensor,” in SPIE Photonic West, (SPIE, 2004), 143–152.

, 6

6. K. Tajima, R. Kobayashi, N. Kuwabara, and M. Tokuda, “Optical Fibers and Devices. Development of Optical Isotropic E-Field Sensor Operating More than 10GHz Using Mach-Zehnder Interferometers,” IEICE Trans. Electron. 85, 961–968 (2002).

]. These photonic E-field sensors using Mach-Zehnder (MZ) interferometer or ring resonator, however, are facing a significant challenge in its spurious free dynamic range (SFDR) for high fidelity measurement of the EM waves. For example, the inherent nonlinear distortion resulted from the sinusoidal transfer curve make the linearity of a conventional MZ interferometer only to be about 70% [7

7. E. M. Zolotov and R. Tavlykaev, “Integrated optical Mach-Zehnder modulator with a linearized modulation characteristic,” Quantum Electron. 18(3), 401–402 (1988). [CrossRef]

], which is too small for the EM wave measurement with large dynamic range. A more important feature is that MZ interferometer designs are bias sensitive. The sinusoidal transfer function between the optical output power versus the drive voltage requires the bias point setting at the half power point, where maximum linear dynamic range can be provided. The optimum bias point could drift slowly due to charging effects [8

8. R. L. Jungerman, C. Johnsen, D. J. McQuate, K. Salomaa, M. P. Zurakowski, R. C. Bray, G. Conrad, D. Cropper, and P. Hernday, “High-speed optical modulator for application in instrumentation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8(9), 1363–1370 (1990). [CrossRef]

], ambient changes such as the variation of temperature, optical power, and wavelength shifts [9

9. R. A. Becker, “Circuit effect in LiNbO3 channel-waveguide modulators,” Opt. Lett. 10(8), 417–419 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

2. Design

The schematic of the photonic E-field sensor is shown in Fig. 1(a)
Fig. 1 (a) Schematic of the photonic electric field sensor based on domain inverted E-O polymer Y-fed directional coupler (b) Cross sectional view of the directional coupler waveguide with equivalent domain inversion
. One input waveguide branches into a pair of symmetric waveguides that are optically coupled with each other. Because of the symmetry, equal optical power with the same phase is launched into the coupled waveguides and, hence, the operating point is automatically set at the 3 dB point without any bias voltage. Phase modulation (Δβ) reversal can be realized by poling the E-O polymer waveguide using a lumped electrode that alternately zigzags from one waveguide to the opposite waveguide in the two domains, with cross sectional view shown in Fig. 1 (b). This configuration creates an equivalent Δβ reversal without domain-inverted poling of the E-O polymer waveguide. After removing the poling electrode, the uniform electric field from free space (far field pattern with wavelength much longer than the E-field sensor dimension) will induce equal phase modulation with reversed polarity. The key design parameters such as the E-O polymer waveguide dimension and the length of the inverted domains exactly follow those in [12

12. B. Lee, C. Y. Lin, A. X. Wang, R. Dinu, and R. T. Chen, “Linearized electro-optic modulators based on a two-section Y-fed directional coupler,” Appl. Opt. 49(33), 6485–6488 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

, 13

13. B. Lee, C. Lin, X. Wang, R. T. Chen, J. Luo, and A. K. Y. Jen, “Bias-free electro-optic polymer-based two-section Y-branch waveguide modulator with 22 dB linearity enhancement,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3277–3279 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

].

3. Fabrication

4. Characterization

The fabricated photonic E-field sensors are tested under a microstrip transmission line that can generate electric field at RF frequency in a direction that is perpendicular to the directional coupler waveguides. The characteristic impedance of the microstrip line is experimentally measured to be 55.6-j5.4 without the insertion of the EM wave sensor and 55-j4.9 with the insertion of the EM wave sensor at 1GHz. The testing setup is shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Testing setup for the photonic E-field sensor with the microstrip line that generate vertical electric field, polarization maintaining single mode fiber for input coupling, and single mode fiber for output coupling. The microstrip line is connected to a RF source with an SMA cable on one end and terminated with a 50ohm terminator on the other end to avoid reflection
. The input optical signal coming from a tunable laser source with TM polarization is butt-coupled to the directional waveguide using a polarization maintaining single mode fiber. The output optical signal is collected using a single mode fiber at one branch of the directional waveguide. The measured insertion loss is around 21dB, which corresponds to 6dB propagation loss and 7.5dB/facet coupling loss, respectively. When the RF electrical signal is guided on the microstrip line, it generates electrical field that oscillates in the vertical direction that can modulate the refractive index of the E-O polymer. Similar to an electro-optic modulator for optical communication application, this modulation in refractive index induces the modulation of the output optical signal, which can be detected with a high-speed avalanche photodiode and analyzed with a microwave spectrum analyzer. It is worth noting that the insertion of the EM wave sensor can slightly enhance the electric field by ~9%. The uniformity of the electric field under the microstrip line is almost unaffected. Also, due to the difference of the dielectric constant between polymer (εr~3.2) and air (εr=1), the electric field in the polymer layers is ~31% of that in the air.

In our experiment, we use 1GHz RF wave as the simulant electric field. The photonic E-field sensors are expected to sense EM waves with much higher frequency in free space (limited by the silicon substrate absorption); however, the microstrip line that we use in our testing setup has significant limited bandwidth due to the skin effect and dielectric absorption. The response from the photonic E-field sensor is shown in Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The response of the photonic E-field sensor with 20dBm RF input power at 1GHz.
with 20dBm RF input power. The photonic E-field sensor shows optical response at the same frequency with 35dB signal to noise ratio (SNR).

To test the sensitivity of the photonic E-field sensor, the input RF power is gradually decreased until the sensing signal from the sensor is buried under the noise level. The signal intensity of the photonic E-field sensor is plotted against the input electric field intensity as shown in Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Response from the photonic E-field sensor as a function of the electric field.
. The electric field E inside the microstrip line can be calculated from the input RF power (Pin) [16

16. K. C. Gupta and I. J. Bahl, Microstrip lines and slotlines (Artech House 1996).

]:

E=2PinZ0, where Z0 is the characteristic impedance of the microstrip line.

The measurement shows that the minimum detectable electric field is found to be 16.7V/m. In our experiment, we measured the electric field up to 550V/m. This is NOT the upper sensing limit of sensor, but simply due to the fact that our RF power source has a maximum output of 20dBm. The variation of the measured curve in Fig. 4 is attributed to the instability of optical coupling and laser power fluctuation.

In order to determine the maximum electric field the device can sense, we measured another photonic E-field on the same chip without removing the poling electrode on top. By this means, we can apply the driving voltage across a very narrow gap (~8μm) to generate a much stronger electric field. The photonic E-field sensor shows over modulation at 6V, which corresponding to an electric field intensity of 750KV/m. Taking consideration of the sensible electric field E from 16.7V/m to 750KV/m, and the Poynting vector of the EM wave is given by S=12ε0εrcE2, this corresponds to a power range from 1.04W/m2 to 2.09×109W/m2, which is as large as 93dB dynamic range. To measure the noise free dynamic range of the photonic E-field sensor, we use two tone RF signals (100KHz and 105KHz) to drive the sensor with top electrode. It shows the maximum noise free dynamic range of 70dB, which is shown in Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The photonic E-field sensor shows a noise free dynamic range of 70dB.
. This result would be of high significance for high fidelity measurement of the EM waves.

5. Summary

In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated electric field sensor based on domain inverted electro-optic (E-O) polymer Y-fed directional coupler for electromagnetic wave detection. The sensor can detect electric field from 16.7V/m to 750KV/m, corresponding to EM waves with large dynamic range of power from 1.04W/m2 to 2.09×109W/m2 . The fabricated photonic E-field sensor also achieves a noise free dynamic range of 70dB. Further optimization of E-field sensor through fine tuning the fabrication processes, improving the poling efficiency, and reducing the optical waveguide loss should allow better performance in sensitivity.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the U.S. ARMY Space & Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command (USASMDC/ARSTRAT) for supporting this work under the SBIR grant W9113M-10-P-0076 that is monitored by Dr. Mark Rader.

References and links

1.

P. Drexler and P. Fiala, “Methods for High-Power EM Pulse Measurement,” IEEE Sens. J. 7(7), 1006–1011 (2007). [CrossRef]

2.

N. Kuwabara, K. Tajima, R. Kobayashi, and F. Amemiya, “Development and analysis of electric field sensor using LiNbO3 optical modulator,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 34(4), 391–396 (1992). [CrossRef]

3.

S. C. Rashleigh, “Magnetic-field sensing with a single-mode fiber,” Opt. Lett. 6(1), 19–21 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4.

J. Kanwisher and K. Lawson, “Electromagnetic flow sensors,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 20(2), 174–182 (1975). [CrossRef]

5.

S. S. Sriram and S. A. Kingsley, “Sensitivity enhancements to photonic electric field sensor,” in SPIE Photonic West, (SPIE, 2004), 143–152.

6.

K. Tajima, R. Kobayashi, N. Kuwabara, and M. Tokuda, “Optical Fibers and Devices. Development of Optical Isotropic E-Field Sensor Operating More than 10GHz Using Mach-Zehnder Interferometers,” IEICE Trans. Electron. 85, 961–968 (2002).

7.

E. M. Zolotov and R. Tavlykaev, “Integrated optical Mach-Zehnder modulator with a linearized modulation characteristic,” Quantum Electron. 18(3), 401–402 (1988). [CrossRef]

8.

R. L. Jungerman, C. Johnsen, D. J. McQuate, K. Salomaa, M. P. Zurakowski, R. C. Bray, G. Conrad, D. Cropper, and P. Hernday, “High-speed optical modulator for application in instrumentation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8(9), 1363–1370 (1990). [CrossRef]

9.

R. A. Becker, “Circuit effect in LiNbO3 channel-waveguide modulators,” Opt. Lett. 10(8), 417–419 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

10.

R. F. Tavlykaev and R. V. Ramaswamy, “Highly linear Y-fed directional coupler modulator with low intermodulation distortion,” J. Lightwave Technol. 17(2), 282–291 (1999). [CrossRef]

11.

X. Wang and B.-S. Lee, “C.-Y. Lin, D. An, and R. T. Chen, “Electroptic Polymer Linear Modulators Based on Multiple-Domain Y-Fed Directional Coupler,” Lightwave Technology,” Journalism 28, 1670–1676 (2010).

12.

B. Lee, C. Y. Lin, A. X. Wang, R. Dinu, and R. T. Chen, “Linearized electro-optic modulators based on a two-section Y-fed directional coupler,” Appl. Opt. 49(33), 6485–6488 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

13.

B. Lee, C. Lin, X. Wang, R. T. Chen, J. Luo, and A. K. Y. Jen, “Bias-free electro-optic polymer-based two-section Y-branch waveguide modulator with 22 dB linearity enhancement,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3277–3279 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

14.

X. Wang, C.-Y. Lin, S. Chakravarty, J. Luo, A. K. Y. Jen, and R. T. Chen, “Effective in-device r33 of 735 pm/V on electro-optic polymer infiltrated silicon photonic crystal slot waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 882–884 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

15.

C.-Y. Lin, X. Wang, S. Chakravarty, B. S. Lee, W. Lai, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, and R. T. Chen, “Electro-optic polymer infiltrated silicon photonic crystal slot waveguide modulator with 23 dB slow light enhancement,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(9), 093304 (2010). [CrossRef]

16.

K. C. Gupta and I. J. Bahl, Microstrip lines and slotlines (Artech House 1996).

OCIS Codes
(280.0280) Remote sensing and sensors : Remote sensing and sensors
(280.4788) Remote sensing and sensors : Optical sensing and sensors
(130.5460) Integrated optics : Polymer waveguides

ToC Category:
Sensors

History
Original Manuscript: July 1, 2011
Revised Manuscript: July 30, 2011
Manuscript Accepted: August 2, 2011
Published: August 18, 2011

Citation
Che-Yun Lin, Alan X. Wang, Beom Suk Lee, Xingyu Zhang, and Ray T. Chen, "High dynamic range electric field sensor for electromagnetic pulse detection," Opt. Express 19, 17372-17377 (2011)
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-19-18-17372


Sort:  Author  |  Year  |  Journal  |  Reset  

References

  1. P. Drexler and P. Fiala, “Methods for High-Power EM Pulse Measurement,” IEEE Sens. J. 7(7), 1006–1011 (2007). [CrossRef]
  2. N. Kuwabara, K. Tajima, R. Kobayashi, and F. Amemiya, “Development and analysis of electric field sensor using LiNbO3 optical modulator,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 34(4), 391–396 (1992). [CrossRef]
  3. S. C. Rashleigh, “Magnetic-field sensing with a single-mode fiber,” Opt. Lett. 6(1), 19–21 (1981). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. J. Kanwisher and K. Lawson, “Electromagnetic flow sensors,” Limnol. Oceanogr. 20(2), 174–182 (1975). [CrossRef]
  5. S. S. Sriram and S. A. Kingsley, “Sensitivity enhancements to photonic electric field sensor,” in SPIE Photonic West, (SPIE, 2004), 143–152.
  6. K. Tajima, R. Kobayashi, N. Kuwabara, and M. Tokuda, “Optical Fibers and Devices. Development of Optical Isotropic E-Field Sensor Operating More than 10GHz Using Mach-Zehnder Interferometers,” IEICE Trans. Electron. 85, 961–968 (2002).
  7. E. M. Zolotov and R. Tavlykaev, “Integrated optical Mach-Zehnder modulator with a linearized modulation characteristic,” Quantum Electron. 18(3), 401–402 (1988). [CrossRef]
  8. R. L. Jungerman, C. Johnsen, D. J. McQuate, K. Salomaa, M. P. Zurakowski, R. C. Bray, G. Conrad, D. Cropper, and P. Hernday, “High-speed optical modulator for application in instrumentation,” J. Lightwave Technol. 8(9), 1363–1370 (1990). [CrossRef]
  9. R. A. Becker, “Circuit effect in LiNbO3 channel-waveguide modulators,” Opt. Lett. 10(8), 417–419 (1985). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. R. F. Tavlykaev and R. V. Ramaswamy, “Highly linear Y-fed directional coupler modulator with low intermodulation distortion,” J. Lightwave Technol. 17(2), 282–291 (1999). [CrossRef]
  11. X. Wang and B.-S. Lee, “C.-Y. Lin, D. An, and R. T. Chen, “Electroptic Polymer Linear Modulators Based on Multiple-Domain Y-Fed Directional Coupler,” Lightwave Technology,” Journalism 28, 1670–1676 (2010).
  12. B. Lee, C. Y. Lin, A. X. Wang, R. Dinu, and R. T. Chen, “Linearized electro-optic modulators based on a two-section Y-fed directional coupler,” Appl. Opt. 49(33), 6485–6488 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. B. Lee, C. Lin, X. Wang, R. T. Chen, J. Luo, and A. K. Y. Jen, “Bias-free electro-optic polymer-based two-section Y-branch waveguide modulator with 22 dB linearity enhancement,” Opt. Lett. 34(21), 3277–3279 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. X. Wang, C.-Y. Lin, S. Chakravarty, J. Luo, A. K. Y. Jen, and R. T. Chen, “Effective in-device r33 of 735 pm/V on electro-optic polymer infiltrated silicon photonic crystal slot waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 36(6), 882–884 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. C.-Y. Lin, X. Wang, S. Chakravarty, B. S. Lee, W. Lai, J. Luo, A. K.-Y. Jen, and R. T. Chen, “Electro-optic polymer infiltrated silicon photonic crystal slot waveguide modulator with 23 dB slow light enhancement,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(9), 093304 (2010). [CrossRef]
  16. K. C. Gupta and I. J. Bahl, Microstrip lines and slotlines (Artech House 1996).

Cited By

Alert me when this paper is cited

OSA is able to provide readers links to articles that cite this paper by participating in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. CrossRef includes content from more than 3000 publishers and societies. In addition to listing OSA journal articles that cite this paper, citing articles from other participating publishers will also be listed.

Figures

Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
 
Fig. 4 Fig. 5
 

« Previous Article  |  Next Article »

OSA is a member of CrossRef.

CrossCheck Deposited